Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-review-army.test.ts
T
Garry Tan dcaea52800 v1.91.7.0 feat: add functional QA and pre-publication docs checks (#2983)
* feat: add surface-aware exploratory QA and ship documentation gates

* test: preserve delegated QA setup authority after main integration

* fix(qa): clarify exploration order and preserve report artifacts

* test(qa): follow the shared setup reference directly

* refactor(ship): make verification and recovery routes explicit

* test(ship): align evidence and review guards with explicit routes

* fix(workflows): clarify ship recovery and functional QA evidence

* fix(workflows): clarify approval recovery and full QA coverage

* refactor(workflows): order review transactions and clarify ship state

* fix(ship): clarify final verification and fail closed at publication

* fix(evals): attribute native atomic documentation writes

* fix(ship): clarify recovery and documentation lifecycle guidance

* fix(test): preserve observed native placeholder styling in CI

* fix(codex): report watchdog timeouts without a process-exit race

* Checkpoint functional QA implementation and workflow validation repairs

* Fix documentation and shared-review fixture contracts

* docs: clarify judge reuse and evaluation supervision

* test: align review evidence and selected case contracts

* test: verify append-only documentation checkpoints and recovery

* fix: qualify QA workflows and CI validation repairs

* fix: launch shared-libs fixture scripts on Windows

* fix: qualify QA deadlines, fixture isolation, and shard cleanup

* fix: preserve qualified QA and cancellation repairs

* fix: enforce functional fixture authority and share strict event decoding

* fix: retain free-test evidence and explain recovery

* fix: reject malformed native evidence after decoder consolidation

* test: use reliable capture for telemetry privacy filters

* test: refresh measured quick coverage and document validation costs

* Fix native fixture receipts and preserve VM validation evidence

* Align negative judge controls with upstream clarity policy

* Fix report-only QA preparation and public evidence handling

* Clarify QA-only preparation and current-report preservation

* Stream Ship quality judgments with an explicit 64k response contract

* Validate compact judge reasoning locally with supported wire schema

* Align functional QA fixture instructions with evidence acceptance

* Bind native browser diagnostics to execution evidence and align review verdicts

* Preserve native diagnostic line boundaries

* Serialize functional QA evidence from native captures

* Keep large QA evidence fixture payload out of Windows argv
2026-09-29 06:07:35 -07:00

789 lines
32 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
import { JUDGE_MS, CAPTURE_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
import { runSkillTest, SESSION_DRAIN_GRACE_MS } from './helpers/session-runner';
import { runRecordedOfficeHoursAttempt, OFFICE_HOURS_BUN_GRACE_MS } from './helpers/office-hours-attempt';
import { resolveEvalModel } from '../lib/eval-model';
import {
ROOT, runId, describeIfSelected, testConcurrentIfSelected,
logCost, recordE2E, createEvalCollector, finalizeEvalCollector,
} from './helpers/e2e-helpers';
import { extractSkillSections, REVIEW_ARMY_E2E_SECTIONS, sliceBetween } from './helpers/skill-fixture';
import { spawnSync } from 'child_process';
import * as fs from 'fs';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as os from 'os';
const evalCollector = createEvalCollector('e2e-review-army');
// Let capture cleanup and assertions settle before Bun retries or
// removes its shared fixture. This adds no model work time.
const CAPTURE_FINALIZE_MS = SESSION_DRAIN_GRACE_MS + 5_000;
// Helper: create a git repo with a feature branch
function setupRepo(prefix: string): { dir: string; run: (cmd: string, args: string[]) => void } {
const dir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), `skill-e2e-${prefix}-`));
const run = (cmd: string, args: string[]) =>
spawnSync(cmd, args, { cwd: dir, stdio: 'pipe', timeout: 5000 });
run('git', ['init', '-b', 'main']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.email', 'test@test.com']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.name', 'Test']);
return { dir, run };
}
// Helper: stage review skill files in the test dir. The SKILL.md fixture is
// EXTRACTED (CLAUDE.md: "E2E test fixtures: extract, don't copy") — core
// review workflow + Step 1.5 (Plan Completion Audit) + Step 4.5 (Review Army
// dispatch: quality score, JSON schema, consensus, Red Team).
//
// /review is carved (T9): the Step 4.5 dispatch body lives in
// review/sections/review-army.md and the Plan Completion Audit in
// review/sections/plan-completion.md — the skeleton keeps only STOP-Read
// pointers, so the '## Step 4.5' H2 no longer exists in review/SKILL.md.
// Extract the skeleton H2s minus Step 4.5, then append both section files
// (still an extraction: sections ARE the minimal on-demand units).
const REVIEW_ARMY_SKELETON_SECTIONS = REVIEW_ARMY_E2E_SECTIONS.filter(
(s) => !s.startsWith('Step 4.5'),
);
function readReviewSection(file: string): string {
const p = path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'sections', file);
const content = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf-8');
// Failure polarity: a fixture is never silently staged empty (regen missing).
if (content.trim().length < 500) {
throw new Error(`review section ${file} is unexpectedly small — was gen-skill-docs run after the carve?`);
}
return content;
}
function copyReviewFiles(dir: string) {
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(dir, 'review-SKILL.md'),
[
extractSkillSections(path.join(ROOT, 'review'), REVIEW_ARMY_SKELETON_SECTIONS),
readReviewSection('plan-completion.md'),
readReviewSection('review-army.md'),
].join('\n'),
);
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'checklist.md'), path.join(dir, 'review-checklist.md'));
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'greptile-triage.md'), path.join(dir, 'review-greptile-triage.md'));
// Copy specialist checklists
const specDir = path.join(dir, 'review-specialists');
fs.mkdirSync(specDir, { recursive: true });
const specialistsRoot = path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'specialists');
for (const f of fs.readdirSync(specialistsRoot)) {
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(specialistsRoot, f), path.join(specDir, f));
}
}
// --- Review Army: Migration Safety ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Migration Safety', ['review-army-migration-safety'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-migration');
dir = repo.dir;
// Base commit
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
// Feature branch with unsafe migration
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/drop-columns']);
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(dir, 'db', 'migrate'), { recursive: true });
const migrationContent = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-migration.sql'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'db', 'migrate', '20260330_drop_columns.sql'), migrationContent);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'drop email and phone columns']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-migration-safety', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch with a database migration that drops columns.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, security.md, performance.md, data-migration.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4 (Critical pass) then Step 4.5 (Review Army — Specialist Dispatch).
The base branch is main. Run gstack-diff-scope style analysis on the changed files.
Since db/migrate/ files changed, the Data Migration specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, instead of launching subagents, just read review-specialists/data-migration.md
and apply it yourself against the diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Write your findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-migration-safety',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army migration', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army migration safety', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
// Verify migration issues were caught
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
const hasMigrationFinding =
content.includes('drop') ||
content.includes('data loss') ||
content.includes('reversib') ||
content.includes('migration') ||
content.includes('column');
expect(hasMigrationFinding).toBe(true);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: N+1 Performance ---
let nPlusOneCaptureSequence = 0;
describeIfSelected('Review Army: N+1 Performance', ['review-army-perf-n-plus-one'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-n-plus-one');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/add-posts-index']);
const n1Content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-n-plus-one.rb'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'posts_controller.rb'), n1Content);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add posts controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-perf-n-plus-one', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch with a Ruby controller that has N+1 queries.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, performance.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4 (Critical pass) then Step 4.5 (Review Army).
The base branch is main. This is a Ruby backend file, so Performance specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, read review-specialists/performance.md and apply it against the diff.
The Performance focus does not waive the skill's conditional Red Team dispatch. If a specialist
produces a CRITICAL finding, dispatch a separate foreground Red Team subagent and merge its findings.
Write all required review outputs to ${dir}/review-output.md. After saving the report,
finish with a brief acknowledgement rather than repeating the findings in the final response.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-perf-n-plus-one',
runId: `${process.env.EVALS_RUN_ID ?? runId}-review-n-plus-one-${process.pid}-${++nPlusOneCaptureSequence}`,
});
logCost('/review army n+1', result);
let passed = false;
try {
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
expect(result.toolCalls.some(call =>
['Agent', 'Task'].includes(call.tool)
&& /\bred[ -]team\b/i.test(call.input.description ?? call.input.subagent_type ?? '')
&& call.input.run_in_background === false,
)).toBe(true);
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
const hasN1Finding =
content.includes('n+1') ||
content.includes('n + 1') ||
content.includes('eager') ||
content.includes('includes') ||
content.includes('preload') ||
content.includes('query') ||
content.includes('loop');
expect(hasN1Finding).toBe(true);
passed = result.browseErrors.length === 0;
} finally {
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army N+1 detection', 'Review Army', result, { passed });
}
}, CAPTURE_MS + CAPTURE_FINALIZE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Delivery Audit ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Delivery Audit', ['review-army-delivery-audit'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-delivery');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/three-features']);
// Write a plan file promising 3 features
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'PLAN.md'), `# Feature Plan
## Implementation Items
1. Add user authentication with login/logout
2. Add user profile page with avatar upload
3. Add email notification system for new signups
## Test Items
- Test login flow
- Test profile page rendering
- Test email sending
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', 'PLAN.md']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add plan']);
// Implement only 2 of 3 features
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'auth.rb'), `class AuthController
def login
# authenticate user
session[:user_id] = user.id
end
def logout
session.delete(:user_id)
end
end
`);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'profile.rb'), `class ProfileController
def show
@user = User.find(params[:id])
end
def update_avatar
@user.avatar.attach(params[:avatar])
end
end
`);
// NOTE: email notification system is NOT implemented (intentionally missing)
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'implement auth and profile features']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-delivery-audit', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on branch feature/three-features.
There is a PLAN.md file that promises 3 features: auth, profile, and email notifications.
The diff (git diff main...HEAD) only implements 2 of them (auth and profile).
Read review-SKILL.md for the review workflow. Focus on the Plan Completion Audit section.
The plan file is at ./PLAN.md. Cross-reference it against the diff.
For each plan item, classify as DONE, PARTIAL, NOT DONE, or CHANGED.
The email notification system should be classified as NOT DONE.
Write your completion audit to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 15,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-delivery-audit',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army delivery', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army delivery audit', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// Should identify email notifications as NOT DONE
const hasNotDone =
content.includes('not done') ||
content.includes('not_done') ||
content.includes('missing') ||
content.includes('not implemented');
const mentionsEmail =
content.includes('email') ||
content.includes('notification');
expect(hasNotDone).toBe(true);
expect(mentionsEmail).toBe(true);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Quality Score ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Quality Score', ['review-army-quality-score'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-quality');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/add-controller']);
// Real source for one defect and one legitimate optional simplification.
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'user_controller.rb'), `class UserController
def create
User.where("name = '#{params[:name]}'")
end
def lookup
User.find(NumberParser.parse(params[:id]))
end
end
`);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'number_parser.rb'), `class NumberParser
def self.parse(value)
Integer(value)
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add user controller']);
// Use the actual merge stage without copying its classification or score
// logic into the prompt. The supplied malformed metadata is the regression.
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'review-merge.md'), sliceBetween(
readReviewSection('review-army.md'), '### Step 4.6: Collect and merge findings', '### Red Team dispatch',
));
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'specialist-findings.jsonl'), [
{ severity: 'CRITICAL', advisory: true, confidence: 9, path: 'user_controller.rb', line: 3,
category: 'injection', summary: 'Interpolating params[:name] into SQL allows injection.',
fix: 'Use a parameterized query.', fingerprint: 'user_controller.rb:3:injection', specialist: 'security' },
{ severity: 'INFORMATIONAL', advisory: true, confidence: 8, path: 'number_parser.rb', line: 1,
category: 'stdlib-wrapper', summary: 'The one-method NumberParser wrapper only forwards to Integer.',
fix: 'Optionally call Integer directly in lookup and remove the wrapper.',
fingerprint: 'number_parser.rb:1:stdlib-wrapper', specialist: 'simplification', lines_removable: 5 },
].map(finding => JSON.stringify(finding)).join('\n') + '\n');
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-quality-score', async () => {
for (const artifact of ['review-output.md', 'merged-review.json']) fs.rmSync(path.join(dir, artifact), { force: true });
const before = ['user_controller.rb', 'number_parser.rb'].map(file => fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir, file), 'utf8'));
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `Replay the completed specialist results in specialist-findings.jsonl through the actual Collect and merge instructions in review-merge.md. Read user_controller.rb and number_parser.rb to verify these findings against the source.
This capture covers only the merge, classification, and scoring stage: do not dispatch additional reviewers, discover unrelated findings, or enter Fix-First. Do not edit application source.
Write the standard merged findings report to ${dir}/review-output.md.
Also write ${dir}/merged-review.json as one JSON object with findings (all final merged finding records, including optional advice), critical_count, informational_count, issues_found (defect count), and quality_score. Preserve each finding's final severity, category, and advisory classification in that artifact, and give each finding record a specialists array naming every specialist source that reported it (an array even when a single specialist did).`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 15,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-quality-score',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army quality', result);
let passed = false, failure: unknown;
try {
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
expect(result.toolCalls.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
const merged = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir, 'merged-review.json'), 'utf8'));
expect(merged).toMatchObject({ critical_count: 1, informational_count: 0, issues_found: 1, quality_score: 8 });
expect(merged.findings).toHaveLength(2);
const defect = merged.findings.find((finding: any) => finding.category === 'injection');
expect(defect).toMatchObject({ severity: 'CRITICAL' });
expect(defect.specialists).toEqual(['security']);
expect(defect.advisory).not.toBe(true);
const advice = merged.findings.find((finding: any) => finding.category === 'stdlib-wrapper');
expect(advice).toMatchObject({ severity: 'INFORMATIONAL', advisory: true });
expect(advice.specialists).toEqual(['simplification']);
expect(content).toMatch(/SPECIALIST REVIEW:\s*1 findings?\s*\(1 critical, 0 informational\)/i);
expect(content).toMatch(/PR Quality Score:\s*8(?:\.0)?\/10/i);
expect(content).toContain('[ADVISORY]');
expect(['user_controller.rb', 'number_parser.rb'].map(file => fs.readFileSync(path.join(dir, file), 'utf8'))).toEqual(before);
passed = true;
} catch (cause) {
failure = cause;
throw cause;
} finally {
recordE2E(evalCollector, 'review-army-quality-score', 'Review Army', result, {
passed, error: failure ? String(failure) : undefined,
exit_reason: passed ? 'success' : result.exitReason === 'success' ? 'assertion_failed' : result.exitReason,
});
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: JSON Findings ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: JSON Findings', ['review-army-json-findings'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-json');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/vuln']);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'search.rb'), `class SearchController
def index
# SQL injection via string interpolation
results = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
"SELECT * FROM products WHERE name LIKE '%#{params[:q]}%'"
)
render json: results
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add search']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-json-findings', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are reviewing a git diff with a SQL injection vulnerability.
Read review-specialists/security.md for the security checklist.
Apply the checklist against this diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Output your findings as JSON objects, one per line, following the schema:
{"severity":"CRITICAL","confidence":9,"path":"search.rb","line":4,"category":"injection","summary":"SQL injection via string interpolation","fix":"Use parameterized query","fingerprint":"search.rb:4:injection","specialist":"security"}
Write ONLY JSON findings (no preamble) to ${dir}/findings.json`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 12,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-json-findings',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army json', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army JSON findings', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const findingsPath = path.join(dir, 'findings.json');
if (fs.existsSync(findingsPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(findingsPath, 'utf-8').trim();
const lines = content.split('\n').filter(l => l.trim());
// At least one finding
expect(lines.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
// Each line should be valid JSON with required fields
for (const line of lines) {
let parsed: any;
try { parsed = JSON.parse(line); } catch { continue; }
// Required fields per schema
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('severity');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('confidence');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('path');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('category');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('summary');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('specialist');
break; // One valid line is enough for the gate test
}
}
}, JUDGE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Red Team (periodic) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Red Team', ['review-army-red-team'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-redteam');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/large-change']);
// Create a large diff (300+ lines)
const lines: string[] = ['class LargeController'];
for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
lines.push(` def method_${i}`);
lines.push(` data = params[:input_${i}]`);
lines.push(` process(data)`);
lines.push(' end');
lines.push('');
}
lines.push('end');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'large_controller.rb'), lines.join('\n'));
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add large controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-red-team', async () => {
await runRecordedOfficeHoursAttempt({
collector: evalCollector,
name: '/review army red team',
suite: 'Review Army',
model: process.env.EVALS_MODEL ?? resolveEvalModel('capture'),
budgetMs: CAPTURE_MS,
run: (signal) => runSkillTest({
signal,
prompt: `You are reviewing a large diff (300+ lines). Read review-SKILL.md.
Skip preamble, lake intro, telemetry.
The diff is large enough to activate the Red Team specialist.
Read review-specialists/red-team.md and apply it against the diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Focus on finding issues that other specialists might miss.
Write your red team findings to ${dir}/review-output.md
Start the file with "RED TEAM REVIEW" on the first line.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-red-team',
runId,
}),
validate: async (result) => {
logCost('/review army red-team', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
expect(content.toLowerCase()).toMatch(/red team|adversarial/);
}
},
});
}, CAPTURE_MS + OFFICE_HOURS_BUN_GRACE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Consensus (periodic) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Consensus', ['review-army-consensus'], () => {
let dir: string;
let consensusCaptureSequence = 0;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-consensus');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/vuln-auth']);
// SQL injection that both security AND testing specialists should flag
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'auth_controller.rb'), `class AuthController
def login
user = User.find_by("email = '#{params[:email]}' AND password = '#{params[:password]}'")
if user
session[:user_id] = user.id
redirect_to root_path
else
flash[:error] = "Invalid credentials"
render :login
end
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add auth controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-consensus', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are reviewing a git diff with a SQL injection in an auth controller.
Read review-SKILL.md, review-checklist.md, and the specialist checklists in review-specialists/.
This vulnerability should be caught by BOTH the security specialist (injection vector)
AND the testing specialist (no test for auth bypass).
Run the review. In your output, if a finding is flagged by multiple perspectives,
mark it as "MULTI-SPECIALIST CONFIRMED" with the confirming categories.
Write findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-consensus',
runId: `${process.env.EVALS_RUN_ID ?? runId}-review-consensus-${process.pid}-${++consensusCaptureSequence}`,
publicStreamDiagnostics: true,
});
logCost('/review army consensus', result);
let passed = false;
try {
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// Should catch the SQL injection
const hasSqlFinding =
content.includes('sql') ||
content.includes('injection') ||
content.includes('interpolat');
expect(hasSqlFinding).toBe(true);
}
passed = result.browseErrors.length === 0;
} finally {
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army consensus', 'Review Army', result, { passed });
}
// The runner can drain stderr for 5s after exit; reserve 1s for assertions/recording.
}, CAPTURE_MS + CAPTURE_FINALIZE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Simplification specialist (activation) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Simplification activation', ['review-army-simplification'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-simplification');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.js'), '// base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/date-utils']);
const overbuild = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-overbuild.js'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'date_utils.js'), overbuild);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add date utils']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-simplification', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch that adds a JS utility file.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, simplification.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4.5 (Review Army) only.
The base branch is main. The diff is over 100 lines, so the Simplification specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, read review-specialists/simplification.md and apply it against the diff.
Write your findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: 180_000,
testName: 'review-army-simplification',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army simplification', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army simplification detection', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// At least one planted invitation caught, expressed through the closed
// tag vocabulary or its obvious phrasing.
const hasStructureFinding =
content.includes('native') ||
content.includes('stdlib') ||
content.includes('speculative') ||
content.includes('intl') ||
content.includes('one implementation') ||
content.includes('single implementation');
expect(hasStructureFinding).toBe(true);
// Advisory findings must not read as defects: the disavowed frame stays out.
expect(content).not.toContain('lean already. ship.');
}, 210_000);
});
// --- Review Army: Simplification specialist (false-flag precision) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Simplification precision', ['review-army-simplification-precision'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-simplification-lean');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.js'), '// base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/parse-port']);
const lean = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-lean-complete.js'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'parse_port.js'), lean);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add parsePort with self-check']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-simplification-precision', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch that adds one small, complete utility (validation + error path + self-check).
Read review-specialists/simplification.md and apply it against the diff of the current branch vs main (git diff main).
Write the specialist's raw output to ${dir}/review-output.md — either the finding JSON lines or the exact NO FINDINGS sentinel.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 12,
timeout: 150_000,
testName: 'review-army-simplification-precision',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army simplification precision', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army simplification precision', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
// Precision: a lean, complete diff yields no simplification findings.
// The specialist must not flag the error path or the self-check for
// deletion — that is the noise failure mode this case pins.
const flaggedTestOrErrorPath =
/"category"\s*:\s*"(delete|shrink|stdlib|native|speculative)"/i.test(content) &&
/(testparseport|self-check|assert|throw)/i.test(content);
expect(flaggedTestOrErrorPath).toBe(false);
expect(content.toUpperCase()).toContain('NO FINDINGS');
}, 180_000);
});
// Finalize eval collector
afterAll(async () => {
await finalizeEvalCollector(evalCollector);
});