mirror of https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git synced 2026-05-02 03:35:09 +02:00

Files

T

Garry Tan 8ee16b867b feat: mode-posture energy fix for /plan-ceo-review and /office-hours (v1.1.2.0) (#1065 )

* feat: restore mode-posture energy to expansion + forcing + builder output

Rewrites Writing Style rule 2-4 examples in scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts
to cover three framing families (pain reduction, upside/delight, forcing
pressure) instead of diagnostic-pain only. Adds inline exemplars to
plan-ceo-review (0D-prelude shared between SCOPE + SELECTIVE EXPANSION)
and office-hours (Q3 forcing exemplar with career/day/weekend domain
gating, builder operating principles wild exemplar).

V1 shipped rule 2-4 examples that all pointed to diagnostic-pain framing
("3-second spinner", "double-click button"). Models follow concrete
examples over abstract taxonomies, so any skill with a non-diagnostic
mode posture (expansion, forcing, delight) got flattened at runtime
even when the template itself said "dream big" or "direct to the point
of discomfort." This change targets the actual lever: swap the single
diagnostic example for three paired framings, one per posture family.

Preserves V1 clarity gains — rules 2, 3, 4 principles unchanged, only
examples expanded. Terse mode (EXPLAIN_LEVEL: terse) still skips the
block entirely.

* chore: regenerate SKILL.md after preamble + template changes

Mechanical cascade from `bun run gen:skill-docs --host all` after the
Writing Style rule 2-4 example rewrite and the plan-ceo-review /
office-hours template exemplar additions. No hand edits — every change
flows from the prior commit's templates.

* test: add gate-tier mode-posture regression tests

Three gate-tier E2E tests detect when preamble / template changes
flatten the distinctive posture of /plan-ceo-review SCOPE EXPANSION or
/office-hours (startup Q3, builder mode). The V1 regression that this
PR fixes shipped without anyone catching it at ship time — this is the
ongoing signal so the same thing doesn't happen again.

Pieces:
- `judgePosture(mode, text)` in `test/helpers/llm-judge.ts`. Sonnet
  judge with mode-specific dual-axis rubric (expansion: surface_framing
  + decision_preservation; forcing: stacking_preserved +
  domain_matched_consequence; builder: unexpected_combinations +
  excitement_over_optimization). Pass threshold 4/5 on both axes.
- Three fixtures in `test/fixtures/mode-posture/` — deterministic input
  for expansion proposal generation, Q3 forcing question, and builder
  adjacent-unlock riffing.
- `plan-ceo-review-expansion-energy` case appended to
  `test/skill-e2e-plan.test.ts`. Generator: Opus (skill default). Judge:
  Sonnet.
- New `test/skill-e2e-office-hours.test.ts` with
  `office-hours-forcing-energy` + `office-hours-builder-wildness`
  cases. Generator: Sonnet. Judge: Sonnet.
- Touchfile registration in `test/helpers/touchfiles.ts` — all three as
  `gate` tier in `E2E_TIERS`, triggered by changes to
  `scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts`, the relevant skill template, the
  judge helper, or any mode-posture fixture.

Cost: ~$0.50-$1.50 per triggered PR. Sonnet judge is cheap; Opus
generator for the plan-ceo-review case dominates.

Known V1.1 tradeoff: judges test prose markers more than deep behavior.
V1.2 candidate is a cross-provider (Codex) adversarial judge on the
same output to decouple house-style bias.

* test: update golden ship baselines + touchfile count for mode-posture entries

Mechanical test updates after the mode-posture work:
- Golden ship SKILL.md baselines (claude + codex + factory hosts) regenerate with
  the rewritten Writing Style rule 2-4 examples from preamble.ts.
- Touchfile selection test expects 6 matches for a plan-ceo-review/ change (was 5)
  because E2E_TOUCHFILES now includes plan-ceo-review-expansion-energy.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v1.1.2.0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-04-19 05:44:39 +08:00

817 B

Raw Permalink Blame History

Plan: Team Velocity Dashboard

Context

We're building a dashboard for engineering managers to track team code velocity — commits per engineer, PR cycle time, review latency, CI pass rate. The data already lives in GitHub; we're just aggregating it for a manager's single-pane view.

Changes

New React component TeamVelocityDashboard in src/dashboard/
REST API endpoint GET /api/team/velocity?days=30 returning aggregated metrics
Background job pulling GitHub data every 15 minutes into Postgres
Simple filter UI: team, date range, metric

Architecture

Frontend: React + shadcn/ui
Backend: Express + PostgreSQL
Data source: GitHub REST API (cached 15min)

Open questions

Should we support multiple repos per team?
Do we show individual engineer names or aggregate only?

817 B Raw Permalink Blame History