Files
gstack/codex/SKILL.md.tmpl
f67c478f05 v1.91.34.0 fix: /autoplan on current Claude Code and long sessions, quieter pre-push and sync guards, gstack-post, gstack-doctor (#3069)
* docs: Oct 7 follow-up wave plan (pre-review)

* docs: Oct 7 follow-up wave plan, reviewed through /autoplan

* docs: Oct 7 wave plan, record final gate decisions (UC1 accepted, UC2 rejected)

* docs: credit #1822 to @Mike-E-Log and #1743 to @habassa5 (v1.64.0.0)

The v1.64.0.0 CHANGELOG entry credited the extension token fix (#1822)
and the polyfill exited promise (#1743) to the wrong handle, and the
extension-sender-auth test header repeated the first slip. Commit history
is not rewritten.

Fixes #3054.

Co-authored-by: Mike Ilog <48659643+Mike-E-Log@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(context-restore): offer newer checkpoints from nested repos and task worktrees

/context-restore could present an older checkpoint as the latest with no
error in two layouts:

1. A session started in a non-git parent saved from a nested repo, so the
   checkpoint went to the nested repo's bucket. Restore in the parent now
   lists checkpoints of other buckets whose project_root lies below the cwd
   (BELOW_CWD; the 200 newest are read, and from $HOME only each project's
   newest). /context-save also leaves a JSON pointer (checkpoint path, bucket,
   project_root) in the starting directory's bucket when $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR
   is set and files elsewhere; restore lists those as POINTER, in or out of git.
2. A plan checkpoint on the main tree's branch shadowed a newer checkpoint
   saved in a ticket worktree. When another branch holds a newer checkpoint
   for the same task (a worktree below the main tree, read from the new
   worktree: stamp; equal normalized titles; or a shared #123 / ABC-123
   token in titles or branch names), restore prints NEWER_TASK and the skill
   shows both and proposes the newer one. Generic titles (wip, checkpoint,
   save, notes, todo) never match on title alone, and the worktree rule
   applies only when restoring from the main tree, so sibling worktrees
   still never shadow each other.

The branch-first ordering itself is unchanged.

Refs #3065.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Gernhardt <t.gernhardt@softwareprojekt.net>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(redact-prepush): list each MEDIUM finding with rule, file line and fix

The pre-push hook printed only a MEDIUM count, which nobody could review
without re-running the engine by hand. It now prints one line per finding:
rule id, file and file line, and a fix, never the matched value.

Line numbers come from the hunk headers (combined --cc headers included), so
a finding in a later hunk or past a scan-chunk boundary points at the real
file line. Findings from the per-commit catch-up path name the commit whose
file line it is, so content removed before the pushed tip is still locatable.

Plan items: CEO-7 (summary half), DX-9 (fix lines), ENG-8 (line mapping).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(redact-prepush): stop flagging your own email and already-public authors (#3060)

The hook never passed the engine's selfEmail / repoPublicEmails, so every
push that added the pusher's address, or a commit author's, raised a MEDIUM
pii.email warning for an address the destination already shows.

The hook now reads `git config user.email` and one bounded `git log` of
author and committer addresses, raw and mailmapped (%ae %aE %ce %cE): the
history of every pushed tip (those commits become public with the push),
each remote tip being replaced, and, for a new branch or an unknown remote
tip pushed to a configured remote, that remote's own tracking refs. A URL or
unknown destination never borrows tracking refs, and another remote's
history never counts.

The read stops at 50,000 commits (the newest authors are used) and 5 seconds.
An error or the timeout passes no history and, when an email finding is
listed, prints one line saying suppression was limited for this push. The two
inputs fail independently. HIGH findings and every other rule are untouched.

Controls: a stranger's address, an address only another remote knows, a URL
push next to a matching remote, and a first push of a repo with no history
all still report.

Plan items: A3, CEO-7, CEO-23 (A3 half), DX-9 (partial history), ENG-8
(history scope, mailmap).

Co-authored-by: akmandhania <143462686+akmandhania@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(redact-prepush): per-address allowlist for pii.email (gstack.redact.allowEmail)

`git config --add gstack.redact.allowEmail <address>` allows that address for
MEDIUM pii.email findings only, so a team alias or support address that has
to be in the repo stops warning without reaching for --no-verify. It never
affects HIGH findings or any other rule, and the pii.email fix line names it.

Controls: a different address still reports, and a HIGH secret next to an
allowed address still blocks.

Plan item: DX-17.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(troubleshooting): pre-push pii.email findings, exemptions and allowlist

Plan item: DX-12 (pre-push touchpoint).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(redact-prepush): assemble fixture addresses at runtime

The email fixtures were literals, so this branch's own push listed 47
pii.email findings in its test file. Build them from a helper instead, the
way the neighbouring tests build credential and IP fixtures.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(browse): offer the user's signed-in tab, name silent aside repl failures

Rules (rendered into every browsing skill, kept short):
- Rule 1: before the first openTab, offer the user's tabs on the target
  origin (title and origin only; the rest of listBrowserTabs() stays
  private) and attach only after the user confirms one.
- Rule 4: a second sign-in wall after a confirmed sign-in means the session
  is bound to the tab or URL; offer that tab instead of another sign-in.
- Rule 6 no longer suggests an early return; rule 7 says a fast [ok without
  GSTACK_STEP_OK is an abort.

Cookbook (browse, devex-review): a "Silent failures" list (evaluate returns
only serializable values, no top-level return, locator(sel).press(key), an
empty DOM read is about the selector until the screenshot and the request's
response say otherwise, read toggle state before clicking) and a signed-in
tab recipe that prints only target-origin tabs and never closes the user's tab.

Parity caps for design-consultation, land-and-deploy, qa and the browse
skeleton are raised to the measured sizes, with notes.

Refs #3063, #3064.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Gernhardt <t.gernhardt@softwareprojekt.net>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(codex): run gstack-codex-probe as a command, one subcommand per probe

Generated skills now execute bin/gstack-codex-probe (select-model, check-auth,
show-sandbox, check-sandbox, probe-model, check-version, show-first-use-notice,
run-with-timeout, log-event, log-hang, help) and capture its KEY: value lines,
so no helper state crosses into the calling shell and the preflight works from
bash, zsh or sh. select-model keeps --model > GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL > config.toml
precedence; run-with-timeout supervises with the existing gtimeout/timeout/
watchdog chain and returns 124 on a deadline; an unknown subcommand exits 64.

Sourcing keeps working for skills rendered before the upgrade and prints one
deprecation line naming /gstack-upgrade; it and the zsh self-locate block are
removed in a release on or after 2026-10-21 (DX-18). Parity caps raised with
measured notes for the longer capture lines.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(gstack-post): one argv-only, redaction-scanned write path for PR and issue text

bin/gstack-post posts a PR/MR or issue comment, a review-comment reply, a
PR title or body, a new PR/MR or a new issue from agent-written files. Every
value reaches gh/glab as its own argv element in --flag=<value> form or on
stdin, never through a shell string, and a target is a number or a URL of
this repository on the same host.

The helper owns the redaction scan: it reads each file once, scans those
exact bytes (visibility from config, then gh/glab; the pusher's own email
suppressed) and sends the same bytes. HIGH is refused with exit 1 and no
confirmation can post it. MEDIUM exits 2 with RULE:/LINE:/PART: lines and a
TOKEN: digest of the bytes, destination, operation and findings; only
--confirm <token> for those exact bytes posts, so any edit needs a new
confirmation. gh/glab failures exit 3, usage errors 64. It also carries the
projectCards REST fallback and the title read-back that /ship did by hand.

The logic lives in lib/gstack-post.ts behind an injectable runner, so its
tests run in the Windows free lane; the stub-gh executable test is POSIX.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(autoplan): guard verifies dispatches on Claude Code 2.1.29x (schema strip, unflushed call, named causes)

Cause A: Claude Code journals the model's raw Agent input but hands
PreToolUse the schema-parsed input; with the fork-subagent gate on (the
interactive default in 2.1.292) run_in_background is dropped, so the journal
record never deep-equaled the payload. nativeToolInput now drops only that
documented strip for Agent. Agent input is bound on both paths: keys limited
to prompt, description, subagent_type (general-purpose) and
run_in_background; a model override or any other key is denied.

Cause B: when a ready journal lacks the current call, the guard evaluates
the payload placed after the last journaled record instead of polling for a
record that may arrive only with the tool result. A phase transition counts
a report only when a later journaled record follows it (and, on the journal
path, it is not in the current call's message). One batch rule covers both
paths; a background reviewer keeps the invocation armed until its
completion notice.

Every outcome now has a stable reason code, disposition and anchor
(autoplan/bin/guard-reasons.ts). UC1: Claude-Code-caused states
(unrecognized shape, journal lag, rewritten journal, oversized record,
unchecked-version schema strip) allow with a visible warning; integrity
failures stay denials. No denial advises a bare retry. Every guarded
decision appends one content-free line to analytics/autoplan-guard.jsonl,
trimmed to 1,000 lines past 256 KiB.

Co-authored-by: Jared <182125291+yolo-jared@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: crblabs <293123359+crblabs@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(autoplan): publish each phase report with a no-op call; foreground requests are conditional

Phase-close step 6 sends the report in a message whose only tool call is
the Bash no-op ': autoplan-published <phase>', and step 7 makes the next
guarded call in a later message, so the guard sees the report flushed
before the next phase entry regardless of Claude Code's journal timing.

Every site that asked for run_in_background: false now asks for it only
when the Agent schema offers it and says how to recover when a dispatch
runs in the background anyway (wait for its completion notice). Parity
caps rise by the measured bytes.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship,spec,review): PR and issue text goes out only through gstack-post

/ship: Step 18 writes the title into an agent-written file. An existing PR's
title is piped from gh/glab through gstack-pr-title-rewrite.sh --stdin (new),
so neither the agent nor a shell string carries it; a new title is written
with the file tool and its version prefix checked in the file. Step 19
composes the body as before and publishes with gstack-post pr-create, or
pr-body then pr-title, which scan the exact bytes they send. The separate
title and body scans, the hand-rolled REST fallback and the title self-check
are gone (the helper does all three). Title preparation moved into the
pr-body section, so the skeleton shrinks.

/spec files its issue with gstack-post issue-create and drops the pre-issue
re-scan; Greptile replies use gstack-post reply and pr-comment.
scripts/resolvers/redact-doc.ts loses its PR and issue sinks, and a test
keeps any template from rendering one again.

Tests that pinned the old scan-then-gh wiring now pin the gstack-post wiring;
the publication tests run the real compose and publish blocks against a stub
gh with the real helper (HIGH in title or body refused, MEDIUM token flow).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: pin Claude Code 2.1.292 in the CI image

2.1.292 is the npm latest users run. Its interactive default turns on the
fork-subagent gate, which strips run_in_background from the Agent schema
and backgrounds reviewers; CI on 2.1.284 never saw the /autoplan guard
break. The image tag is a content hash, so every eval workflow picks up
the new image without a workflow edit.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(brain-sync): one drain lock for every writer to the artifacts repo

gstack-artifacts-init, gstack-brain-restore, gstack-gbrain-source-wireup
and the skill-start merge ran git in $GSTACK_HOME without the drain's lock,
so the drain could never tell an abandoned .git/index.lock from a live one.
They now take the same mkdir lock (bin/gstack-brain-lock.sh): the drain and
the skill-start merge skip when it is held, user-run writers wait for it
(GSTACK_BRAIN_LOCK_WAIT, default 120 s), and a child of the holder (the
drain's daily worktree advance, restore's wireup) inherits it by token.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(brain-sync): hold back only the flagged file, keep coupled artifacts whole

One file with secret-shaped text used to block every push, silently. The
drain now attributes scanner hits to files in one pass over the staged diff
(split on its diff --git headers), holds back each flagged file with the
rest of its coupled group, unstages it, and requires the remaining staged
diff to re-scan clean; anything short of that falls back to a full unstage
and status blocked. Held files stay queued and are re-scanned every drain.

- Status file gains held_count, drainable, last_drain_at, last_push_at and
  held[] (path, scanner rule, dependents, both fixes); new status held.
- Coupled groups come from an explicit map (decisions.jsonl and
  decisions.active.json): a queued member stages the whole group, a group
  stages only when its snapshot matches its log in the index, a skipped
  member stops the whole group.
- --unskip-file undoes --skip-file and queues the path again.
- An index lock older than 10 minutes is removed under the drain lock; a
  younger one, a failed git add, a failed commit (hooks included) keep the
  queue and report status error. A verified empty staged diff is the only
  "nothing to commit". git add runs once, batched.
- The scanner reads bytes, so undecodable content no longer crashes it into
  a false clean; matched text never reaches the status file.
- An empty-queue run with unpushed sync commits stays push_failed.
- Privacy-held duplicate records collapse to one per path; --status counts
  a spool too deep for a shell glob.
- --attention prints skill start's fixed attention lines from the sync
  status table in the usage header.

Co-authored-by: v639dragoon <matthewsbrickley@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(skill-start): ARTIFACTS_SYNC attention lines for a stuck sync

Skill start now prints one fixed attention line per sync-status-table row
that applies (held, blocked, push_failed, error, unknown, stale-push,
stale-drain), each naming gstack-brain-sync by absolute path. Values from
the status file are clamped (status code to the table, counts to digits,
timestamps to their shape), so the status message, file paths and scanner
output never reach the line. The preamble tells the model to surface the
line in one sentence and continue. Skill-start tests are generated from the
table in bin/gstack-brain-sync, and docs/gbrain-sync-errors.md carries the
same table.

Co-authored-by: v639dragoon <matthewsbrickley@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(outside-review): severity words in label position count as findings

The Oct 7 /autoplan run's Codex CEO and DX reviews labeled seven and eight
findings High/Medium without [Pn] tags, and the classifier printed
VERDICT: clean / FINDINGS: none for both. lib/outside-review-result.ts now
reads severity words in label position (Severity: High, a leading High: /
High — / [High], **High**, a table cell): critical/high block like P0/P1,
medium/low are advisory. Words in prose (high-level, low-risk, no critical
findings) never count. A review or structured response with neither tags,
labels nor an explicit no-findings statement is unverified, never clean
(DX-11, ENG-10). Design-direction proposals move to a new proposal gate so
they keep needing only their Recommendation line, and review prompts ask
for a severity per finding. Fixtures reproduce the CEO/DX label shapes, the
eng [P1] output, a table and prose negative controls; the stored Codex panel
keeps its verdicts. docs/troubleshooting.md explains how the verdict is read.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat: gstack-doctor readiness report and setup --status Codex row (B5)

bin/gstack-doctor prints one row per check without starting a skill:
install root (the registry rows behind ./setup --status), state root, Bun
against the floor, hook parse check, Codex mode and self-locate via
gstack-codex-probe subcommands, the cached model probe with its age
(--live runs the paid probe-model), artifacts-sync health from the status
file with the status code clamped, the browse bundle, Claude Code version,
the largest session journal and the last five schema-1 guard reason codes.
Rows are ok, warn, not configured or fail; only fail exits non-zero; fix
lines name helpers by absolute install-root path.

./setup --status gains a read-only Codex row (bin/gstack-codex-status.sh,
shared with the doctor) and ends with the doctor's absolute path.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: bug-report template asks for doctor output; README troubleshooting entry; doctor test in the Windows lane

The template gives the Claude Code doctor path and a lookup for other
hosts and names no bare gstack- command (asserted in
test/gstack-doctor.test.ts). The doctor test runs every script through
explicit bash argv, so it joins the curated Windows free subset.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(troubleshooting): readiness check section points at gstack-doctor

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(question-tuning,plan-tune,gbrain): free text reaches helpers only through agent-written files

Question tuning no longer pipes the question summary through printf: a
registered id needs no summary, and for an unregistered id the agent writes
the summary to .gstack/tmp/qt.txt and passes --summary-file (new). The
helper resolves a relative path against the git top level, removes scratch
files under .gstack/tmp, and asks normally when the file is missing.

/plan-tune tune events carry the user's own words again: they go into a
file the agent writes and reach gstack-question-preference --write through
--free-text-file (new), still behind the injection filter and the
user-origin gate.

docs/gbrain-write-surfaces.md drops its heredoc templates for the
agent-written page file on stdin, matching the per-skill save block, and the
generic save block stops showing a quoted --content argument.

The tuning prose was tightened so every preamble stays within its size cap.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(evals): daily autoplan-schema-canary on the latest Claude Code

A periodic rule case installs the latest published Claude Code with
install scripts off, verifies registry signatures, and runs one headless
session with the fork-subagent gate on whose PreToolUse hook records an
Agent and a Read payload. Each payload must match its journal record under
the guard's own comparison, keep the journal's key set apart from the
documented run_in_background strip, and stay inside the Agent allowlist;
a background Agent's completion notice must keep the shape the guard reads.
evals-periodic.yml runs it daily on its own schedule and concurrency group
(read-only token); the weekly census also includes it. A free test proves
the comparison fails on an injected strip.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(doctor): read the artifacts sync held count from held_count, the field the drain writes

* fix(artifacts sync): the init and restore pre-commit hooks catch Bearer/Basic/Token-prefixed JSON auth headers like the drain does

* feat(greptile-early): detect Greptile, ask once on public repos, open the early draft, wait for the review

bin/gstack-greptile-early backs /ship's early Greptile PR:
- detect: a root .greptile/ folder (which takes precedence), greptile.json,
  or a Greptile comment on the repo in the last 90 days; triggerOnDrafts from
  the effective root config; repo visibility; public-repo consent. It prints
  the signal, that /ship will push and open a draft now, the 10-minute wait
  cap and the absolute gstack-config command that turns it off.
- consent yes|no: the public-repo answer, remembered per repo in the
  project's state.
- open: opens the draft through gstack-post with a body saying /ship opened
  it early, and posts one @greptileai comment through gstack-post when the
  config does not set triggerOnDrafts: true. An open PR is left alone.
- wait: polls every 30 s for a completed Greptile check run, a Greptile
  review of the head commit or a summary naming it; each call returns within
  about 90 s and reports timeout 10 minutes after the PR opened.

gstack-config gains ship_greptile_early (default true, invalid values
rejected): on automatically whenever the repo uses Greptile, off per user.
The logic is in lib/greptile-early.ts behind an injectable runner, so its
fixture-repo tests run in the Windows lane; an end-to-end test drives the
real helper and gstack-post against a stub gh.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(ship): early Greptile PR at Step 6.5, bounded wait at Step 10 (#3020)

When the repo uses Greptile, /ship pushes and opens a draft PR right after
its free tests pass (new lazy section greptile-early, Step 6.5), so Greptile
reviews while Steps 7-9 run. A public repo asks once, remembered per repo;
declining keeps today's order. Step 10 waits for that review with
gstack-greptile-early wait and takes the existing unavailable route on a
timeout, never a claim of zero comments. Step 18 replaces the provisional
title, Step 19 marks the draft ready unless a draft was requested, and a
/ship that stops after Step 6.5 leaves the draft open with one comment
saying why.

ship's union cap rises to 1.5275 with the measured note (B4 +836 bytes,
B2 +4,732 bytes); the step-numbering guard allows 6.5; ship goldens are
refreshed for B4 and B2.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(autoplan): the publication no-op is 'true autoplan-published <phase>'

Measured on Claude Code 2.1.292 in a default-settings interactive session:
a bare ':' Bash command asks for approval ('This command requires
approval'), and after a background reviewer's completion notice starts a
new turn the skill's allowed tools no longer cover it, so the phase-close
no-op prompted the user. 'true' with arguments runs without approval and
prints nothing. The guard only needs a later journaled record, so the
command changes everywhere it is named.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(evals): live autoplan-guard-pty case on the pinned Claude Code

A gate-tier rule case (one trial, haiku) drives an interactive PTY
session with default settings through a project skill that carries
/autoplan's own hook block: init, Phase 1 entry, a CEO reviewer dispatch
that sends run_in_background, a prepared close packet, the report
published with the no-op, and the Phase 2 entry in a later message. It
reads outcomes from the guard decision log (three verified allows) and
fails if the no-op raises a permission card; other cards are approved and
printed.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(autoplan): bounded, append-tolerant owned-journal read (A2)

The publication guard no longer reads the whole parent journal or refuses
it at 32 MiB. lib/claude-owned-journal.ts streams the bytes present at open
to the last complete line (pass one), keeps a content-free index per record
and decides ownership, ancestry and causal order on it with the same checks
and reason codes as before. Pass two reloads in full only what the
evaluation reads (autoplan/bin/guard-journal.ts): every literal init and its
result, the current call, and inside the invocation window (from the latest
human turn at or before the bound chain's first init) guarded and
close-packet Read results, structured Bash results, error results, assistant
text after the first close Read and active-plan mutations, plus the earlier
Read a dedup reply cites even before the window (ENG-4).

- lib/claude-journal-records.ts: per-record event extraction, record
  metadata and the causal-order checks, shared by readPlanCountTranscript
  and the bounded reader. The batch reader keeps its whole-file read and cap.
- Appends after open never fail a read; same device and inode and no
  shrink are required (identity). A second read in one hook invocation must
  hash bytes [0, first size) the same, or it is `rewritten` (UC1 unverified);
  the unrecognized-shape double read uses that prefix hash. `changing` is
  removed (REMOVED_CODES; its anchor stays).
- OWNED_RECORD_MAX_BYTES (32 MiB): only one record over it is too_large.
  OWNED_RETAINED_MAX_BYTES (32 MiB): over it is the new oversized_invocation
  fallback denial. GSTACK_TRANSCRIPT_TEST_MAX_BYTES and
  GSTACK_TRANSCRIPT_TEST_RETAINED_BYTES can only lower them.
- ENG-5: evaluation groups uses and results by tool id once (no per-tool
  rescans).

CEO-25 / ENG-5 spike (120 MiB synthetic, 31,242 records, 4 vCPU Linux,
Bun 1.4.2): a full streaming rescan (parse every line, small index, sha256)
took 254-326 ms at 147-161 MiB peak RSS; a pass-one index cache under the
state root (load cached index, verify a 64 KiB tail hash, parse the tail)
took 26-29 ms at 47 MiB. The rescan meets the 1 s budget, so the cache is
not adopted: it would add trusted persistent state and invalidation for no
budget need. A backward tail read cannot prove competing_root or cycle, so
it was not a candidate.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(autoplan): journal-read benchmark and its dispatch-only workflow (CEO-2, CEO-6)

scripts/measure-journal-read.ts builds two synthetic 120 MiB parent journals
around a real /autoplan invocation (mixed: ~28k records, most bytes inside
the invocation; large-invocation: ~89k records with a current invocation of
many small records), keeps appending while the guard reads, and measures one
hook call in a fresh process (wall ms, peak RSS). The workflow runs it on
ubuntu-latest and macos-latest on workflow_dispatch only.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(evals): autoplan-long-session, a resumed >100 MiB session enters Phase 1

CEO-15 with ENG-6's observer: a real session is compacted, its journal
padded past 100 MiB with owned records before the compact boundary, and
the resumed interactive session runs the scripted phase boundary; the
guard decision log must show a verified Phase 1 allow. A free test proves
that observer on a padded journal through the lower-only bound seams
(the PTY counting reader refuses the same journal), with a sidechain
control that must deny.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* v1.91.34.0: CHANGELOG, TODOS, version; harness decision for test-pr-profile; ship title-step test reads its new section

* docs(changelog): use an example.com address in the allowEmail example

* test: assemble GitHub-token fixtures at runtime in the new brain-sync and skill-start tests (CI credential scan)

* fix: integration repairs across the wave (Step 6.5 fence, printed helper paths on Windows, probe usage without a heredoc) and tests pinned to the moved title and gstack-post contracts

* test(doctor): the healthy fixture builds browse.exe on Windows, the name setup uses there

* test(shared-libs): recognize Claude Code 2.1.292's internal git probe prefix (format.pretty and per-hook disables), with its CI receipt

* fix(ship-measure): report lists v1 measurements as an older format instead of crashing

---------

Co-authored-by: Mike Ilog <48659643+Mike-E-Log@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Gernhardt <t.gernhardt@softwareprojekt.net>
Co-authored-by: akmandhania <143462686+akmandhania@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared <182125291+yolo-jared@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: crblabs <293123359+crblabs@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: v639dragoon <matthewsbrickley@gmail.com>
2026-10-07 23:29:05 +00:00

349 lines
17 KiB
Cheetah

---
name: codex
preamble-tier: 3
version: 1.0.0
description: |
OpenAI Codex CLI wrapper — three modes. Code review: independent diff review via
codex review with pass/fail gate. Challenge: adversarial mode that tries to break
your code. Consult: ask codex anything with session continuity for follow-ups.
The "200 IQ autistic developer" second opinion. Use when asked to "codex review",
"codex challenge", "ask codex", "second opinion", or "consult codex". (gstack)
voice-triggers:
- "code x"
- "code ex"
- "get another opinion"
triggers:
- codex review
- second opinion
- outside voice challenge
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- Glob
- Grep
- AskUserQuestion
---
{{PREAMBLE}}
{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}
# /codex — Multi-AI Second Opinion
You are running the `/codex` skill. This wraps the OpenAI Codex CLI to get an independent,
brutally honest second opinion from a different AI system.
Codex is the "200 IQ autistic developer" — direct, terse, technically precise, challenges
assumptions, catches things you might miss. Present its output faithfully, not summarized.
---
{{SECTION_INDEX:codex}}
---
## Step 0.4: Check codex binary
```bash
CODEX_BIN=$(command -v codex || echo "")
[ -z "$CODEX_BIN" ] && echo "NOT_FOUND" || echo "FOUND: $CODEX_BIN"
```
If `NOT_FOUND`: stop and tell the user:
"Codex CLI not found. Install it: `npm install -g @openai/codex` or see https://github.com/openai/codex"
If `NOT_FOUND`, also log the event:
```bash
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe log-event codex_cli_missing 2>/dev/null || true
```
---
## Step 0.5: Auth probe + model probe + version check
Before building expensive prompts, verify Codex has valid auth, that the account
can actually USE gstack's selected model, AND the installed CLI version isn't in the
known-bad list. `gstack-codex-probe` is the shared helper that `/codex`, `/autoplan`
and every outside review run as a command, one subcommand per check.
Model order: a model the user names for this request, `GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL`, Codex
`config.toml` `model` (`review_model` first for `codex review`; honors `$CODEX_HOME`),
then `gpt-6-astra`. Each call prints `CODEX_MODEL: <model> (<kind>; source: ...)` first.
For a named model, add `--model '<model>'` to every `select-model` and `probe-model`
call, including the probe below. An invalid or unavailable choice stops with a repair
message, never the default.
```bash
_CODEX_PROBE=~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe
[ -x "$_CODEX_PROBE" ] || { echo "HELPER_UNAVAILABLE"; exit 1; }
{{OUTSIDE_SELF_GUARD:codex}}
if ! "$_CODEX_PROBE" check-auth >/dev/null; then
"$_CODEX_PROBE" log-event codex_auth_failed
echo "AUTH_FAILED"
elif "$_CODEX_PROBE" check-sandbox; then # free; Linux only
"$_CODEX_PROBE" probe-model exec # ~10s round trip on first run, cached 1h
fi
"$_CODEX_PROBE" check-version # warns if known-bad, non-blocking
```
If the runtime guard reports a harness mismatch, stop. Outside coverage is unavailable. Repair with `./setup --host codex`; do not silently substitute another provider or force a same-harness invocation.
If the output contains `HELPER_UNAVAILABLE`, stop: `gstack-codex-probe` is missing or
not executable in this install. Tell the user to re-run `./setup` (or `/gstack-upgrade`).
If the output contains `AUTH_FAILED`, stop and tell the user:
"No Codex authentication found. Run `codex login` or set `$CODEX_API_KEY` / `$OPENAI_API_KEY`, then re-run this skill."
If the output contains `MODEL_UNUSABLE`, stop — the selected model (named with its
source on the `CODEX_MODEL:` line) is invalid or the account cannot use it. Relay the
probe's HINT lines and
follow the "Model not supported (HTTP 400 or 404)" recovery steps in
`## Error Handling` below. Running the modes anyway just burns four
invocations on the same 400.
If the output contains `MODEL_QUOTA_EXHAUSTED`, stop: the account hit its Codex
usage limit. Relay Codex's own line under the marker verbatim (it names the reset
time) and the HINT line (how long gstack skips Codex, and how to retry now); the model
is fine, so do not change it. Running the modes anyway fails the same way.
`MODEL_PROBE_RATE_LIMITED` is non-blocking: Codex answered 429. Report
`CODEX_MODE: unverified (rate_limited)`, relay Codex's line and continue; a
rate-limited mode run is missing coverage, never a pass.
If the output contains `CODEX_SANDBOX: unavailable`, stop: Codex's sandbox cannot
start here, so every command it runs would fail and its review would read nothing.
Relay the `Codex outside review unavailable: ...` line verbatim, including its fix.
No paid call was made.
`MODEL_PROBE_INCONCLUSIVE` is non-blocking (timeout/transient network): report
`CODEX_MODE: unverified`, pass the warning through and continue; the mode's own
validator still decides the result.
If the version check printed a `WARN:` line, pass it through to the user verbatim
(non-blocking — Codex may still work, but the user should upgrade).
The probe multi-signal auth logic accepts: `$CODEX_API_KEY` set, `$OPENAI_API_KEY`
set, or `${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/auth.json` exists. Avoids false-negatives for
env-auth users (CI, platform engineers) that file-only checks would reject.
---
## Step 0.6: Resolve portable roots
Before any mode runs, resolve `$PLAN_ROOT` (where plan files live) and `$TMP_ROOT`
(where ephemeral codex stderr / response captures land) via `bin/gstack-paths`.
This keeps the skill working whether installed as a Claude Code plugin
(`CLAUDE_PLANS_DIR` set), a global `~/.claude/skills/gstack/` install, or a CI
container where `HOME` may be unset and `/tmp` may be read-only.
```bash
GSTACK_STATE_ROOT=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-paths --get GSTACK_STATE_ROOT); : "${GSTACK_STATE_ROOT:?gstack-paths failed; reinstall with ./setup or /gstack-upgrade}"
PLAN_ROOT=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-paths --get PLAN_ROOT)
TMP_ROOT=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-paths --get TMP_ROOT)
```
After this, every subsequent bash block in this skill uses `"$PLAN_ROOT"` and
`"$TMP_ROOT"` rather than hardcoded `~/.claude/plans` or `/tmp/codex-*`.
---
## Step 1: Detect mode
Parse the user's input to determine which mode to run:
1. `/codex review` or `/codex review <instructions>` — **Review mode** (Step 2A)
2. `/codex challenge` or `/codex challenge <focus>` — **Challenge mode** (Step 2B)
3. `/codex` with no arguments — **Auto-detect:**
- Check for a diff (with fallback if origin isn't available):
`git diff origin/<base> --stat 2>/dev/null | tail -1 || git diff <base> --stat 2>/dev/null | tail -1`
- If a diff exists, use AskUserQuestion:
```
Codex detected changes against the base branch. What should it do?
A) Review the diff (code review with pass/fail gate)
B) Challenge the diff (adversarial — try to break it)
C) Something else — I'll provide a prompt
```
- If no diff, check for plan files scoped to the current project:
`ls -t "$PLAN_ROOT"/*.md 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l "$(basename $(pwd))" 2>/dev/null | head -1`
If no project-scoped match, fall back to: `ls -t "$PLAN_ROOT"/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1`
but warn the user: "Note: this plan may be from a different project."
- If a plan file exists, offer to review it
- Otherwise, ask: "What would you like to ask Codex?"
4. `/codex <anything else>` — **Consult mode** (Step 2C), where the remaining text is the prompt
The three modes are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE — at most one runs per invocation. Once
the mode is determined, read ONLY that mode's section (see the Section index
above); never read the other two mode sections.
**Reasoning effort override:** If the user's input contains `--xhigh` anywhere,
note it and remove it from the prompt text before passing to Codex. When `--xhigh`
is present, use `model_reasoning_effort="xhigh"` for all modes regardless of the
per-mode default below. Otherwise, use the per-mode defaults:
- Review (2A): `high` — bounded diff input, needs thoroughness
- Challenge (2B): `high` — adversarial but bounded by diff
- Consult (2C): `medium` — large context, interactive, needs speed
---
## Filesystem Boundary
Every prompt sent to Codex MUST be prefixed with this boundary instruction:
> IMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any files under ~/.claude/, ~/.agents/, .claude/skills/, or agents/. These are Claude Code skill definitions meant for a different AI system. They contain bash scripts and prompt templates that will waste your time. Ignore them completely. Do NOT modify agents/openai.yaml. Stay focused on the repository code only.
This applies to Challenge mode (prompt) and Consult mode (persona prompt), and to the
custom-instructions path of Review mode — all three use `codex exec`, which still takes
a free-form prompt (fed on stdin with `codex exec -`, so size and quoting never break it). It does **not** apply to the default scoped `codex review`
call in Step 2A: that command is invoked with **no prompt at all** (see "Scope
flags exclude the prompt argument" in the Review mode section), so there is nowhere to put the preamble. That
is acceptable — `codex review --base` hands the model a pre-computed diff rather than
turning it loose on the filesystem, so the rabbit-hole risk the boundary guards against
is much lower on that path. Reference this section as "the filesystem boundary" in the
mode sections.
---
## Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED) — all modes
Every mode ends by emitting ONE synthesis recommendation line after presenting
Codex's verbatim output, in this format:
```
Recommendation: <action> because <one-line reason that names the most actionable finding>
```
The reason must engage with a specific Codex finding or insight and compare
against an alternative (another finding, fix-vs-ship, fix order, or status-quo).
Boilerplate reasons ("because it's better", "because adversarial review found
things") fail the format. The recommendation is the ONE line a user reads when
they don't have time for the verbatim output. **Never silently auto-decide;
always emit the line.** Each mode section restates this rule with mode-specific
examples.
---
{{SECTION:review-mode}}
{{SECTION:challenge-mode}}
{{SECTION:consult-mode}}
{{PLAN_FILE_REVIEW_REPORT}}
{{EXIT_PLAN_MODE_GATE}}
---
## Model & Reasoning
**Model:** every Codex call passes the selection above via `{{CODEX_MODEL_CONFIG_FLAG}}`.
Native `codex review` selects with `review` and sets both `model` and `review_model`. The
flag also keeps installed skills out of Codex's context, so a review cannot become a
nested skill run.
**Reasoning effort (per-mode defaults):**
- **Review (2A):** `high` — bounded diff input, needs thoroughness but not max tokens
- **Challenge (2B):** `high` — adversarial but bounded by diff size
- **Consult (2C):** `medium` — large context (plans, codebase), interactive, needs speed
`xhigh` uses ~23x more tokens than `high` and causes 50+ minute hangs on large context
tasks (OpenAI issues #8545, #8402, #6931). Users can override with `--xhigh` flag
(e.g., `/codex review --xhigh`) when they want maximum reasoning and are willing to wait.
**Web search:** All codex commands pass `{{CODEX_WEB_SEARCH_FLAG}}` so `codex exec`
invocations can look up docs and APIs during review. This is OpenAI's cached index —
fast, no extra cost. Unlike the legacy `--enable`-based spelling (deprecated by
codex >=0.144), the `-c` form explicitly overrides any top-level
`web_search` setting in `~/.codex/config.toml`. Note: native `codex review` disables
web search regardless of configuration, so on the default Review path the flag is a
harmless no-op — only exec-based modes actually search.
If the user specifies a model (e.g., `/codex review -m gpt-5.6-sol` or
`/codex challenge --model gpt-daybreak-blue-latest`), translate it to the same config
form and replace the default model flag with `-c "model=\"<model>\""`. Native review
also requires `-c "review_model=\"<model>\""`; replace both model values together.
Review mode runs `codex review`, which REJECTS `-m` (`error: unexpected argument '-m' found`,
verified on 0.147.0), while `-c model=...` is accepted by both `codex review` and
`codex exec`.
---
## Cost Estimation
Parse token count from stderr. Codex prints `tokens used\nN` to stderr.
Display as: `Tokens: N`
If token count is not available, display: `Tokens: unknown`
---
## Error Handling
- **Binary not found:** Detected in Step 0. Stop with install instructions.
- **Auth error:** Codex prints an auth error to stderr. Surface the error:
"Codex authentication failed. Run `codex login` in your terminal to authenticate via ChatGPT."
- **Timeout (Bash outer gate):** Every Bash gate sits ABOVE its inner wrapper (360s gate
over the 330s review wrapper; 600s gate, the tool maximum, over the 540s challenge/consult
wrappers), so
the wrapper's exit-124 path normally fires first with its explicit message. If the Bash
call itself times out anyway (wrapper unavailable AND codex hung), tell the user:
"Codex timed out. The prompt may be too large or the API may be slow. Try again or use a smaller scope."
- **Timeout (inner `timeout` wrapper, exit 124):** If the wrapper fires first (it TERMs Codex, then KILLs it after 10s), the skill's hang-detection block auto-logs a telemetry event + operational learning and prints: "Codex stalled past 9 minutes. Common causes: model API stall, long prompt, network issue. Try re-running. If persistent, split the prompt or check `~/.codex/logs/`." No extra action needed.
- **`the argument '[PROMPT]' cannot be used with '--base <BRANCH>'`:** a prompt argument
leaked into a scoped `codex review`. This fails instantly, before any API call, so it
looks like a hang-free "no output" — do not misread it as a model stall. Drop the
prompt: the scope flags (`--base`, `--commit`, `--uncommitted`) carry the scope on
their own. If the prompt was custom review instructions, run them through `codex exec`
instead (Step 2A, custom-instructions path). Do **not** fix it by removing `--base` and
keeping the prompt — that parses, but silently reviews the uncommitted working tree
instead of the branch diff.
- **Review says "no changes" on a branch that clearly has changes:** the scope flag is
missing or wrong. A prompt-only `codex review` defaults to uncommitted changes, so a
clean working tree reads as an empty review even when `<base>...HEAD` is large. Confirm
`--base <base>` is actually on the command line.
- **Model not supported (HTTP 400 or 404):** stderr shows
`The '<model>' model is not supported when using Codex with a ChatGPT account`
(a `status: 400` / `invalid_request_error` naming a model), or
`404 Not Found: The model '<model>' does not exist or you do not have access to it`
(a retired model; a bare 404 usually means a custom provider's `base_url` is wrong).
`requires a newer version of Codex` means the CLI is too old: upgrade it instead.
None of these is an auth or network failure, and the auth probe cannot catch them.
Recovery, in order:
1. Read the `CODEX_MODEL:` line: it names the model and where it came from.
2. Fix that source: name another model for this request, update
`GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL`, or change `model` (or `review_model`) in the Codex
`config.toml`. With none of these set, gstack uses `gpt-6-astra`; set any of
them to a model the account can use.
3. If Codex printed `[notice.model_migrations]`, use that replacement model.
Never present this as a model stall or a PASS — it is a fail-closed gate result.
- **`VERDICT: unavailable`:** the shared validator found the run did not execute (for
example `Codex's sandbox could not start here`). Relay its line and fix verbatim; it is
missing coverage, never a PASS. Details: `docs/troubleshooting.md` in the gstack checkout.
- **Empty response:** If `$TMPRESP` is empty or doesn't exist, tell the user:
"Codex returned no response. Check stderr for errors."
- **Session resume failure:** If resume fails, delete the session file and start fresh.
---
## Important Rules
- **Never modify files.** This skill is read-only. Codex runs in read-only sandbox mode
(full access only when the user exported `GSTACK_CODEX_NO_SANDBOX=1`; it warns on every use).
- **Present output verbatim.** Do not truncate, summarize, or editorialize Codex's output
before showing it. Show it in full inside the CODEX SAYS block.
- **Add synthesis after, not instead of.** Any Claude commentary comes after the full output.
- **Bash gate above the wrapper.** Every Bash call to codex sets its `timeout`
parameter ABOVE the inner `run-with-timeout` budget (Review:
`timeout: 360000` over the 330s wrapper; Challenge/Consult: `timeout: 600000`
over the 540s wrappers) so the wrapper fires first with a diagnosable exit 124.
- **No double-reviewing.** If the user already ran `/review`, Codex provides a second
independent opinion. Do not re-run Claude Code's own review.
- **Detect skill-file rabbit holes.** After receiving Codex output, scan for signs
that Codex got distracted by skill files: `gstack-config`, `gstack-update-check`,
`SKILL.md`, or `skills/gstack`. If any of these appear in the output, append a
warning: "Codex appears to have read gstack skill files instead of reviewing your
code. Consider retrying."