Files
Garry Tan 5ca4ac48ab fix: plan-review right-sized diff counterbalance (not minimal-diff default)
/plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review listed "minimal diff" as an
engineering preference without counterbalancing language. Reviewers
picked up on that and rejected rewrites that should have been approved.

The preference is now framed as "right-sized diff" with explicit
permission to recommend a rewrite when the existing foundation is
broken. Implementation alternatives section in CEO review gets an
equal-weight clarification: don't default to minimal viable just
because it is smaller. Recommend whichever best serves the user's
goal; if the right answer is a rewrite, say so.

Three-line tone edit per template, no voice / ETHOS / YC / promotional
content change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-18 12:10:33 +08:00
..