mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-11-14 20:37:14 +01:00
ac20ef1e13
* fix(make-pdf,design): real TOC page numbers and anchors; design models move to gpt-5.5 + gpt-image-2 (#2903, #2807) * ci: pin every action to a SHA, Scorecard, checksummed Bun, scoped Codex CLI in the CI image, macOS named-regressions job (#1948, #1706, #1997) * fix(cso,browse): Windows/macOS lease identity, retention skips bad runs, truthful 'not assessed' reports, env.kv false positive, Windows browse spawn fixes (#2894, #2912, #2048, #2637, #2805) * fix(outside-voice): one Codex model precedence for probe and dispatch, bounded timeouts with KILL escalation, probe cache identity, guarded mktemp, skills hidden in nested Codex (#2776, #2914, #2787, #2881, #2847) * feat(setup): install registry, ./setup --status, staged activation, per-scope migrations, host tiers and conformance kit, OpenCode/Hermes fixes, Copilot CLI (experimental), disabled_skills, slimmer CLAUDE.md (#1925, #2879, #2347, #2338, #2626, #2629, #2825, #2015, #393, #1206, #2096) Co-authored-by: Andrey Esipov <61357035+andrey-esipov@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Williams <5863886+ridermw@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rocky Wu <92764750+lolisaigao1234@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(preamble): skills start in worktree-isolated Claude Code sessions — one literal skill-start line, context-recovery helper, no eval in skill blocks, $N token tripwire, honest plan-mode precedence (#2763, #2896, #2851) * fix(setup): per-install renders for renamed, vendored and custom-config installs, space-safe alias roots, per-host /cso launcher path (#1882, #2906) * test: free tests never write the real HOME (home-write tripwire), no orphaned browse daemons, symlinked-TMPDIR (macOS) fixes, gbrain-on-PATH isolation (#2895, #2816, #2829, #2841, #2982, #2911, #2909, #2908, #2910) * chore: integrate wave follow-ups — regenerate all hosts, README model docs, TODOS, touchfiles, duration seeds, Bun 1.3 telemetry test fix, replay fixtures pinned to their recorded bytes * v1.91.14.0: release metadata * test(browse): group-kill cleanup falls back to the leader when macOS returns EPERM for a live group * ci: Codex login steps run under bash (the CI container's default sh rejects pipefail) * fix: full-suite repairs — private state roots for 7 real-HOME writers, truthful home-guard attribution with --attribute-home, gstack-paths shim in ship-hook fixtures, Copilot in team-init probes, test-of-test detector, cookie review fixture pinned to the approved excerpt * fix(windows): LF for Dockerfiles, normalized home-guard exclusions, path.relative fixture containment, ship push test spawn timeouts * test(design-detect): widen the whole-scan budget test's timing margins so a loaded macOS runner can't time out the single-batch call * fix(evals): qa protocol names defined for the judge, async PTY judge so overlapping sessions keep their cleanup deadline, bws setup cases use the standard JUDGE_MS tier * test(pty): the non-blocking judge case is POSIX-only (its fake judge is a shebang script, like the PTY harness it covers) * test(evals): ship-coverage-audit names absolute skill paths, uses Read, and skips the Step 7 artifact nothing consumes (removes the mechanism behind 3 of 4 historical timeouts) * test: deflake terminal-agent concurrent startup (write the placeholder record before spawning, like the product) and qa-evidence resumed pipe (barrier on a full high-water mark instead of a sleep) * fix(design): daemon log stream handles open errors instead of crashing the daemon; shutdown test awaits the stubbed exit * test(evals): skillify checks the product's resolved state root (no GSTACK_HOME bypass), negative cases check every root; tpa shims live outside the agent's cwd and answer consistently * test(evals): coverage-audit detector splits parallel columns at │ rails and [+] groups; coverage prompts name absolute skill paths; TODOs from the gate eval census * fix(plan-eng-review): scope gate always sends the menu (no headless 'Scope pending' exit); PTY harness ends idle turn-ends and API-error panels promptly with a precise diagnostic * test(evals): one position-bound coverage-read rule credits read-only && chains (labels, context ranges, git displays in either order) and still rejects forged output * fix(ship): documentation section has one saved source inserted by cat (never retyped); spawned-marker evidence is the child output; refreshed codex/factory ship goldens * test(docsync): the byte-exact insert positive is POSIX-only (the bash-command observer refuses backslash paths by design) * test(evals): plan-design-with-ui focus-title rule accepts the comma-less 'dimensions or focus' wording (replayed on the captured CI run, negative controls kept) * fix(qa-callers): exploratory preflight says the scope/method Reads come after exploratory.md; design-review scan check credits an executed scan proven by one engine run over the changed files --------- Co-authored-by: Andrey Esipov <61357035+andrey-esipov@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Williams <5863886+ridermw@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rocky Wu <92764750+lolisaigao1234@users.noreply.github.com>
221 lines
27 KiB
JSON
221 lines
27 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"source": "fb10b21c2a01365d82c1ac44d6fd53f67b9db644",
|
|
"sourceSha256": "b1c20b1c3b63ef7be689040c210cba9300c6eecc9a85e26db7c922f8b1b97bf5",
|
|
"provenance": {
|
|
"publicPath": ".context/nouakchott-fb10b21c-monitor/autoplan/ceo-close-design-dispatch/public-native.json",
|
|
"publicSha256": "2745c31f77172d957a34692f4e202f2977c5dccf79641e36cad7af817aab6b5a",
|
|
"observationPath": ".context/nouakchott-fb10b21c-monitor/autoplan/ceo-close-design-dispatch/observation.json",
|
|
"observationSha256": "a4027687986b17951c69ebb08741b2043920d49aea09fa1931b73b8146c0946f",
|
|
"qualification": "Exact native parent Read/ACK plus every public parent assistant message in this capture. The original phase publication is absent; no terminal verdict or behavioral pass is inferred."
|
|
},
|
|
"configDir": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-WBvG4i/tmp/gstack-hermetic-1332848-VqTn5j/with-skills/.claude",
|
|
"ownedSkillStateRoot": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-WBvG4i/tmp/gstack-hermetic-1332848-VqTn5j/skill-home-fqHY3V/.gstack",
|
|
"observedPrematurePhaseEntry": null,
|
|
"events": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:18:58.990Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01CvVuWnRgxP6wn1iFM31wnt",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Read",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"file_path": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-WBvG4i/tmp/gstack-hermetic-1332848-VqTn5j/skill-home-fqHY3V/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md"
|
|
},
|
|
"messageId": "msg_011Cf88ZXwxKoBngky9aznMW",
|
|
"requestId": "req_011Cf88ZXYdrZtj8gviiroWY"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:18:59.007Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01CvVuWnRgxP6wn1iFM31wnt",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "1\t<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from design-phase.md.tmpl \u2014 do not edit directly -->\n2\t<!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->\n3\tBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" methodology design \"<REVIEW_SKILL>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n4\t\n5\t**Override rules:**\n6\t- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n7\t- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n8\t- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n9\t- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n10\t- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n11\t\n12\t **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `<DESIGN_INPUT>` for both voices:\n13\t```bash\n14\tbun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" create design \"<ACTIVE_PLAN>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\" \"<methodologyPath>\"\n15\t```\n16\t Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n17\t\n18\t **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n19\t Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n20\t Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n21\t\n22\t Read `snapshot.json` beside `<DESIGN_INPUT>`. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n23\t verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n24\t Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n25\t all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n26\t\n27\t **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n28\t Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for <agent ID>.\"\n29\t No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n30\t Other hosts await that ID. Then outside \u2192 this phase's review ONLY.\n31\t Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n32\t No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n33\t\n34\t **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n35\t Outside prompt: inline the full contents of <DESIGN_INPUT> and context below (Write tool).\n36\t\n37\tIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n38\t\n39\t Read the plan file at <DESIGN_INPUT>. Evaluate this plan's\n40\t UI/UX design decisions.\n41\t\n42\t Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n43\t <insert CEO dual voice findings summary \u2014 key concerns, disagreements>\n44\t\n45\t Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n46\t states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n47\t imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n48\t accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n49\t aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n50\t What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n51\t Be opinionated. No hedging.\n52\t\n53\tWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for `<prepared-prompt-file>`; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: <action> because <specific reason> line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n54\t\n55\t```bash\n56\t# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\n57\tif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n58\t echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n59\t if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n60\t echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host <actual-harness> (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n61\t else\n62\t echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n63\t fi\n64\t exit 78\n65\tfi\n66\t\n67\t_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n68\t_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\n69\ttrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n70\t_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\n71\tcat -- '<prepared-prompt-file>' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n72\t\n73\tsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n74\t_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n75\t_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n76\t_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n77\t# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\n78\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n79\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n80\t _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n81\t _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\n82\tfi\n83\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n84\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n85\t echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n86\t exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\n87\tfi\n88\tbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n89\t\n90\techo 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n91\t```\n92\t\n93\tShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n94\t\n95\tOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review \u2192 unavailable; disabled \u2192 skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n96\t\n97\tRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n98\t\n99\t Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n100\t\n101\t- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n102\t \u2192 TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on \u2192 USER CHALLENGE.\n103\t\n104\t**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n105\t\n106\t1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n107\t\n108\t2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design \u2014 UX challenge)\n109\t and Claude SUBAGENT (design \u2014 independent review).\n110\t Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n111\t to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n112\t Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n113\t\n114\t3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n115\t DISAGREE items from scorecard \u2192 raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n116\t\n117\t**Close this phase:**\n118\t\n119\tThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\n120\tread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint `<DESIGN_INPUT>`, and this phase's\n121\t`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n122\t\n123\t> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n124\t> in full. Do not work from memory \u2014 that section is the source of truth for this step.\n125\t",
|
|
"file": {
|
|
"filePath": "/tmp/g-vlxin2hi/gstack-paid-shard-WBvG4i/tmp/gstack-hermetic-1332848-VqTn5j/skill-home-fqHY3V/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md",
|
|
"content": "<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from design-phase.md.tmpl \u2014 do not edit directly -->\n<!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->\nBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" methodology design \"<REVIEW_SKILL>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n\n**Override rules:**\n- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n\n **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `<DESIGN_INPUT>` for both voices:\n```bash\nbun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" create design \"<ACTIVE_PLAN>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\" \"<methodologyPath>\"\n```\n Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n\n **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n\n Read `snapshot.json` beside `<DESIGN_INPUT>`. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n\n **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for <agent ID>.\"\n No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n Other hosts await that ID. Then outside \u2192 this phase's review ONLY.\n Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n\n **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n Outside prompt: inline the full contents of <DESIGN_INPUT> and context below (Write tool).\n\nIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n\n Read the plan file at <DESIGN_INPUT>. Evaluate this plan's\n UI/UX design decisions.\n\n Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n <insert CEO dual voice findings summary \u2014 key concerns, disagreements>\n\n Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n Be opinionated. No hedging.\n\nWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for `<prepared-prompt-file>`; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: <action> because <specific reason> line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n\n```bash\n# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\nif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host <actual-harness> (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n else\n echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n fi\n exit 78\nfi\n\n_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\ntrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\ncat -- '<prepared-prompt-file>' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n\nsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\nfi\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\nfi\nbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n\necho 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n```\n\nShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n\nOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review \u2192 unavailable; disabled \u2192 skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n\nRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n\n Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n\n- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n \u2192 TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on \u2192 USER CHALLENGE.\n\n**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n\n1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n\n2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design \u2014 UX challenge)\n and Claude SUBAGENT (design \u2014 independent review).\n Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n\n3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n DISAGREE items from scorecard \u2192 raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n\n**Close this phase:**\n\nThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\nread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint `<DESIGN_INPUT>`, and this phase's\n`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n\n> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n> in full. Do not work from memory \u2014 that section is the source of truth for this step.\n",
|
|
"numLines": 125,
|
|
"startLine": 1,
|
|
"totalLines": 125
|
|
},
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "I'll start with the skill preamble.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:43:28.451Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Preamble healthy: interactive session, no Conductor, question tuning off. Now context recovery, platform detection, and the design doc check.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:43:36.918Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "No remote, so platform is unknown; base branch falls back to `main`. A design doc exists. Let me read it and the rest of the repo.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:43:53.847Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Scope result: `dxRequired: true` (21 term matches; the rule says a positive result can't be negated by context, so Phase 2.5 runs). Let me check the initialized ACTIVE_PLAN and confirm UI scope.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:44:42.898Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Codex passes skipped (codex_reviews disabled) \u2014 running Claude adversarial only.\n\nNow Phase 1. Reading the CEO phase section in full before executing.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:45:15.797Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the methodology step: get `methodologyPath` and `readRanges` for the CEO skill.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:45:21.482Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Reading the 2434-line CEO methodology in the five listed ranges.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:45:31.977Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Before 0H I need to understand how the snapshot tool applies accepted obligations (`create` / `amend-input`). Quick look at its usage:",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:49:49.246Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now write the CEO scope summary (under GSTACK_STATE_ROOT, allowed) and create the Step 0 checkpoint.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:52:48.653Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "CEO_STEP0_CHECKPOINT = `.../autoplan-ceo-kihTiC/ceo-implementation.md`. Now amend-input to apply the accepted block.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:53:41.079Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Dispatching the Spec Review Loop reviewer (launch 1 of \u22643) with both inputs.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:54:16.655Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Waiting for the spec reviewer to complete.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:54:33.907Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Spec review launch 1: score 6/10, 21 issues, OVERALL: ISSUES. All are spec-tightening fixes that don't reopen T1/T2; applying via 0D (auto-decided, logged), then re-dispatching.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:56:46.767Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now rewrite the accepted block with the fixes and add the baseline-edits record.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:57:15.147Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "I'll update both copies identically (amend-input resyncs the Implementation copy anyway), then add the baseline record only in the Review record.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:58:21.323Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now update the CEO summary (tally, justifications, new obligations, reviewer concerns).",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T00:59:23.556Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Baseline edit applied (line 19). Reading the new review input in full, then re-dispatching (launch 2).",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:00:27.315Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Waiting for spec review launch 2.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:00:49.772Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Launch 2: 7/10, 5 new issues (none repeated). Applying fixes and running the final launch (3 of 3).",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:02:14.199Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the CEO summary, then amend-input.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:03:20.491Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Waiting for the final spec review launch.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:04:38.812Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Launch 3: 7/10, 7 issues, three-launch cap reached; loop stops. The findings are valid and mechanical, so I'm applying them via 0D and recording them as post-cap Reviewer Concerns (not reviewer-confirmed).",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:06:53.733Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the CEO summary: Reviewer Concerns section and ledger updates, then metrics.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:08:07.561Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Spec Review Loop complete: 3 launches, 33 found, 26 reviewer-confirmed fixed, 7 applied post-cap (recorded as Reviewer Concerns), score 6\u21927\u21927. Now Step 0.5: bind the fresh CEO_INPUT snapshot.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:08:36.131Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "CEO_INPUT bound (sha ae34bf17\u2026). Dispatching the native CEO reviewer with the `nativeDispatchPrompt` verbatim as the only tool call of this response.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:08:47.532Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Waiting for the native CEO reviewer.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:08:59.942Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Native CEO review complete (INPUT matches snapshot). Codex voice: disabled \u2192 skipped, `outside_status: disabled`. Now the consensus table and Sections 1\u201311. Let me pull the section headings from the methodology.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:10:27.870Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the CEO review body: consensus table, Sections 1\u201311, mandatory outputs, tasks, completion summary.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:11:46.236Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the audit row for the hardening item, the tasks JSONL, and the CEO summary update.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:17:29.741Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now the CEO summary update for native-voice changes, R17, and the hardening item.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:18:01.098Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now phase close. Reading the section file afresh.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:18:30.152Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "DESIGN_READY. Per Step 0.5 (PLAN MODE EXCEPTION), generating mockups. Attempting one sequential variants run for the dashboard page.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:22:04.349Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Now binding the design input snapshot.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:22:44.549Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "DESIGN_INPUT bound: `autoplan-design-3EKBYv/design-implementation.md` (sha `f6803414\u2026`). Dispatching the native design subagent with the `nativeDispatchPrompt` verbatim.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:23:05.312Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "d3dddf71-ec90-4aa3-a510-f0eb9d85ad5d",
|
|
"text": "Waiting for the native design reviewer.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T01:23:17.444Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|