Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-plan-mode.test.ts
T
Garry TanandClaude Fable 5 6841183c35 refactor(test): mechanical sweep — 298 paid-test timeouts onto eval-budget tiers
69 files, both shapes (trailing bun-test budgets and runner
timeout/timeoutMs options), ROUND-UP ONLY so nothing that passed can
start failing: 75 → JUDGE_MS, 137 → CAPTURE_MS, 74 → CAPTURE_LONG_MS,
9 → PTY_MS, 3 → PTY_LONG_MS. Raw >=60s literal count in the paid scope:
395 → 97, of which 51 are non-timeout noise (fixture dates, run IDs)
and 46 are enumerated justified holds (comment-carrying calibrated
budgets, poll-loop constants, utility spawn waits, and the seven
physical-ceiling 1_500_000 sites). The eval-budgets policy ratchet
keeps the residue from regrowing.

Known collapse: where an inner runner budget and its enclosing test
budget now share a tier, the old stagger is gone — an overrun surfaces
as a bun test timeout instead of a graceful runner timeout
(diagnosability trade, not a correctness one).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 05:25:06 +00:00

83 lines
4.0 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* plan-ceo-review plan-mode smoke (gate, paid, real-PTY).
*
* Asserts: when /plan-ceo-review is invoked in plan mode, the FIRST terminal
* outcome is 'asked' — a skill-question numbered list. Permission dialogs
* (which also render numbered lists) are filtered out by `runPlanSkillObservation`
* via its `isPermissionDialogVisible(visible.slice(-1500))` short-circuit.
*
* Reaching 'plan_ready' first IS the regression we want to catch: the agent
* skipped Step 0 entirely and went straight to ExitPlanMode. The original
* failure had the assistant read a diff, write a plan with two issues, and
* call ExitPlanMode without ever firing AskUserQuestion — the user had to
* manually call out the missing per-issue questions.
*
* Why this skill is special: unlike plan-eng-review / plan-design-review /
* plan-devex-review (whose smokes accept either 'asked' or 'plan_ready'),
* plan-ceo-review's template mandates Step 0A premise challenge (3 baked-in
* questions) AND Step 0F mode selection BEFORE any plan write. There is no
* legitimate path to plan_ready that does not first emit a skill-question
* numbered prompt.
*
* Env passthrough: passes `QUESTION_TUNING=false` and `EXPLAIN_LEVEL=default`
* via the runner's env option. Today these are advisory — `gstack-config`
* reads `~/.gstack/config.yaml`, not env vars, so a contributor with
* `question_tuning: true` set in their YAML config can still see AUTO_DECIDE
* masking. The env passthrough is wired so a future gstack-config change to
* honor env overrides will make this test hermetic without further edits.
* Tracked as a post-merge follow-up.
*
* FAIL conditions: 'plan_ready' first, silent Write/Edit before any prompt,
* claude crash, timeout.
*
* See test/helpers/claude-pty-runner.ts for runner internals.
*/
import { test } from 'bun:test';
import { CAPTURE_LONG_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
import { describeE2ETier } from './helpers/e2e-gate';
import {
runPlanSkillObservation,
assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten,
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
const describeE2E = describeE2ETier('gate');
describeE2E('plan-ceo-review plan-mode smoke (gate)', () => {
test('first terminal outcome is asked (Step 0 fires before any plan write)', async () => {
const obs = await runPlanSkillObservation({
skillName: 'plan-ceo-review',
inPlanMode: true,
// 420s, not 300s: measured 2026-08-11, a clean isolated pass took
// 295.7s (80s on a quiet main run) — 4s under the old budget — and the
// same run timed out at ~308s three times under concurrent eval load.
// Same runner-contention class as review-dashboard-via/retro-base-
// branch; headroom instead of a budget-edge flake in the gate lane.
timeoutMs: 420_000,
env: { QUESTION_TUNING: 'false', EXPLAIN_LEVEL: 'default' },
});
if (obs.outcome !== 'asked') {
const diagnosis =
obs.outcome === 'plan_ready'
? `'plan_ready' first means the agent skipped Step 0 entirely and went straight to ExitPlanMode without asking.`
: obs.outcome === 'timeout'
? `Timeout means the agent neither asked nor completed within the budget — likely hung mid-question or stuck on a permission dialog.`
: obs.outcome === 'silent_write'
? `Silent Write/Edit fired to an unsanctioned path before any AskUserQuestion — also a Step 0 skip.`
: `Outcome '${obs.outcome}' is unexpected; investigate the evidence below.`;
throw new Error(
`plan-ceo-review smoke FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}\n` +
`${diagnosis}\n` +
`Expected 'asked'. See plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md.tmpl: the Step 0 STOP rules ` +
`and the "One issue = one AskUserQuestion call" rule under "CRITICAL RULE — ` +
`How to ask questions".\n` +
`summary: ${obs.summary}\n` +
`elapsed: ${obs.elapsedMs}ms\n` +
`--- evidence (last 2KB visible) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
assertReportAtBottomIfPlanWritten(obs);
}, CAPTURE_LONG_MS);
});