gstack/test/fixtures/ceo-expansion-auq-ac.json

{
  "provenance": {
    "run": "ship-source-ac-full-paid-20260909-1635",
    "sourceHead": "7b08fbfe568fe60c441b7509570b92e1cbd2d111",
    "native": {
      "path": ".context/ship-source-ac-full-paid-20260909-1635/native-observation/pinned-native/429318-237663/059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54/a6b85e600f038d0be49b874dbe8eb7e23bd87d2b780035130846de1847f2f49e.jsonl",
      "sha256": "a6b85e600f038d0be49b874dbe8eb7e23bd87d2b780035130846de1847f2f49e",
      "bytes": 549256,
      "pid": 429318,
      "startTicks": "237663"
    },
    "log": {
      "path": ".context/ship-source-ac-full-paid-20260909-1635/gstack-paid-shard-skill-e2e-plan-ceo-mode-routing-2026-09-09T16-36-59-163Z-412001-7.log",
      "sha256": "ceaf7ff542dc184abfc5db589d780fdf1576e850f5da33891b9a05863bbf4f5e"
    },
    "records": "Exact public assistant text and two native AUQ requests/replies only; other calls and hidden reasoning excluded.",
    "ui": "Exact failure-log menu and downstream tail; this is a retained truncated rendered tail, not an invented complete screen.",
    "testSelectionLowerBound": {
      "at": "2026-09-09T16:40:17.645Z",
      "basis": "Native mode request timestamp; the runner selectionStartedAt clock was not separately retained."
    }
  },
  "modeToolUseId": "toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2",
  "expansionToolUseId": "toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds",
  "requestReplyTimes": {
    "toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2": {
      "request": "2026-09-09T16:40:17.645Z",
      "reply": "2026-09-09T16:40:17.964Z"
    },
    "toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds": {
      "request": "2026-09-09T16:41:19.614Z",
      "reply": "2026-09-09T16:41:21.214Z"
    }
  },
  "records": [
    {
      "type": "assistant",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:37:12.580Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "I'll start the plan-ceo-review workflow: run the skill preamble, then the system audit, then walk through Step 0 with you."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "assistant",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:38:45.613Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "Standard review it is. Now: enable cross-project learnings (a ~/.gstack write, allowed in plan mode), re-run learnings search, and do the landscape check via WebSearch since Aside is absent."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "assistant",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:39:55.956Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "Approach B locked. Logging that decision, recording it in the plan, and asking the mode question in the same pass."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "assistant",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:40:17.645Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "tool_use",
            "id": "toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2",
            "name": "AskUserQuestion",
            "input": {
              "questions": [
                {
                  "question": "D4 \u2014 Which review posture (mode) for this plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved project views, approach B chosen.\nELI10: The mode sets how ambitious I am allowed to be for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch the cathedral version and you opt into each piece. Selective means I harden the current scope AND show you a menu of add-ons to cherry-pick. Hold means the scope is final and I only make it bulletproof. Reduction means I cut to the smallest thing that removes the pain. This is an enhancement to an existing task list, which normally points to Selective.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too ambitious and a two-week pilot ships late; too narrow and the pilot measures a feature that misses obvious wins like shared team views or a default view.\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is well understood and the interesting choices (shared views, default view, URL links, view sprawl controls) deserve individual yes/no calls rather than a blanket dream or a blanket no.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nA) SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n  \u2705 Current scope gets full rigor first, then each add-on is a separate neutral decision\n  \u2705 You pick exactly which extras ride along in the pilot\n  \u274c More questions during the review than Hold\nB) SCOPE EXPANSION\n  \u2705 Surfaces the 10x version: views as a shareable, linkable platform primitive\n  \u2705 Enthusiastic recommendations, still opt-in per item\n  \u274c Risk of pilot scope ballooning past the two-week window\nC) HOLD SCOPE\n  \u2705 Fastest path to a bulletproof version of exactly what PLAN.md says\n  \u2705 Zero scope negotiation, maximum rigor on errors, edges, observability\n  \u274c Obvious adjacent wins are never surfaced for a decision\nD) SCOPE REDUCTION\n  \u2705 Tests whether URL-persisted filter state alone removes the pain before building save/list/edit/delete\n  \u2705 Smallest pilot, fastest signal\n  \u274c Pilot may measure something too thin to tell whether members actually want saved views\nNet: how much of the review is spent on 'make it right' vs. 'make it bigger' vs. 'make it smaller'.",
                  "header": "Mode",
                  "multiSelect": false,
                  "options": [
                    {
                      "label": "SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)",
                      "description": "Hold PLAN.md scope as the baseline and harden it, then present each expansion (shared views, default view, URL links, sprawl cap, etc.) as its own neutral yes/defer/skip."
                    },
                    {
                      "label": "SCOPE EXPANSION",
                      "description": "Dream big: views as a shareable, linkable primitive. Every expansion pitched enthusiastically, still opt-in one at a time."
                    },
                    {
                      "label": "HOLD SCOPE",
                      "description": "Scope is final. Maximum rigor only: architecture, security, error paths, edge cases, observability, rollout. No expansions surfaced."
                    },
                    {
                      "label": "SCOPE REDUCTION",
                      "description": "Strip to the minimum that removes the pain, possibly URL-persisted filter state plus a single save action, then review that."
                    }
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "caller": {
              "type": "direct"
            }
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "user",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:40:17.964Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "user",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "tool_result",
            "content": "Your questions have been answered: \"D4 \u2014 Which review posture (mode) for this plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved project views, approach B chosen.\nELI10: The mode sets how ambitious I am allowed to be for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch the cathedral version and you opt into each piece. Selective means I harden the current scope AND show you a menu of add-ons to cherry-pick. Hold means the scope is final and I only make it bulletproof. Reduction means I cut to the smallest thing that removes the pain. This is an enhancement to an existing task list, which normally points to Selective.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too ambitious and a two-week pilot ships late; too narrow and the pilot measures a feature that misses obvious wins like shared team views or a default view.\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is well understood and the interesting choices (shared views, default view, URL links, view sprawl controls) deserve individual yes/no calls rather than a blanket dream or a blanket no.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nA) SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n  \u2705 Current scope gets full rigor first, then each add-on is a separate neutral decision\n  \u2705 You pick exactly which extras ride along in the pilot\n  \u274c More questions during the review than Hold\nB) SCOPE EXPANSION\n  \u2705 Surfaces the 10x version: views as a shareable, linkable platform primitive\n  \u2705 Enthusiastic recommendations, still opt-in per item\n  \u274c Risk of pilot scope ballooning past the two-week window\nC) HOLD SCOPE\n  \u2705 Fastest path to a bulletproof version of exactly what PLAN.md says\n  \u2705 Zero scope negotiation, maximum rigor on errors, edges, observability\n  \u274c Obvious adjacent wins are never surfaced for a decision\nD) SCOPE REDUCTION\n  \u2705 Tests whether URL-persisted filter state alone removes the pain before building save/list/edit/delete\n  \u2705 Smallest pilot, fastest signal\n  \u274c Pilot may measure something too thin to tell whether members actually want saved views\nNet: how much of the review is spent on 'make it right' vs. 'make it bigger' vs. 'make it smaller'.\"=\"SCOPE EXPANSION\". You can now continue with these answers in mind.",
            "tool_use_id": "toolu_01GSNy9VjrqLscsjp6sceiV2"
          }
        ]
      },
      "toolUseResult": {
        "answers": {
          "D4 \u2014 Which review posture (mode) for this plan? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-mode>\nProject/branch/task: main, PLAN.md saved project views, approach B chosen.\nELI10: The mode sets how ambitious I am allowed to be for the rest of the review. Expansion means I pitch the cathedral version and you opt into each piece. Selective means I harden the current scope AND show you a menu of add-ons to cherry-pick. Hold means the scope is final and I only make it bulletproof. Reduction means I cut to the smallest thing that removes the pain. This is an enhancement to an existing task list, which normally points to Selective.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Too ambitious and a two-week pilot ships late; too narrow and the pilot measures a feature that misses obvious wins like shared team views or a default view.\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is well understood and the interesting choices (shared views, default view, URL links, view sprawl controls) deserve individual yes/no calls rather than a blanket dream or a blanket no.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nA) SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n  \u2705 Current scope gets full rigor first, then each add-on is a separate neutral decision\n  \u2705 You pick exactly which extras ride along in the pilot\n  \u274c More questions during the review than Hold\nB) SCOPE EXPANSION\n  \u2705 Surfaces the 10x version: views as a shareable, linkable platform primitive\n  \u2705 Enthusiastic recommendations, still opt-in per item\n  \u274c Risk of pilot scope ballooning past the two-week window\nC) HOLD SCOPE\n  \u2705 Fastest path to a bulletproof version of exactly what PLAN.md says\n  \u2705 Zero scope negotiation, maximum rigor on errors, edges, observability\n  \u274c Obvious adjacent wins are never surfaced for a decision\nD) SCOPE REDUCTION\n  \u2705 Tests whether URL-persisted filter state alone removes the pain before building save/list/edit/delete\n  \u2705 Smallest pilot, fastest signal\n  \u274c Pilot may measure something too thin to tell whether members actually want saved views\nNet: how much of the review is spent on 'make it right' vs. 'make it bigger' vs. 'make it smaller'.": "SCOPE EXPANSION"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "assistant",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:41:19.614Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "tool_use",
            "id": "toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds",
            "name": "AskUserQuestion",
            "input": {
              "questions": [
                {
                  "question": "D5 \u2014 Expansion 1 of 8: URL-encoded filter state and linkable views? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-expansion-url-state>\nProject/branch/task: main, saved project views, EXPANSION mode.\nELI10: Imagine you tweak three filters, hit refresh, and everything is still there. You paste the address to a teammate and they see the same list. That is what putting filter and sort state into the URL gives you, before any save button exists. A saved view then is just a named URL: /projects/42/tasks?view=17, with any unsaved tweaks layered on as query params. Concrete shape: a filter-state serializer/parser shared by the filter bar and the saved-view loader; the view id in the route; unsaved deltas in the query string. Effort: human ~1 day / CC ~20 min.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without it, back button, refresh, and bookmarks all lose state, and 'reopen a view' means clicking through the picker every time. Many members would never save a view because a bookmark can't do it for them.\nRecommendation: A because this is the foundation the other expansions (sharing, default view, deep links from notifications) stand on, and it halves the pain for members who never save anything.\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nA) Add to scope (recommended)\n  \u2705 Refresh, back button, bookmarks, and pasted links all preserve filters and sort\n  \u2705 One serializer shared by the filter bar and saved views: DRY by construction\n  \u274c Must define a stable, versioned query-param format and test parse/serialize round-trips\nB) Defer to TODOS.md\n  \u2705 Ships the pilot with fewer moving parts in the router\n  \u2705 Can be added later without changing the saved_views schema\n  \u274c Views can't be linked to; pilot measures a weaker experience\nC) Skip\n  \u2705 Zero routing work\n  \u274c The 'recreate filters' pain persists for anyone who doesn't save a view\nNet: routing work now vs. views that are only reachable through the picker.",
                  "header": "URL state",
                  "multiSelect": false,
                  "options": [
                    {
                      "label": "Add to scope (recommended)",
                      "description": "Filter+sort state in the URL, view id in the route, one shared serializer. Human ~1 day / CC ~20 min. Completeness 10/10."
                    },
                    {
                      "label": "Defer to TODOS.md",
                      "description": "Ship personal views reachable only via the picker; write URL state up as follow-on work. Completeness 6/10."
                    },
                    {
                      "label": "Skip",
                      "description": "Do not pursue URL-encoded filter state. Completeness 3/10."
                    }
                  ]
                }
              ]
            },
            "caller": {
              "type": "direct"
            }
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "type": "user",
      "sessionId": "059be58d-efe9-4ee7-a6ea-41669d305c54",
      "cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-plan-count-awA78c",
      "isSidechain": false,
      "timestamp": "2026-09-09T16:41:21.214Z",
      "message": {
        "role": "user",
        "content": [
          {
            "type": "tool_result",
            "content": "Your questions have been answered: \"D5 \u2014 Expansion 1 of 8: URL-encoded filter state and linkable views? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-expansion-url-state>\nProject/branch/task: main, saved project views, EXPANSION mode.\nELI10: Imagine you tweak three filters, hit refresh, and everything is still there. You paste the address to a teammate and they see the same list. That is what putting filter and sort state into the URL gives you, before any save button exists. A saved view then is just a named URL: /projects/42/tasks?view=17, with any unsaved tweaks layered on as query params. Concrete shape: a filter-state serializer/parser shared by the filter bar and the saved-view loader; the view id in the route; unsaved deltas in the query string. Effort: human ~1 day / CC ~20 min.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without it, back button, refresh, and bookmarks all lose state, and 'reopen a view' means clicking through the picker every time. Many members would never save a view because a bookmark can't do it for them.\nRecommendation: A because this is the foundation the other expansions (sharing, default view, deep links from notifications) stand on, and it halves the pain for members who never save anything.\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nA) Add to scope (recommended)\n  \u2705 Refresh, back button, bookmarks, and pasted links all preserve filters and sort\n  \u2705 One serializer shared by the filter bar and saved views: DRY by construction\n  \u274c Must define a stable, versioned query-param format and test parse/serialize round-trips\nB) Defer to TODOS.md\n  \u2705 Ships the pilot with fewer moving parts in the router\n  \u2705 Can be added later without changing the saved_views schema\n  \u274c Views can't be linked to; pilot measures a weaker experience\nC) Skip\n  \u2705 Zero routing work\n  \u274c The 'recreate filters' pain persists for anyone who doesn't save a view\nNet: routing work now vs. views that are only reachable through the picker.\"=\"Add to scope (recommended)\". You can now continue with these answers in mind.",
            "tool_use_id": "toolu_014Q5SA47BqSvstMA1QpQzds"
          }
        ]
      },
      "toolUseResult": {
        "answers": {
          "D5 \u2014 Expansion 1 of 8: URL-encoded filter state and linkable views? <gstack-qid:plan-ceo-review-expansion-url-state>\nProject/branch/task: main, saved project views, EXPANSION mode.\nELI10: Imagine you tweak three filters, hit refresh, and everything is still there. You paste the address to a teammate and they see the same list. That is what putting filter and sort state into the URL gives you, before any save button exists. A saved view then is just a named URL: /projects/42/tasks?view=17, with any unsaved tweaks layered on as query params. Concrete shape: a filter-state serializer/parser shared by the filter bar and the saved-view loader; the view id in the route; unsaved deltas in the query string. Effort: human ~1 day / CC ~20 min.\nStakes if we pick wrong: Without it, back button, refresh, and bookmarks all lose state, and 'reopen a view' means clicking through the picker every time. Many members would never save a view because a bookmark can't do it for them.\nRecommendation: A because this is the foundation the other expansions (sharing, default view, deep links from notifications) stand on, and it halves the pain for members who never save anything.\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10, C=3/10\nA) Add to scope (recommended)\n  \u2705 Refresh, back button, bookmarks, and pasted links all preserve filters and sort\n  \u2705 One serializer shared by the filter bar and saved views: DRY by construction\n  \u274c Must define a stable, versioned query-param format and test parse/serialize round-trips\nB) Defer to TODOS.md\n  \u2705 Ships the pilot with fewer moving parts in the router\n  \u2705 Can be added later without changing the saved_views schema\n  \u274c Views can't be linked to; pilot measures a weaker experience\nC) Skip\n  \u2705 Zero routing work\n  \u274c The 'recreate filters' pain persists for anyone who doesn't save a view\nNet: routing work now vs. views that are only reachable through the picker.": "Add to scope (recommended)"
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "visibleAtModeTail": "\u2502 that misses obvious wins like shared team views or a default view.\n\u2502 Recommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the core is well understood and the interesting choices (shared views,\n\u2502 default view, URL links, view sprawl controls) deserve individual yes/no calls rather than a blanket dream or a\n\u2502 blanket no.\n\u2502 Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n\u2502 A) SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n\u2502   \u2705  Current scope gets full rigor first, then each add-on is a separate neutral decision\n\u2502   \u2705  You pick exactly which extras ride along in the pilot\n\u2502   \u274c  More questions during the review than Hold\n\u2502 B) SCOPE EXPANSION\n\u2502   \u2705  Surfaces the 10x version: views as a shareable, linkable platform primitive\n\u2502   \u2705  Enthusiastic recommendations, still opt-in per item\n\u2502   \u274c  Risk of pilot scope ballooning past the two-week window\n\u2502 C) HOLD SCOPE\n\u2502   \u2705  Fastest path to a bulletproof version of exactly what PLAN.md says\n\u2502   \u2705  Zero scope negotiation, maximum rigor on errors, edges, observability\n\u2502   \u274c  Obvious adjacent wins are never surfaced for a decision\n\u2502 D) SCOPE REDUCTION\n\u2502   \u2705  Tests whether URL-persisted filter state alone removes the pain before building save/list/edit/delete\n\u2502   \u2705  Smallest pilot, fastest signal\n\u2502   \u274c  Pilot may measure something too thin to tell whether members ac\u2026\n\n\u276f 1. SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n     Hold PLAN.md scope as the baseline and harden it, then present each expansion (shared views, default view, URL\n     links, sprawl cap, etc.) as its own neutral yes/defer/skip.\n  2. SCOPE EXPANSION\n     Dream big: views as a shareable, linkable primitive. Every expansion pitched enthusiastically, still opt-in one at\n     a time.\n  3. HOLD SCOPE\n     Scope is final. Maximum rigor only: architecture, security, error paths, edge cases, observability, rollout. No\n     expansions surfaced.\n  4. SCOPE REDUCTION\n     Strip to the minimum that removes the pain, possibly URL-persisted filter state plus a single save action, then\n     review that.\n  5. Type something.\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n  6. Chat about this\n\nEnter to select \u00b7 \u2191/\u2193 to navigate \u00b7 Esc to cancel\n\n",
  "downstreamTail": "\n\u273b\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u273d\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u25cf\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n9\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u273b\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2736\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n*8\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2722\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00b7\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u25cf\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2722\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n*\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u27369\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\nPlanning:\n/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-1e2MBy/tmp/gstack-hermetic-429232-yVH2IW/wth-skills/.claud/plans/floofy-dazzling-sundae.md\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n \u2610 Shared views\n\n\u2502 D6 \u2014 Expansion 2 of 8: Shared project views (private or project-visible)?\n\u2502<gstck-qid:plan-ceo-review-expansion-shared-views>\n\n\u2502Project/branch/task:main,savedprojectviews,EXPANSIONmode.\n\n\u2502ELI10:Picturealeadbuilding'Blockedthissprint'onceandeverymemberoftheprojectseeingitintheirpicker,\n\n\u2502noSlackmessagewithinstructions.Eachviewgetsavisibilityswitch:private(onlyme)orproject(everymember).\n\n\u2502Onlytheowner(oraprojectadmin)caneditordeleteaprojectview;otherscanduplicateitintotheirown.\n\n\u2502Concreteshape:avisibilitycolumnwithacheckconstraint,listendpointreturnsownprivateviewsplus\n\n\u2502project-visibleviews,authorizationonupdate/deletechecksowneroradmin,pickergroups'Mine'and'Shared'.\n\n\u2502Effort:human~2days/CC~30minontopofthebase.\n\n\u2502Stakesifwepickwrong:Withoutit,tenmemberseachrecreatethesameteamview,whichistheoriginalpainmoved\n\n\u2502onelevelup.Withitdonebadly,amembercaneditaviewthewholeteamrelieson,orasharedviewexposesafilter\n\n\u2502valuefromatasktheycannotsee.\n\n\u2502Recommendation:AbecausetheschemafromD3alreadyanticipatesavisibilitycolumnandthepilotmetric('domembers\n\n\u2502reuseviews')getsitsstrongestsignalfromviewsaleadcanhandtotheteam.\n\n\u2502Completeness:A=10/10,B=7/10,C=4/10\n\n\u2502A)Addtoscope(recommended)\n\n\u2502\u2705OnesharedviewreplacesNidenticalprivateones;theteampainissolved,notjusttheindividualone\n\n\u2502\u2705Authorizationrules(owneroradminedits,anyoneduplicates)areexplicitandtestable\n\n\u2502\u274cAddsanauthorizationmatrixanda'whochangedtheteamview'auditneed\n\n\u2502B)DefertoTODOS.md\n\n\u2502\u2705Personal-onlypilotissimplertoreasonaboutandmeasure\n\n\u2502\u2705Visibilitycolumncanshipasprivate-onlynowwiththeenuminplace\n\n\u2502\u274cPilotcannottellwhethersharedviewsdrivereuse,whichislikelythebiggereffect\n\n\u2502C)Skip\n\n\u2502\u2705Smallestauthorizationsurface\n\n\u2502\u274cEverymemberkeepsrebuildingtheteam'sstandardviews\n\n\u2502Net:solvingtheteam'spa\u2026\n\n\n\n\u276f1.Addtoscope(recommended)\n\nvisibility\u2208{private,project};ownerorprojectadminedits;anyonecanduplicate;pickergroupsMine/Shared.\n\nHuman~2days/CC~30min.Completeness10/10.\n\n2.DefertoTODOS.md\n\nShipthevisibilitycolumnasprivate-only;writesharedviewsupasthefirstfollow-on.Completeness7/10.\n\n3.Skip\n\nPersonalviewsonly,novisibilityconcept.Completeness4/10.\n\n4.Typesomething.\n\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n\n5.Chataboutthis\n\n\n\nEntertoselect\u00b7\u2191/\u2193tonavigate\u00b7Esctocancel\n\n\n"
}