mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-16 18:05:31 +02:00
* feat: add a restricted and supervised Claude Code runner Preserve configured authentication and models while enforcing tool access, strict completion JSON, bounded output and process cleanup. Cover argv, failure handling, session metadata and Windows process containment. * feat: route outside reviews by harness and migrate wrapper installs Use Claude Code from Codex and Codex from other supported hosts, with shared invocation rendering, positive gate validation and per-phase provenance. Rename /claude to /claude-code, repair managed shared and copied installations safely, and generate native Kiro skills. Add installed-workflow, failure-injection and live cross-harness regression coverage. * test: recognize CEO mode labels without terminal spacing The paid workflow rendered SCOPEEXPANSION at option 4, but its driver required a literal space. Match the leading mode title without cursor-spacing artifacts and ignore adjacent preview text. Preserve missing-target failures and downstream posture assertions. * test: isolate plan-count fixtures before starting review workflows Seed the complete test plan in a private git repository before launching Claude, so a bare slash command cannot review the live workspace while a delayed fixture message remains queued. Preserve count thresholds, parsers and budgets. Add initial-context and installed-discovery tests, and retain startup/terminal diagnostics on failed evaluations. * test: stabilize review fixtures and Claude eval startup Preserve source boundaries in workflow judge inputs, isolate CEO mode plans, and wait for interactive trust input readiness. Keep startup failure evidence and retain existing models, budgets, and assertions. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: classify collapsed review modes and isolate seeded findings Keep review questions out of the setup count when terminal cursor positioning removes spaces. State existing webhook safeguards so the five-finding control measures its seeded defects without accidental extra security and concurrency gaps. Preserve question bands and the paired control. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: isolate browser daemon state across free shards Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: stabilize native review counting and interactive navigation Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * chore: prepare v1.82.0.0 release Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: eliminate browser and process-cleanup test flakes Pin every CI surface to Bun 1.4.0 to avoid extra-stdio finalizers closing reused live sockets. Add an isolated GC/listener regression that fails on Bun 1.3.13, and prevent coordinated rollback to an affected CI runtime. Check renderer cleanup against the render's own staging directory so concurrent renders cannot invalidate the assertion. Make the no-pgrep process-tree walk tolerate disappearing /proc entries, and synchronize its test fixture through child readiness and pipe EOF instead of sleeps. Validation: 9,157 passed, 31 skipped, zero failures across 556 files with retries disabled. Build, all-host generation freshness, and skill checks passed. All three races have failing-before/passing-after regressions. * fix: count completed native review questions in evals * fix: drive review navigation from confirmed native choices * fix: require complete section-loading eval reports * test: isolate telemetry HTTP transport from local assertions * fix: keep review input on the active native question * test: let tunnel revocation daemon choose an available port * test: allocate available ports for pairing and watchdog fixtures * fix: stabilize planning eval navigation and phase reporting * test: isolate installed runtime paths in planning evals * test: stabilize review evidence and concurrent refresh fixtures * fix: resolve design findings before editing the plan * fix: honor and persist disabled outside plan reviews * fix: preserve planning decisions and terminal evidence Load installed host reviews at autoplan phase entry and wait for completed reviewers and saved artifacts. Reuse approved remedies while preserving individual finding decisions. Drive interactive evals from the current terminal viewport, bind native questions across scrolling, and require complete native report evidence. Cover captured stale menus, permission lifecycles, setup classification, and disabled-review tool availability with deterministic regressions. Advance release metadata and the upgrade migration to the unclaimed 1.83.0.0 slot. * fix: drive native review questions and preserve current plans Use the native single-choice keyboard protocol and current terminal viewport, with per-question navigation inside packets and completed-call coverage. Keep permissions, multi-select menus, and Submit controls distinct. Send Autoplan reviewers the amended implementation plan, keep its review record separate, and supply retained application contracts in the chain fixture. Clarify individual DevEx decisions and complete CEO fix options; use one active plan destination for the section-loading report. * fix: preserve complete plan-review decisions * fix: recognize native plan dialogs and reviewer controls * fix: preserve review decisions and phase completion * fix: recognize completed reviews without losing findings * fix: preserve review continuity and native eval completion * test: fix native review completion and eval retry isolation * test: handle native review menus and complete eval fixtures * test: fix native review setup, completion, and isolation failures * test: limit native skill discovery to runtime assets * fix: bind Autoplan reviews to full ordered phase inputs * test: fix planning eval routing, counting, and timeout handling * chore: advance queued release to v1.84.0.0 * fix: preserve complete review inputs and planning decisions * fix: reconcile review approvals and preserve phase obligations * fix: preserve review obligations and unblock eval permissions Carry recorded Autoplan requirements into blind phase inputs, require Eng review approvals before exit, and exercise combined asynchronous flows in CEO reviews. Correct native finding and handoff classification and unblock repeated report edits using scoped request identities. * fix: retain plan requirements and complete native review dialogs * fix: complete native review prompts and retain plan references * fix: preserve review inputs and classify native eval evidence * fix: check competing completion orders in CEO reviews * fix: recognize review decisions and require phase methodology Require the current phase methodology before Autoplan snapshots. Correct substantive decision, closed handoff, and cache-finding classification, and honor the recommended implementation approach in native review dialogs. Add captured-transcript regressions without changing review thresholds, provider models, retries, or deadlines. * test: bind native review decisions and close completed handoffs * fix: complete review dialogs and verify methodology delivery * fix: preserve review evidence and unblock native eval prompts * fix: handle native review question completions * fix: recognize native review narration and controls * fix: count native review decisions and isolate eval fixtures * test: verify seeded review coverage and current artifact permissions * test: isolate model and brain-aware skill renders * fix: repair native workflow evaluation and clarify review steps * fix: stabilize workflow eval evidence and review guidance * test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation * fix: recognize completed workflow evidence and owned skill reads * test: repair seeded workflow delivery and completion evidence * test: recognize current review evidence across native forms * test: handle native review variants and permission redraws * fix: honor review preferences and recognize native eval evidence * test: recognize completed review decisions and queued permissions * test: match current review contracts and partial-line edits * test: recognize completed workflow evidence and bounded human waits * fix: preserve review entry gates and native eval interactions * fix: recognize native workflow evidence and preserve review gates * test: recognize current review evidence and preconfigure workflow fixtures * test: recognize completed review findings and scoped artifact permissions * fix: stabilize native workflow review and permission evidence * fix: recognize current review evidence and scoped edit confirmations Clarify Design and engineering review entry instructions and Design scoring. Recognize required legacy coverage and public Autoplan completion recaps. Bind the pending Edit confirmation to its exact file, ordered digest, and one-request approval when a preceding command display remains visible. Keep reviews within their existing size limits and preserve scope gates when extracting workflow fixtures from either supported preamble header. Keep failure outcomes, review thresholds, provider choices, and eval budgets. * fix: recover review workflow progress and eval evidence * fix: recognize valid review evidence and scope selection * test: fix review evidence parsing and repeated artifact prompts * test: recognize valid review decisions and pending native cards * fix(plan-eng-review): keep final navigation consistent with approved tasks * test: recognize valid review evidence and bind legacy diff requests * fix: stabilize review eval evidence and harness repair guidance * docs: update project documentation for v1.85.0.0 Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: fix Windows CI fixtures and credential scan Rebase captured JSON values and filesystem evidence using the appropriate path convention. Compile native fake CLIs on Windows and synchronize pipe holder readiness, with cleanup retained when assertions fail. Assemble synthetic credential fixtures at runtime so the added-line scan keeps enforcing the same gate without flagging its own rejection controls. Discover generated skills directly for the empty-find regression check, avoiding a recursive scan through saved evaluation artifacts and dependencies. * fix: preserve source renders on Windows Compare canonical generator paths using native separators so an output sidecar pointing at the source cannot overwrite its skill or metadata. Keep the regression fixture isolated from the real checkout and expose freshness diagnostics before asserting subprocess status. Detach Windows drain-test pipe holders from the fake provider's automatic child cleanup while preserving the enclosing runner job and its assertions. * fix: clarify outside review fallback and CEO decisions Render one applicable own-harness fallback path and retain native review, disabled policy, and missing-coverage semantics. Align report field names and mode labels, and make the existing per-cut scope approval explicit. Regenerate skill outputs and keep the workflow judge's model, thresholds, and retry policy unchanged. * chore: move release to free version slot (v1.86.0.0) PR #2852 now claims v1.85.0.0. Align the release metadata and rename migration so upgrades from that version still receive it. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: include engineering review prerequisites and restore branch context * fix: recognize coverage diagrams and clarify design review instructions * fix: preserve file identities and join Windows test processes --------- Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
190 lines
25 KiB
JSON
190 lines
25 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"sourceHead": "5e7b66c7f41942ea2b0840405385612cec046d78",
|
||
"screen": " f2 with icon and explicit text; all text meets AA | PENDING |\n 62 \n 63 +## Approved design decisions \n 64 + \n 65 +### Decision 1 (Pass 1, D2 → 1A): Save is the single visual anchor of the header \n 66 +Save renders as the only filled button (#1d4ed8 background, white text). Reset, \n 67 +Cancel, and Export render as neutral ghost buttons. Use the existing Button \n 68 +variants; no new variant. Ghost buttons keep 44px targets and a border/text \n 69 +contrast of at least 3:1 so they stay obviously clickable without hover. \n 70 + \n 71 +Read order the header now produces (first, second, third): \n 72 + \n 73 +```text \n 74 +Persistent app navigation \n 75 +main \n 76 + Account settings (h1) ← 1st: where am I \n 77 + Manage your display name, email address, ← context \n 78 + and notification preferences. \n 79 + [ Save ] Reset Cancel Export ← 2nd: Save (filled) then ghosts \n 80 + InlineStatus (blank | Unsaved changes | Saved at HH:mm) ← 3rd: state \n 81 + Profile (h2) \n 82 + Display name [__________] \n 83 + Email [__________] \n 84 + Notifications (h2) \n 85 + Weekly digest (switch) \n 86 + Product tips (switch) \n 87 +``` \n 88 + \n 89 ## Pass scores\n 90 Recorded as passes run. Format: initial → after approved fixes.\n 91 \n╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌\n Do you want to make this edit to gstack-test-plan-design.md?\n ❯ 1. Yes\n 2. Yes, and switch to accept edits (auto-approve file edits and common file commands) for this session; Yes, and\n always allow access to /tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-design-iqHQUu for this session\n 3. Nohift+tab)\n\n Esc to cancel · Tab to amend\n",
|
||
"hook": {
|
||
"cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj",
|
||
"expected": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-e2e-plan-design-iqHQUu/gstack-test-plan-design.md",
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"transcriptPath": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-hermetic-3157466-nVT3Zd/with-skills/.claude/projects/-tmp-gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul-tmp-gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj/e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e.jsonl",
|
||
"seenIds": [
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01XJrCtfHgPW1YJ7fdTTqbrg",
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01EKGuPLcZtQZfUFrCJt6SVj",
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_013ZnnsgVQJKTMtqari64Zwx",
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01PiMVfTP1sFjqJT7bmPNEV4"
|
||
],
|
||
"pendingId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01PiMVfTP1sFjqJT7bmPNEV4",
|
||
"completedId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_013ZnnsgVQJKTMtqari64Zwx",
|
||
"completedIds": [
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01XJrCtfHgPW1YJ7fdTTqbrg",
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_01EKGuPLcZtQZfUFrCJt6SVj",
|
||
"e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e:toolu_013ZnnsgVQJKTMtqari64Zwx"
|
||
],
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:08:42.044Z"
|
||
},
|
||
"ownedBefore": "# Plan: Settings Page UI redesign (design-reviewed)\n\n## Context\nThe account-settings form already ships with an approved shell, components, and\nbehavior spec (PLAN.md + DESIGN.md). The implementation drifted from DESIGN.md in\nfive places: undifferentiated Save button, uneven section spacing, an error\nsurface below WCAG AA contrast, three label font sizes, and no pending indicator\non Save. This plan brings the form back into conformance with the checked-in\ndesign system without visual exploration or component replacement.\n\nReview mode: text-only (mockups skipped by user request), native review only\n(outside voices skipped by user request), all seven design passes.\n\n## Accepted behavior (inherited unchanged from PLAN.md + DESIGN.md)\n- Single-column settings shell, 640px max width. Persistent app navigation, then\n `main`: \"Account settings\" (h1) + description \"Manage your display name, email\n address, and notification preferences.\" (verbatim), action group\n Save | Reset | Cancel | Export, InlineStatus, Profile (h2) fieldset (Display\n name, Email), Notifications (h2) fieldset (Weekly digest, Product tips).\n h2s label fieldsets via aria-labelledby; no heading level skipped.\n- Reuse existing Button, Field, InlineStatus, ErrorSummary, ConfirmationDialog.\n No new component family. Font stays system-ui, sans-serif, inherited by controls.\n- Defaults for a new account: account name/email, Weekly digest on, Product tips\n off. Initial load uses the existing form skeleton. Read failure shows Retry\n (aria-label \"Retry loading\").\n- InlineStatus: role=status, aria-live=polite, aria-atomic=true. Blank before the\n first successful save; \"Unsaved changes\" when any field differs from saved;\n \"Saved at HH:mm\" (local 24h) after success; revert-all or confirmed Reset\n restores the prior text (timestamp or blank). Failed save keeps \"Unsaved\n changes\" beside the error.\n- Save is atomic. Repeat submissions disabled while pending. Save and Export\n mutually exclusive; Reset and Cancel disabled while either is pending; all\n four re-enable on settle. Export downloads latest successfully saved\n preferences as JSON; pending Export shows the inline spinner beside\n \"Exporting…\" inside its disabled button, aria-busy=true, reduced-motion safe.\n- Errors: validation beside fields plus linked ErrorSummary (aria-describedby),\n focus first invalid field. Network/Export failures preserve edits and show\n Retry as a sibling button outside the live region, visible text \"Retry\",\n aria-label \"Retry save\" / \"Retry export\". Export success clears only the\n Export error.\n- Dialogs: Reset → \"Discard unsaved changes?\" / \"Your saved preferences will be\n restored.\" Actions \"Keep editing\" (default) / \"Discard changes\". Cancel uses\n the same dialog with \"Discard and leave\". Focus trapped, Escape cancels,\n focus returns to the trigger when staying; confirmed navigation focuses the\n destination main heading.\n- Responsive: above 640px, actions in one row. At 640px and below, full-width\n Save first, then Reset | Cancel | Export in one equal-column row, DOM/tab\n order preserved, fits 320px with 44px targets and no horizontal scroll.\n- A11y: 44px targets, focus-visible 2px solid #1d4ed8 outline offset 2px\n (measured contrast > 3:1) on every control and dialog action, semantic\n fieldsets/labels, main landmark, heading order, reduced motion respected.\n\n## Review findings (each remedy PENDING until individually approved)\n\n| # | Pass | Gap (current implementation) | Proposed remedy (DESIGN.md) | Status |\n|---|------|------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|\n| 1 | 1 Info Arch | Save has same size/weight/color as Reset, Cancel, Export; no visible primary action | Save = only filled primary (#1d4ed8, white text); Reset/Cancel/Export = neutral ghost buttons | APPROVED (D2 → 1A) |\n| 2 | 2 States | Save pending 2-5s with no indicator; page looks frozen | Inline spinner beside \"Saving…\" inside the disabled Save button, aria-busy=true, reduced-motion support (same pattern Export already uses) | PENDING |\n| 3 | 5 Design Sys | Section gaps are 16/24/32px, no rhythm | 8px base: sections 32px, field groups 24px, label-to-input 8px | PENDING |\n| 4 | 5 Design Sys | Labels use 14/16/18px | Two roles only: 16px body/labels/helper, 20px section headings | PENDING |\n| 5 | 6 A11y | Error text on light pink at ~3:1 contrast, below WCAG AA | error.text #991b1b on error.surface #fef2f2 with icon and explicit text; all text meets AA | PENDING |\n\n## Pass scores\nRecorded as passes run. Format: initial → after approved fixes.\n\n| Pass | Initial | After | Notes |\n|------|---------|-------|-------|\n| 1 Information Architecture | 7 | 10 | Page order was already exact; approving filled Save + ghost secondaries gives the header one anchor |\n| 2 Interaction States | — | — | |\n| 3 User Journey | — | — | |\n| 4 AI Slop Risk | — | — | |\n| 5 Design System Alignment | — | — | |\n| 6 Responsive & A11y | — | — | |\n| 7 Unresolved Decisions | n/a | n/a | register only |\n\n## Implementation tasks\nPopulated only from individually approved remedies.\n\n## Verification\nPopulated with approved tasks.\n",
|
||
"cwd": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj",
|
||
"config": "/tmp/gstack-paid-shard-90X2Ul/tmp/gstack-hermetic-3157466-nVT3Zd/with-skills/.claude",
|
||
"startedAt": 1789045498100,
|
||
"transcript": {
|
||
"status": "ready",
|
||
"calls": [
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01XfsQLPBLynKkDxTSMykEb3",
|
||
"questions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"header": "Focus areas",
|
||
"question": "D1 — Review all 7 design passes, or focus on specific ones?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj on main, reviewing the settings-form conformance plan.\nELI10: I rated the plan 6/10. The behavior spec is thorough, but the built form still breaks the design system in five known places (which button is primary, uneven spacing, an error box that is hard to read, three label sizes, and a Save button that gives no feedback for 2-5 seconds). Each pass looks for gaps like these and any others the plan missed. Stakes if we pick wrong: focusing narrowly could leave an unlisted gap for the implementer to guess at.\nRecommendation: A because you asked for all seven dimensions and the five known gaps span four different passes.\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10\nA) All 7 passes (recommended)\n ✅ Every known gap gets its own decision, plus a sweep for anything the plan missed\n ✅ Produces the storyboard, state table, and decision register the implementer needs\n ❌ Five to seven individual decision questions before the report is done\nB) Only the passes that hold the five listed gaps (1, 2, 5, 6)\n ✅ Faster: skips Journey, AI Slop, and the decision register\n ✅ Still resolves every gap the plan already names\n ❌ Misses unlisted gaps and the storyboard; Pass 3 and 4 have no output\nNet: full coverage costs a few more questions; a partial pass saves minutes but leaves blind spots.",
|
||
"options": [
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "All 7 passes (recommended)",
|
||
"description": "Full review: every pass rated, one question per gap, storyboard and state table included."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "Passes 1, 2, 5, 6 only",
|
||
"description": "Only the passes containing the five listed gaps. Skips Journey, AI Slop, decision register."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"multiSelect": false
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"header": "Routing rules",
|
||
"question": "gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the edit and commit to CLAUDE.md happen after this review exits plan mode.",
|
||
"options": [
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||
"description": "Append a Skill routing section to CLAUDE.md and commit it, once plan mode is exited."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "No thanks",
|
||
"description": "Invoke skills manually. Records routing_declined so this is not asked again for this project."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"multiSelect": false
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"header": "Learnings",
|
||
"question": "gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.",
|
||
"options": [
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "Enable cross-project (recommended)",
|
||
"description": "Search learnings across all your local projects."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "Project-scoped only",
|
||
"description": "Only search learnings recorded for this project."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"multiSelect": false
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"answered": true,
|
||
"failed": false,
|
||
"answers": {
|
||
"D1 — Review all 7 design passes, or focus on specific ones?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj on main, reviewing the settings-form conformance plan.\nELI10: I rated the plan 6/10. The behavior spec is thorough, but the built form still breaks the design system in five known places (which button is primary, uneven spacing, an error box that is hard to read, three label sizes, and a Save button that gives no feedback for 2-5 seconds). Each pass looks for gaps like these and any others the plan missed. Stakes if we pick wrong: focusing narrowly could leave an unlisted gap for the implementer to guess at.\nRecommendation: A because you asked for all seven dimensions and the five known gaps span four different passes.\nCompleteness: A=10/10, B=6/10\nA) All 7 passes (recommended)\n ✅ Every known gap gets its own decision, plus a sweep for anything the plan missed\n ✅ Produces the storyboard, state table, and decision register the implementer needs\n ❌ Five to seven individual decision questions before the report is done\nB) Only the passes that hold the five listed gaps (1, 2, 5, 6)\n ✅ Faster: skips Journey, AI Slop, and the decision register\n ✅ Still resolves every gap the plan already names\n ❌ Misses unlisted gaps and the storyboard; Pass 3 and 4 have no output\nNet: full coverage costs a few more questions; a partial pass saves minutes but leaves blind spots.": "All 7 passes (recommended)",
|
||
"gstack works best when your project's CLAUDE.md includes skill routing rules. Add them? Note: plan mode is active, so if you pick A the edit and commit to CLAUDE.md happen after this review exits plan mode.": "Add routing rules (recommended)",
|
||
"gstack can search learnings from your other projects on this machine to find patterns that might apply here. This stays local (no data leaves your machine). Recommended for solo developers. Skip if you work on multiple client codebases where cross-contamination would be a concern.": "Enable cross-project (recommended)"
|
||
},
|
||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T13:07:42.691Z"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"toolUseId": "toolu_01EsAQeRNYEWFQjexLpWrJgd",
|
||
"questions": [
|
||
{
|
||
"header": "Issue 1",
|
||
"question": "D2 — Issue 1: How should the header make Save the visible primary action?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj on main, Pass 1 Information Architecture.\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export look identical. A user scanning the header cannot tell which one commits their edits, so some will hit Reset or Cancel by mistake and lose work, or hunt for Save. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled button and the rest are ghost buttons. Stakes if we pick wrong: mis-clicks on destructive neighbors and a header that reads as four equal choices.\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token, reuses the existing Button variants, and makes Save the one anchor in the header.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\n1A) Save filled #1d4ed8 with white text; Reset, Cancel, Export as neutral ghost buttons (recommended) (human: ~1h / CC: ~5min)\n ✅ One visual anchor; the eye lands on Save before reading any label\n ✅ Exact DESIGN.md token, so no new color or variant enters the system\n ❌ Ghost buttons must still hit 44px targets and 3:1 border contrast; needs a check at 320px\n1B) Save filled, but keep Reset/Cancel/Export as today's filled neutral style (human: ~30min / CC: ~3min)\n ✅ Smaller diff: only Save's variant changes\n ✅ Save still reads as primary against three gray siblings\n ❌ Diverges from DESIGN.md's ghost spec, so four filled shapes still compete for weight\n1C) Leave all four identical and rely on position (Save first) (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n ✅ No code change\n ✅ DOM order already puts Save first\n ❌ Position alone fails the 3-second scan test and leaves the documented gap open\nNet: 1A costs a few minutes and closes the gap with the system's own tokens; anything less leaves the header ambiguous.",
|
||
"options": [
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "1A Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)",
|
||
"description": "Save #1d4ed8/white as the only filled button; Reset, Cancel, Export neutral ghost. Exact DESIGN.md spec."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "1B Filled Save, filled neutral others",
|
||
"description": "Only change Save; keep the other three as filled neutral buttons. Deviates from DESIGN.md."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"label": "1C Leave as is",
|
||
"description": "No change; rely on Save being first in order. Gap stays open."
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"multiSelect": false
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"answered": true,
|
||
"failed": false,
|
||
"answers": {
|
||
"D2 — Issue 1: How should the header make Save the visible primary action?\nProject/branch/task: gstack-plan-count-Wg2rCj on main, Pass 1 Information Architecture.\nELI10: Right now Save, Reset, Cancel, and Export look identical. A user scanning the header cannot tell which one commits their edits, so some will hit Reset or Cancel by mistake and lose work, or hunt for Save. DESIGN.md already says Save is the only filled button and the rest are ghost buttons. Stakes if we pick wrong: mis-clicks on destructive neighbors and a header that reads as four equal choices.\nRecommendation: 1A because it is the exact DESIGN.md token, reuses the existing Button variants, and makes Save the one anchor in the header.\nCompleteness: 1A=10/10, 1B=7/10, 1C=3/10\n1A) Save filled #1d4ed8 with white text; Reset, Cancel, Export as neutral ghost buttons (recommended) (human: ~1h / CC: ~5min)\n ✅ One visual anchor; the eye lands on Save before reading any label\n ✅ Exact DESIGN.md token, so no new color or variant enters the system\n ❌ Ghost buttons must still hit 44px targets and 3:1 border contrast; needs a check at 320px\n1B) Save filled, but keep Reset/Cancel/Export as today's filled neutral style (human: ~30min / CC: ~3min)\n ✅ Smaller diff: only Save's variant changes\n ✅ Save still reads as primary against three gray siblings\n ❌ Diverges from DESIGN.md's ghost spec, so four filled shapes still compete for weight\n1C) Leave all four identical and rely on position (Save first) (human: 0 / CC: 0)\n ✅ No code change\n ✅ DOM order already puts Save first\n ❌ Position alone fails the 3-second scan test and leaves the documented gap open\nNet: 1A costs a few minutes and closes the gap with the system's own tokens; anything less leaves the header ambiguous.": "1A Filled Save, ghost others (recommended)"
|
||
},
|
||
"unansweredQuestionIndices": [],
|
||
"answeredAt": "2026-09-10T13:08:12.298Z"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"assistantMessages": [
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"text": "Starting the /plan-design-review skill: running the preamble, then auto-selecting the plan target since plan mode is active.",
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:05:14.728Z"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"text": "Audit done. Writing the initial plan artifact to the path you specified, then asking the setup and focus questions in one call.",
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:06:34.749Z"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"text": "Pre-review audit complete: DESIGN.md found and will guide the review, existing components (Button, Field, InlineStatus, ErrorSummary, ConfirmationDialog) can be reused, but the plan scores 6/10 due to five DESIGN.md violations (primary action, spacing, error contrast, label sizes, Save pending state) that need resolving to reach a complete spec.",
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:07:17.658Z"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"text": "Found no prior learnings, so I'll proceed with the routing-rules edit after plan mode ends. I scored the plan's information architecture 7/10—the layout order is solid, but the four identical action buttons lack hierarchy, so I'll flag making Save the visual anchor over the other three.\n\n",
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:08:01.433Z"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"sessionId": "e9aa75df-769b-4622-b1ed-d42278bbac8e",
|
||
"text": "Approved 1A. Applying it to the plan and re-rating Pass 1.",
|
||
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T13:08:17.827Z"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"provenance": {
|
||
"capture": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/capture.json",
|
||
"sha256": "c45bbc9f5fc18b779ebf6341bb1bc07c92c19e7317d06541cf49045fea29bb0e",
|
||
"bytes": 3367
|
||
},
|
||
"screen": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/terminal.screen.log",
|
||
"sha256": "234b0501b63c91f8bb5f4a4c9525395e3afe51b3e143a309ecc8f7f9f0f680c0",
|
||
"bytes": 4037
|
||
},
|
||
"hook": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/file-permission-state.json",
|
||
"sha256": "15dc4d4f7a2aa3cb711e0d2134f69acaea977ec128b3b1564b282a5bfc806282",
|
||
"bytes": 1163
|
||
},
|
||
"ownedBefore": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/before-report.md",
|
||
"sha256": "fc55f093aadaf47b91af112a7ddcf20148972156bf7c22947adb496efadd7227",
|
||
"bytes": 5165
|
||
},
|
||
"transcriptSource": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/observation.json",
|
||
"sha256": "e56a78ac3327daf4dca19d086f34a5ecf95b52100e6728ca2f67297c1bfc9340",
|
||
"bytes": 25685
|
||
},
|
||
"replay": {
|
||
"path": ".context/ship-source-ap-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-crop-gutter-plan-v1/replay-v1.json",
|
||
"sha256": "f9bdc52b65f4441f5d6a5216235fd9183fa2714742b5e72ff44db7109a924eb7",
|
||
"bytes": 1616
|
||
},
|
||
"limits": [
|
||
"Only exact current owned public hook metadata, report bytes, rendered screen and public transcript are included.",
|
||
"The command lower bound is native process start, not asserted exact slash-command time.",
|
||
"No private raw journal is included; live inputs and paid outcomes are unchanged."
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|