mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-11-05 16:34:00 +01:00
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot]
6f7488a70f
* fix(evals): plan-design focus rating in plain words, docsync own-call rule at the candidate --help, floor Create menu cropped at its rule (GSTA-65) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(evals): floor actor answers Step 0D's focus menu in the template's own words (GSTA-65) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(evals): floor actor identifies Step 0D's focus menu by its structure, not one wording (GSTA-65) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(changelog): GSTA-65 paid-side flaky repairs under [Unreleased] Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(evals): the 0D focus picker moves into plan-design-finding-floor's owned fixture; no harness series reset (GSTA-65) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * test(evals): the 0D picker rows join the floor case's owner test (test-of-test ratchet) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * v1.91.185.0 fix(evals): plan-design focus rating in plain words, docsync own-call rule, floor Create crop and 0D menu (GSTA-65) (#3358) Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
16 lines
5.2 KiB
JSON
16 lines
5.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"source": "Periodic run 39209106033 slice 30 (main 2d42e4e, v1.91.143.0), plan-design-finding-floor: outcome timeout at 610 s (observer_timeout), issue #2756.",
|
|
"note": "Exact final viewport (terminal.screen.log) and the owned Write input from its own PreToolUse witness (pendingWriteInputs). The owned working-plan Create menu's 'Create file' title and file row scrolled away, so the crop starts on the native rule above the numbered preview. The harness then had no grant and the menu stayed open until the observer timed out; on main it would end as permission_unanswered after 20 s.",
|
|
"sessionId": "94631d4e-4d3b-48fc-9835-1d17d04e8f71",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01LtZoeoZvC7CMStkNyremFA",
|
|
"basename": "gstack-test-plan-design-floor.md",
|
|
"recorded": {
|
|
"outcome": "timeout",
|
|
"summary": "no qualifying finding question within 600000ms",
|
|
"elapsedMs": 610041
|
|
},
|
|
"screen": "\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n 1 # Plan: Marketing landing page\n 2\n 3 ## Context\n 4\n 5 Source plan: `PLAN.md` (seed commit c2e0324). This file is the plan-mode plan\n 6 produced by `/plan-design-review`. It starts as a faithful copy of the supplied\n 7 requirements. Design gaps found during review are recorded below as PENDING\n 8 until the user approves each fix individually. Nothing in the \"Approved\n 9 implementation\" section changes until that approval lands.\n 10\n 11 Product scope is preserved as supplied: a single marketing landing page.\n 12 No DESIGN.md exists in this repo, so recommendations calibrate against\n 13 universal design principles, not a project design system.\n 14\n 15 ## Supplied requirements (verbatim from PLAN.md)\n 16\n 17 ### Layout\n 18 All headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n 19 \"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead with no\n 20 breathing room; the CTA button is the same visual weight as a\n 21 secondary \"Learn more\" link directly beside it.\n 22\n 23 ## Approved implementation\n 24\n 25 _(Nothing approved beyond the supplied requirements yet. Items move here from\n 26 \"Pending design decisions\" only after an explicit per-issue approval.)_\n 27 \n 28 ## Pending design decisions\n 29 \n 30 _(Populated during the review passes. Each entry is a proposed fix, not a\n 31 completed decision.)_\n\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\u254c\n Do you want to create gstack-test-plan-design-floor.md?\n \u276f 1. Yes\n 2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session (shift+tab)\n 3. No\n\n Esc to cancel \u00b7 Tab to amend\n",
|
|
"screenSha256": "ca7939cd9c82db92a4b5b8bc980777d90e4970977481687643f1c0ea3542d126",
|
|
"writeContent": "# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Context\n\nSource plan: `PLAN.md` (seed commit c2e0324). This file is the plan-mode plan\nproduced by `/plan-design-review`. It starts as a faithful copy of the supplied\nrequirements. Design gaps found during review are recorded below as PENDING\nuntil the user approves each fix individually. Nothing in the \"Approved\nimplementation\" section changes until that approval lands.\n\nProduct scope is preserved as supplied: a single marketing landing page.\nNo DESIGN.md exists in this repo, so recommendations calibrate against\nuniversal design principles, not a project design system.\n\n## Supplied requirements (verbatim from PLAN.md)\n\n### Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead with no\nbreathing room; the CTA button is the same visual weight as a\nsecondary \"Learn more\" link directly beside it.\n\n## Approved implementation\n\n_(Nothing approved beyond the supplied requirements yet. Items move here from\n\"Pending design decisions\" only after an explicit per-issue approval.)_\n\n## Pending design decisions\n\n_(Populated during the review passes. Each entry is a proposed fix, not a\ncompleted decision.)_\n"
|
|
}
|