gstack/test/fixtures/native-auq-packet-clipped-elided-sep21.json

{
  "publicCall": {
    "sessionId": "f5b79e56-921d-414c-9194-34abc3095185",
    "toolUseId": "toolu_013SFKoGjBNUP6a3qCvDFNXR",
    "questions": [
      {
        "question": "D1 — Confirm the product and surface before I design for it\nProject/branch/task: main branch, design consultation for the terminal-first task manager described in product.md.\nELI10: Before picking fonts, colors, and layout I need to know what I'm designing for. Your brief says a terminal-first task manager for senior engineers, pre-launch. The visual system for a TUI (text user interface) is very different from a marketing site that sells one, and both differ from a companion web dashboard. The stakes: design the wrong surface and the whole system is unusable.\nStakes if we pick wrong: a pixel-perfect web style guide is worthless if the real product is a monospace grid in a terminal, and vice versa.\nRecommendation: A because a pre-launch developer tool almost always needs both a launch site and the tool itself to share one visual voice.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) TUI plus a launch/marketing site (recommended)\n  ✅ One coherent brand across the terminal, the README, and the landing page from day one\n  ✅ Lets me define both a monospace-native palette and a web typography system that echo each other\n  ❌ More surface to cover, so the proposal takes longer to read and review\nB) TUI only\n  ✅ Tight focus: terminal palette, ANSI color mapping, layout density, keyboard affordances\n  ✅ Fastest path to a DESIGN.md you can apply in code this week\n  ❌ Leaves the launch site undesigned, so it risks looking like an afterthought\nC) Marketing site only\n  ✅ Concentrates effort on the first impression that drives pre-launch signups\n  ✅ Full web typography and color freedom without terminal constraints\n  ❌ The product people actually use stays unstyled and can drift from the brand\nD) Something else\n  ✅ Maybe there's a web dashboard, editor plugin, or docs site I haven't guessed\n  ✅ Tell me in chat and I'll fold it in\n  ❌ I'll need a sentence or two from you before I can proceed\nNet: I'm trading breadth of coverage for speed; A gets a coherent brand, B gets shipped fastest.\nAt any point you can just drop into chat and we'll talk through anything — this isn't a rigid form, it's a conversation. <gstack-qid:design-consultation-product-context>",
        "header": "Product",
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "TUI + launch site (recommended)",
            "description": "✅ One coherent brand across terminal, README, and landing page\n✅ Monospace palette and web typography that echo each other\n❌ More surface to cover, longer proposal to review"
          },
          {
            "label": "TUI only",
            "description": "✅ Tight focus on terminal palette, ANSI mapping, density, keyboard affordances\n✅ Fastest path to a DESIGN.md you can apply in code this week\n❌ Launch site stays undesigned and may look like an afterthought"
          },
          {
            "label": "Marketing site only",
            "description": "✅ Concentrates effort on the first impression that drives signups\n✅ Full web typography and color freedom, no terminal constraints\n❌ The product people actually use stays unstyled and can drift"
          },
          {
            "label": "Something else",
            "description": "✅ A web dashboard, editor plugin, or docs site I haven't guessed\n✅ Tell me in chat and I'll fold it into the plan\n❌ I need a sentence or two from you before proceeding"
          }
        ],
        "multiSelect": false
      },
      {
        "question": "Want me to research what top products in your space are doing for design (Taskwarrior, todo.txt clients, lazygit-style TUIs, Linear, Height, and the developer-tool landing pages people copy), or should I work from my design knowledge?\nRecommendation: research, because pre-launch is exactly when you want to know what the category looks like so you can deliberately break from it.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Research the space first (recommended)\n  ✅ Grounds the proposal in what your users already see every day\n  ✅ Surfaces the category clichés so we can pick deliberate departures\n  ❌ Adds a research pass before you see any proposal (human: ~half a day / CC: ~5 min)\nB) Work from design knowledge\n  ✅ You get a proposal immediately with no waiting\n  ✅ Avoids anchoring on competitors you may already know well\n  ❌ Risks reinventing the same dark-mode developer-tool look everyone ships\nNet: a few minutes of research buys a proposal that knows what it's rejecting.",
        "header": "Research",
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "Research the space (recommended)",
            "description": "✅ Grounds the proposal in what your users see daily\n✅ Surfaces category clichés so we can pick deliberate departures\n❌ Adds a short research pass before the proposal"
          },
          {
            "label": "Work from design knowledge",
            "description": "✅ Proposal immediately, no waiting\n✅ Avoids anchoring on competitors you already know\n❌ Risks the same dark-mode dev-tool look everyone ships"
          }
        ],
        "multiSelect": false
      },
      {
        "question": "What's the one thing you want someone to remember after they see this product for the first time? One sentence: a feeling, a visual, a claim, or a posture. Every design decision will serve it.\nRecommendation: pick the closest option or type your own — this is a taste call, no strong preference either way.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\nPros / cons:\nA) Built for people who live in the terminal (recommended)\n  ✅ Signals seriousness to senior engineers who distrust polished consumer tools\n  ✅ Justifies monospace-native, dense, keyboard-first design choices\n  ❌ Can read as gatekeeping if the launch site leans on it too hard\nB) Fast enough to disappear\n  ✅ Speed as the brand gives every screen a clear editing rule: remove anything slow\n  ✅ Strong differentiator against web-first task tools that feel heavy\n  ❌ Hard to show speed in a static landing page without motion work\nC) Calm, not another notification machine\n  ✅ Positions against noisy project tools and earns a quieter palette\n  ✅ Appeals to senior engineers who guard their focus time\n  ❌ Calm can tip into forgettable if the type and color are too restrained\nD) I'll write my own\n  ✅ Your words will be sharper than my guesses about your product\n  ✅ Anything you type becomes the sentence the whole system serves\n  ❌ Needs a sentence from you before I move on\nNet: this line becomes the tiebreaker for every later font, color, and layout decision.",
        "header": "Memorable",
        "options": [
          {
            "label": "Built for terminal natives (recommended)",
            "description": "✅ Signals seriousness to senior engineers who distrust polished consumer tools\n✅ Justifies monospace-native, dense, keyboard-first choices\n❌ Can read as gatekeeping if the site leans on it too hard"
          },
          {
            "label": "Fast enough to disappear",
            "description": "✅ Speed as the brand gives every screen a clear editing rule\n✅ Strong differentiator against heavy web-first task tools\n❌ Hard to show speed on a static landing page without motion"
          },
          {
            "label": "Calm, not a notification machine",
            "description": "✅ Positions against noisy project tools and earns a quieter palette\n✅ Appeals to senior engineers who guard focus time\n❌ Calm tips into forgettable if type and color are too restrained"
          },
          {
            "label": "I'll write my own",
            "description": "✅ Your words beat my guesses about your product\n✅ Whatever you type becomes the sentence the system serves\n❌ Needs a sentence from you before I move on"
          }
        ],
        "multiSelect": false
      }
    ],
    "answered": false,
    "failed": false,
    "source": "pre_tool_use"
  },
  "viewport": "│ terminal, and vice versa.\n│ Recommendation: A because a pre-launch developer tool almost always needs both a launch site and the tool itself to\n│ share one visual voice.\n│ Note: options differ in kind, not coverage — no completeness score.\n│ Pros / cons:\n│ A) TUI plus a launch/marketing site (recommended)\n│   ✅ One coherent brand across the terminal, the README, and the landing page from day one\n│   ✅ Lets me define both a monospace-native palette and a web typography system that echo each other\n│   ❌ More surface to cover, so the proposal takes longer to read and review\n│ B) TUI only\n│   ✅ Tight focus: terminal palette, ANSI color mapping, layout density, keyboard affordances\n│   ✅ Fastest path to a DESIGN.md you can apply in code this week\n│   ❌ Leaves the launch site undesigned, so it risks looking like an afterthought\n│ C) Marketing site only\n│   ✅ Concentrates effort on the first impression that drives pre-launch signups\n│   ✅ Full web typography and color freedom without terminal constraints\n│   ❌ The product people actually use stays unstyled and can drift from the brand\n│ D) Something else\n│   ✅ Maybe there's a web dashboard, editor plugin, or docs site I haven't guessed\n│   ✅ Tell me in chat and I'll fold it in\n│   ❌ I'll need a sentence or two from you before I can proceed\n│ Net: I'm trading breadth of coverage for speed; A gets…\n\n❯ 1. TUI + launch site (recommended)\n     ✅ One coherent brand across terminal, README, and landing page�✅ Monospace palette and web typography that echo\n     each other�❌ More surface to cover, longer proposal to review\n  2. TUI only\n     ✅ Tight focus on terminal palette, ANSI mapping, density, keyboard affordances�✅ Fastest path to a DESIGN.md you\n     can apply in code this week�❌ Launch site stays undesigned and may look like an afterthought\n  3. Marketing site only\n     ✅ Concentrates effort on the first impression that drives signups�✅ Full web typography and color freedom, no\n     terminal constraints�❌ The product people actually use stays unstyled and can drift\n  4. Something else\n     ✅ A web dashboard, editor plugin, or docs site I haven't guessed�✅ Tell me in chat and I'll fold it into the\n     plan�❌ I need a sentence or two from you before proceeding\n  5. Type something.                                                            \n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  6. Chat about this\n\nEnter to select · Tab/Arrow keys to navigate · Esc to cancel"
}