{
  "source": "90f099817ac7e56cddafbd6fdac4c12dfd70f4a4",
  "cliVersion": "2.1.251",
  "originalOutcome": {
    "outcome": "error",
    "reviewCount": 0,
    "step0Count": 0,
    "error": "Invalid or duplicated completed native decision"
  },
  "provenance": {
    "case": "plan-ceo-finding-count:paired",
    "attempt": "plan-ceo-review-1789487819364-A9tWfs",
    "publicCaptureSha256": "77dab72421f48dbea2d459b9ed27eb64e9289b327f69f4e01dc68f8b8b439eee",
    "scope": "One complete acknowledged onboarding call only; no report existed or was required before setup."
  },
  "call": {
    "sessionId": "d85796d3-a8b8-463c-8cb7-a60d806874d6",
    "toolUseId": "toolu_01G57fBV3scjjCCf9xcCDcss",
    "questions": [
      {
        "header": "Routing",
        "question": "D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-3VUDV3 on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs → /investigate, strategy → /plan-ceo-review, and so on). Without it you invoke each skill by hand. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the append and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way; A means a small committed CLAUDE.md change, B means you type skill names yourself.\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make later reviews one line to trigger.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nNet: a one-time 15-line addition to CLAUDE.md versus manual skill invocation.",
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "Add routing rules (recommended)",
            "description": "✅ Skills auto-route from plain requests, no memorizing slash names\n✅ Teammates get the same routing from the committed file\n❌ Adds a commit touching CLAUDE.md in a fixture repo you may not own"
          },
          {
            "label": "No thanks, manual",
            "description": "✅ CLAUDE.md stays exactly as checked in, zero repo churn\n✅ Re-enable any time with gstack-config set routing_declined false\n❌ Every future skill needs its explicit /name typed"
          }
        ],
        "multiSelect": false
      },
      {
        "header": "Learnings",
        "question": "D2 — Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\nProject/branch/task: same repo and review.\nELI10: gstack records small lessons per project (command quirks, pitfalls). Cross-project mode lets this review also read lessons from your other repos on this machine. Nothing leaves the machine. Good for solo devs; skip if you juggle multiple client codebases where mixing is a concern.\nStakes if we pick wrong: A on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; B on a solo machine just means slower compounding.\nRecommendation: A because this is a local-only read and there are zero learnings recorded yet, so risk is nil today.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nNet: broader local recall versus strict per-project isolation.",
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "Enable cross-project (recommended)",
            "description": "✅ Past fixes from sibling repos surface as 'Prior learning applied' hints\n✅ Stays on this machine; a local config flag, flip back any time\n❌ Client-work isolation is weaker if you mix codebases on one box"
          },
          {
            "label": "Project-scoped only",
            "description": "✅ Hard wall between projects; nothing crosses repos\n✅ Safest default for consulting or multi-tenant machines\n❌ Learnings compound slower since each repo starts cold"
          }
        ],
        "multiSelect": false
      }
    ],
    "answered": true,
    "failed": false,
    "answers": {
      "D1 — Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-3VUDV3 on main, CEO review of the payment test-coverage plan.\nELI10: gstack skills work best when CLAUDE.md tells Claude which skill to reach for (bugs → /investigate, strategy → /plan-ceo-review, and so on). Without it you invoke each skill by hand. Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the append and commit happen after this review exits plan mode, not now.\nStakes if we pick wrong: mild either way; A means a small committed CLAUDE.md change, B means you type skill names yourself.\nRecommendation: A because routing rules are cheap and make later reviews one line to trigger.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nNet: a one-time 15-line addition to CLAUDE.md versus manual skill invocation.": "Add routing rules (recommended)",
      "D2 — Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\nProject/branch/task: same repo and review.\nELI10: gstack records small lessons per project (command quirks, pitfalls). Cross-project mode lets this review also read lessons from your other repos on this machine. Nothing leaves the machine. Good for solo devs; skip if you juggle multiple client codebases where mixing is a concern.\nStakes if we pick wrong: A on a multi-client machine could surface one client's quirks in another's review; B on a solo machine just means slower compounding.\nRecommendation: A because this is a local-only read and there are zero learnings recorded yet, so risk is nil today.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nNet: broader local recall versus strict per-project isolation.": "Enable cross-project (recommended)"
    },
    "unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
    "answeredAt": "2026-09-15T15:58:13.529Z"
  }
}