mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-02 11:45:20 +02:00
Garry Tan
8af68207f5
User feedback: "i don't think i would use gstack-publish, i think we
should remove it." Agreed. The CLI + marketplace wiring was an
ambitious but speculative primitive. Zero users, zero validated demand,
and the existing manual `clawhub publish` workflow already covers the
real case (OpenClaw methodology skill publishing).
Deleted:
- bin/gstack-publish (the CLI)
- skills.json (the marketplace manifest)
- test/publish-dry-run.test.ts (13 tests)
- ship/SKILL.md.tmpl Step 19.5 — the methodology-skill publish-on-ship
check. No target to dispatch to anymore.
- README.md Power tools row for gstack-publish
Updated:
- bin/gstack-model-benchmark doc comment: dropped "matches gstack-publish
--dry-run semantics" reference (self-describing flag now)
- CHANGELOG 1.3.0.0 entry:
* Release summary: "three new binaries" → "two new binaries".
Dropped the /ship publish-check narrative.
* Numbers table: "1 of 3 → 3 of 3 wired" → "1 of 2 → 2 of 2 wired".
Deterministic test count: 45 → 32 (removed publish-dry-run's 13).
* Added section: removed gstack-publish CLI bullet + /ship Step 19.5
bullet.
* "What this means for users" closer: replaced the /ship publish
paragraph with the design-taste-engine learning loop, which IS
real, wired, and something users hit every week via /design-shotgun.
* Contributors section: "Four new test files" → "Three new test files"
Retained:
- openclaw/skills/gstack-openclaw-* skill dirs (pre-existed this PR,
still publishable manually via `clawhub publish`, useful standalone
for ClawHub installs)
- CLAUDE.md publishing-native-skills section (same rationale)
Regenerated SKILL.md across all hosts. Ship golden fixtures refreshed
for claude/codex/factory. 455 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>