Files
gstack/lib/result-codes-eval.ts
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 4eff47c5cf v1.92.2.0 evals: no-gstack arms for the model panel, arm-benchmark, safety and routing evals (#3708)
* feat(eval-plan): results --check refuses a results table without its no-gstack rows

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(model-panel): a <model>#no-gstack arm per model, identity-keyed cells, one campaign, results.md (GST-468)

Each panel model also runs as <model>#no-gstack: the same fixture, ticket,
tools, limits, route and reservation, with no skill folder and no routing
line. The arm identity keys the ledger attempt, test name, row and summary;
candidate folders are named after the fixture project and the seed commit
has a neutral author. summarize reads one campaign (run id and PREREG.md
sha256) and refuses a duplicate cell; suggestionLine reads the skill arms
only, so the preregistered particle-1 line is unchanged. renderResults writes
results.md, which passes gstack-eval-plan results --check against the new
test/fixtures/model-panel/PREREG.md (supersedes GSTA-173 for later runs).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(arm-benchmark): no-gstack arm on a pinned model, 3 paired trials, both-order paired judge, spend ledger (GST-469)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(evals): no-gstack arm for the safety-rule and router evals (GST-470)

GSTACK_SAFETY_ARM and GSTACK_ROUTER_ARM take a third value, none: the same
fixture, tools and user request with no skill excerpt, rule text, step file
or installed skill. Under none every behavioral check is recorded as an
observation (none-arm-observations.jsonl) and never fails the case or writes
contract-violations.jsonl; harness preconditions still assert.

The four safety prompt builders (ship-evidence, codex-boundary,
codex-consult, design-risk) and the router fixtures move into helpers; the
rule, removed, current and before prompts stay byte-identical, proven
against reference copies of main's code. pair-agent and ios-demo refuse
none with the reason (NO_NONE_ARM). GSTACK_ROUTER_ARM now throws on an
unknown value instead of silently running current.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: changelog fragment for the no-gstack arms in existing evals

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(arm-benchmark): arm-pair paired-judge calibration run (bar met 6/6, $7.22)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(paid-shards): keep loop-named panel and arm-benchmark cases selectable by --case

The lanes moved each cell's testName into helpers, so the static detector no
longer saw a computed registration and B4 failed for all eight cases. Same
runtime test names; the paid runs are unaffected.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(tests): keep FREE_FIXTURES and the placeholder allowlist current for the no-gstack arms

scripts/judge-calibration.ts is now an arm-benchmark paid touchfile, so it can no
longer be a free consumer of test/fixtures/judge-calibration/** (CI free-suite 8).
The eval-plan Step 5 fence names <prereg-path> and <results-path>; allowlist both
as PATH placeholders (CI free-suite 19).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(eval-plan): cover a complete table after a partial one, --json output and the results usage error

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(eval-plan): keep the Step 7 coverage test as reviewed

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: name the changelog fragment after the branch slug

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: arm-benchmark project folder names and the arm-pair calibration corpus

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: keep the judge-calibration fixture README as reviewed

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(skills): describe eval-plan results --check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-31 22:41:36 +00:00

39 lines
2.7 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Result codes for the /eval-plan preregistration (bin/gstack-eval-plan prereg
* --check, the priced pilot's arm list). Kept beside lib/result-codes.ts, which
* spreads this table into RESULT_CODES; the same rules apply: one stable
* docs/troubleshooting.md anchor, a summary and a fix clause each. The
* no-gstack arm rule is documented in docs/TESTING_INTERNALS.md#no-gstack-arm.
*/
import type { ResultCode } from './result-codes';
export const EVAL_RESULT_CODES = {
PREREG_INCOMPLETE: {
anchor: 'prereg-incomplete',
summary: 'the preregistration file lacks a required section, a section is empty, or the Comparison or Diagnostics declaration is malformed',
fix: 'fill every section `gstack-eval-plan prereg --check` names (bars, arms, comparison, decoys, stop rules, held-out exposure) before any priced call',
},
// Field list 2 (2026-10-16), W8: preregistered diagnostics run before the freeze commit.
PREREG_DIAGNOSTIC_UNTESTED: {
anchor: 'prereg-diagnostic-untested',
summary: 'the declared summarizer, run on the declared synthetic fixture, did not report every preregistered diagnostic at its expected count',
fix: 'fix the summarizer or the declared definition (expected count, fixture) until every PREREG_DIAGNOSTIC line says ok, then commit the freeze; never freeze a diagnostic the summarizer has not counted',
},
// Garry, 2026-10-31: "all of our head to head tests have to test no gstack from here".
PREREG_NO_GSTACK_ARM: {
anchor: 'prereg-no-gstack-arm',
summary: 'the Comparison says stack: loaded and the No-gstack arm section is missing, lacks a key, or does not give every model its own <model>#no-gstack Arms line',
fix: 'add `## No-gstack arm` with arms:, inputs:, prompt:, panel: and report:, and list each <model>#no-gstack arm under Arms; when no arm loads a skill stack, say stack: none with a why: line',
},
EVAL_REPORT_NO_GSTACK_ROW: {
anchor: 'eval-report-no-gstack-row',
summary: 'the results file has no single table with a filled row for every arm the preregistration lists, so a no-gstack row is missing or not beside its variants',
fix: 'put one row per arm identity (each <model>#no-gstack beside its variants) in one markdown table of the results file, then rerun `gstack-eval-plan results --check`; publish no number before it says ok',
},
EVAL_ARM_DUPLICATE: {
anchor: 'eval-arm-duplicate',
summary: 'the pilot was given the same arm identity twice, so two arms would share one set of attempts',
fix: 'give each arm its own identity, <model> or <model>#<loadout> (for example claude-opus-5-5#no-gstack beside claude-opus-5-5); nothing was reserved',
},
} as const satisfies Record<string, ResultCode>;