Files
gstack/land-and-deploy/SKILL.md.tmpl
T
Garry Tan 7b534d3e90 v1.90.2.0 perf: halve local free-suite time and preserve coverage (#2972)
* perf: remove repeated test work and preserve AUQ execution budgets

* fix: validate native evaluation fixture evidence at its actual boundaries

* fix: clarify deployment approval and recovery state transitions

* chore: document coverage and release v1.90.2.0

* test: preserve Windows scheduling and native no-change consent

* test: recognize verified reads through fixture symlinks

* test: isolate alias-name installation from runtime assets
2026-09-25 13:27:07 -04:00

502 lines
23 KiB
Cheetah

---
name: land-and-deploy
preamble-tier: 4
version: 1.0.0
description: |
Land and deploy workflow. Merges the PR, waits for CI and deploy,
verifies production health via canary checks. Takes over after /ship
creates the PR. Use when: "merge", "land", "deploy", "merge and verify",
"land it", "ship it to production". (gstack)
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- Glob
- AskUserQuestion
sensitive: true
triggers:
- merge and deploy
- land the pr
- ship to production
---
{{PREAMBLE}}
{{THIRD_PARTY_ACTIONS}}
{{ASIDE_SETUP}}
{{BROWSE_FALLBACK}}
{{BASE_BRANCH_DETECT}}
**If the platform detected above is GitLab or unknown:** STOP with: "GitLab support for /land-and-deploy is not yet implemented. Run `/ship` to create the MR, then merge manually via the GitLab web UI." Do not proceed.
# /land-and-deploy — Merge, Deploy, Verify
As **Release Engineer**, pick up the PR created by `/ship`: check readiness, merge
with approval, monitor deployment, verify production, and report evidence.
## User-invocable
When the user types `/land-and-deploy`, run this skill.
## Arguments
- `/land-and-deploy` — auto-detect PR from current branch, no post-deploy URL
- `/land-and-deploy <url>` — auto-detect PR, verify deploy at this URL
- `/land-and-deploy #123` — specific PR number
- `/land-and-deploy #123 <url>` — specific PR + verification URL
## Automation and approval
Automate read-only detection and polling. First-run setup confirmation (Step 1.5)
and pre-merge approval (Step 3.5) are mandatory when applicable. Stop on missing
access, unknown target/state, failing required CI, conflicts, or failing tests.
After any merge error, read server state before deciding whether to stop.
Failures, timeouts, staging choices, rollback, and optional cleanup use the explicit
decisions below; no approval overrides a blocker or authorizes a different revision.
## Voice & Tone
Narrate progress, name the actual app/PR and explain the stakes before asking.
First run: teach what each check does. Confirmed runs: brief status updates.
---
{{SECTION_INDEX:land-and-deploy}}
---
## Step 1: Pre-flight
Tell the user: "Checking access and finding your PR."
1. Check GitHub CLI authentication:
```bash
gh auth status
```
If unauthenticated, **STOP**; ask the user to run `gh auth login`, then retry.
2. Save any URL as `VERIFY_URL` (an explicit verification request). Set `PR_NUMBER`
to the numeric `#NNN` argument, or detect it once from the current branch:
```bash
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner) || exit 1
if [ -z "$PR_NUMBER" ]; then
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --repo "$REPO" --json number -q .number) || exit 1
fi
PR_JSON=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --json number,state,title,url,mergeable,baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid,baseRefOid) || exit 1
PR_HEAD=$(printf '%s' "$PR_JSON" | jq -er .headRefOid) || exit 1
HEAD_BRANCH=$(printf '%s' "$PR_JSON" | jq -er .headRefName) || exit 1
BASE_BRANCH=$(printf '%s' "$PR_JSON" | jq -er .baseRefName) || exit 1
```
Carry these values across fresh shells. Every later command targets this repository
and PR, never implicit current-branch detection. A failed query is unknown, not an
empty PR. Tell the user the selected number, title, head → base and head SHA.
3. No PR: **STOP**, suggest `/ship`. CLOSED: **STOP**, ask to reopen it. MERGED:
**STOP**, suggest `/canary <url>`; do not merge again or claim a deploy happened.
Only OPEN continues. Before any HEAD-based evidence, require the matching clean checkout:
```bash
LOCAL_HEAD=$(git rev-parse HEAD) || exit 1
LOCAL_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current) || exit 1
LOCAL_STATUS=$(git status --porcelain) || exit 1
if [ "$LOCAL_HEAD" != "$PR_HEAD" ] || [ "$LOCAL_BRANCH" != "$HEAD_BRANCH" ] || [ -n "$LOCAL_STATUS" ]; then
echo "LOCAL_TARGET_MISMATCH"
exit 1
fi
git fetch "https://github.com/$REPO.git" "$BASE_BRANCH" || exit 1
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD) || exit 1
SCOPE_RESULT=$(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-diff-scope "$BASE_SHA") || exit 1
eval "$SCOPE_RESULT"
```
On mismatch, **STOP** and ask the user to save their work, check out/update the PR
branch, and rerun. Do not switch, reset, or stash for them. Preserve `BASE_SHA`, the
PR's commit list and all scope flags before merging; cleanup may change HEAD afterward.
Unknown scope is not docs-only. `DOCS_ONLY=true` requires SCOPE_DOCS and no other scope.
---
## Step 1.5: First-run dry-run validation
Check for prior setup confirmation and changed configuration (not proof of a successful deploy):
```bash
{{SLUG_EVAL}}
if [ ! -f ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/land-deploy-confirmed ]; then
echo "FIRST_RUN"
else
# Check if deploy config has changed since confirmation
SAVED_HASH=$(cat ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/land-deploy-confirmed 2>/dev/null)
CURRENT_HASH=$(sed -n '/## Deploy Configuration/,/^## /p' CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null | shasum -a 256 | cut -d' ' -f1)
# Also hash workflow files that affect deploy behavior
WORKFLOW_HASH=$(find .github/workflows -maxdepth 1 \( -name '*deploy*' -o -name '*cd*' \) 2>/dev/null | xargs cat 2>/dev/null | shasum -a 256 | cut -d' ' -f1)
COMBINED_HASH="${CURRENT_HASH}-${WORKFLOW_HASH}"
if [ "$SAVED_HASH" != "$COMBINED_HASH" ] && [ -n "$SAVED_HASH" ]; then
echo "CONFIG_CHANGED"
else
echo "CONFIRMED"
fi
fi
```
**If CONFIRMED:** Say "Setup was previously confirmed." Go to Step 2; do NOT read the dry-run section.
**If FIRST_RUN or CONFIG_CHANGED:** Read and execute the dry-run section:
{{SECTION:first-run-validation}}
Choice A saves the fingerprint and continues to Step 2; B/C stop.
---
## Step 2: Pre-merge checks
Tell the user: "Checking CI status and merge readiness..."
```bash
gh pr checks "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --required --json name,state,bucket,link
```
Parse valid JSON using `bucket` (pass/fail/pending/skipping/cancel). Exit 8 means
pending; a nonzero exit with valid failing checks is a CI failure. Auth/network/schema
errors are **STOP**, never "no required checks". An empty successful result or the
CLI's explicit "no required checks reported" response means none are configured.
1. Required checks **FAILING/cancelled**: **STOP**, list failures to fix.
2. Required checks **PENDING**: announce the wait and proceed to Step 3.
3. All pass (or none required): report that exact result. Skip only Step 3's wait;
continue to Step 3.4, then Step 3.5 before merging.
Also check for merge conflicts:
```bash
gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --json mergeable -q .mergeable
```
If `CONFLICTING`: **STOP**, resolve conflicts first. Failed/UNKNOWN readback: **STOP**,
readiness is not established. Cancelled required checks are failures, not passes.
---
## Step 3: Wait for CI (if pending)
If required checks are still pending, wait for them to complete. Use a timeout of 15 minutes:
```bash
gh pr checks "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "$REPO" --required --watch --fail-fast --interval 30
```
Record the CI wait time for the deploy report.
Pass: report duration and continue to Step 3.4, then Step 3.5 before merging.
Failure: **STOP**, show failing checks. Timeout (15 minutes): **STOP**, point to
GitHub Actions. Enforce the deadline; do not leave an unbounded watch running.
---
## Step 3.4: VERSION drift detection (workspace-aware ship)
Check that another workspace has not claimed this PR's VERSION since `/ship`.
```bash
BRANCH_VERSION=$(git show "$PR_HEAD:VERSION" 2>/dev/null | tr -d '\r\n[:space:]')
BASE_VERSION=$(git show "$BASE_SHA:VERSION" 2>/dev/null | tr -d '\r\n[:space:]')
QUEUE_JSON=$(bun run ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-next-version \
--base "$BASE_BRANCH" \
--exclude-pr "$PR_NUMBER" \
--bump patch \
--current-version "$BASE_VERSION" 2>/dev/null || echo '{"offline":true}')
NEXT_SLOT=$(echo "$QUEUE_JSON" | jq -r '.version // empty')
OFFLINE=$(echo "$QUEUE_JSON" | jq -r '.offline // false')
```
Use the existing conservative patch-level allocation; compare numeric version
components, not lexical strings. If this project has no VERSION, report this check
not applicable. A missing/unparseable version on only one side is unavailable, not green.
1. `OFFLINE=true`, helper failure or invalid result: report VERSION check unavailable
with the reason; continue to Step 3.5. CI's version gate is the backstop.
2. `BRANCH_VERSION >= NEXT_SLOT`: no drift; continue.
3. `BRANCH_VERSION < NEXT_SLOT`: **STOP** with "VERSION drift detected", both versions
and instructions to rerun `/ship` from the feature branch. Its ALREADY_BUMPED path
reconciles VERSION, package.json, CHANGELOG header and PR title together. Do NOT
auto-bump or merge here: duplicate versions can overwrite another branch's release notes.
---
{{SECTION:readiness-gate}}
---
{{SECTION:merge-and-deploy}}
---
## Step 6: Wait for deploy (if applicable)
Unless returning for rollback, set `TARGET=production` and `DEPLOY_SHA=MERGE_SHA`. Use the deployment facts from
Steps 3.5/5; preserve status separately from canary health. A reachable URL alone
does not prove this revision deployed. No configured trigger: do not invent one.
### Strategy A: GitHub Actions workflow
If a deploy workflow was detected, find the run triggered by the merge commit:
```bash
gh run list --repo "$REPO" --branch "$BASE_BRANCH" --limit 10 --json databaseId,headSha,status,conclusion,name,workflowName
```
Match `DEPLOY_SHA`, workflow and target environment. If no run appears yet, repeat
the lookup within the same 20-minute deadline. A name match on another SHA is not evidence.
Poll every 30 seconds:
```bash
gh run view <run-id> --repo "$REPO" --json status,conclusion
```
### Strategy B: Platform CLI (Fly.io, Render, Heroku)
If a deploy status command was configured in CLAUDE.md (e.g., `fly status --app myapp`), use it instead of or in addition to GitHub Actions polling.
**Fly.io:** Check the configured app (do not issue `fly deploy`):
```bash
fly status --app {app} 2>/dev/null
```
Look for started Machines and a release tied to `DEPLOY_SHA`; time alone is not proof.
**Render:** Check its release record for the connected branch/revision, then reachability:
```bash
curl -sf {production-url} -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" 2>/dev/null
```
Poll every 30 seconds. HTTP 200 proves reachability, not which release is live.
**Heroku:** Check latest release:
```bash
heroku releases --app {app} -n 1 2>/dev/null
```
### Strategy C: Auto-deploy platforms (Vercel, Netlify)
When configured to auto-deploy on this merge, wait 60 seconds, inspect the deployment
record for `DEPLOY_SHA`, then Step 7. No record means deployment UNVERIFIED, not success.
### Strategy D: Custom deploy hooks
Run only the configured read-only status command. Check its exit code and revision
output; a generic health check cannot certify a new deployment.
### Common: Timing and failure handling
Record deploy start time. Show progress every 2 minutes: "Deploy is still running... ({X}m so far). This is normal for most platforms."
Matching revision successfully deployed: record `DEPLOY_STATUS=PASSED`, duration,
and evidence. Continue to Step 7, or Step 5's URL question if none is available.
If deploy fails/cancels: record `DEPLOY_STATUS=FAILED`, then use AskUserQuestion:
- **Re-ground:** "The deploy workflow failed after the merge. The code is merged but may not be live yet. Here's what I can do:"
- **RECOMMENDATION:** Choose A to investigate before reverting.
- A) Let me look at the deploy logs to figure out what went wrong
- B) Revert the merge immediately — roll back to the previous version
- C) Continue to health checks anyway — the deploy failure might be a flaky step, and the site might actually be fine
**A:** Read `gh run view <run-id> --repo "$REPO" --log-failed` (or configured platform
logs), summarize the cause and evidence limits, then ask: revert (Step 8), inspect
health (Step 7), or finish unverified (Step 9). No automatic code edits or redeploy.
**B:** Step 8. **C:** Step 7 if a URL exists, otherwise Step 5's URL question. A passing
canary never erases FAILED deployment evidence.
At 20 minutes (including waiting for a run to appear), ask: **A)** wait another bounded
20 minutes, **B)** finish without verification. A resets only the wait deadline and
resumes the same lookup/poll; B records pending/unknown deployment and goes to Step 9.
Status-query failure is unknown: show the error and offer the same bounded wait or
finish choices, not a fabricated success. During rollback monitoring, failure offers
logs or a pending report, never a second automatic revert.
---
## Step 7: Canary verification (conditional depth)
Tell the user which target/revision is confirmed or unverified, then check its URL.
If browser access is unavailable, record SKIPPED with the reason for this target.
Staging choice A returns to its production route; C goes to Step 9 without claiming
STAGING VERIFIED. Production goes to Step 9 with incomplete health evidence.
Use the saved pre-merge scope and Step 5's precedence rule; URL/triggered-deploy paths
still verify docs-only. Set `TARGET=production` unless entering from staging choice A/C.
| Diff Scope | Canary Depth |
|------------|-------------|
| SCOPE_DOCS only | Smoke when Step 5 routes here; otherwise skipped there |
| SCOPE_CONFIG only | Smoke: the Aside script below; `responseStatus` in `NAV=` must be 200 |
| SCOPE_BACKEND only | Console errors + perf check |
| SCOPE_FRONTEND (any) | Full: console + perf + screenshot |
| Mixed scopes | Full canary |
**Full canary sequence** — one `aside repl` script does the whole check (console hook first, then load, then evidence):
```bash
aside repl '
const HOOK = `(() => { window.__gstackErrs = window.__gstackErrs || []; const oe = console.error; console.error = (...a) => { window.__gstackErrs.push(a.map(String).join(" ")); oe.apply(console, a); }; window.addEventListener("error", e => window.__gstackErrs.push("uncaught: " + e.message)); window.addEventListener("unhandledrejection", e => window.__gstackErrs.push("unhandledrejection: " + (e.reason && e.reason.message || e.reason))); })()`;
const pg = await openTab("about:blank");
await pg._sendToTarget("Page.addScriptToEvaluateOnNewDocument", { source: HOOK });
await pg.goto("<url>");
console.log("URL=" + pg.url());
console.log("CONSOLE_ERRORS=" + JSON.stringify(await pg.evaluate(() => window.__gstackErrs)));
console.log("NAV=" + await pg.evaluate(() => JSON.stringify(performance.getEntriesByType("navigation")[0])));
console.log("TEXT_START"); console.log((await pg.evaluate(() => document.body.innerText)).slice(0, 20000)); console.log("TEXT_END");
await pg.screenshot({ path: "post-deploy.jpg", type: "jpeg", quality: 60, fullPage: true });
const a = await annotatedScreenshot(pg);
await fs.writeFile(path.join(pwd, "post-deploy-annotated.png"), Buffer.from(a.base64Image, "base64"));
console.log("ASIDE_DIR=" + pwd);
await closeTab(pg);
console.log("GSTACK_STEP_OK");
'
```
Then copy the evidence out of the printed session directory:
```bash
mkdir -p .gstack/deploy-reports && cp "<ASIDE_DIR>/post-deploy.jpg" "<ASIDE_DIR>/post-deploy-annotated.png" .gstack/deploy-reports/
```
Read the output line by line:
- `URL=` — the page loaded and stayed on the site (not a redirect to an error page). A line starting with `[error` or a missing `GSTACK_STEP_OK` means the load failed.
- `CONSOLE_ERRORS=` — check for critical errors: entries containing `Error`, `Uncaught`, `Failed to load`, `TypeError`, `ReferenceError`. Ignore warnings.
- `NAV=` — `responseStatus` is the HTTP status of the document (Chromium PerformanceNavigationTiming) — must be 200. `loadEventEnd` is the page load time. Check that it is under 10 seconds.
- `TEXT_START` / `TEXT_END` — verify the page has real content (not blank, not a generic error page).
- `post-deploy.jpg` and the annotated `post-deploy-annotated.png` are the evidence. Read the copied screenshot so the user sees it.
**Health assessment:**
- Page loads successfully with 200 status (`responseStatus` in `NAV=`) → PASS
- No critical console errors → PASS
- Page has real content (not blank or error screen) → PASS
- Loads in under 10 seconds → PASS
Assess only checks required by the selected depth; mark unperformed checks N/A.
All required checks pass: record HEALTHY for this target. Staging returns through
Step 5a's chosen A/C route; production goes to Step 9. Preserve deployment uncertainty.
If any fail: show the evidence (screenshot path, console errors, perf numbers). Use AskUserQuestion:
- **Re-ground:** "I found some issues on the live site after the deploy. Here's what I see: {specific issues}. This might be temporary (caches clearing, CDN propagating) or it might be a real problem."
- **RECOMMENDATION:** Choose based on severity — B for critical (site down), A for minor (console errors).
- A) Accept these observed issues for now — report DEGRADED, not healthy
- B) That's broken — revert the merge and roll back to the previous version
- C) Let me investigate more — open the site and look at logs before deciding
**A:** Record DEGRADED and the user's acknowledgment, then Step 9 (do not silently
continue from failed staging to production verification). **B:** Step 8, only with
explicit rollback approval. **C:** Inspect the page/evidence and read-only logs;
summarize findings, then ask for one recheck (repeat Step 7), rollback (Step 8), or
finish DEGRADED (Step 9). These investigations never modify or redeploy code.
When `ROLLBACK=true`, failures remain ROLLBACK PENDING; offer investigation or report,
not another revert. Keep staging/production screenshots distinct when checking both.
---
## Step 8: Revert (if needed)
Enter only after the user's explicit rollback choice. Explain that this adds inverse
commits; production is not restored until rollback deploys and health is checked.
Require a clean worktree, fetch `BASE_BRANCH` from `REPO`, switch to the local base
and fast-forward only to that fetched tip. Dirty, diverged, or occupied base: **STOP**
with ROLLBACK PENDING, never reset/force or discard work.
Inspect the actual landed commit, not just the requested merge method:
```bash
git show --no-patch --format='%H %P' "$MERGE_SHA"
```
- Two parents: verify parent 1 is the base-side history, then
`git revert -m 1 "$MERGE_SHA" --no-edit`.
- One-parent **confirmed squash**: `git revert "$MERGE_SHA" --no-edit`.
- **Rebase merge:** establish the exact landed commit range for this PR and revert
it newest-first. `mergeCommit.oid` alone is only the last commit, not the range.
Unknown range/method (including an external merge) or other parent shapes: **STOP**
with ROLLBACK PENDING and request manual rollback; do not guess.
Conflicts: stop, show `git status` and the attempted command, leave resolution to the
user. After a clean revert, record `REVERT_SHA` and push to the selected base:
`git push "https://github.com/$REPO.git" "HEAD:refs/heads/$BASE_BRANCH"`. If branch
protection rejects it, keep the commit, create `revert/pr-<number>-<timestamp>` there,
push that branch and open a revert PR against `BASE_BRANCH`. Report its URL and
ROLLBACK PENDING; never merge it without separate approval. Other push errors stop
with the error and pending status, not a protection bypass.
After a successful base push, set `ROLLBACK=true`, `TARGET=production`,
`DEPLOY_SHA=REVERT_SHA`, and reset production deployment/health to UNKNOWN/SKIPPED
for that revision. Keep original/staging evidence separately. Monitor via Steps 6-7
without resetting those values. Only a confirmed rollback deployment
and healthy production canary yields REVERTED (or a confirmed base revert where no
deploy is required). All incomplete, failed, skipped or PR-based rollback paths go
to Step 9 as ROLLBACK PENDING. Preserve the original merge SHA in the report.
---
## Step 9: Deploy report
Choose the first matching verdict; never infer deployment success from merge or HTTP 200:
| Evidence | Verdict |
|----------|---------|
| Rollback requested, not yet confirmed on base and live/healthy (when deploy applies) | ROLLBACK PENDING |
| Rollback confirmed as described in Step 8 | REVERTED |
| Any accepted target-health failure | DEGRADED |
| User chose staging-only and staging passed | STAGING VERIFIED — PRODUCTION UNVERIFIED |
| Explicit no-deploy confirmation or Step 5's docs-only skip | MERGED — NO DEPLOY NEEDED |
| Matching production deployment PASSED and production HEALTHY | DEPLOYED AND VERIFIED |
| Matching production deployment PASSED but canary skipped/unavailable | DEPLOYED (UNVERIFIED) |
| Everything else, including failed/pending/unknown deploy even with a healthy old site | MERGED (UNVERIFIED) |
Display **LAND & DEPLOY REPORT** and save `.gstack/deploy-reports/{date}-pr{number}-deploy.md`
(`date` = UTC YYYY-MM-DD). Include PR/title/repository, head → base, approved head,
merge timestamp/SHA/method/path, first-run status, CI/review status and warnings,
scope, separate deploy/staging/canary outcomes with evidence links/errors, console
count, load time, screenshot paths (N/A when not checked), verdict and next action.
Record dry-run, CI wait, queue, deploy, staging, canary and total durations in seconds;
skipped stages have duration 0 with a reason, never a fabricated pass. Inline review
is passed/skipped/not-needed; inline fixes stopped before merge and cannot appear here.
For rollback include revert SHA or PR URL and unresolved work.
```bash
mkdir -p .gstack/deploy-reports
{{SLUG_EVAL}}
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
```
Pass one JSON entry to `~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-review-log '<JSON>'` for
the dashboard's branch-scoped JSONL log. `status` is SUCCESS
only for DEPLOYED AND VERIFIED or MERGED — NO DEPLOY NEEDED, REVERTED for confirmed
rollback, otherwise INCOMPLETE. Keep the full `verdict` and independent evidence states:
```json
{"skill":"land-and-deploy","timestamp":"<ISO>","status":"<SUCCESS/REVERTED/INCOMPLETE>","verdict":"<verdict>","pr":<number>,"merge_sha":"<sha>","merge_path":"<auto/direct/queue/external>","first_run":<true/false>,"deploy_status":"<PASSED/FAILED/PENDING/UNKNOWN/NOT_NEEDED>","verification":"<HEALTHY/DEGRADED/SKIPPED>","staging_status":"<VERIFIED/DEGRADED/SKIPPED/N/A>","review_status":"<observed status>","dry_run_s":<N>,"ci_wait_s":<N>,"queue_s":<N>,"deploy_s":<N>,"staging_s":<N>,"canary_s":<N>,"total_s":<N>}
```
---
## Step 10: Suggest follow-ups
State the verdict in plain English. Verified: changes are live. Unverified/degraded:
name the missing evidence/issues and the exact workflow/status command or `/canary <url>`
to check next. No deploy needed: merged, verification skipped for the stated reason.
Staging-only: production remains unverified, not necessarily undeployed. Rollback
pending: identify who must resolve conflicts, merge the revert PR, or verify its deploy.
REVERTED: cite rollback evidence; do not claim the original branch survived cleanup.
Offer `/canary <url>` for extended monitoring, `/benchmark <url>` when performance
matters, and `/document-release` when docs need updating.
---
## Section self-check (before you finish)
You ran a carved skill. For your situation, list every section the Section index
named as applying, and confirm you issued a Read for each one (a CONFIRMED Step 1.5
correctly skips the dry-run section). Missing Read: STOP and read the source now.
Recheck read-only evidence; never redo a merge/deploy because a section was missed.
---
## Important Rules
- Never force-push, bypass CI, replay a confirmed merge, or hide missing evidence.
- Auto-detect facts; ask when unknown or when an explicit approval gate applies.
- Poll at 30-second intervals with the stated deadlines and progress messages.
- After merge failures, offer approved rollback when appropriate; never revert a rollback automatically.
- Verify once; `/canary` provides extended monitoring. Rechecks require the user's choice.
- Use `--delete-branch`; reconcile failed cleanup non-destructively with confirmation.