{ "source": "361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f", "runId": "ship-all-361c4dd7-4870cafe-60de-4d7a-883e-3557d02b87b0", "attempt": "plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ", "qualification": "Exact original pending public Edit and permission viewport; no native file epoch exists because the registration omitted permissionPlanPath. Any later mock epoch is controlled new-caller proof, not recovered historical authority.", "event": { "sessionId": "32a4d922-6f04-4084-8cf7-ace613b1ff70", "timestamp": "2026-09-17T02:41:39.388Z", "toolUseId": "toolu_018277AbKBPrrLzE4iqgXjsY", "kind": "use", "name": "Edit", "input": { "replace_all": false, "file_path": "/tmp/g-58_o3060/gstack-paid-shard-YfqajR/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow-Ut4Q1U/gstack-test-plan-ceo-split-overflow.md", "old_string": "Decision gate: Analyze done (claims corrected: \"no shared infrastructure\" holds for transport only). Resolve: S1-b routed to Section 2; S1-a and S1-c pending with owners, no new decision at this depth. Apply: plan text above matches ledger; no scope change.\n\n## Answered decision D2.1 (E1)", "new_string": "Decision gate: Analyze done (claims corrected: \"no shared infrastructure\" holds for transport only). Resolve: S1-b routed to Section 2; S1-a and S1-c pending with owners, no new decision at this depth. Apply: plan text above matches ledger; no scope change.\n\n### Section 2: Error & Rescue Map\n\nCodepaths are the ones any implementation of the accepted set must have; names are placeholders, not prescribed contracts.\n\n```\n METHOD/CODEPATH | WHAT CAN GO WRONG | EXCEPTION CLASS (placeholder)\n ------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------\n SlackAlertSender#deliver (E1) | token revoked / app uninstalled | SlackAuthError (token_revoked, account_inactive)\n | DM target user not in workspace / deactivated | SlackUserNotFound (user_not_found, users_not_found)\n | rate limited | SlackRateLimited (429 + Retry-After)\n | message too long (>40k chars) / blocks > 50 | SlackInvalidPayload (msg_too_long, invalid_blocks)\n | network timeout | TimeoutError\n | missing im:write scope on existing token | SlackMissingScope (missing_scope)\n TeamsAlertSender#deliver (E3) | client secret expired / app consent revoked | TeamsAuthError (401 invalid_client)\n | webhook URL deleted by tenant admin | TeamsWebhookGone (404/410)\n | throttled | TeamsThrottled (429)\n | adaptive card schema rejected | TeamsInvalidCard (400)\n | tenant blocks custom apps | TeamsInstallBlocked (403 at install)\n | network timeout | TimeoutError\n TelegramAlertSender#deliver | bot blocked by user / chat deleted | TelegramForbidden (403)\n (E4) | chat_id unknown | TelegramBadRequest (400 chat not found)\n | rate limited | TelegramRateLimited (429 retry_after)\n | message > 4096 chars | TelegramMessageTooLong (400)\n | network timeout | TimeoutError\n Inbound callback handlers | signature/JWT invalid | SignatureInvalid (all three)\n (E1 events, E3 bot, E4 webhook)| replayed request | ReplayDetected\n | malformed body | JSONParseError\n Alert event construction | incident has no destination configured | NoDestinationConfigured\n (shared by nature, P1) | incident title/body empty | EmptyAlertContent\n ------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------\n\n EXCEPTION CLASS | RESCUED? (per PLAN.md) | RESCUE ACTION (required if D3=A) | USER SEES\n -------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------\n *RateLimited (all) | unspecified ← GAP | honor Retry-After, backoff, max N, then dead-letter | nothing if retry succeeds; dead-letter alert if not\n TimeoutError (all) | unspecified ← GAP | retry 2x with jitter, then dead-letter | same\n *AuthError (all) | unspecified ← GAP | no retry; mark integration unhealthy; notify workspace owner + ops | banner \"Slack/Teams alerts disconnected, reconnect\"\n SlackUserNotFound | unspecified ← GAP | no retry; fall back to channel or ops; log with user id | ops sees \"recipient gone\"\n TelegramForbidden | unspecified ← GAP | mark chat dead; stop sending; surface in settings | \"Telegram destination blocked the bot\"\n TeamsWebhookGone | unspecified ← GAP | mark destination dead; notify owner | \"Teams webhook removed, re-add\"\n *InvalidPayload/Card/TooLong | unspecified ← GAP | truncate + retry once with plain fallback; log full payload hash | alert arrives in reduced form\n SignatureInvalid | unspecified ← GAP | reject 401, log source IP + platform, count metric | nothing (attacker gets 401)\n ReplayDetected | unspecified ← GAP | reject, log | nothing\n JSONParseError (inbound) | unspecified ← GAP | reject 400, log body hash | nothing\n NoDestinationConfigured | unspecified ← GAP | do not silently skip: log at warn, count metric, show in incident timeline | \"alert not sent: no Slack destination\"\n EmptyAlertContent | unspecified ← GAP | render fallback text with incident id | alert with generic title\n```\n\nEvery row is a GAP because PLAN.md specifies build cost and demand only; it names no failure behavior. That is expected at prioritization depth. What is not acceptable at any depth: an incident-alerting feature whose delivery failures are invisible. The rows marked `*AuthError`, `TelegramForbidden`, `TeamsWebhookGone` and `NoDestinationConfigured` are the silent-failure cases: the platform says no, and nobody who cares is told.\n\nRules check: no catch-alls proposed; every rescue above names the class. Retry-then-dead-letter is the only \"swallow\" and it is not silent.\n\nFindings:\n- **CRITICAL GAP** (S2-a, = S1-b, ledger P5) Delivery failure visibility is unspecified for all three accepted integrations. Decision D3 below.\n- **WARNING** (S2-b) Inbound signature verification is unspecified; Section 3 owns it.\n- **WARNING** (S2-c) NoDestinationConfigured is the most likely day-1 silent failure (incident fires before anyone connected a workspace). Covered by D3 if A.\n\nDecision gate: Resolve S2-a now via 0D (row P5).\n\n## Answered decision D2.1 (E1)" }, "messageId": "msg_011Cf8EqZuAjPn5tvsgakuQo", "requestId": "req_011Cf8EqZVcNkrTASxzbecQK" }, "screen": " +hash | alert arrives in reduced form \n 274 + SignatureInvalid | unspecified ← GAP | reject 401, log source IP + platform, count metric | nothing\n + (attacker gets 401) \n 275 + ReplayDetected | unspecified ← GAP | reject, log | nothing \n 276 + JSONParseError (inbound) | unspecified ← GAP | reject 400, log body hash | nothing \n 277 + NoDestinationConfigured | unspecified ← GAP | do not silently skip: log at warn, count metric, show in inc\n +ident timeline | \"alert not sent: no Slack destination\" \n 278 + EmptyAlertContent | unspecified ← GAP | render fallback text with incident id | alert wit\n +h generic title \n 279 +``` \n 280 + \n 281 +Every row is a GAP because PLAN.md specifies build cost and demand only; it names no failure behavior. That is exp\n +ected at prioritization depth. What is not acceptable at any depth: an incident-alerting feature whose delivery fa\n +ilures are invisible. The rows marked `*AuthError`, `TelegramForbidden`, `TeamsWebhookGone` and `NoDestinationConf\n +igured` are the silent-failure cases: the platform says no, and nobody who cares is told. \n 282 + \n 283 +Rules check: no catch-alls proposed; every rescue above names the class. Retry-then-dead-letter is the only \"swall\n +ow\" and it is not silent. \n 284 + \n 285 +Findings: \n 286 +- **CRITICAL GAP** (S2-a, = S1-b, ledger P5) Delivery failure visibility is unspecified for all three accepted int\n +egrations. Decision D3 below. \n 287 +- **WARNING** (S2-b) Inbound signature verification is unspecified; Section 3 owns it. \n 288 +- **WARNING** (S2-c) NoDestinationConfigured is the most likely day-1 silent failure (incident fires before anyone\n + connected a workspace). Covered by D3 if A. \n 289 + \n 290 +Decision gate: Resolve S2-a now via 0D (row P5). \n 291 + \n 292 ## Answered decision D2.1 (E1)\n 293 Commitment comparison:\n 294 \n╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌\n Do you want to make this edit to gstack-test-plan-ceo-split-overflow.md?\n ❯ 1. Yes\n 2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session; Yes, and\n always allow access to /tmp/g-58_o3060/gstack-paid-shard-YfqajR/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow-Ut4Q1U for\n this session (shift+tab)\n 3. No\n\n Esc to cancel · Tab to amend", "provenance": { "observation.json": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/phases/periodic-independent/shards/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/pty-count/ship-all-361c4dd7-4870cafe-60de-4d7a-883e-3557d02b87b0/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/observation.json", "bytes": 71445, "sha256": "219d6486c01163ea820b58bbe82c0a95110a0ffcc99fc82838c7a50fc8d3364a" }, "terminal.screen.log": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/phases/periodic-independent/shards/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/pty-count/ship-all-361c4dd7-4870cafe-60de-4d7a-883e-3557d02b87b0/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/terminal.screen.log", "bytes": 4225, "sha256": "460f7e354e7f942829b4c964d0856a63d345d4c62aecc80d18e662f8f4098fc7" }, "terminal.visible.log": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/phases/periodic-independent/shards/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/pty-count/ship-all-361c4dd7-4870cafe-60de-4d7a-883e-3557d02b87b0/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/terminal.visible.log", "bytes": 627624, "sha256": "b166179e2932fd95575ebe4840ff945231f7f73978730b4ff8c659864ad3f5b0" }, "public-transcript.json": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/public-retention/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/latest-public-transcript.json", "bytes": 432397, "sha256": "8fcb6fd48de86059b88ec174098837c632487cfbb0b14b457352aeeffe9d621d" }, "ownership.json": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/public-retention/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/ownership.json", "bytes": 1277, "sha256": "98b2da3a68cd1eb2bc45a6342c2e904126914a6c0d960bd71664a0d0252472f2" }, "owned-report.md": { "source": "/home/vercel-sandbox/gstack/.context/nouakchott-c6fc-impact/runtime-ceo-placement-next/executions/361c4dd7642ac03f4a35d720d263905d41db318f/all/run/public-retention/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-split-overflow/plan-ceo-review-1789612045991-KRs4UZ/objects/746e366671fc89ed47a3143f3f425bfaf7f4269d164bc9db26c614bd38f99798.md", "bytes": 44668, "sha256": "746e366671fc89ed47a3143f3f425bfaf7f4269d164bc9db26c614bd38f99798" } } }