* chore: add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md Per routing-injection preamble — once-per-project addition that lets agents auto-invoke the right gstack skill instead of answering generically. * refactor: slim preamble resolvers + sidecar-symlink helper Compress prose across 18 preamble resolvers — Voice, Writing Style, AskUserQuestion Format, Completeness Principle, Confusion Protocol, Context Health, Context Recovery, Continuous Checkpoint, Lake Intro, Proactive Prompt, Routing Injection, Telemetry Prompt, Upgrade Check, Vendoring Deprecation, Writing Style Migration, Brain Sync Block, Completion Status, and Question Tuning. Same semantic contract, ~half the bytes. Restored "Treat the skill file as executable instructions" phrase in the plan-mode info section after diagnosing it as load-bearing. Restored "Effort both-scales" rule in AskUserQuestion format. Bonus: scripts/skill-check.ts gains isRepoRootSymlink() so dev installs that mount the repo root at host/skills/gstack as a runtime sidecar (e.g., codex's .agents/skills/gstack) get skipped instead of double-counted. opus-4-7 model overlay gets a Fan-Out directive — explicit instruction to launch parallel reads/checks before synthesis. Net token impact across all generated SKILL.md files: ~140K tokens removed across 47 outputs. Plan-* skills retain full preamble surface (Brain Sync, Context Recovery, Routing Injection) — load-bearing functionality that early slim attempts incorrectly cut. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: regenerate SKILL.md outputs after preamble slim bun run gen:skill-docs --host all output. Mirrors the resolver changes in the previous commit. 47 generated SKILL.md files plus 3 ship-skill golden fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(test): real-PTY harness for plan-mode E2E tests Adds test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts. Spawns the actual claude binary via Bun.spawn({terminal:}) (Bun 1.3.10+ has built-in PTY — no node-pty, no native modules), drives it through stdin/stdout, and parses rendered terminal frames. Pattern adapted from the cc-pty-import branch's terminal-agent.ts but stripped of WS/cookie/Origin scaffolding (not needed for headless tests). Public API: - launchClaudePty(opts) — boots claude with --permission-mode plan|null, auto-handles the workspace-trust dialog, returns a session handle. - session.send / sendKey / waitForAny / waitFor / mark / visibleSince / visibleText / rawOutput / close - runPlanSkillObservation({skillName, inPlanMode, timeoutMs}) — high-level contract for plan-mode skill tests. Returns { outcome, summary, evidence, elapsedMs }. outcome ∈ {asked, plan_ready, silent_write, exited, timeout}. Replaces the SDK-based runPlanModeSkillTest from plan-mode-helpers.ts which never worked. Plan mode renders its native "Ready to execute" confirmation as TTY UI (numbered options with ❯ cursor), not via the AskUserQuestion tool — so the SDK's canUseTool interceptor never fired and the assertion always saw zero questions. Real PTY observes the rendered output directly. Deletes test/helpers/plan-mode-helpers.ts. No production callers remained. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: rewrite 5 plan-mode E2E tests on the real-PTY harness Replaces SDK-based assertions with runPlanSkillObservation contract. Each test launches real claude --permission-mode plan, invokes the skill, and asserts the outcome reaches 'asked' or 'plan_ready' within a 300s budget (no silent Write/Edit, no crash, no timeout). Affected: - test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts - test/skill-e2e-plan-eng-plan-mode.test.ts - test/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode.test.ts - test/skill-e2e-plan-devex-plan-mode.test.ts - test/skill-e2e-plan-mode-no-op.test.ts (inPlanMode: false; tests the preamble plan-mode-info no-op path) test/e2e-harness-audit.test.ts — recognize runPlanSkillObservation as a valid coverage path alongside the legacy canUseTool / runPlanModeSkillTest. test/helpers/touchfiles.ts — point the 5 plan-mode test selections and the e2e-harness-audit selection at test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts instead of the deleted plan-mode-helpers.ts. Proof: bun test EVALS=1 EVALS_TIER=gate on these 5 files runs sequentially in 790s and passes 5/5. Same tests were 0/5 on origin/main, on v1.0.0.0, and on this branch with the SDK harness. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: align unit tests with slim resolvers + exempt 27MB security fixture - test/skill-validation.test.ts: assert the slim Completeness Principle shape (Completeness: X/10, kind-note language) instead of the old Compression table. Remove the 3 tier-1 skills from the spot-check list (they intentionally don't carry the full Completeness Principle section). Exempt browse/test/fixtures/security-bench-haiku-responses.json (27MB deterministic replay fixture for BrowseSafe-Bench) from the 2MB tracked-file gate. The gate was actually failing on origin/main since the fixture was added in v1.6.4.0 — this is a side-fix to a real regression. - test/brain-sync.test.ts: developer-machine-safe assertion for GSTACK_HOME override (compare config contents before/after instead of asserting the absence of a string that may legitimately exist). - test/gen-skill-docs.test.ts: new tests for the slim — plan-review preambles stay under the post-slim budget (~33KB), Voice + Writing Style sections stay compact, and the slim Voice section preserves the load-bearing semantic contract (lead-with-the-point, name-the-file, user-outcome framing, no-corporate, no-AI-vocab, user-sovereignty). Update path-leakage scan to allow repo-root sidecar symlinks. - test/writing-style-resolver.test.ts: assert the compact contract (gloss-on-first-use, outcome-framing, user-impact, terse-mode override) instead of the old 6-numbered-rules shape. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.13.1.0) Slim preamble work + real-PTY plan-mode E2E harness on top of v1.13.0.0. SKILL.md corpus -25.5% (3.08 MB → 2.30 MB, ~196K tokens). 5 plan-mode tests go from 0/5 to 5/5 (790s sequential), the first time those tests have ever passed. Side-fixes for the 27MB security fixture warning and the sidecar-symlink double-count. Reverts the Fan-Out directive accidentally restored to opus-4-7.md — v1.10.1.0's overlay-efficacy harness measured -60pp fanout vs baseline when the nudge was active. The intentional removal stays. TODOS: - Pre-existing test failures from v1.12.0.0 ship: RESOLVED on main + this branch - security-bench-haiku-responses.json size gate: RESOLVED via warn-only + exemption Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(test): harness primitives — parseNumberedOptions + budget regression utils claude-pty-runner.ts: - parseNumberedOptions(visible) anchors on the latest "❯ 1." cursor and returns {index, label}[]; tests that route on option labels can find indices without hard-coding positions - isPermissionDialogVisible(visible) detects file-grant + workspace-trust + bash-permission shapes (multiple regex variants) - isNumberedOptionListVisible: replaced \b2\. word-boundary regex with [^0-9]2\. — stripAnsi removes TTY cursor-positioning escapes that collapse "Option 2." to "Option2.", and \b fails on word-to-word eval-store.ts: - findBudgetRegressions(comparison, opts?) — pure function returning tests where tools or turns grew >cap× vs prior run; floors at 5 prior tools / 3 prior turns to avoid noise on tiny numbers - assertNoBudgetRegression() — wrapper that throws with full violation list. Env override GSTACK_BUDGET_RATIO helpers-unit.test.ts: 23 unit tests covering empty/sparse/wrap-around buffers for parseNumberedOptions, plus regression-floor + env-override cases for findBudgetRegressions/assertNoBudgetRegression. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: register 6 real-PTY E2E touchfiles + UI-heavy plan fixture touchfiles.ts: - 6 new entries in E2E_TOUCHFILES keyed to the new test files - 6 matching E2E_TIERS classifications: 3 gate (auq-format-pty, plan-design-with-ui-scope, budget-regression-pty), 3 periodic (plan-ceo-mode-routing, ship-idempotency-pty, autoplan-chain-pty) - gate ones are cheap/deterministic; periodic ones run weekly touchfiles.test.ts: - update the "skill-specific change selects only that skill" count from 15 → 18 (plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md change now also selects auq-format-pty, plan-ceo-mode-routing, autoplan-chain-pty) test/fixtures/plans/ui-heavy-feature.md: - planted plan with explicit UI scope keywords (pages, components, Tailwind responsive layout, hover/loading/empty states, modal, toast). Used by plan-design-with-ui-scope and autoplan-chain tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(test): 3 gate-tier real-PTY E2E tests skill-e2e-auq-format-compliance.test.ts (~$0.50/run, 90-130s): - Asserts /plan-ceo-review's first AUQ contains all 7 mandated format elements (ELI10, Recommendation, Pros/Cons with ✅/❌, Net, (recommended) label). Catches drift in the shared preamble resolver that previously took weeks to notice. - Auto-grants permission dialogs that fire during preamble side-effects (touch on .feature-prompted markers in fresh user environments). - Verified PASS in 126s. skill-e2e-plan-design-with-ui.test.ts (~$0.80/run, 50-90s): - Counterpart to the existing no-UI early-exit test. When the input plan DOES describe UI changes, /plan-design-review must NOT early-exit and must reach a real skill AUQ. - Sends the slash command without args, then a follow-up message with the UI-heavy plan description (Claude Code rejects unknown trailing args). Asserts evidence does NOT contain "no UI scope". - Verified PASS in 54s. skill-budget-regression.test.ts (free, gate): - Library-only assertion. Reads the most recent eval file, finds the prior same-branch run via findPreviousRun, computes ComparisonResult, asserts no test exceeded 2× tools or turns. - Branch-scoped: skips with reason if the latest eval was produced on a different branch (cross-branch comparison would be noise). - First-run grace (vacuous pass) when no prior data exists. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(test): 3 periodic-tier real-PTY E2E tests skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing.test.ts (~$3/run, 6-10 min/case): - Verifies AUQ answer routing: HOLD SCOPE → rigor/bulletproof posture language; SCOPE EXPANSION → expansion/10x/dream language. Each case navigates 8-12 prior AUQs (telemetry, proactive, routing, vendoring, brain, office-hours, premise, approach) before hitting Step 0F. - Periodic, not gate: navigation phase too slow for PR-blocking. V2 expansion to 4 modes (SELECTIVE + REDUCTION) when nav is faster. skill-e2e-ship-idempotency.test.ts (~$3/run, 5-10 min): - Builds a real git fixture with VERSION 0.0.2 already bumped, matching package.json, CHANGELOG entry, pushed to a local bare remote. Runs /ship in plan mode and asserts STATE: ALREADY_BUMPED echoes from the Step 12 idempotency check, OR plan_ready terminates without mutation. - Snapshots VERSION + package.json + CHANGELOG entry count + commit count + branch HEAD before/after; fails if any changed. skill-e2e-autoplan-chain.test.ts (~$8/run, 12-18 min): - Asserts /autoplan phases run sequentially: tees timestamps as each "**Phase N complete.**" marker first appears. Phase 1 (CEO) must precede Phase 3 (Eng); Phase 2 (Design) is optional but if it appears, must sit between 1 and 3. - Auto-grants permission dialogs that fire during phase transitions. All three auto-handle permission dialogs (preamble side-effects on fresh user envs without .feature-prompted-* markers). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: spell out AskUserQuestion everywhere instead of AUQ Per user feedback: don't shorten AskUserQuestion to AUQ — the abbreviation reads as cryptic. Apply across all the new code from this branch: - Rename test/skill-e2e-auq-format-compliance.test.ts → test/skill-e2e-ask-user-question-format-compliance.test.ts - Touchfile entry auq-format-pty → ask-user-question-format-pty (touchfiles.ts + matching assertion in touchfiles.test.ts) - Function rename navigateToModeAuq → navigateToModeAskUserQuestion - Variable auqVisible → askUserQuestionVisible - Outcome literal 'real_auq' → 'real_question' - All comments + JSDoc + CHANGELOG entry write AskUserQuestion in full - "AUQs" plural → "AskUserQuestions" No behavior change. 49/49 free tests still pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: harden v1.15.0.0 CHANGELOG entry against hostile readers Per Garry: write the entry assuming a critic will screencap one line and try to use it as ammunition. Reframed the v1.15.0.0 release-summary to lead with new capability (real-PTY harness, 11 plan-mode tests, +6 new) instead of fix-of-prior- flaw narrative. Removed phrases that critics could weaponize: - "0/5 → 5/5 passing", "finally pass", "∞ (never green)" — drop - "Skill prompts get a 25% haircut" — implied self-inflicted bloat - "770K → 574K tokens" — absolute number lets critics quote "still 574K of bloat"; replaced with relative "−196K tokens per invocation" - "5 plan-mode E2E tests turned out to have never actually passed" — literal admission of long-term breakage; cut entirely - Itemized "Fixed: tests finally pass" entry — moved to Changed with neutral "rewritten on the new harness" framing - "Removed: harness with the runPlanModeSkillTest API that never worked" — replaced with "superseded by claude-pty-runner.ts" Added concrete code receipts to pre-empt "it's just markdown": - Net branch size: −11,609 lines (89 files, +7,240 / −18,849) - 654 lines of TypeScript in test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts - 8 new test files, ~1,453 lines of new TS code - 23 helper unit tests + 6 new gate/periodic E2E tests The deletion-heavy net diff (−11.6K lines) is itself the strongest defense against the "bloat" critique — surfaced explicitly in the numbers table. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
25 KiB
name, preamble-tier, version, description, triggers, allowed-tools
| name | preamble-tier | version | description | triggers | allowed-tools | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| benchmark-models | 1 | 1.0.0 | Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best". |
|
|
Preamble (run first)
_UPD=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || .claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-update-check 2>/dev/null || true)
[ -n "$_UPD" ] && echo "$_UPD" || true
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/sessions
touch ~/.gstack/sessions/"$PPID"
_SESSIONS=$(find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin -120 -type f 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
find ~/.gstack/sessions -mmin +120 -type f -exec rm {} + 2>/dev/null || true
_PROACTIVE=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get proactive 2>/dev/null || echo "true")
_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.proactive-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
_SKILL_PREFIX=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get skill_prefix 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "PROACTIVE: $_PROACTIVE"
echo "PROACTIVE_PROMPTED: $_PROACTIVE_PROMPTED"
echo "SKILL_PREFIX: $_SKILL_PREFIX"
source <(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-repo-mode 2>/dev/null) || true
REPO_MODE=${REPO_MODE:-unknown}
echo "REPO_MODE: $REPO_MODE"
_LAKE_SEEN=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.completeness-intro-seen ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "LAKE_INTRO: $_LAKE_SEEN"
_TEL=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get telemetry 2>/dev/null || true)
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.gstack/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
_SESSION_ID="$$-$(date +%s)"
echo "TELEMETRY: ${_TEL:-off}"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
_EXPLAIN_LEVEL=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get explain_level 2>/dev/null || echo "default")
if [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "default" ] && [ "$_EXPLAIN_LEVEL" != "terse" ]; then _EXPLAIN_LEVEL="default"; fi
echo "EXPLAIN_LEVEL: $_EXPLAIN_LEVEL"
_QUESTION_TUNING=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get question_tuning 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "QUESTION_TUNING: $_QUESTION_TUNING"
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/analytics
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"benchmark-models","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","repo":"'$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")'"}' >> ~/.gstack/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
fi
for _PF in $(find ~/.gstack/analytics -maxdepth 1 -name '.pending-*' 2>/dev/null); do
if [ -f "$_PF" ]; then
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ] && [ -x "~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log" ]; then
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log --event-type skill_run --skill _pending_finalize --outcome unknown --session-id "$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null || true
fi
rm -f "$_PF" 2>/dev/null || true
fi
break
done
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || true
_LEARN_FILE="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}/projects/${SLUG:-unknown}/learnings.jsonl"
if [ -f "$_LEARN_FILE" ]; then
_LEARN_COUNT=$(wc -l < "$_LEARN_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d ' ')
echo "LEARNINGS: $_LEARN_COUNT entries loaded"
if [ "$_LEARN_COUNT" -gt 5 ] 2>/dev/null; then
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-learnings-search --limit 3 2>/dev/null || true
fi
else
echo "LEARNINGS: 0"
fi
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-timeline-log '{"skill":"benchmark-models","event":"started","branch":"'"$_BRANCH"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'"}' 2>/dev/null &
_HAS_ROUTING="no"
if [ -f CLAUDE.md ] && grep -q "## Skill routing" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null; then
_HAS_ROUTING="yes"
fi
_ROUTING_DECLINED=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get routing_declined 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "HAS_ROUTING: $_HAS_ROUTING"
echo "ROUTING_DECLINED: $_ROUTING_DECLINED"
_VENDORED="no"
if [ -d ".claude/skills/gstack" ] && [ ! -L ".claude/skills/gstack" ]; then
if [ -f ".claude/skills/gstack/VERSION" ] || [ -d ".claude/skills/gstack/.git" ]; then
_VENDORED="yes"
fi
fi
echo "VENDORED_GSTACK: $_VENDORED"
echo "MODEL_OVERLAY: claude"
_CHECKPOINT_MODE=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get checkpoint_mode 2>/dev/null || echo "explicit")
_CHECKPOINT_PUSH=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config get checkpoint_push 2>/dev/null || echo "false")
echo "CHECKPOINT_MODE: $_CHECKPOINT_MODE"
echo "CHECKPOINT_PUSH: $_CHECKPOINT_PUSH"
[ -n "$OPENCLAW_SESSION" ] && echo "SPAWNED_SESSION: true" || true
Plan Mode Safe Operations
In plan mode, allowed because they inform the plan: $B, $D, codex exec/codex review, writes to ~/.gstack/, writes to the plan file, and open for generated artifacts.
Skill Invocation During Plan Mode
If the user invokes a skill in plan mode, the skill takes precedence over generic plan mode behavior. Treat the skill file as executable instructions, not reference. Follow it step by step starting from Step 0; the first AskUserQuestion is the workflow entering plan mode, not a violation of it. AskUserQuestion satisfies plan mode's end-of-turn requirement. At a STOP point, stop immediately. Do not continue the workflow or call ExitPlanMode there. Commands marked "PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — ALWAYS RUN" execute. Call ExitPlanMode only after the skill workflow completes, or if the user tells you to cancel the skill or leave plan mode.
If PROACTIVE is "false", do not auto-invoke or proactively suggest skills. If a skill seems useful, ask: "I think /skillname might help here — want me to run it?"
If SKILL_PREFIX is "true", suggest/invoke /gstack-* names. Disk paths stay ~/.claude/skills/gstack/[skill-name]/SKILL.md.
If output shows UPGRADE_AVAILABLE <old> <new>: read ~/.claude/skills/gstack/gstack-upgrade/SKILL.md and follow the "Inline upgrade flow" (auto-upgrade if configured, otherwise AskUserQuestion with 4 options, write snooze state if declined).
If output shows JUST_UPGRADED <from> <to>: print "Running gstack v{to} (just updated!)". If SPAWNED_SESSION is true, skip feature discovery.
Feature discovery, max one prompt per session:
- Missing
~/.claude/skills/gstack/.feature-prompted-continuous-checkpoint: AskUserQuestion for Continuous checkpoint auto-commits. If accepted, run~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set checkpoint_mode continuous. Always touch marker. - Missing
~/.claude/skills/gstack/.feature-prompted-model-overlay: inform "Model overlays are active. MODEL_OVERLAY shows the patch." Always touch marker.
After upgrade prompts, continue workflow.
If WRITING_STYLE_PENDING is yes: ask once about writing style:
v1 prompts are simpler: first-use jargon glosses, outcome-framed questions, shorter prose. Keep default or restore terse?
Options:
- A) Keep the new default (recommended — good writing helps everyone)
- B) Restore V0 prose — set
explain_level: terse
If A: leave explain_level unset (defaults to default).
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set explain_level terse.
Always run (regardless of choice):
rm -f ~/.gstack/.writing-style-prompt-pending
touch ~/.gstack/.writing-style-prompted
Skip if WRITING_STYLE_PENDING is no.
If LAKE_INTRO is no: say "gstack follows the Boil the Lake principle — do the complete thing when AI makes marginal cost near-zero. Read more: https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean" Offer to open:
open https://garryslist.org/posts/boil-the-ocean
touch ~/.gstack/.completeness-intro-seen
Only run open if yes. Always run touch.
If TEL_PROMPTED is no AND LAKE_INTRO is yes: ask telemetry once via AskUserQuestion:
Help gstack get better. Share usage data only: skill, duration, crashes, stable device ID. No code, file paths, or repo names.
Options:
- A) Help gstack get better! (recommended)
- B) No thanks
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set telemetry community
If B: ask follow-up:
Anonymous mode sends only aggregate usage, no unique ID.
Options:
- A) Sure, anonymous is fine
- B) No thanks, fully off
If B→A: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set telemetry anonymous
If B→B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set telemetry off
Always run:
touch ~/.gstack/.telemetry-prompted
Skip if TEL_PROMPTED is yes.
If PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is no AND TEL_PROMPTED is yes: ask once:
Let gstack proactively suggest skills, like /qa for "does this work?" or /investigate for bugs?
Options:
- A) Keep it on (recommended)
- B) Turn it off — I'll type /commands myself
If A: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive true
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set proactive false
Always run:
touch ~/.gstack/.proactive-prompted
Skip if PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is yes.
If HAS_ROUTING is no AND ROUTING_DECLINED is false AND PROACTIVE_PROMPTED is yes:
Check if a CLAUDE.md file exists in the project root. If it does not exist, create it.
Use AskUserQuestion:
gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules.
Options:
- A) Add routing rules to CLAUDE.md (recommended)
- B) No thanks, I'll invoke skills manually
If A: Append this section to the end of CLAUDE.md:
## Skill routing
When the user's request matches an available skill, invoke it via the Skill tool. When in doubt, invoke the skill.
Key routing rules:
- Product ideas/brainstorming → invoke /office-hours
- Strategy/scope → invoke /plan-ceo-review
- Architecture → invoke /plan-eng-review
- Design system/plan review → invoke /design-consultation or /plan-design-review
- Full review pipeline → invoke /autoplan
- Bugs/errors → invoke /investigate
- QA/testing site behavior → invoke /qa or /qa-only
- Code review/diff check → invoke /review
- Visual polish → invoke /design-review
- Ship/deploy/PR → invoke /ship or /land-and-deploy
- Save progress → invoke /context-save
- Resume context → invoke /context-restore
Then commit the change: git add CLAUDE.md && git commit -m "chore: add gstack skill routing rules to CLAUDE.md"
If B: run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config set routing_declined true and say they can re-enable with gstack-config set routing_declined false.
This only happens once per project. Skip if HAS_ROUTING is yes or ROUTING_DECLINED is true.
If VENDORED_GSTACK is yes, warn once via AskUserQuestion unless ~/.gstack/.vendoring-warned-$SLUG exists:
This project has gstack vendored in
.claude/skills/gstack/. Vendoring is deprecated. Migrate to team mode?
Options:
- A) Yes, migrate to team mode now
- B) No, I'll handle it myself
If A:
- Run
git rm -r .claude/skills/gstack/ - Run
echo '.claude/skills/gstack/' >> .gitignore - Run
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-team-init required(oroptional) - Run
git add .claude/ .gitignore CLAUDE.md && git commit -m "chore: migrate gstack from vendored to team mode" - Tell the user: "Done. Each developer now runs:
cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup --team"
If B: say "OK, you're on your own to keep the vendored copy up to date."
Always run (regardless of choice):
eval "$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)" 2>/dev/null || true
touch ~/.gstack/.vendoring-warned-${SLUG:-unknown}
If marker exists, skip.
If SPAWNED_SESSION is "true", you are running inside a session spawned by an
AI orchestrator (e.g., OpenClaw). In spawned sessions:
- Do NOT use AskUserQuestion for interactive prompts. Auto-choose the recommended option.
- Do NOT run upgrade checks, telemetry prompts, routing injection, or lake intro.
- Focus on completing the task and reporting results via prose output.
- End with a completion report: what shipped, decisions made, anything uncertain.
GBrain Sync (skill start)
_GSTACK_HOME="${GSTACK_HOME:-$HOME/.gstack}"
_BRAIN_REMOTE_FILE="$HOME/.gstack-brain-remote.txt"
_BRAIN_SYNC_BIN="~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-brain-sync"
_BRAIN_CONFIG_BIN="~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-config"
_BRAIN_SYNC_MODE=$("$_BRAIN_CONFIG_BIN" get gbrain_sync_mode 2>/dev/null || echo off)
if [ -f "$_BRAIN_REMOTE_FILE" ] && [ ! -d "$_GSTACK_HOME/.git" ] && [ "$_BRAIN_SYNC_MODE" = "off" ]; then
_BRAIN_NEW_URL=$(head -1 "$_BRAIN_REMOTE_FILE" 2>/dev/null | tr -d '[:space:]')
if [ -n "$_BRAIN_NEW_URL" ]; then
echo "BRAIN_SYNC: brain repo detected: $_BRAIN_NEW_URL"
echo "BRAIN_SYNC: run 'gstack-brain-restore' to pull your cross-machine memory (or 'gstack-config set gbrain_sync_mode off' to dismiss forever)"
fi
fi
if [ -d "$_GSTACK_HOME/.git" ] && [ "$_BRAIN_SYNC_MODE" != "off" ]; then
_BRAIN_LAST_PULL_FILE="$_GSTACK_HOME/.brain-last-pull"
_BRAIN_NOW=$(date +%s)
_BRAIN_DO_PULL=1
if [ -f "$_BRAIN_LAST_PULL_FILE" ]; then
_BRAIN_LAST=$(cat "$_BRAIN_LAST_PULL_FILE" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
_BRAIN_AGE=$(( _BRAIN_NOW - _BRAIN_LAST ))
[ "$_BRAIN_AGE" -lt 86400 ] && _BRAIN_DO_PULL=0
fi
if [ "$_BRAIN_DO_PULL" = "1" ]; then
( cd "$_GSTACK_HOME" && git fetch origin >/dev/null 2>&1 && git merge --ff-only "origin/$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)" >/dev/null 2>&1 ) || true
echo "$_BRAIN_NOW" > "$_BRAIN_LAST_PULL_FILE"
fi
"$_BRAIN_SYNC_BIN" --once 2>/dev/null || true
fi
if [ -d "$_GSTACK_HOME/.git" ] && [ "$_BRAIN_SYNC_MODE" != "off" ]; then
_BRAIN_QUEUE_DEPTH=0
[ -f "$_GSTACK_HOME/.brain-queue.jsonl" ] && _BRAIN_QUEUE_DEPTH=$(wc -l < "$_GSTACK_HOME/.brain-queue.jsonl" | tr -d ' ')
_BRAIN_LAST_PUSH="never"
[ -f "$_GSTACK_HOME/.brain-last-push" ] && _BRAIN_LAST_PUSH=$(cat "$_GSTACK_HOME/.brain-last-push" 2>/dev/null || echo never)
echo "BRAIN_SYNC: mode=$_BRAIN_SYNC_MODE | last_push=$_BRAIN_LAST_PUSH | queue=$_BRAIN_QUEUE_DEPTH"
else
echo "BRAIN_SYNC: off"
fi
Privacy stop-gate: if output shows BRAIN_SYNC: off, gbrain_sync_mode_prompted is false, and gbrain is on PATH or gbrain doctor --fast --json works, ask once:
gstack can publish your session memory to a private GitHub repo that GBrain indexes across machines. How much should sync?
Options:
- A) Everything allowlisted (recommended)
- B) Only artifacts
- C) Decline, keep everything local
After answer:
# Chosen mode: full | artifacts-only | off
"$_BRAIN_CONFIG_BIN" set gbrain_sync_mode <choice>
"$_BRAIN_CONFIG_BIN" set gbrain_sync_mode_prompted true
If A/B and ~/.gstack/.git is missing, ask whether to run gstack-brain-init. Do not block the skill.
At skill END before telemetry:
"~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-brain-sync" --discover-new 2>/dev/null || true
"~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-brain-sync" --once 2>/dev/null || true
Model-Specific Behavioral Patch (claude)
The following nudges are tuned for the claude model family. They are subordinate to skill workflow, STOP points, AskUserQuestion gates, plan-mode safety, and /ship review gates. If a nudge below conflicts with skill instructions, the skill wins. Treat these as preferences, not rules.
Todo-list discipline. When working through a multi-step plan, mark each task complete individually as you finish it. Do not batch-complete at the end. If a task turns out to be unnecessary, mark it skipped with a one-line reason.
Think before heavy actions. For complex operations (refactors, migrations, non-trivial new features), briefly state your approach before executing. This lets the user course-correct cheaply instead of mid-flight.
Dedicated tools over Bash. Prefer Read, Edit, Write, Glob, Grep over shell equivalents (cat, sed, find, grep). The dedicated tools are cheaper and clearer.
Voice
Direct, concrete, builder-to-builder. Name the file, function, command, and user-visible impact. No filler.
No em dashes. No AI vocabulary: delve, crucial, robust, comprehensive, nuanced, multifaceted. Never corporate or academic. Short paragraphs. End with what to do.
The user has context you do not. Cross-model agreement is a recommendation, not a decision. The user decides.
Completion Status Protocol
When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- DONE — completed with evidence.
- DONE_WITH_CONCERNS — completed, but list concerns.
- BLOCKED — cannot proceed; state blocker and what was tried.
- NEEDS_CONTEXT — missing info; state exactly what is needed.
Escalate after 3 failed attempts, uncertain security-sensitive changes, or scope you cannot verify. Format: STATUS, REASON, ATTEMPTED, RECOMMENDATION.
Operational Self-Improvement
Before completing, if you discovered a durable project quirk or command fix that would save 5+ minutes next time, log it:
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-learnings-log '{"skill":"SKILL_NAME","type":"operational","key":"SHORT_KEY","insight":"DESCRIPTION","confidence":N,"source":"observed"}'
Do not log obvious facts or one-time transient errors.
Telemetry (run last)
After workflow completion, log telemetry. Use skill name: from frontmatter. OUTCOME is success/error/abort/unknown.
PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — ALWAYS RUN: This command writes telemetry to
~/.gstack/analytics/, matching preamble analytics writes.
Run this bash:
_TEL_END=$(date +%s)
_TEL_DUR=$(( _TEL_END - _TEL_START ))
rm -f ~/.gstack/analytics/.pending-"$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null || true
# Session timeline: record skill completion (local-only, never sent anywhere)
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-timeline-log '{"skill":"SKILL_NAME","event":"completed","branch":"'$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo unknown)'","outcome":"OUTCOME","duration_s":"'"$_TEL_DUR"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'"}' 2>/dev/null || true
# Local analytics (gated on telemetry setting)
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"SKILL_NAME","duration_s":"'"$_TEL_DUR"'","outcome":"OUTCOME","browse":"USED_BROWSE","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"}' >> ~/.gstack/analytics/skill-usage.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
fi
# Remote telemetry (opt-in, requires binary)
if [ "$_TEL" != "off" ] && [ -x ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log ]; then
~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-telemetry-log \
--skill "SKILL_NAME" --duration "$_TEL_DUR" --outcome "OUTCOME" \
--used-browse "USED_BROWSE" --session-id "$_SESSION_ID" 2>/dev/null &
fi
Replace SKILL_NAME, OUTCOME, and USED_BROWSE before running.
Plan Status Footer
In plan mode before ExitPlanMode: if the plan file lacks ## GSTACK REVIEW REPORT, run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-read and append the standard runs/status/findings table. With NO_REVIEWS or empty, append a 5-row placeholder with verdict "NO REVIEWS YET — run /autoplan". If a richer report exists, skip.
PLAN MODE EXCEPTION — always allowed (it's the plan file).
/benchmark-models — Cross-Model Skill Benchmark
You are running the /benchmark-models workflow. Wraps the gstack-model-benchmark binary with an interactive flow that picks a prompt, confirms providers, previews auth, and runs the benchmark.
Different from /benchmark — that skill measures web page performance (Core Web Vitals, load times). This skill measures AI model performance on gstack skills or arbitrary prompts.
Step 0: Locate the binary
BIN="$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-model-benchmark"
[ -x "$BIN" ] || BIN=".claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-model-benchmark"
[ -x "$BIN" ] || { echo "ERROR: gstack-model-benchmark not found. Run ./setup in the gstack install dir." >&2; exit 1; }
echo "BIN: $BIN"
If not found, stop and tell the user to reinstall gstack.
Step 1: Choose a prompt
Use AskUserQuestion with the preamble format:
- Re-ground: current project + branch.
- Simplify: "A cross-model benchmark runs the same prompt through 2-3 AI models and shows you how they compare on speed, cost, and output quality. What prompt should we use?"
- RECOMMENDATION: A because benchmarking against a real skill exposes tool-use differences, not just raw generation.
- Options:
- A) Benchmark one of my gstack skills (we'll pick which skill next). Completeness: 10/10.
- B) Use an inline prompt — type it on the next turn. Completeness: 8/10.
- C) Point at a prompt file on disk — specify path on the next turn. Completeness: 8/10.
If A: list top-level gstack skills that have SKILL.md files (from find . -maxdepth 2 -name SKILL.md -not -path './.*'), ask the user to pick one via a second AskUserQuestion. Use the picked SKILL.md path as the prompt file.
If B: ask the user for the inline prompt. Use it verbatim via --prompt "<text>".
If C: ask for the path. Verify it exists. Use as positional argument.
Step 2: Choose providers
"$BIN" --prompt "unused, dry-run" --models claude,gpt,gemini --dry-run
Show the dry-run output. The "Adapter availability" section tells the user which providers will actually run (OK) vs skip (NOT READY — remediation hint included).
If ALL three show NOT READY: stop with a clear message — benchmark can't run without at least one authed provider. Suggest claude login, codex login, or gemini login / export GOOGLE_API_KEY.
If at least one is OK: AskUserQuestion:
- Simplify: "Which models should we include? The dry-run above showed which are authed. Unauthed ones will be skipped cleanly — they won't abort the batch."
- RECOMMENDATION: A (all authed providers) because running as many as possible gives the richest comparison.
- Options:
- A) All authed providers. Completeness: 10/10.
- B) Only Claude. Completeness: 6/10 (no cross-model signal — use /ship's review for solo claude benchmarks instead).
- C) Pick two — specify on next turn. Completeness: 8/10.
Step 3: Decide on judge
[ -n "$ANTHROPIC_API_KEY" ] || grep -q 'ANTHROPIC' "$HOME/.claude/.credentials.json" 2>/dev/null && echo "JUDGE_AVAILABLE" || echo "JUDGE_UNAVAILABLE"
If judge is available, AskUserQuestion:
- Simplify: "The quality judge scores each model's output on a 0-10 scale using Anthropic's Claude as a tiebreaker. Adds ~$0.05/run. Recommended if you care about output quality, not just latency and cost."
- RECOMMENDATION: A — the whole point is comparing quality, not just speed.
- Options:
- A) Enable judge (adds ~$0.05). Completeness: 10/10.
- B) Skip judge — speed/cost/tokens only. Completeness: 7/10.
If judge is NOT available, skip this question and omit the --judge flag.
Step 4: Run the benchmark
Construct the command from Step 1, 2, 3 decisions:
"$BIN" <prompt-spec> --models <picked-models> [--judge] --output table
Where <prompt-spec> is either --prompt "<text>" (Step 1B), a file path (Step 1A or 1C), and <picked-models> is the comma-separated list from Step 2.
Stream the output as it arrives. This is slow — each provider runs the prompt fully. Expect 30s-5min depending on prompt complexity and whether --judge is on.
Step 5: Interpret results
After the table prints, summarize for the user:
- Fastest — provider with lowest latency.
- Cheapest — provider with lowest cost.
- Highest quality (if
--judgeran) — provider with highest score. - Best overall — use judgment. If judge ran: quality-weighted. Otherwise: note the tradeoff the user needs to make.
If any provider hit an error (auth/timeout/rate_limit), call it out with the remediation path.
Step 6: Offer to save results
AskUserQuestion:
- Simplify: "Save this benchmark as JSON so you can compare future runs against it?"
- RECOMMENDATION: A — skill performance drifts as providers update their models; a saved baseline catches quality regressions.
- Options:
- A) Save to
~/.gstack/benchmarks/<date>-<skill-or-prompt-slug>.json. Completeness: 10/10. - B) Just print, don't save. Completeness: 5/10 (loses trend data).
- A) Save to
If A: re-run with --output json and tee to the dated file. Print the path so the user can diff future runs against it.
Important Rules
- Never run a real benchmark without Step 2's dry-run first. Users need to see auth status before spending API calls.
- Never hardcode model names. Always pass providers from user's Step 2 choice — the binary handles the rest.
- Never auto-include
--judge. It adds real cost; user must opt in. - If zero providers are authed, STOP. Don't attempt the benchmark — it produces no useful output.
- Cost is visible. Every run shows per-provider cost in the table. Users should see it before the next run.