Files
gstack/test/llm-judge-frontier.test.ts
T
Garry Tan dcaea52800 v1.91.7.0 feat: add functional QA and pre-publication docs checks (#2983)
* feat: add surface-aware exploratory QA and ship documentation gates

* test: preserve delegated QA setup authority after main integration

* fix(qa): clarify exploration order and preserve report artifacts

* test(qa): follow the shared setup reference directly

* refactor(ship): make verification and recovery routes explicit

* test(ship): align evidence and review guards with explicit routes

* fix(workflows): clarify ship recovery and functional QA evidence

* fix(workflows): clarify approval recovery and full QA coverage

* refactor(workflows): order review transactions and clarify ship state

* fix(ship): clarify final verification and fail closed at publication

* fix(evals): attribute native atomic documentation writes

* fix(ship): clarify recovery and documentation lifecycle guidance

* fix(test): preserve observed native placeholder styling in CI

* fix(codex): report watchdog timeouts without a process-exit race

* Checkpoint functional QA implementation and workflow validation repairs

* Fix documentation and shared-review fixture contracts

* docs: clarify judge reuse and evaluation supervision

* test: align review evidence and selected case contracts

* test: verify append-only documentation checkpoints and recovery

* fix: qualify QA workflows and CI validation repairs

* fix: launch shared-libs fixture scripts on Windows

* fix: qualify QA deadlines, fixture isolation, and shard cleanup

* fix: preserve qualified QA and cancellation repairs

* fix: enforce functional fixture authority and share strict event decoding

* fix: retain free-test evidence and explain recovery

* fix: reject malformed native evidence after decoder consolidation

* test: use reliable capture for telemetry privacy filters

* test: refresh measured quick coverage and document validation costs

* Fix native fixture receipts and preserve VM validation evidence

* Align negative judge controls with upstream clarity policy

* Fix report-only QA preparation and public evidence handling

* Clarify QA-only preparation and current-report preservation

* Stream Ship quality judgments with an explicit 64k response contract

* Validate compact judge reasoning locally with supported wire schema

* Align functional QA fixture instructions with evidence acceptance

* Bind native browser diagnostics to execution evidence and align review verdicts

* Preserve native diagnostic line boundaries

* Serialize functional QA evidence from native captures

* Keep large QA evidence fixture payload out of Windows argv
2026-09-29 06:07:35 -07:00

208 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript

import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, spyOn, test } from 'bun:test';
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
import { armJudge, callJudge, JudgeRefusalError } from './helpers/llm-judge';
describe('frontier Claude judge compatibility', () => {
let originalKey: string | undefined;
let create: ReturnType<typeof spyOn>;
let diagnostics: ReturnType<typeof spyOn>;
beforeEach(() => {
originalKey = process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;
process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY = 'test-only-key';
create = spyOn(Anthropic.Messages.prototype, 'create');
diagnostics = spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {});
});
afterEach(() => {
create.mockRestore();
diagnostics.mockRestore();
if (originalKey === undefined) delete process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;
else process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY = originalKey;
});
test('parses JSON text after an omitted-thinking block', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [
{ type: 'thinking', thinking: '', signature: 'fixture' },
{ type: 'text', text: '{"score":4}' },
] } as never);
expect(await callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1')).toEqual({ score: 4 });
expect(create.mock.calls[0][0].max_tokens).toBe(8192);
expect(diagnostics).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
test('an explicit provider refusal retains typed public evidence without parsing a score or retrying', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'msg_synthetic', _request_id: 'req_synthetic', model: 'claude-fable-5-1',
stop_reason: 'refusal', content: [], usage: { input_tokens: 3886, output_tokens: 0 } } as never);
let failure: unknown;
try { await callJudge('Synthetic test prompt', 'claude-fable-5-1'); } catch (error) { failure = error; }
expect(failure).toBeInstanceOf(JudgeRefusalError);
expect((failure as JudgeRefusalError).refusal).toEqual({ stop_reason: 'refusal', response_id: 'msg_synthetic',
request_id: 'req_synthetic', model: 'claude-fable-5-1', input_tokens: 3886, output_tokens: 0, text_blocks: 0 });
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]).stopReason).toBe('refusal');
});
test('retains complete public response on malformed JSON and fails without another request', async () => {
// Synthetic malformed response: the actual failed provider text was not retained.
const textBlocks = ['{"questions":[{"toolUseId":"c1","reason":"' + 'evidence '.repeat(500) + '"', '}]'];
create.mockResolvedValue({
id: 'msg_fixture', _request_id: 'req_fixture', model: 'test-judge-model', stop_reason: 'end_turn',
content: [
{ type: 'thinking', thinking: 'PRIVATE_THINKING', signature: 'PRIVATE_SIGNATURE' },
...textBlocks.map(text => ({ type: 'text', text })),
{ type: 'redacted_thinking', data: 'PRIVATE_REDACTED' },
],
usage: { input_tokens: 120, output_tokens: 90, cache_creation_input_tokens: 10, cache_read_input_tokens: 20,
server_tool_use: { ignored: true }, thinking: 'PRIVATE_NESTED' },
} as never);
const controller = new AbortController();
let failure: unknown;
try { await callJudge('classify the supplied evidence', 'test-judge-model', { signal: controller.signal, max_tokens: 16_384 }); }
catch (error) { failure = error; }
expect(failure).toBeInstanceOf(SyntaxError);
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(create.mock.calls[0]).toEqual([{
model: 'test-judge-model', max_tokens: 16_384,
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'classify the supplied evidence' }],
}, { signal: controller.signal }]);
expect(diagnostics).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0])).toEqual({
type: 'llm-judge-response-parse-error', responseId: 'msg_fixture', requestId: 'req_fixture',
model: 'test-judge-model', stopReason: 'end_turn',
usage: { input_tokens: 120, output_tokens: 90, cache_creation_input_tokens: 10, cache_read_input_tokens: 20 },
textBlocks, error: { name: 'SyntaxError', message: (failure as Error).message },
});
expect(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]).not.toContain('PRIVATE_');
});
test('retains non-JSON text without inventing a judgment or leaking non-scalar metadata', async () => {
const text = 'No JSON object. ' + 'Public response '.repeat(100);
create.mockResolvedValue({
id: { secret: 'PRIVATE_ID' }, _request_id: ['PRIVATE_REQUEST'],
content: [{ type: 'text', text }], usage: { input_tokens: { secret: 'PRIVATE_USAGE' } },
} as never);
await expect(callJudge('score this', 'test-judge-model')).rejects.toThrow('Judge returned non-JSON');
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(diagnostics).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
const retained = JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]);
expect(retained.textBlocks).toEqual([text]);
expect(retained.responseId).toBeNull();
expect(retained.requestId).toBeNull();
expect(retained.usage.input_tokens).toBeNull();
expect(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]).not.toContain('PRIVATE_');
});
test('preserves an explicit output budget', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [{ type: 'text', text: '{"score":5}' }] } as never);
await callJudge('score this', 'claude-sonnet-4-6', { max_tokens: 2048 });
expect(create.mock.calls[0][0].max_tokens).toBe(2048);
});
test('rejects token exhaustion even when a partial answer contains valid JSON', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({
stop_reason: 'max_tokens',
content: [{ type: 'text', text: '{"score":4}' }],
} as never);
await expect(callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1', { max_tokens: 1024 }))
.rejects.toThrow('Judge response truncated at max_tokens=1024');
expect(diagnostics).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0])).toMatchObject({ stopReason: 'max_tokens', textBlocks: ['{"score":4}'] });
});
test('retains public truncation evidence without accepting a score or exposing private blocks', async () => {
const text = '{"clarity":4,"completeness":4,"actionability":4,"reasoning":"Partial response"}';
create.mockResolvedValue({
id: 'msg_truncated', _request_id: 'req_truncated', model: 'claude-fable-5-1', stop_reason: 'max_tokens',
content: [
{ type: 'thinking', thinking: 'PRIVATE_THINKING', signature: 'PRIVATE_SIGNATURE' },
{ type: 'text', text },
{ type: 'redacted_thinking', data: 'PRIVATE_REDACTED' },
],
usage: { input_tokens: 1000, output_tokens: 8192, thinking: 'PRIVATE_USAGE' },
} as never);
await expect(callJudge('score the complete workflow', 'claude-fable-5-1'))
.rejects.toThrow('Judge response truncated at max_tokens=8192');
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(create.mock.calls[0][0].max_tokens).toBe(8192);
expect(diagnostics).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0])).toEqual({
type: 'llm-judge-response-parse-error', responseId: 'msg_truncated', requestId: 'req_truncated',
model: 'claude-fable-5-1', stopReason: 'max_tokens',
usage: { input_tokens: 1000, output_tokens: 8192, cache_creation_input_tokens: null, cache_read_input_tokens: null },
textBlocks: [text], error: { name: 'Error', message: 'Judge response truncated at max_tokens=8192 (model=claude-fable-5-1)' },
});
expect(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]).not.toContain('PRIVATE_');
});
test('keeps text-only responses and explicit model options working', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [{ type: 'text', text: '{"score":5}' }] } as never);
expect(await callJudge('score this', 'claude-sonnet-4-6', { temperature: 0 })).toEqual({ score: 5 });
expect(create.mock.calls[0][0]).toMatchObject({ model: 'claude-sonnet-4-6', temperature: 0 });
});
test('rejects responses without JSON text', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [{ type: 'thinking', thinking: '', signature: 'fixture' }] } as never);
await expect(callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1')).rejects.toThrow('Judge returned non-JSON');
});
test('structured JSON is opt-in and preserves request options and quoted values', async () => {
const jsonSchema = { type: 'object', properties: { score: { type: 'integer' }, reason: { type: 'string' } },
required: ['score', 'reason'], additionalProperties: false };
const answer = { score: 4, reason: 'Quotes "inside" a value, literal } { braces, and café.' };
const controller = new AbortController();
create.mockResolvedValue({ stop_reason: 'end_turn', content: [
{ type: 'thinking', thinking: 'PRIVATE_THINKING', signature: 'PRIVATE_SIGNATURE' },
{ type: 'text', text: ' ' + JSON.stringify(answer) + '\n' },
] } as never);
expect(await callJudge('classify the supplied evidence', 'claude-fable-5-1', {
signal: controller.signal, max_tokens: 16_384, jsonSchema,
})).toEqual(answer);
expect(create.mock.calls).toEqual([[{
model: 'claude-fable-5-1', max_tokens: 16_384,
output_config: { format: { type: 'json_schema', schema: jsonSchema } },
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'classify the supplied evidence' }],
}, { signal: controller.signal }]]);
expect(diagnostics).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
test('structured responses parse the full text while default callers retain brace extraction', async () => {
const jsonSchema = { type: 'object', properties: { score: { type: 'integer' } }, required: ['score'], additionalProperties: false };
for (const text of ['Summary: {"score":4}', '```json\n{"score":4}\n```', '{"score":4} trailing prose', '{"score":']) {
create.mockClear(); diagnostics.mockClear();
create.mockResolvedValue({ stop_reason: 'end_turn', content: [{ type: 'text', text }] } as never);
await expect(callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1', { jsonSchema })).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(SyntaxError);
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(JSON.parse(diagnostics.mock.calls[0][0]).textBlocks).toEqual([text]);
}
create.mockClear(); diagnostics.mockClear();
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [{ type: 'text', text: 'Summary: {"score":4} done.' }] } as never);
expect(await callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1')).toEqual({ score: 4 });
expect(create.mock.calls[0][0]).not.toHaveProperty('output_config');
expect(diagnostics).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
test('structured refusals and incomplete stops never return even valid JSON', async () => {
const jsonSchema = { type: 'object', properties: { score: { type: 'integer' } }, required: ['score'], additionalProperties: false };
for (const stop_reason of ['refusal', 'max_tokens', 'stop_sequence', 'tool_use', null]) {
create.mockClear(); diagnostics.mockClear();
create.mockResolvedValue({ stop_reason, content: [{ type: 'text', text: '{"score":4}' }] } as never);
await expect(callJudge('score this', 'claude-fable-5-1', { max_tokens: 16_384, jsonSchema }))
.rejects.toThrow(stop_reason === 'max_tokens' ? 'truncated at max_tokens=16384'
: stop_reason === 'refusal' ? 'Judge provider refused the evaluation; no automated score' : 'Structured judge did not complete');
expect(create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
}
});
test('arm judge sends no unsupported temperature to Fable', async () => {
create.mockResolvedValue({ content: [
{ type: 'thinking', thinking: '', signature: 'fixture' },
{ type: 'text', text: '{"over_engineering":0,"construct":"none","reasoning":"Scoped change"}' },
] } as never);
expect((await armJudge('ticket', '+ requested change')).over_engineering).toBe(0);
const request = create.mock.calls[0][0];
expect(request.model).toBe('claude-fable-5-1');
expect(request).not.toHaveProperty('temperature');
});
});