{
  "provenance": {
    "source": "043a75b461e35ee6836cebf0633c58d87ed16126",
    "runId": "ship-all-043a75b4-462f1a9f-b669-46e7-be4e-bcbbd18ee174",
    "attempt": "plan-ceo-review-1789556788212-3aA2I5",
    "outcome": "timeout",
    "publicCaptureSha256": "4d827b11207855bb0c7ce7972364ce17d953465a8f25da891b6e833b9c9e4d48",
    "qualification": "Exact public messages and tool events; no question-log file was retained. Tests provide a separately labeled synthetic owned-file witness, not a retrospective paid pass."
  },
  "transcript": {
    "status": "ready",
    "calls": [],
    "assistantMessages": [
      {
        "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
        "text": "Received. I have the draft plan — deterministic skill-list ordering: sort registered skill names before rendering in the existing listing path, keep membership/aliases/metadata/text+JSON output unchanged, add tests for mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order. Noted that this draft is the review target (not the current branch), that you want only the review-mode decision for this invocation, and that no review mode has been selected yet.\n\nWaiting for your slash command.",
        "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:56:41.760Z"
      },
      {
        "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
        "text": "Running the /plan-ceo-review preamble first.",
        "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:56:47.113Z"
      },
      {
        "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
        "text": "**Review mode: HOLD SCOPE** — auto-decided from your stored `plan-ceo-review-mode` preference (`AUTO_DECIDE`), recommendation derived from the plan being a fix/refactor of existing behavior across ~2 files. Recorded as ledger row D1 in the working plan file at `.claude/plans/keep-this-draft-plan-cheeky-lerdorf.md`, with the draft plan, stated limits, and mode provenance.\n\n**STATUS: DONE** for the requested scope (mode decision only).\n\nDeferred at your instruction, not skipped silently:\n- Office Hours / design-doc offer.\n- Setup prompts that fired: CLAUDE.md skill-routing rules (also blocked by plan mode's no-edit rule) and the cross-project-learnings config. Both gates are marker-based and will re-fire on the next run.\n- The substantive review (system audit against the real target repo, 0A–0C, 0G HOLD checks, 0I, Sections 1–11, `## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT`). Not run, so I did not call ExitPlanMode; the plan file notes the exit gate is not yet satisfied.\n\nQuestion decision logged (`auto_decided: true`); skill-end telemetry recorded. No durable learnings this session.",
        "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:58:30.436Z"
      }
    ],
    "planReadyRequests": []
  },
  "tools": [
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:56:49.261Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_015WuDn8gUUQwFrhCd9mBwZK",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Bash",
      "input": {
        "command": "_SS=\"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n[ -x \"$_SS\" ] || _SS=\".claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-start\"\n\"$_SS\" --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --model \"claude\" --parent-pid \"$PPID\" \\\n  || echo \"SKILL_START: unavailable — stale install; run ./setup or /gstack-upgrade (preamble degraded, continue the user's task)\"",
        "description": "Run gstack skill-start preamble"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zpnEuxNRV2MEa7p3Az",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zpmn8PCBpNps2S9mYY"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:56:50.999Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_015WuDn8gUUQwFrhCd9mBwZK",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "SKILL_START_PROTO: 1\nBRANCH: main\nPROACTIVE: true\nPROACTIVE_PROMPTED: yes\nSKILL_PREFIX: false\nREPO_MODE: unknown\nSESSION_KIND: interactive\nCONDUCTOR_SESSION: true\nACTIVATED: yes\nFIRST_LOOP_SHOWN: yes\nFIRST_TASK: \nLAKE_INTRO: yes\nTELEMETRY: off\nTEL_PROMPTED: yes\nSESSION_ID: 11077-1789556210-f86a3cad\nTEL_START: 1789556210\nEXPLAIN_LEVEL: default\nQUESTION_TUNING: true\nUPDATE_CHECK: false\nLEARNINGS: 0\nHAS_ROUTING: no\nROUTING_DECLINED: false\nVENDORED_GSTACK: no\nMODEL_OVERLAY: claude\nCHECKPOINT_MODE: explicit\nCHECKPOINT_PUSH: false\nGSTACK_PLAN_MODE: active\nARTIFACTS_SYNC: off\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_BEGIN: routing-injection 11077-1789556210-f86a3cad\ngstack works best when the project CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. If no CLAUDE.md exists in the project root, create it. Use AskUserQuestion:\n\n> gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules.\n\nOptions: A) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)  B) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually\n\nIf A: append this section to the end of CLAUDE.md, then commit it (`git add CLAUDE.md && git commit -m \"chore: add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md\"`):\n\n## Skill routing\n\nWhen the user's request matches an available skill, invoke it via the Skill tool. When in doubt, invoke the skill.\n\nKey routing rules:\n- Product ideas/brainstorming → invoke /office-hours\n- Strategy/scope → invoke /plan-ceo-review\n- Architecture → invoke /plan-eng-review\n- Design system/plan review → invoke /design-consultation or /plan-design-review\n- Full review pipeline → invoke /autoplan\n- Bugs/errors → invoke /investigate\n- QA/testing site behavior → invoke /qa or /qa-only\n- Code review/diff check → invoke /review\n- Visual polish → invoke /design-review\n- Ship/deploy/PR → invoke /ship or /land-and-deploy\n- Save progress → invoke /context-save\n- Resume context → invoke /context-restore\n- Author a backlog-ready spec/issue → invoke /spec\n\nIf B: run `/tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-hermetic-10931-KbhuIv/skill-home-3b8YQx/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set routing_declined true` and say they can re-enable with `/tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-hermetic-10931-KbhuIv/skill-home-3b8YQx/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set routing_declined false`. This only happens once per project.\nGSTACK_INSTRUCTION_END",
      "isError": false
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:14.310Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_013DpdbERXSbhaLk6tqRHUdc",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Bash",
      "input": {
        "command": "echo \"--- remote ---\"; git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null || echo \"no remote\"; echo \"--- log ---\"; git log --oneline -30; echo \"--- stash ---\"; git stash list; echo \"--- files ---\"; git ls-files | head -50; echo \"--- todos ---\"; grep -rn \"TODO\\|FIXME\\|HACK\\|XXX\" -l --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=vendor --exclude-dir=.git . 2>/dev/null | head -30",
        "description": "Audit repo state, history and file list"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zqT7FJ5AA5LRr7AoNL",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zqSY25s29ZEMCZX2cp"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:16.359Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_013DpdbERXSbhaLk6tqRHUdc",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "--- remote ---\nno remote\n--- log ---\nce7e491 Seed review plan\n--- stash ---\n--- files ---\nCLAUDE.md\nPLAN.md\n--- todos ---",
      "isError": false
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:20.541Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_017ufEb6b8BhteKzU1HRCCSv",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Read",
      "input": {
        "file_path": "/tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-plan-count-dFbJ2H/PLAN.md"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zsKc7JAStTnfcDXbBA",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zsJzQF6dm3ZUV8vofL"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:20.563Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_017ufEb6b8BhteKzU1HRCCSv",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "1\t# Draft: deterministic skill-list ordering\n2\t\n3\tUsers compare skill listings in scripts and reviews. Make the existing listing\n4\tpath sort registered skill names deterministically before rendering them.\n5\tKeep skill membership, aliases, metadata and text/JSON output formats unchanged.\n6\tCover mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order with tests.\n7\t\n8\tThis draft is the review target, not the current branch. For this invocation,\n9\tI want only the review-mode decision; I will handle optional Office Hours and\n10\tsetup separately, and run the substantive review later. No review mode has\n11\tbeen selected.",
      "file": {
        "filePath": "/tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-plan-count-dFbJ2H/PLAN.md",
        "content": "# Draft: deterministic skill-list ordering\n\nUsers compare skill listings in scripts and reviews. Make the existing listing\npath sort registered skill names deterministically before rendering them.\nKeep skill membership, aliases, metadata and text/JSON output formats unchanged.\nCover mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order with tests.\n\nThis draft is the review target, not the current branch. For this invocation,\nI want only the review-mode decision; I will handle optional Office Hours and\nsetup separately, and run the substantive review later. No review mode has\nbeen selected.",
        "numLines": 11,
        "startLine": 1,
        "totalLines": 11
      },
      "isError": false
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:25.331Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_01YS6e8Cd4apwcB4uVLnHKTn",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Bash",
      "input": {
        "command": "printf '%s' \"Which review mode should /plan-ceo-review use for the deterministic skill-list ordering plan\" | ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-preference --check \"plan-ceo-review-mode\" --summary-stdin; echo \"EXIT: $?\"",
        "description": "Check stored preference for review-mode question"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zsdSfK4f4biXzX7t8w",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zsd1NC2JRMuQTmungP"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:57:26.469Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_01YS6e8Cd4apwcB4uVLnHKTn",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "AUTO_DECIDE\nEXIT: 0",
      "isError": false
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:58:07.949Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_01X8KfCh4G15KGJ4DwURvoAg",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Write",
      "input": {
        "file_path": "/tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-hermetic-10931-KbhuIv/with-skills/.claude/plans/keep-this-draft-plan-cheeky-lerdorf.md",
        "content": "# Working plan: deterministic skill-list ordering\n\n## Context\n\nUsers diff skill listings in scripts and reviews. Today the listing renders\nregistered skill names in whatever order the registry/directory enumeration\nyields, so identical installs can print different orders and spurious diffs.\nThe fix: sort registered skill names deterministically in the existing listing\npath before rendering. Skill membership, aliases, metadata and the text/JSON\noutput formats stay unchanged. Tests must cover mixed-case names and differing\ndirectory enumeration order.\n\nSource: PLAN.md (repo root, commit ce7e491). This draft is the review target;\nthe current branch (`main`, fixture repo with only CLAUDE.md + PLAN.md) is not.\n\n## Draft plan under review (verbatim)\n\n> Users compare skill listings in scripts and reviews. Make the existing listing\n> path sort registered skill names deterministically before rendering them.\n> Keep skill membership, aliases, metadata and text/JSON output formats unchanged.\n> Cover mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order with tests.\n\n## Stated limits (carried forward unchanged)\n\n| Measure | Value | Source |\n|---|---|---|\n| Sort target | registered skill names, in the existing listing path | PLAN.md L3-4 |\n| Invariants | membership, aliases, metadata, text + JSON formats unchanged | PLAN.md L5 |\n| Required tests | mixed-case names; differing directory enumeration order | PLAN.md L6 |\n| Planned changed files | ~2 (listing module edit + test file) — ESTIMATE, target code not in this repo | derived |\n\n## Decision ledger\n\n| ID and owner | Contract and evidence | Current | Proposed | Status | Exact approval and scope |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| D1 (user) — /plan-ceo-review mode | 0E step 2: ~2 planned files (estimate) ≤ 15; goal = correcting existing listing behavior (fix/refactor). Preference check `plan-ceo-review-mode` → `AUTO_DECIDE`, exit 0 (2026-09-16). | none selected (PLAN.md L10-11) | HOLD SCOPE (recommended); alternatives SCOPE EXPANSION / SELECTIVE EXPANSION / SCOPE REDUCTION | approved | Auto-decided via stored user preference (`AUTO_DECIDE` on `plan-ceo-review-mode`). Scope: review mode for this plan only. Change with /plan-tune. |\n\n## Mode selection record\n\n- **Mode:** HOLD SCOPE\n- **Provenance:** successful preference check (`gstack-question-preference --check plan-ceo-review-mode` → `AUTO_DECIDE`); recommendation derived from 0E step 2 (fix/refactor, ~2 files). No question was asked. Logged as `auto_decided: true`.\n- **Rationale:** the plan corrects existing behavior in an existing code path with explicit invariants (formats, membership, aliases, metadata unchanged). HOLD SCOPE preserves those invariants and applies maximum rigor to failure paths, edge cases (case-insensitive vs case-sensitive collation, locale, duplicate names differing only by case, empty registry, alias/name collisions) and test coverage, without inviting scope additions to a deliberately narrow change.\n- **What HOLD SCOPE governs downstream:** 0G HOLD checks (complexity ≤ 8 files / ≤ 2 new classes; minimum change; keep stated invariants), 0I temporal interrogation, then the 11-section review from `sections/review-sections.md`. Every deferral still needs an explicit per-item Defer/Keep answer.\n\n## NOT in scope (this invocation)\n\nPer the user's instruction (PLAN.md L8-11), this invocation delivered only the\nreview-mode decision. Deferred by the user, not rejected:\n\n- Office Hours / design doc offer — user will handle separately.\n- CLAUDE.md skill-routing rules (routing-injection instruction) — setup; also blocked by plan mode's no-edit rule. Gate is marker-based and will re-fire.\n- Cross-project learnings config prompt (`cross_project_learnings` unset) — setup.\n- Substantive review: pre-review system audit against the real target repo, 0A–0C evidence, 0G HOLD checks, 0I, Sections 1–11, required outputs and the `## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT` — to be run later under HOLD SCOPE.\n\n## Review status\n\nReview NOT yet run. No `## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT` exists; ExitPlanMode must not\nbe called on this file until the substantive review completes and the exit gate\npasses.\n"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zt4nAigAT64BHMN1wo",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zt4FARf2d6hiHtaWoo"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:58:08.000Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_01X8KfCh4G15KGJ4DwURvoAg",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "File created successfully at: /tmp/g-q50pz9gl/gstack-paid-shard-5hQylt/tmp/gstack-hermetic-10931-KbhuIv/with-skills/.claude/plans/keep-this-draft-plan-cheeky-lerdorf.md (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)",
      "isError": false
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:58:19.202Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_014GT7uPk6KACM1Li2SMKPdJ",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Bash",
      "input": {
        "command": "~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-question-log '{\"skill\":\"plan-ceo-review\",\"question_id\":\"plan-ceo-review-mode\",\"question_summary\":\"Review mode for deterministic skill-list ordering plan\",\"category\":\"routing\",\"door_type\":\"two-way\",\"options_count\":4,\"user_choice\":\"HOLD SCOPE\",\"recommended\":\"HOLD SCOPE\",\"auto_decided\":true,\"session_id\":\"11077-1789556210-f86a3cad\"}' 2>/dev/null && echo \"QLOG: ok\" || echo \"QLOG: unavailable\"\n~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-skill-end --skill \"plan-ceo-review\" --outcome success \\\n  --session-id \"11077-1789556210-f86a3cad\" --tel-start \"1789556210\" --used-browse no \\\n  --error-message \"\" --failed-step \"\" 2>/dev/null && echo \"SKILL_END: ok\" || echo \"SKILL_END: skipped\"",
        "description": "Log mode decision and run skill-end telemetry"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6zw85gXy9qJ79NGvPK6",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6zw7kq95PqHn8ui8Tv7"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T10:58:21.288Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_014GT7uPk6KACM1Li2SMKPdJ",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "QLOG: ok\nSKILL_END: recorded outcome=success duration_s=91\nSKILL_END: ok",
      "isError": false
    }
  ],
  "options": {
    "sessionId": "9f796d40-55de-43d9-abc8-7002fd5fec7f",
    "skillName": "plan-ceo-review",
    "commandStartedAt": 1789556201929,
    "now": 1789556788210
  },
  "retryObservation": {
    "provenance": {
      "source": "043a75b461e35ee6836cebf0633c58d87ed16126",
      "attempt": "plan-ceo-review-1789557388416-XDXHv5",
      "outcome": "timeout",
      "observationSha256": "bab99804f4d2d34754289ff3d087953848e73aad5ce07750a6f7a76c47caefef",
      "qualification": "Exact retained public messages. Tool events and owned log file were not retained for this retry; tests of its prose explicitly use synthetic owned context."
    },
    "transcript": {
      "status": "ready",
      "calls": [],
      "assistantMessages": [
        {
          "sessionId": "583e8162-2741-4ab7-91fd-7f5f216cd6d6",
          "text": "Received. I have the draft plan — deterministic sorting of registered skill names in the existing listing path, with membership, aliases, metadata, and text/JSON output formats unchanged, plus tests covering mixed-case names and differing directory enumeration order.\n\nI'll hold here and won't start any review or call tools. Send your slash command when ready.",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-16T11:06:41.931Z"
        },
        {
          "sessionId": "583e8162-2741-4ab7-91fd-7f5f216cd6d6",
          "text": "Starting `/plan-ceo-review`. Running the preamble first.",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-16T11:06:48.011Z"
        },
        {
          "sessionId": "583e8162-2741-4ab7-91fd-7f5f216cd6d6",
          "text": "**Mode decision: HOLD SCOPE** (auto-decided from your `plan-ceo-review-mode` preference; recommendation was HOLD SCOPE regardless).\n\nProvenance: preference check exited 0 with `AUTO_DECIDE`; logged with `auto_decided: true`. Ledger row M1 is approved with that reference; rows P1 (mixed-case sort key) and P2 (enumeration-order test method) are recorded as unresolved for the substantive review.\n\nStopping here per your instruction. Nothing beyond the plan file was written; skill-end telemetry recorded as `abort` since the review workflow was intentionally cut short, not completed. Plan file with Step 0 evidence, ledger, and deferred items: `.claude/plans/keep-this-draft-plan-virtual-milner.md`. Not calling ExitPlanMode; the review report does not exist yet and the exit gate requires it.\n\nDeferred to you: `/office-hours`, cross-project-learnings config, CLAUDE.md routing onboarding (all re-fire on the next run). No durable learnings this session.\n\n**STATUS:** DONE (scoped to mode decision only)",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-16T11:09:10.227Z"
        }
      ]
    },
    "options": {
      "sessionId": "583e8162-2741-4ab7-91fd-7f5f216cd6d6",
      "skillName": "plan-ceo-review",
      "commandStartedAt": 1789556802164,
      "now": 1789557388414
    }
  }
}