Files
gstack/test/fixtures/workflow-required-steps.json
Garry Tanandcapy-ai[bot] 14d7414af3 v1.93.33.0 wave(review): #3705 #3744 #3745 #3764 #3765 #3795 (#3852)
* fix(ship): base merges, adjacent base edits, test-only and audit-requested fixes no longer force a second review loop (GST-407, GST-384, GST-391)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship driver: trim two phrases for headroom with #3662

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship driver: keep the Next steps heading phrase the handoff check reads; trim elsewhere

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: regenerate ship goldens

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes

comparePath returns same only when every hunk sits where the base change puts it (patch-ids ignore positions) and treats a file-mode change as changed; the scoped-review packet says when a fence is truncated; --docs-result must be the posted audit's result; the --context-reviewed record goes beside the packet, outside the worktree. Negative controls for each.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pass-2 review fixes

A test edit routes as tests= only when it adds lines with no gate tag; a removed or changed line or an unreadable test diff goes through the full loop. Diffs skip textconv. A hunkless patch (binary, empty, mode-only) is same when its patch-id matches. Without --reviewed-base test files route as before. finish's packet path and attempt's state directory have fallbacks.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: Step 11 review fixes; a version-only stamp_files edit after review is release metadata (GBRA-251)

gateEditedPaths reads removed lines only inside hunks; carry refuses when a path listing fails; docs freshness stops on a failed listing; attempt counts an unreadable state file. releasePaths includes stamp_files paths whose edit is a version swap under stamp_patterns.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: no test edit skips review; guard packet writes; exclusive attempt state

A test-only edit with no gate tag gets the scoped fix-check of its test hunks instead of a lanes-only rerun. Packet write failures print a STOP or RECEIPT_CARRY_REFUSED. attempt's allowance uses an exclusive create.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: attempt prints gstack's install command; carry checks the product diff outside context paths

The attempt STOP no longer echoes the audit child's fix text. A scoped-review carry now requires the product patch-id without the context paths to match at both heads.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: oversized packets take the full loop; exact --docs-requested match; name-only test globs only in test dirs

A scoped-review packet section over 200 lines sends that path to the full loop instead of a truncated packet. The docs-result path match is exact. test_*.py, *Test.java and similar count as test code only under a test directory.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(unattended): carry's scoped-review refusal and what it keeps

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: carry's scoped-review route in ship-policy, review-policy and troubleshooting (docs-a-1)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(windows): curate ship-rereview-triggers out of the Windows lane like ship-release (run 41193336209)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review-log): record a notes-only /ship pass clean; name the cause and repair when a pass's tree moved (GST-430)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(receipt): carry and write handle PRs with thousands of files; tree receipt fails closed on a failed diff (GST-448)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): preflight routes RECEIPT_CARRY_SCOPED_REVIEW to the scoped review; carry --dry-run writes no packet (GST-442)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(ship): Step 1.4 and Step 16 route the scoped-review refusal and the --docs-requested fix; trims keep the cap (GST-442, GST-444)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: /ship review pass 1: notes-only floor, scoped carry order, named temp and diff refusals

- A notes-only pass is recorded clean only when every finding is fixed, or noted or deferred below the
  blocking floor (never CRITICAL or blocking), by its logger-stamped action, and the findings account
  for the claimed issue and critical counts (GST-430).
- The preflight scoped carry route commits and pushes the base-merge fix before writing the packet (GST-442).
- patchId refuses by name on an unwritable TMPDIR; the tree receipt names why its diff failed (GST-448).
- Step 16 stage 3 spells out --docs-requested with its --docs-result (GST-444).

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: pin the Step 16 --docs-requested route with its --docs-result

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: a claimed clean review row with a logger-stamped open gate finding reads UNVERIFIED (red-team, pass 1)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: Step 11 findings: gate rows from --findings are stamped, one open rule, stale patch-id dirs swept

- deriveFromFindings stamps gate rows with the session kind before deriving status, so a findings file cannot
  dispose of a gate finding the unattended logger forces open (outside-voice#1).
- reviewFreshness reads a claimed row's findings with isOpenByAction, the rule the notes-only rewrite uses;
  noted and deferred clear a finding only when it is marked blocking: false and is not CRITICAL.
- patchId sweeps gstack-patch-id-* directories over an hour old that a killed carry left in TMPDIR.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: Step 11 round 2: stamped-open gates win over status and disposition; resolved gate, skipped and below-floor actions stay CURRENT

- isOpenFinding treats action 'open' (the logger's forced-open stamp) as open before a row's status or disposition.
- reviewFreshness flags a claimed clean row only for an 'open' action or a CRITICAL or blocking deferral or note, so
  interactive kept and restored gates, skipped advisories and INFORMATIONAL deferrals read CURRENT as before.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: carry dry run offers the scoped route last; patch-id diff under the git dir; changelog matches the review-log floor

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: a claimed clean review row with any unresolved non-gate CRITICAL finding reads UNVERIFIED (pass 2 red-team)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: carry dry-run scoped route, patch-id directory, tree-receipt refusal (docs-d-1 audit)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): Step 3 names merge conflicts in its STOP sentence again (ship-workflow-clarity pin)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(tree-receipt): keep the gated-to-current diff at the file helper timeout (60 s); pregate literals check

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(carry): large-diff fixture sets core.longpaths so Git for Windows can add its long receipt paths (windows-free-shard 1, run 41210080055)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): a stale local base branch yields to its origin twin in gate-diff and diff-scope (GST-462)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(ship): Step 11 saves the targeted record and the receipt writes carry it; Step 9 clears it (GST-464)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: GST-464 and GST-462

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(review): pass 1: ahead and diverged labels, diff-scope needs shared history; preflight refreshes origin/<base> and stops on a diff far beyond the PR (GST-462, HARN-15)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pass-2 review fixes for base twin, prSized stop and targeted record

Resolve the tracking twin by refs/remotes/<remote>/<ref> and only for a bare
branch name, keep a local base that is ahead or diverged, quote the prSized
stop's base and name the fork case, and have every Step 9 entry create,
exclude and clear .gstack/tmp/targeted.json.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: origin's tracking base wins whenever related; prSized lower bound

The fix-check found that keeping a local base ahead of origin left unpushed
base commits out of the gate scan while review-plan listed them. The tracking
branch now wins whenever it shares history with HEAD, an explicit origin/main
reads refs/remotes/origin/main, the preflight also stops when the diff lists
fewer files than the PR, and the Step 9 exclude line survives a missing
.git/info and an exclude file without a final newline.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: the tracking-ref claim holds while the tracking branch exists

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: repin the two ship section briefs under no-loss replay GST-464

GST-464 brief-identity check: every reviewer brief lib/review-brief.ts cuts
from ship/sections/review-army.md and adversarial.md stays byte-identical to
the bodies the L and GST-257 replays admitted; only lead instructions outside
the cut spans changed. The check is a test CI runs.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: keep Step 9's PASS_HEAD sentence whole; repin review-army under GST-464

The targeted-record line follows the PASS_HEAD/RANGE_BASE sentence instead of
splitting it (test/review-fix-range.test.ts pins that sentence). The brief-body
check still holds: every reviewer brief is byte-identical.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: restore bin/gstack-ship-receipt after the main merge

The merge commit b10e2db wrote a truncated copy of the file. This is the
three-way merge of both sides with the refused() union: main's codes plus
RECEIPT_CARRY_SCOPED_REVIEW.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: narrow the consumer scan and give it one 300 s deadline (GST-544)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: keep the consumer scan deadline under the 180 s plan timeout (review fix)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: plain paths under --literal-pathspecs; whole-millisecond timeout override (review fix)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: whole-tree grep for non-UTF-8 names, no argument spread, name spawn errors (review fix)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: cap the consumer grep output at 256 MB across calls; per-scan deadline wording (review fix, cycle 4)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-collect: read a missing spawn status as null (Bun 1.4.2 returns undefined on ENOENT)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: review-collect whole-tree helper reads a null status as -1 (typecheck:test ratchet)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-bots: /review and /ship triage every configured review bot, not only Greptile (#3122)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (gh before 2.48 pages without --slurp; driver routes Step 10; tests for guards, review-bot fence, REMOTE_SLUG owner)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: drop the review-bot fence test that could not fail (the tool-fence WARN degrade is unreachable: placeholder spans are skipped first)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: Step 11 review fixes (record by comment id so a filename never reaches a shell; lookup failures are errors; tojson pages; longest bot prefix wins)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pass-2 review fixes (record refuses * paths, colliding ids and a missing fetch dir; parent requires id and dir; botOwning doc)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review: classify the PR type and always check repo conventions (#356)

The checklist now opens with a PR-type line (application, CI/infra,
scripts/tooling, docs-only or mixed). Application and mixed diffs run
every category; other types always run five categories, including the
new Repo Conventions & Platform Fit, and report the rest as not
applicable in one line instead of skipping silently.

No-loss replay: GSTA-224 H1 preregistered no-loss run (run id
gsta224-h1-20261031, Opus 5.5, 81 calls, $9.53) against main's checklist
with a no-gstack arm; every preregistered bar passed. The
review/checklist.md pin in test/review-packets-removed.test.ts moves to
a32963ef with replay 'GSTA-224 H1'.

Refs GSTA-224

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review-bots: allowlist the record placeholders and match Step 10's id rule in tests

The record fence uses <comment-id>, <fix|fp|already-fixed> and <category>,
each with an enum or numeric grammar; <greptile-dir> becomes <bot-dir>.
review/greptile-triage.md also lists every REVIEW_BOTS skip reason.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: review-bot triage covers every configured bot (#3122)

README, CONTRIBUTING, the contributor reference and standalone-binaries
name gstack-review-bots and the review-bot fence; TODOS drops the #3122
item; the changelog fragment covers record-by-id and lookup errors.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: the PR-type test also pins the compose, Terraform and README/CHANGELOG phrases

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: follow the review-bot rename in the remote free tier's three reds

The cross-skill consistency judge describes review-bot-history.md and its
record helper; the tracker-guard exemption for the removed raw Greptile
fetch in review/greptile-triage.md is dropped (the fetch now lives in
gstack-review-bots, whose bodies still reach context only through
gstack-issue-guard); the Step 10 PR-check test expects 'Review bots: not
run'. HARNESS_VERSION stays 6: skill-fixture.ts and llm-judge.ts are
recorded non-behavioral for every other case.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: keep the cross-skill judge's rubric to one renamed bullet

Name review-bot-history.md beside the older greptile-history.md so the
calibration corpus still matches, and keep the REMOTE_SLUG bullet. One
live 3-sample panel at this tree: consistent 3/3, scores 4/4/4.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: H1 fragment passes prose lint

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: name the H1 fragment after its branch; TODOS drops #356

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: /review's PR type step in docs/skills.md (#356)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship-policy: review_exclude_paths key and loadPolicyAt (GST-508)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* review: apply the base policy's review_exclude_paths and the reviewer diff ceiling (GST-508)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* receipt: bind review_exclude in write, carry and the queue (GST-508)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs, tests and changelog for review_exclude_paths (GST-508)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: pre-landing review fixes (binary by bytes, links kept, untracked files out of the selection)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: keep binary files at code paths under review_exclude_paths

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: name the reasons that keep a binary file under review_exclude_paths

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: keep every review_exclude_paths candidate when the gate scan is unknown; docs example names its version

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: keep the NUL fixture clear of the sync-spawn tripwire

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: split the ceiling sentence

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: keep a live binary file whose bytes cannot be read; tests render outside voices from a clean checkout and read the ship fixture text

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test(review-exclude): explicit +x for the census script; skip the chmod-000 read case on Windows and root

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor: move loadPolicyAt to lib/ship-policy-at.ts so lib/ship-policy.ts stays under the 800-line module cap

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: refuse a base that contains HEAD; skip a self-pointing origin/HEAD (GST-774)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: regenerate gstack-doctor-components.sh for BASE_CONTAINS_HEAD

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: land resumes a merged merge-only PR instead of refusing BASE_CONTAINS_HEAD (GST-774 review)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: changelog fragment for GST-774

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: troubleshooting names diff-scope base_contains_head and the self-pointing no_base case (GST-774 docs audit)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: repin the reviewer briefs to GST-508's no-loss-tested bytes

ship/sections/review-army.md, ship/sections/adversarial.md and lib/review-depth.ts now pin
the bytes the GST-508 preregistered no-loss replay ran at ef2760f (handoffs/GSTA-202/noloss-results.md
in the GStack Minder drive): Arm V 33/41 vs R 33/41, delta 4, exact sign flip, p_NI 0.0279 (pass).
The merge of main 83ae96e leaves these three files byte-identical to ef2760f, and an Arm P unit
(3593) renders byte-identical briefs at ef2760f and at the merge.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: GST-774 review round 1 — merged resume depth, aliased and detached PR checkouts, develop/trunk defaults

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* ship: Step 20 says a metrics row, keeping DRIVER.md at 12 KB after the main merge

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* test: ship-parts resend case leaves room for the first phase-3 part after the Step 9 targeted-record sentence

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: /ship delivers review/checklist.md in two parts so checklist v1 fits the 24576-byte part cap (#3670)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* changelog: drop the GST-407 and GST-430 fragments, already released on main (stacked history)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* wave review-53cfb5bfe011: lib/ship-policy.ts back to 800 lines (module-size ratchet after merging #3744 and #3795)

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* wave review-53cfb5bfe011: /ship pass 1 fixes

- lib/ship-receipt-depth.ts: a merged resume (land after a true merge) no longer recomputes the review_exclude digest over the emptied range, so it lands instead of RECEIPT_INVALID (failing-first land test with review_exclude_paths active).
- bin/gstack-review-dispatch render: a standalone targeted render under an active review_exclude_paths refuses and points at the pass manifest voices stage, instead of writing a brief with no selection that leaves verify dirty (failing-first test).
- test/default-base.test.ts: #3795 expectations follow main R51 depth (light for an 80-line code diff; runtime_lines=80 still proves the real base).
- test/review-dispatch.test.ts: the GST-897 fingerprint test renders from the clean checkout, like its neighbor, because CI rebuilds the tracked lib/diagram-render/dist/diagram-render.html and the reviewer diff ceiling refused the ROOT render.

* wave review-53cfb5bfe011: /ship pass 2 fixes

- lib/review-exclude.ts: binaryContent reads each blob's first 8,000 bytes (git cat-file blob, 8 KB buffer) instead of one --batch read capped at 256 MB, so head mode (receipt, carry, queue) and the plan agree past 256 MB of blobs; an unreadable blob is kept, as in live mode. Failing-first test with two 270 MB blobs.
- lib/review-bots.ts: a file-level bot review comment (subject_type file, no line position) is triaged instead of read as outdated. Failing-first test.
- test/ship-queue-land.test.ts: the merged-resume exclusion test runs its gate scan under the fixture state root, not the real home (CI free-suite 6 home containment).

* fix: merge follow-ups for main 3d99c22: origin/* stays qualified in diff-scope's twin step, retro skeleton back under its cap, combined no-loss pin GST-508+R51+GST-911

* fix(review): receipt write gate-scans whenever the base declares review_exclude_paths; collectLive never re-qualifies origin/<base> (#3852 /ship red-team#1, outside-voice#1)

* test: the docs-only receipt digest test keeps its gate scan out of the real home (free-suite shard 5 FREE_SUBSHARD_REJECTED)

* fix(merge fc292e22f): tentative REVIEW_EXCLUDE_KEY_VERSION, classify targeted.json, render main's new outside-voice test from a clean checkout

- lib/ship-policy.ts: REVIEW_EXCLUDE_KEY_VERSION 1.93.0.0 -> 1.94.0.0, the next-minor tentative form stamp_paths moves (docs/ship-policy.md, #3512); 1.93.0.0 is a released heading that never names the key.
- test/gstack-clean-producers.test.ts (new from main): KEPT gains targeted.json, the wave's --review-targeted input.
- test/review-dispatch.test.ts: main's wrong-tree test rendered the outside voice from ROOT; a CI build that dirties ROOT pushes that diff past the wave's REVIEW_DIFF_MAX_BYTES ceiling, so render refused and verify saw no brief (exit 3). It now runs in cleanCheckout like the wave's other outside-voice tests.

* test(merge 68410828f): GST-967's brief-body pin carries the wave's GST-508 placeholders

The merged sectionTexts differ from main's by exactly the wave's GST-508 exclude-pathspec lines (merged minus main equals wave minus fc292e22f); the 1,440-case plan grid still hashes to main's MAIN_PLANS. Checks: GStack Minder drive handoffs/GSTA-202/merge-6841-checks.md.

* fix(merge e85005482): targeted classes since the read accept an empty range; the wave's receipt tests pass main's targeted record

- lib/ship-receipt-depth.ts targetedClassesSince (main, GST-986) reads the range from the commit the targeted reader read to HEAD through headInputs, which since #3795 runs gstack-diff-scope's BASE_CONTAINS_HEAD check. When the reader read HEAD itself the range is empty, diff-scope reported base_contains_head, and every write with --review-targeted was refused (the product patch matched). It now passes merged=true (--merged), which skips only that check; an ancestor check already guards the range.
- test/review-exclude.test.ts and test/review-targeted.test.ts: since #3887 write refuses a money head with no targeted record and requires the record's head, so the wave's two writes that must succeed pass one, as main's own tests do (targetedAtHead in test/ship-receipt-depth.test.ts).

* test(merge e85005482): drop the wave's duplicate targeted.json KEPT entry

Main (#3887) classified .gstack/tmp/targeted.json in KEPT too; the auto-merge kept both keys, which typecheck:test rejects (TS1117). Main's entry stays.

* test(merge e85005482): ship size ledger entry for the merged tree (-232 B)

Main's ship size ledger plus the wave's entries summed to 345,334 B; the merged tree measures 345,102 B because DRIVER.md takes main's shorter Step 19 line. Recorded with scripts/size-ledger.ts record ship.

---------

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-03 01:40:07 +00:00

221 lines
8.2 KiB
JSON

{
"source": "Step and phase headings of the judged workflow skills, derived on 2026-10-04 from the generated Claude SKILL.md and sections (templates at the integration head). qa-only lists its template's own top-level headings. C1 calibration showed the workflow judges pass a bundle with a required step removed, so missing-step coverage lives here.",
"skills": {
"qa": {
"SKILL.md": [
"## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch",
"## Phases 1-6: QA Baseline",
"## Phase 7: Triage",
"## Phase 8: Fix Loop",
"### 8a. Diagnose and reproduce",
"### 8a.5. Regression test before repair",
"### 8b. Fix",
"### 8c. Re-test",
"### 8d. Commit verified work",
"### 8e. Classify",
"### 8e.5. Regression Test record",
"### 8f. Self-Regulation (STOP AND EVALUATE)",
"## Phase 9: Final QA",
"## Phase 10: Report",
"## Phase 11: TODOS.md Update"
],
"sections/exploratory.md": [
"## 1. Charter and preflight",
"## 2. Probe loop",
"## 3. Parent handoff",
"## 4. Final report"
],
"sections/qa-patterns.md": [
"### Phase 1: Initialize",
"### Phase 2: Authenticate (if needed)",
"### Phase 3: Orient",
"### Phase 4: Explore",
"### Phase 5: Document",
"### Phase 6: Wrap Up"
]
},
"qa-only": {
"SKILL.md": [
"## Request Parameters",
"## Test Plan Context",
"## Select Surfaces and Isolation",
"## Prepare Report Artifacts",
"## Browser Setup (conditional)",
"## Run the Selected Checks",
"## Output",
"## Additional Rules (qa-only specific)"
],
"sections/exploratory.md": [
"## 0. Preparation gate",
"## 1. Charter and preflight",
"## 2. Probe loop",
"## 3. Parent handoff",
"## 4. Final report"
],
"sections/reporting.md": [
"## 1. Establish each finding once",
"## 2. Fill timing fields from their actual boundaries",
"## 3. Assemble and check every repetition before writing",
"## 4. Capture permitted notes, then write the report"
]
},
"review": {
"SKILL.md": [
"## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch",
"## Step 1: Check branch",
"## Step 1.5: Scope Drift Detection",
"## Step 2: Read the checklist",
"## Step 2.5: Check for review bot comments",
"## Step 3: Get the diff",
"## Step 3.4: Workspace-aware queue status (advisory)",
"## Step 3.5: Diff scans",
"## Step 3.6: Gather review context",
"## Step 4: Critical pass (core review)",
"### Step 4.7: Exploratory QA (before Fix-First)",
"## Step 5: Fix-First Review",
"### Step 5.0: Cross-review finding dedup",
"### Step 5a: Classify each finding",
"### Step 5b: Auto-fix all AUTO-FIX items",
"### Step 5c: Batch-ask about ASK items",
"### Step 5d: Apply user-approved fixes",
"## Step 5.8: Persist Eng Review result",
"### 1. Re-review after edits",
"### 2. Fill the record"
],
"sections/adversarial.md": [
"## Step 4.8: Adversarial review (always-on)"
],
"sections/review-army.md": [
"## Step 4.5: Review Army — Specialist Dispatch",
"### Step 4.6: Collect and merge findings",
"#### 1. Parse outputs",
"#### 2. Validate severity",
"#### 3. Identify and merge",
"#### 4. Lead judgment",
"#### 5. Apply specialist confidence gates",
"#### 6. Score and present specialists",
"#### 7. Save specialist activity",
"#### 8. Hand off to Fix-First"
]
},
"ship": {
"SKILL.md": [
"## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch",
"## Step 0.9: Apple target detection",
"## Step 1: Pre-flight",
"## Step 2: Distribution Pipeline Check",
"## Step 3: Merge the base branch (BEFORE tests)",
"## Step 11.5: Bind the reviews",
"## Step 12: Version bump (auto-decide)",
"## Step 14: TODOS.md (auto-update)",
"## Step 14.5: Documentation audit (every ship)",
"## Step 15: Commit (bisectable chunks)",
"## Step 16: Verification Gate",
"### 1. Finish writers and prepare outputs",
"### 2. Choose the change route",
"### 3. Resolve documentation freshness",
"### 4. Verify the frozen candidate",
"### 5. Report, then push",
"## Step 17: Push",
"## Step 18: Prepare publication metadata",
"## Step 20: Persist ship metrics",
"## Step 21: Plan-tune discoverability nudge (first-successful-ship only)",
"## Step 22: Terminal line (every run)"
],
"sections/adversarial.md": [
"## Step 11: Adversarial review"
],
"sections/changelog.md": [
"## Step 13: CHANGELOG (auto-generate)"
],
"sections/greptile-early.md": [
"## Step 6.5: Early Greptile PR (after the free tests pass)"
],
"sections/greptile.md": [
"## Step 10: Address review bot comments (if PR exists)"
],
"sections/plan-completion.md": [
"## Step 8: Plan Completion Audit",
"## Step 8.1: Plan Verification",
"## Step 8.2: Scope Drift Detection"
],
"sections/pr-body.md": [
"## Step 19: Create PR/MR"
],
"sections/review-army.md": [
"## Step 9: Pre-Landing Review",
"## Step 9.1: Review Army — Specialist Dispatch",
"### Step 9.2: Collect and merge findings",
"#### 1. Parse outputs",
"#### 2. Validate severity",
"#### 3. Identify and merge",
"#### 4. Lead judgment",
"#### 5. Apply specialist confidence gates",
"#### 6. Score and present specialists",
"#### 7. Save specialist activity",
"#### 8. Hand off to Fix-First",
"### Step 9.2.1: Exploratory QA (before Fix-First)",
"### Step 9.3: Cross-review finding dedup",
"## Step 9.4: Fix-First and persistence"
],
"sections/test-coverage.md": [
"## Step 7: Test Coverage Audit"
],
"sections/tests.md": [
"## Step 4: Test Framework Bootstrap",
"## Step 5: Run tests (on merged code)",
"## Step 6: Eval Suites (conditional)"
]
},
"plan-ceo-review": {
"SKILL.md": [
"## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch",
"## Step 0: Nuclear Scope Challenge + Mode Selection",
"### 0A. Premise Challenge",
"### 0B. Existing Code Leverage",
"### 0C. Dream State Mapping",
"### 0D. Alternatives (reusable decision procedure)",
"### 0E. Mode Selection",
"### 0F. Expansion Framing (shared by EXPANSION and SELECTIVE EXPANSION)",
"### 0G. Mode-Specific Analysis",
"### 0H. Persist CEO Plan (EXPANSION and SELECTIVE EXPANSION only)",
"### 0I. Temporal Interrogation (EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, and HOLD modes)"
],
"sections/review-sections.md": [
"### Section 1: Architecture Review",
"### Section 2: Error & Rescue Map",
"### Section 3: Security & Threat Model",
"### Section 4: Data Flow & Interaction Edge Cases",
"### Section 5: Code Quality Review",
"### Section 6: Test Review",
"### Section 7: Performance Review",
"### Section 8: Observability & Debuggability Review",
"### Section 9: Deployment & Rollout Review",
"### Section 10: Long-Term Trajectory Review",
"### Section 11: Design & UX Review (skip if no UI scope detected)"
]
},
"plan-eng-review": {
"SKILL.md": [
"### Step 0: Scope Challenge"
],
"sections/review-sections.md": [
"### 1. Architecture review",
"### 2. Code quality review",
"### 3. Test review",
"### 4. Performance review"
]
},
"setup-deploy": {
"SKILL.md": [
"### Step 1: Check existing configuration",
"### Step 2: Detect platform",
"### Step 3: Platform-specific setup",
"### Step 4: Write configuration",
"### Step 5: Verify",
"### Step 6: Summary"
]
}
}
}