{ "source": "fb10b21c2a01365d82c1ac44d6fd53f67b9db644", "expectedPath": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-gR2uza/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-wMJyQi/gstack-test-plan-ceo.md", "cwd": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-gR2uza/tmp/gstack-plan-count-MRwRV4", "viewport": " ting WebhookDispatcher\") is superseded by this answer. |\n 109 | R2 \u2014 Section 3 (security) | User lookup input handling. PLAN.md:21-26 (opaque TEXT, unsanitized, no format restr\n iction), 110-112 (raw SQL fragment). Coverage: none. | Raw SQL interpolation of `request.params.userId` | Paramete\n rized/bound lookup (no format validation, ids stay opaque TEXT) | approved | D5 answer = A. Scope: `userId` passed\n as a bind value (ORM `find_by(id:)` or placeholder), no cast, no allowlist, exact-match TEXT compare; unknown use\n r \u2192 retained lookup guard. Hostile-id test method pending R4. PLAN.md:110-112 (\"raw SQL fragment\") superseded. |\n 110 | R3 \u2014 Section 2 (errors) | Email-leg failure handling. PLAN.md:52-53, 62-63, 96-97 (mail client rethrows), 85-91 \n (idempotency key + durable retry record), 66-69 (runbook retries notification, never payment), 114-116 (no handlin\n g). | Mail exception escapes handler \u2192 ingress returns 500 after committed update | Rescue the named mail-client e\n xceptions after the update commits; log correlated outcome; return 200; recovery via existing notification retry p\n rocedure | approved | D4 answer = A. Scope: send after commit; rescue only MailTimeout + the client's delivery-err\n or class around the send; one structured correlated error log; no inline retry; return 200; DB exceptions still pr\n opagate. Test method pending R4. PLAN.md:114-116 (\"no error handling on the email leg\") superseded. |\n 111 -| R4 \u2014 Section 6 (tests) | Regression coverage. PLAN.md:76-80 (manual checklist is not regression coverage), 118-1\n -19 (none planned). | No automated tests | Unit tests for handler paths + integration test through the guards | unr\n -esolved (pending owner section) | \u2014 | \n 111 +| R4 \u2014 Section 6 (tests) | Regression coverage. PLAN.md:76-80 (manual checklist is not regression coverage), 118-1\n +19 (none planned). | No automated tests | Unit tests for handler paths + integration test through the guards | app\n +roved | D6 answer = A. Scope: unit tests for handler items 2\u20139 (bound lookup incl. hostile ids `'` `;` `--` Unicod\n +e 5KB, user-nil guard, zero/nil orders \u2192 one receipt with empty summary, idempotent update, recipient skip, single\n + send with PI key, MailTimeout/MailDeliveryError \u2192 200 + committed paid + one correlated log + no inline retry, DB\n + error \u2192 500); integration tests through WebhookDispatcher + retained guards (flag on \u2192 new handler identity in tr\n +ace; flag off \u2192 prior handler; unregistered type \u2192 acked without handler; duplicate delivery both lock orders with\n + controlled release; replay after crash between commit and marker; deletion before/after lock). Faked mail client/\n +provider, injected clock, no sleeps. Query-count assertion added only if R5 approved. PLAN.md:118-119 superseded. \n +| \n 112 | R5 \u2014 Section 7 (performance) | Order loading. PLAN.md:81-84 (one receipt with order summary; zero orders still o\n ne receipt), 94-95 (2s combined DB deadline), 121-123 (per-order loop). | Per-order query loop | Single batched or\n der query for the user's PaymentIntent | unresolved (pending owner section) | \u2014 |\n 113 \n 114 ## Review Sections\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n Do you want to make this edit to gstack-test-plan-ceo.md?\n \u276f 1. Yes\n 2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session; Yes, and\n always allow access to /tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-gR2uza/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-wMJyQi for this session\n (shift+tab)\n 3. No\n\n Esc to cancel \u00b7 Tab to amend", "sourceLine": 108, "priorLine": "| R1 \u2014 Step 0D (architecture; carried to Section 1) | Handler placement. PLAN.md:10-11 (dispatcher remains available, bypass is a choice to review), 100-103 (name settled, placement open), 105-108 (plan bypasses). Coverage: no tests planned. | Plan bypasses `WebhookDispatcher`; new class wired directly to ingress | A) register `Webhooks::StripePaymentWebhookHandler` for `payment_intent.succeeded` inside `WebhookDispatcher`; B) bypass as written; C) investigate dispatcher wiring first | approved | D3 answer = A. Scope: new class registered through `WebhookDispatcher`; one routing path; no bypass. Wiring-test scope stays pending R4. Plan text PLAN.md:105-108 (\"bypasses the existing WebhookDispatcher\") is superseded by this answer. |", "originalReportBytes": 70729, "reportSha256": "489021a5103eb520cfacce330d66adda5aaec6dbdfa1a756cfea9225f2355e31", "viewportSha256": "3d7b5df8af2459d6293734075db88419293f21a26209f6707e0d5c9f677fdb9c", "pendingId": "47e96dd8-efc3-418b-9b4c-9c81d79620bb:toolu_01PyH7XjCnxbSh9W3ooQuQ6K", "completedId": "47e96dd8-efc3-418b-9b4c-9c81d79620bb:toolu_01Wgf2Pky8jZqs2Bvh2cjhUw" }