garrytanandcapy-ai[bot] d4f942492d fix(capy-install): the launch file is part of the ok verdict ...

Third adversarial pass: a passing run whose launch file could not be
written still said gstack: ok with exit 0 and printed only the GSTACK_LAUNCH
line, leaving a shell-evaluating caller with the re-typing path the branch
exists to remove. The file is now written before the verdict is recorded;
a write failure on a passing run turns the run into
"gstack: fail launch-file — could not write the launch file <path>; fix: …
(LAUNCH_FILE_UNWRITABLE)" with exit 1 and an ok:false verdict, and every
failing run removes the launch file an earlier passing run left beside the
verdict. The two failure tests assert the new contract, the doctor-FAIL
tests assert no launch file is announced or left, and the docs, Capy skill
and CHANGELOG say the same.

Co-authored-by: capy-ai[bot] <230910855+capy-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

2026-10-26 05:07:27 +00:00

..

skill/gstack

fix(capy-install): the launch file is part of the ok verdict

2026-10-26 05:07:27 +00:00

support.env

v1.91.113.0 fix(capy): trailers say behind=<n> with a fix, a skipped upgrade is never ok, and a reused pid no longer holds the upgrade lease (#3232)

2026-10-17 01:52:40 +00:00