mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-02 11:45:20 +02:00
1b64d492b9
Three new resolvers for the self-learning system: - LEARNINGS_SEARCH: tells skills to load prior learnings before analysis - LEARNINGS_LOG: tells skills to capture discoveries after completing work - CONFIDENCE_CALIBRATION: adds 1-10 confidence scoring to all review findings Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
97 lines
3.9 KiB
TypeScript
97 lines
3.9 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Learnings resolver — cross-skill institutional memory
|
|
*
|
|
* Learnings are stored per-project at ~/.gstack/projects/{slug}/learnings.jsonl.
|
|
* Each entry is a JSONL line with: ts, skill, type, key, insight, confidence,
|
|
* source, branch, commit, files[].
|
|
*
|
|
* Storage is append-only. Duplicates (same key+type) are resolved at read time
|
|
* by gstack-learnings-search ("latest winner" per key+type).
|
|
*
|
|
* Cross-project discovery is opt-in. The resolver asks the user once via
|
|
* AskUserQuestion and persists the preference via gstack-config.
|
|
*/
|
|
import type { TemplateContext } from './types';
|
|
|
|
export function generateLearningsSearch(ctx: TemplateContext): string {
|
|
if (ctx.host === 'codex') {
|
|
// Codex: simpler version, no cross-project, uses $GSTACK_BIN
|
|
return `## Prior Learnings
|
|
|
|
Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions on this project:
|
|
|
|
\`\`\`bash
|
|
$GSTACK_BIN/gstack-learnings-search --limit 10 2>/dev/null || true
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
If learnings are found, incorporate them into your analysis. When a review finding
|
|
matches a past learning, note it: "Prior learning applied: [key] (confidence N, from [date])"`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return `## Prior Learnings
|
|
|
|
Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions:
|
|
|
|
\`\`\`bash
|
|
_CROSS_PROJ=$(${ctx.paths.binDir}/gstack-config get cross_project_learnings 2>/dev/null || echo "unset")
|
|
echo "CROSS_PROJECT: $_CROSS_PROJ"
|
|
if [ "$_CROSS_PROJ" = "true" ]; then
|
|
${ctx.paths.binDir}/gstack-learnings-search --limit 10 --cross-project 2>/dev/null || true
|
|
else
|
|
${ctx.paths.binDir}/gstack-learnings-search --limit 10 2>/dev/null || true
|
|
fi
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
If \`CROSS_PROJECT\` is \`unset\` (first time): Use AskUserQuestion:
|
|
|
|
> gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find
|
|
> patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine).
|
|
> Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases
|
|
> where cross-contamination would be a concern.
|
|
|
|
Options:
|
|
- A) Enable cross-project learnings (recommended)
|
|
- B) Keep learnings project-scoped only
|
|
|
|
If A: run \`${ctx.paths.binDir}/gstack-config set cross_project_learnings true\`
|
|
If B: run \`${ctx.paths.binDir}/gstack-config set cross_project_learnings false\`
|
|
|
|
Then re-run the search with the appropriate flag.
|
|
|
|
If learnings are found, incorporate them into your analysis. When a review finding
|
|
matches a past learning, display:
|
|
|
|
**"Prior learning applied: [key] (confidence N/10, from [date])"**
|
|
|
|
This makes the compounding visible. The user should see that gstack is getting
|
|
smarter on their codebase over time.`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function generateLearningsLog(ctx: TemplateContext): string {
|
|
const binDir = ctx.host === 'codex' ? '$GSTACK_BIN' : ctx.paths.binDir;
|
|
|
|
return `## Capture Learnings
|
|
|
|
If you discovered a non-obvious pattern, pitfall, or architectural insight during
|
|
this session, log it for future sessions:
|
|
|
|
\`\`\`bash
|
|
${binDir}/gstack-learnings-log '{"skill":"${ctx.skillName}","type":"TYPE","key":"SHORT_KEY","insight":"DESCRIPTION","confidence":N,"source":"SOURCE","files":["path/to/relevant/file"]}'
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
|
|
**Types:** \`pattern\` (reusable approach), \`pitfall\` (what NOT to do), \`preference\`
|
|
(user stated), \`architecture\` (structural decision), \`tool\` (library/framework insight).
|
|
|
|
**Sources:** \`observed\` (you found this in the code), \`user-stated\` (user told you),
|
|
\`inferred\` (AI deduction), \`cross-model\` (both Claude and Codex agree).
|
|
|
|
**Confidence:** 1-10. Be honest. An observed pattern you verified in the code is 8-9.
|
|
An inference you're not sure about is 4-5. A user preference they explicitly stated is 10.
|
|
|
|
**files:** Include the specific file paths this learning references. This enables
|
|
staleness detection: if those files are later deleted, the learning can be flagged.
|
|
|
|
**Only log genuine discoveries.** Don't log obvious things. Don't log things the user
|
|
already knows. A good test: would this insight save time in a future session? If yes, log it.`;
|
|
}
|