gstack/test/fixtures/ceo-mode-scrolled-review-36606688266.json

{
 "source": "run 36606688266 plan-ceo-mode-routing HOLD SCOPE: final viewport, accumulated screen text from the last tab frame, and the pending native call",
 "screen": " \u2502   ELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so requests like \"review this\n \u2502   diff\" route to the right skill automatically. This is a plain text section appended to CLAUDE.md.\n \u2502   Stakes if we pick wrong: without it you invoke skills by name manually; with it, plain requests auto-route. Either\n \u2502   is reversible.\n \u2502   Recommendation: A because auto-routing removes a step from every future session and costs one commit.\n \u2502   Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n \u2502   Net: convenience now vs. one extra committed section in CLAUDE.md. Plan mode blocks file edits, so if you pick A\n \u2502   the append + commit happens after this review exits plan mode.\n   \u2192 Add routing rules (recommended)\n \u2502 \u25cf D2 \u2014 Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\n \u2502   Project/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; one-time gstack setup prompt.\n \u2502   ELI10: gstack saves small lessons per project (\"this test runner needs flag X\"). Cross-project mode also searches\n \u2502   lessons from your other local projects when reviewing this one. Everything stays on this machine.\n \u2502   Stakes if we pick wrong: too narrow and you miss patterns you already learned elsewhere; too broad and a client\n \u2502   codebase could surface a lesson from another client's repo in a review.\n \u2502   Recommendation: A because this is a solo-style environment and the data never leaves the machine.\n \u2502   Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n \u2502   Net: more recall vs. strict per-project isolation.\n   \u2192 Enable cross-project (recommended)\n \u2502 \u25cf D3 \u2014 R2: Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\n \u2502   Project/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; reviewing PLAN.md \"Add saved project views\".\n \u2502   ELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. Expansion pushes for the biggest version, Hold Scope\n \u2502   stress-tests exactly what you wrote, Reduction strips to the smallest shippable core, and Selective holds your\n \u2502   scope while offering a few add-ons one at a time for you to accept or decline.\n \u2502   Stakes if we pick wrong: too ambitious and a small feature balloons; too strict and we ship personal-only views\n \u2502   when the goal (\"team members repeatedly recreate filters\") may really be a shared-view problem, forcing a second\n \u2502   migration later.\n \u2502   Recommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the plan is an added capability of ~8\u201310 files, but its member-only\n \u2502   scoping is the one fact that could be wrong: every incumbent ships shared views too, and the table shape decides\n \u2502   whether adding them later is a column or a rewrite. Selective lets you rule on that once without committing to a\n \u2502   bigger build.\n \u2502   Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n \u2502   Net: how much of the review is spent challenging scope vs. hardening the scope you already chose.\n   \u2192 HOLD SCOPE\n\nReady to submit your answers?\n\n\u276f 1. Submit answers\n  2. Cancel\n",
 "screenText": "omething.\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n  4. Chat about this\n\nEnter to select \u00b7 Tab/Arrow keys to navigate \u00b7 Esc to cancel\n\n\n\n \u2612 Learnings  \u2610 Review mode \n3R2:Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\nreviewing PLAN.md \"Add saved project views\".\nThe mode sts y posture for the rest of e review. Expansion pushes forthe biggest version, Hld Scop \nstress-testsexactly what youwt, Reduction strpso the smallst shippable cre, and Selective holds your scope \nwhil ofering a few add-onsone at time for you o accept or dcline.\nStakes if we pick wrong:too ambitious and asmall featureballoons; too strict and we ship personal-only views when \nthe goal (\"teammembers repeatedly recreate filters\") ay really be  shared-viw problm, forcing a second migration \nlar.\nRcomendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION becaue the plan is an added capability of ~8\u201310 files, but its member-only \n\u2502scoping is the one fact that could be wrong: every incumbent ships shared views too, and the table shape decides \n\u2502whether adding them later is a column or a rewrite. Selective lets you rule on that once without committing to a \n\u2502bigger build.\n\u2502Note: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\n\u2502Net: how much of the review is spent challenging scope vs. hardening the scope you already chose.\n\n\u276f1.SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)\n\u2705 Keep your fou approach bullets as the bselineand hardens hemwith fullrigor\ufffd\u2705 Offers each expansion \n   (shared views, default view, cleanup) as a separate add/defer/skip call\ufffd\u274c A few more decision questions than Hold \n     Scope before the deep review starts\n2.HOLDSCOPE\n\u2705 Maximum rigor on exactly what is written: error paths, edge cases, tests, observability\ufffd\u2705 Fastest path to an \n     implementation-ready plan wiho scopquetions\ufffd\u274c Shared views and table-shape futureproofing get flagged, not \noffered; possible second migration later\n\n3.SCOPEEXPANSION\n\n\u2705Designstheplatonicsaved-viewsfeature:personal+shared,defaults,sharelinks,cleanup\ufffd\u2705Bestlong-term\n\narchitectureupfront;nofollow-upmigrations\ufffd\u274cTurnsa~10-filefeatureintoamulti-surfacebuildbeforethe\n\ntwo-weekpilotprovesreuse\n\n4.SCOPEREDUCTION\n\n\u2705Findsthesmallestcorethatteststhepilothypothesis(maybecreate/list/applyonly)\ufffd\u2705Lowestriskand\n\nfastesttothetwo-weekreusemeasurement\ufffd\u274cUpdate/deleteandpickerpolishgetdeferred;pilotmaymeasurea\n\nclunkyversionofthefeature\n\n5.Typesomething.\n\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n\n6.Chataboutthis\n\n\n\nEntertoselect\u00b7Tab/Arrowkeystonavigate\u00b7Esctocancel\n\n\n\nReview your answers\n \u2502 \u25cf D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project'sCLAUDE.md?\n \u2502   Project/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; one-time gstack setup prompt.\n \u2502   ELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so requests like \"review this\n \u2502   diff\" route to the right skill automatically. This is a plain text section appended to CLAUDE.md.\n \u2502   Stakes if we pick wrong: without it you invoke skills by name manually;withit,plainrequestsauto-route.Either\n \u2502   is reversible.\n \u2502   Recommendation: A because auto-routing removes a step from every future session and costs one commit.\n \u2502   Note:optionsdifferinkind,notcoverage\u2014nocompletenessscore.\n \u2502   Net: convenience now vs. one extra committed section in CLAUDE.md. Plan mode blocks file edits, so if you pickA\n \u2502   the append + commit happens after this review exits plan mode.\n  \u2192 Add routing rules (recommended)\n \u2502 \u25cf D2 \u2014 Let gstacksearchlearningsfromyourotherprojectsonthismachine?\n \u2502   Project/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; one-time gstacksetupprompt.\n \u2502   ELI10: gstack saves small lessons per project (\"this test runner needs flag X\"). Cross-projectmodealsosearches\n\u2502lessonsfromyourotherlocalprojectswhenreviewingthisone.Everythingstaysonthismachine.\n \u2502  Stakes if we pick wrong: too narrowandyoumisspatternsyoualreadylearnedelsewhere;toobroadandaclient\n\u2502codebase could surface a lesson from another client's repo in a review.\n\u2502Recommendation: A because this is a solo-style environment and the data never leaves the machine.\n\u2502Note: options differ in kind, not coverage\u2014nocompletenessscore.\n\u2502  Net:more recallvs.strictper-projectisolation.\n\u2192 Enable cross-project (recommended)\n\u2502\u25cfD3 \u2014 R2: Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\n\u2502Project/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQukonmain;reviewingPLAN.md\"Addsavedprojectviews\".\n\u2502  ELI10: The modesetsmyposturefortherestofthereview.Expansionpushesforthebiggestversion,HoldScope\n\u2502stress-tests exactly what you wrote, Reduction strips to the smallest shippable core, and Selective holds your\n\u2502scope while offering a few add-ons one at a time for you to accept or decline.\n\u2502Stakes if we pick wrong: tooambitiousandasmallfeatureballoons;toostrictandweshippersonal-onlyviews\n\u2502  when the goal (\"teammembersrepeatedlyrecreatefilters\")mayreallybeashared-viewproblem,forcingasecond\n\u2502migration later.\n\u2502Recommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the plan is an added capability of ~8\u201310 files, but its member-only\n\u2502scoping is the one fact that couldbewrong:everyincumbentshipssharedviewstoo,andthetableshapedecides\n\u2502   whether adding themlaterisacolumnorarewrite.Selectiveletsyouruleonthatoncewithoutcommittingtoa\n \u2502   bigger build.\n\u2502  Note: options differinkind,notcoverage\u2014nocompletenessscore.\n\u2502Net:howmuchofthereviewisspentchallengingscopevs.hardeningthescopeyoualreadychose.\n   \u2192 HOLD SCOPE\n\n\n\nReadytosubmityouranswers?\n\n\n\n\u276f1.Submitanswers\n\n2.Cancel\n\n",
 "transcript": {
  "status": "ready",
  "calls": [
   {
    "sessionId": "4ea226bf-5a31-4342-8141-c76094320f94",
    "toolUseId": "toolu_01Ee4tS4SoMXqLyS14ayssEy",
    "questions": [
     {
      "question": "D1 \u2014 Add gstack skill routing rules to this project's CLAUDE.md?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; one-time gstack setup prompt.\nELI10: gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules, so requests like \"review this diff\" route to the right skill automatically. This is a plain text section appended to CLAUDE.md.\nStakes if we pick wrong: without it you invoke skills by name manually; with it, plain requests auto-route. Either is reversible.\nRecommendation: A because auto-routing removes a step from every future session and costs one commit.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: convenience now vs. one extra committed section in CLAUDE.md. Plan mode blocks file edits, so if you pick A the append + commit happens after this review exits plan mode.",
      "header": "Routing",
      "multiSelect": false,
      "options": [
       {
        "label": "Add routing rules (recommended)",
        "description": "\u2705 Plain requests (\"ship this\", \"find the bug\") route to the right skill without naming it\n\u2705 One short section, committed once; teammates get the same routing\n\u274c Adds a gstack-specific block to CLAUDE.md; applied after plan mode exits, not now"
       },
       {
        "label": "No thanks, manual invocation",
        "description": "\u2705 CLAUDE.md stays exactly as it is; no tool-specific text in the repo\n\u2705 You keep full control over when a skill runs\n\u274c Every skill needs its /name typed; re-enable later via gstack-config routing_declined false"
       }
      ]
     },
     {
      "question": "D2 \u2014 Let gstack search learnings from your other projects on this machine?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; one-time gstack setup prompt.\nELI10: gstack saves small lessons per project (\"this test runner needs flag X\"). Cross-project mode also searches lessons from your other local projects when reviewing this one. Everything stays on this machine.\nStakes if we pick wrong: too narrow and you miss patterns you already learned elsewhere; too broad and a client codebase could surface a lesson from another client's repo in a review.\nRecommendation: A because this is a solo-style environment and the data never leaves the machine.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: more recall vs. strict per-project isolation.",
      "header": "Learnings",
      "multiSelect": false,
      "options": [
       {
        "label": "Enable cross-project (recommended)",
        "description": "\u2705 Lessons from other local projects surface here when they match a finding\n\u2705 Local only; nothing leaves the machine, and it is a one-line config flip to undo\n\u274c Not ideal if you work on multiple client codebases where mixing context is a concern"
       },
       {
        "label": "Keep project-scoped only",
        "description": "\u2705 Strict isolation: reviews here only see this project's lessons\n\u2705 Safe default for multi-client work or shared machines\n\u274c Patterns you already learned on another repo will not be suggested here"
       }
      ]
     },
     {
      "question": "D3 \u2014 R2: Which review mode for the saved-views plan?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-FwyQuk on main; reviewing PLAN.md \"Add saved project views\".\nELI10: The mode sets my posture for the rest of the review. Expansion pushes for the biggest version, Hold Scope stress-tests exactly what you wrote, Reduction strips to the smallest shippable core, and Selective holds your scope while offering a few add-ons one at a time for you to accept or decline.\nStakes if we pick wrong: too ambitious and a small feature balloons; too strict and we ship personal-only views when the goal (\"team members repeatedly recreate filters\") may really be a shared-view problem, forcing a second migration later.\nRecommendation: SELECTIVE EXPANSION because the plan is an added capability of ~8\u201310 files, but its member-only scoping is the one fact that could be wrong: every incumbent ships shared views too, and the table shape decides whether adding them later is a column or a rewrite. Selective lets you rule on that once without committing to a bigger build.\nNote: options differ in kind, not coverage \u2014 no completeness score.\nNet: how much of the review is spent challenging scope vs. hardening the scope you already chose.",
      "header": "Review mode",
      "multiSelect": false,
      "options": [
       {
        "label": "SELECTIVE EXPANSION (recommended)",
        "description": "\u2705 Keeps your four approach bullets as the baseline and hardens them with full rigor\n\u2705 Offers each expansion (shared views, default view, cleanup) as a separate add/defer/skip call\n\u274c A few more decision questions than Hold Scope before the deep review starts"
       },
       {
        "label": "HOLD SCOPE",
        "description": "\u2705 Maximum rigor on exactly what is written: error paths, edge cases, tests, observability\n\u2705 Fastest path to an implementation-ready plan with no scope questions\n\u274c Shared views and table-shape futureproofing get flagged, not offered; possible second migration later"
       },
       {
        "label": "SCOPE EXPANSION",
        "description": "\u2705 Designs the platonic saved-views feature: personal + shared, defaults, share links, cleanup\n\u2705 Best long-term architecture up front; no follow-up migrations\n\u274c Turns a ~10-file feature into a multi-surface build before the two-week pilot proves reuse"
       },
       {
        "label": "SCOPE REDUCTION",
        "description": "\u2705 Finds the smallest core that tests the pilot hypothesis (maybe create/list/apply only)\n\u2705 Lowest risk and fastest to the two-week reuse measurement\n\u274c Update/delete and picker polish get deferred; pilot may measure a clunky version of the feature"
       }
      ]
     }
    ],
    "answered": false,
    "failed": false
   }
  ],
  "assistantMessages": []
 }
}