{ "source": "cf74db538a2f4c4361f2573316abb91e01663564", "originalOutcome": "source-contract violation; root cancellation, no Bun verdict invented", "receiptSha256": "0b1ede1efe136406921c6dc50a4d321d8b2dc63759a86ecaa10f07b0830e9de0", "readback": { "id": "toolu_01SpARevKkyf9P9MqwN8w9Ms", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:27:53.896Z", "startLine": 1, "numLines": 109, "totalLines": 109, "sha256": "bc1cefa2d63d8c5c754d79e5ba5f73369e4f53f0f64e058fdf8bdc92df3c2457", "equalsCurrentExport": true }, "events": [ { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:28:04.501Z", "toolUseId": "toolu_01XvX1QbuKqv1xWjpdHsFLnj", "kind": "use", "name": "Read", "input": { "file_path": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md" } }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:28:04.526Z", "toolUseId": "toolu_01XvX1QbuKqv1xWjpdHsFLnj", "kind": "result", "content": "1\t\n2\t\n3\tBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"\" methodology design \"\" \"\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n4\t\n5\t**Override rules:**\n6\t- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n7\t- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n8\t- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n9\t- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n10\t- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n11\t\n12\t **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `` for both voices:\n13\t```bash\n14\tbun \"\" create design \"\" \"\" \"\"\n15\t```\n16\t Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n17\t\n18\t **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n19\t Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n20\t Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n21\t\n22\t Read `snapshot.json` beside ``. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n23\t verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n24\t Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n25\t all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n26\t\n27\t **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n28\t Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for .\"\n29\t No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n30\t Other hosts await that ID. Then outside \u2192 this phase's review ONLY.\n31\t Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n32\t No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n33\t\n34\t **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n35\t Outside prompt: inline the full contents of and context below (Write tool).\n36\t\n37\tIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n38\t\n39\t Read the plan file at . Evaluate this plan's\n40\t UI/UX design decisions.\n41\t\n42\t Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n43\t \n44\t\n45\t Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n46\t states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n47\t imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n48\t accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n49\t aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n50\t What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n51\t Be opinionated. No hedging.\n52\t\n53\tWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for ``; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: because line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n54\t\n55\t```bash\n56\t# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\n57\tif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n58\t echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n59\t if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n60\t echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n61\t else\n62\t echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n63\t fi\n64\t exit 78\n65\tfi\n66\t\n67\t_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n68\t_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\n69\ttrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n70\t_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\n71\tcat -- '' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n72\t\n73\tsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n74\t_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n75\t_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n76\t_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n77\t# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\n78\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n79\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n80\t _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n81\t _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\n82\tfi\n83\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n84\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n85\t echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n86\t exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\n87\tfi\n88\tbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n89\t\n90\techo 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n91\t```\n92\t\n93\tShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n94\t\n95\tOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review \u2192 unavailable; disabled \u2192 skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n96\t\n97\tRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n98\t\n99\t Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n100\t\n101\t- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n102\t \u2192 TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on \u2192 USER CHALLENGE.\n103\t\n104\t**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n105\t\n106\t1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n107\t\n108\t2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design \u2014 UX challenge)\n109\t and Claude SUBAGENT (design \u2014 independent review).\n110\t Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n111\t to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n112\t Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n113\t\n114\t3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n115\t DISAGREE items from scorecard \u2192 raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n116\t\n117\t**Close this phase:**\n118\t\n119\tThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\n120\tread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint ``, and this phase's\n121\t`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n122\t\n123\t> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n124\t> in full. Do not work from memory \u2014 that section is the source of truth for this step.\n125\t", "file": { "filePath": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md", "content": "\n\nBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"\" methodology design \"\" \"\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n\n**Override rules:**\n- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n\n **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `` for both voices:\n```bash\nbun \"\" create design \"\" \"\" \"\"\n```\n Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n\n **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n\n Read `snapshot.json` beside ``. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n\n **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for .\"\n No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n Other hosts await that ID. Then outside \u2192 this phase's review ONLY.\n Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n\n **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n Outside prompt: inline the full contents of and context below (Write tool).\n\nIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n\n Read the plan file at . Evaluate this plan's\n UI/UX design decisions.\n\n Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n \n\n Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n Be opinionated. No hedging.\n\nWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for ``; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: because line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n\n```bash\n# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\nif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n else\n echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n fi\n exit 78\nfi\n\n_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\ntrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\ncat -- '' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n\nsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\nfi\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\nfi\nbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n\necho 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n```\n\nShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n\nOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review \u2192 unavailable; disabled \u2192 skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n\nRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n\n Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n\n- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n \u2192 TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on \u2192 USER CHALLENGE.\n\n**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n\n1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n\n2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design \u2014 UX challenge)\n and Claude SUBAGENT (design \u2014 independent review).\n Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n\n3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n DISAGREE items from scorecard \u2192 raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n\n**Close this phase:**\n\nThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\nread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint ``, and this phase's\n`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n\n> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n> in full. Do not work from memory \u2014 that section is the source of truth for this step.\n", "numLines": 125, "startLine": 1, "totalLines": 125 }, "isError": false } ], "assistantMessages": [ { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:55:20.480Z", "text": "I'll start with the skill preamble." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:55:37.812Z", "text": "No remote, no CLI platform. Base branch falls back to `main`. There's a plan file and a design doc in the repo already. Let me read them plus run the design doc check." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:56:27.558Z", "text": "Restore point created (`originalSha256 2fdf0ece\u2026`, 4607 bytes). Scope: `dxRequired: true` (21 term matches, threshold 2). Let me check UI scope and look at what init wrote to ACTIVE_PLAN." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:57:06.702Z", "text": "Now the methodology command for the CEO phase, which tells me which ranges of the CEO skill to read." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:57:19.478Z", "text": "Methodology assembled: 2380 lines across 4 read ranges. Reading range 1 (1-600)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:57:24.662Z", "text": "Range 1 (1-600) read. Range 2 (601-1200):" }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:57:31.089Z", "text": "Range 2 (601-1200) read. Range 3 (1201-1800):" }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:57:36.892Z", "text": "Range 3 (1201-1800) read. Final range 4 (1801-2380):" }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:58:31.747Z", "text": "WebSearch works. One more targeted query on the key architectural question (single aggregate endpoint vs per-panel fetches), then synthesis." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T00:59:50.775Z", "text": "Both searches worked. Before writing Step 0, let me check the snapshot tool's `create`/`amend-input` semantics so I write the accepted-obligations block in the shape it expects." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:04:53.860Z", "text": "Step 0 written. Now 0H: save the CEO plan summary, then create the amendment checkpoint." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:05:51.710Z", "text": "Review input reconciles with the CEO summary (16 accepted requirements, all present at lines 79-94). Dispatching the Spec Review Loop reviewer (launch 1 of max 3)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:06:09.422Z", "text": "Waiting for the spec reviewer." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:07:42.290Z", "text": "Spec review launch 1: Overall 7/10, 13 issues. All are concrete and in-scope fixes; applying them to the accepted block, plus a baseline edit for #6 (reorder panel mentions in the original text)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:08:58.936Z", "text": "`amend-input` also wrote the block into the live `## Implementation plan` (rebuilt from the checkpoint each run). Editing the Review record copy with unique context." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:09:56.596Z", "text": "Adding audit-trail rows for the spec-review decisions, then re-running amend-input." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:10:16.719Z", "text": "Baseline edits applied (Context and UI Scope now read QuickActions first). Reading the new review input in full, then launch 2." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:10:23.105Z", "text": "Reconciled with the CEO summary. Launch 2 of the Spec Review Loop." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:10:39.534Z", "text": "Waiting for spec review launch 2." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:12:13.085Z", "text": "Launch 2: Overall 8/10 (Clarity 7). Seven remaining clarity items, all answerable now. Folding them in for launch 3 (final)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:13:30.760Z", "text": "Lines 1-77 are unchanged from the previous read (same baseline, same edits). Launch 3 (final)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:13:45.539Z", "text": "Waiting for spec review launch 3." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:15:16.234Z", "text": "Launch 3: PASS, Overall 9/10. Folding in the three non-blocking notes (cheap, real edge cases), then logging spec-review metrics." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:15:51.316Z", "text": "Spec Review Loop closed (PASS). Refreshing the live Implementation plan with the final block, then Step 0.5: fresh CEO snapshot for the independent Claude CEO voice." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:16:05.722Z", "text": "`` = `autoplan-ceo-6szRsM/ceo-implementation.md` (sha `1c409792\u2026`). Reading its `snapshot.json` for the dispatch prompt." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:16:10.776Z", "text": "Dispatching the independent Claude CEO voice with the prompt verbatim." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:16:20.087Z", "text": "Waiting for the independent CEO reviewer." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:18:18.982Z", "text": "INPUT line matches (`ceo 1c409792\u2026`). The reviewer raised 9 findings, two CRITICAL on strategy. Before reconciling and running Sections 1-11, I need the exact section requirements from the methodology." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:19:28.689Z", "text": "I have the section spec. Now reconciling the independent CEO voice with Step 0, then running Sections 1-11 and the required outputs. Writing to the plan." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:26:27.800Z", "text": "Now the accepted block additions (both copies, since the block appears in Implementation plan and Review record)." }, { "sessionId": "647c542b-5f7a-45d7-b1d9-8e2d984eab17", "timestamp": "2026-09-16T01:27:36.112Z", "text": "Tasks JSONL written (13 rows). Now the phase-close procedure for CEO." } ] }