mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-16 18:05:31 +02:00
* feat: add a restricted and supervised Claude Code runner Preserve configured authentication and models while enforcing tool access, strict completion JSON, bounded output and process cleanup. Cover argv, failure handling, session metadata and Windows process containment. * feat: route outside reviews by harness and migrate wrapper installs Use Claude Code from Codex and Codex from other supported hosts, with shared invocation rendering, positive gate validation and per-phase provenance. Rename /claude to /claude-code, repair managed shared and copied installations safely, and generate native Kiro skills. Add installed-workflow, failure-injection and live cross-harness regression coverage. * test: recognize CEO mode labels without terminal spacing The paid workflow rendered SCOPEEXPANSION at option 4, but its driver required a literal space. Match the leading mode title without cursor-spacing artifacts and ignore adjacent preview text. Preserve missing-target failures and downstream posture assertions. * test: isolate plan-count fixtures before starting review workflows Seed the complete test plan in a private git repository before launching Claude, so a bare slash command cannot review the live workspace while a delayed fixture message remains queued. Preserve count thresholds, parsers and budgets. Add initial-context and installed-discovery tests, and retain startup/terminal diagnostics on failed evaluations. * test: stabilize review fixtures and Claude eval startup Preserve source boundaries in workflow judge inputs, isolate CEO mode plans, and wait for interactive trust input readiness. Keep startup failure evidence and retain existing models, budgets, and assertions. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: classify collapsed review modes and isolate seeded findings Keep review questions out of the setup count when terminal cursor positioning removes spaces. State existing webhook safeguards so the five-finding control measures its seeded defects without accidental extra security and concurrency gaps. Preserve question bands and the paired control. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: isolate browser daemon state across free shards Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: stabilize native review counting and interactive navigation Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * chore: prepare v1.82.0.0 release Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: eliminate browser and process-cleanup test flakes Pin every CI surface to Bun 1.4.0 to avoid extra-stdio finalizers closing reused live sockets. Add an isolated GC/listener regression that fails on Bun 1.3.13, and prevent coordinated rollback to an affected CI runtime. Check renderer cleanup against the render's own staging directory so concurrent renders cannot invalidate the assertion. Make the no-pgrep process-tree walk tolerate disappearing /proc entries, and synchronize its test fixture through child readiness and pipe EOF instead of sleeps. Validation: 9,157 passed, 31 skipped, zero failures across 556 files with retries disabled. Build, all-host generation freshness, and skill checks passed. All three races have failing-before/passing-after regressions. * fix: count completed native review questions in evals * fix: drive review navigation from confirmed native choices * fix: require complete section-loading eval reports * test: isolate telemetry HTTP transport from local assertions * fix: keep review input on the active native question * test: let tunnel revocation daemon choose an available port * test: allocate available ports for pairing and watchdog fixtures * fix: stabilize planning eval navigation and phase reporting * test: isolate installed runtime paths in planning evals * test: stabilize review evidence and concurrent refresh fixtures * fix: resolve design findings before editing the plan * fix: honor and persist disabled outside plan reviews * fix: preserve planning decisions and terminal evidence Load installed host reviews at autoplan phase entry and wait for completed reviewers and saved artifacts. Reuse approved remedies while preserving individual finding decisions. Drive interactive evals from the current terminal viewport, bind native questions across scrolling, and require complete native report evidence. Cover captured stale menus, permission lifecycles, setup classification, and disabled-review tool availability with deterministic regressions. Advance release metadata and the upgrade migration to the unclaimed 1.83.0.0 slot. * fix: drive native review questions and preserve current plans Use the native single-choice keyboard protocol and current terminal viewport, with per-question navigation inside packets and completed-call coverage. Keep permissions, multi-select menus, and Submit controls distinct. Send Autoplan reviewers the amended implementation plan, keep its review record separate, and supply retained application contracts in the chain fixture. Clarify individual DevEx decisions and complete CEO fix options; use one active plan destination for the section-loading report. * fix: preserve complete plan-review decisions * fix: recognize native plan dialogs and reviewer controls * fix: preserve review decisions and phase completion * fix: recognize completed reviews without losing findings * fix: preserve review continuity and native eval completion * test: fix native review completion and eval retry isolation * test: handle native review menus and complete eval fixtures * test: fix native review setup, completion, and isolation failures * test: limit native skill discovery to runtime assets * fix: bind Autoplan reviews to full ordered phase inputs * test: fix planning eval routing, counting, and timeout handling * chore: advance queued release to v1.84.0.0 * fix: preserve complete review inputs and planning decisions * fix: reconcile review approvals and preserve phase obligations * fix: preserve review obligations and unblock eval permissions Carry recorded Autoplan requirements into blind phase inputs, require Eng review approvals before exit, and exercise combined asynchronous flows in CEO reviews. Correct native finding and handoff classification and unblock repeated report edits using scoped request identities. * fix: retain plan requirements and complete native review dialogs * fix: complete native review prompts and retain plan references * fix: preserve review inputs and classify native eval evidence * fix: check competing completion orders in CEO reviews * fix: recognize review decisions and require phase methodology Require the current phase methodology before Autoplan snapshots. Correct substantive decision, closed handoff, and cache-finding classification, and honor the recommended implementation approach in native review dialogs. Add captured-transcript regressions without changing review thresholds, provider models, retries, or deadlines. * test: bind native review decisions and close completed handoffs * fix: complete review dialogs and verify methodology delivery * fix: preserve review evidence and unblock native eval prompts * fix: handle native review question completions * fix: recognize native review narration and controls * fix: count native review decisions and isolate eval fixtures * test: verify seeded review coverage and current artifact permissions * test: isolate model and brain-aware skill renders * fix: repair native workflow evaluation and clarify review steps * fix: stabilize workflow eval evidence and review guidance * test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation * fix: recognize completed workflow evidence and owned skill reads * test: repair seeded workflow delivery and completion evidence * test: recognize current review evidence across native forms * test: handle native review variants and permission redraws * fix: honor review preferences and recognize native eval evidence * test: recognize completed review decisions and queued permissions * test: match current review contracts and partial-line edits * test: recognize completed workflow evidence and bounded human waits * fix: preserve review entry gates and native eval interactions * fix: recognize native workflow evidence and preserve review gates * test: recognize current review evidence and preconfigure workflow fixtures * test: recognize completed review findings and scoped artifact permissions * fix: stabilize native workflow review and permission evidence * fix: recognize current review evidence and scoped edit confirmations Clarify Design and engineering review entry instructions and Design scoring. Recognize required legacy coverage and public Autoplan completion recaps. Bind the pending Edit confirmation to its exact file, ordered digest, and one-request approval when a preceding command display remains visible. Keep reviews within their existing size limits and preserve scope gates when extracting workflow fixtures from either supported preamble header. Keep failure outcomes, review thresholds, provider choices, and eval budgets. * fix: recover review workflow progress and eval evidence * fix: recognize valid review evidence and scope selection * test: fix review evidence parsing and repeated artifact prompts * test: recognize valid review decisions and pending native cards * fix(plan-eng-review): keep final navigation consistent with approved tasks * test: recognize valid review evidence and bind legacy diff requests * fix: stabilize review eval evidence and harness repair guidance * docs: update project documentation for v1.85.0.0 Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: fix Windows CI fixtures and credential scan Rebase captured JSON values and filesystem evidence using the appropriate path convention. Compile native fake CLIs on Windows and synchronize pipe holder readiness, with cleanup retained when assertions fail. Assemble synthetic credential fixtures at runtime so the added-line scan keeps enforcing the same gate without flagging its own rejection controls. Discover generated skills directly for the empty-find regression check, avoiding a recursive scan through saved evaluation artifacts and dependencies. * fix: preserve source renders on Windows Compare canonical generator paths using native separators so an output sidecar pointing at the source cannot overwrite its skill or metadata. Keep the regression fixture isolated from the real checkout and expose freshness diagnostics before asserting subprocess status. Detach Windows drain-test pipe holders from the fake provider's automatic child cleanup while preserving the enclosing runner job and its assertions. * fix: clarify outside review fallback and CEO decisions Render one applicable own-harness fallback path and retain native review, disabled policy, and missing-coverage semantics. Align report field names and mode labels, and make the existing per-cut scope approval explicit. Regenerate skill outputs and keep the workflow judge's model, thresholds, and retry policy unchanged. * chore: move release to free version slot (v1.86.0.0) PR #2852 now claims v1.85.0.0. Align the release metadata and rename migration so upgrades from that version still receive it. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: include engineering review prerequisites and restore branch context * fix: recognize coverage diagrams and clarify design review instructions * fix: preserve file identities and join Windows test processes --------- Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
240 lines
17 KiB
JSON
240 lines
17 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-70/shards/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode/pty-count/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1-70/plan-design-review-1789084087736-U04P81/observation.json",
|
|
"sha256": "33fb98e5445679bdeb4bc6532aea25910ebb66534529ce43d2a07526ed9c0f2c",
|
|
"bytes": 44263
|
|
},
|
|
"publicProjection": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/scope-announcement-public-independent-v1/plan-design-review-1-public.json",
|
|
"sha256": "236ad210d7b3a57fc872c6c858e9d02c2cd65511e61b0e02921e560b8781be39",
|
|
"bytes": 12397
|
|
},
|
|
"observed": {
|
|
"scopeGateAutoSelectObserved": false,
|
|
"scopeGateQuestionObserved": false
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"text": "The user typed `/plan-design-review`, so I'll invoke that skill to review the draft plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:46:18.064Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"text": "Audit complete: DESIGN.md defines the gstack system to calibrate against, TODOS.md has nothing relevant, and brain context is cold, so I'll rely on DESIGN.md and the draft itself. Now writing the initial plan artifact with the draft copied verbatim and gaps recorded as pending.\n\n",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:47:20.872Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"text": "## Step 0: Design Scope Assessment\n\n**0A. Initial rating: 2/10 on design completeness.**\n\nIt's a 2 because the plan names page sections but makes zero design decisions that survive contact with an implementer. The three decisions it does make are the wrong ones:\n\n- **Center-align everything** because of a \"clean modern look.\" That's a vibe, not a decision. Centered body copy is the single most reliable tell of AI-generated marketing pages, and DESIGN.md already chose an editorial hero.\n- **h1 8px above the subhead.** 8px is the `sm` token. Under a 72px Satoshi display line it reads as a typo. The hero needs breathing room in the `lg` to `xl` range so the headline and subhead register as two thoughts, not one run-on.\n- **CTA equals \"Learn more.\"** Two actions with equal weight means no action. The user satisfices on whatever they see first, and half of them click the wrong thing.\n\nThen the structure: hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer, 3 pricing cards. That is the exact template every AI landing page generator produces. Two of those sections are hard rejections in the outside-voice litmus (generic card grid as first impression, carousel with no narrative purpose).\n\nAnd the states section is honest about skipping everything that makes a site feel built rather than generated: no loading, no error, no empty, and mobile is \"stacks.\"\n\n**What a 10 looks like for this plan:** every section has one job and a named layout (not \"grid\" but \"asymmetric 7/5 split, left-aligned, JetBrains Mono eyebrow label\"). Type sizes, weights, and spacing come from the DESIGN.md scale. One primary CTA per viewport in amber, secondary as a text link. Features replaced with something specific to gstack (a real terminal session, a skill list, a live number). Testimonials as static, attributed quotes or cut. Pricing with a recommended tier, billing toggle, and an FAQ. Loading skeletons, a failure fallback for anything remote, a 404, and a focus-visible spec. Mobile designed per viewport: what gets cut, what reorders, 44px tap targets.\n\n**0B. DESIGN.md status:** exists. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system: Industrial/Utilitarian, Satoshi display, DM Sans body, JetBrains Mono as the personality font, amber-500 accent on #0C0C0C, 4px base spacing, 12-column grid at 1200px, grain texture, one authored motion moment already spent on the live-feed pulse.\n\n**0C. Existing design leverage:** DESIGN.md gives you the whole token set, so nothing here needs inventing. The \"editorial hero for landing page\" line in the Layout section is a direct instruction the draft contradicts. The type scale (Hero 72px clamp, H2 32px, Body 16px, Nano 11px mono labels) resolves G2 and G9 without a taste call. The decisions log already reserves the one authored motion moment, which settles the carousel question before we even argue about it.\n\n**0D. Focus areas.** Twelve gaps recorded as pending in the plan file. Biggest: alignment and hierarchy (G1-G3), AI slop structure (G4-G6), and missing states (G7-G8).",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:47:56.843Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:46:19.278Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01S3CYJqVdi6LabNUkSqt3pQ",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
|
},
|
|
"messageId": "msg_011CeveeunC4YtXnFomfzGKK",
|
|
"requestId": "req_011CeveetfDt2tMDZYc6guwt"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:46:20.400Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01S3CYJqVdi6LabNUkSqt3pQ",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "1b45c550-2c23-4bad-9c4c-2cb2b5620630",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789083973186
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-70/shards/skill-e2e-plan-design-plan-mode/pty-count/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1-70/plan-design-review-1789084189314-RBt8DC/observation.json",
|
|
"sha256": "07b3e65627e31c2fae5fd73cf3b4fd90b53fa6bbeece64fc4d8e1f91f3e277a8",
|
|
"bytes": 190267
|
|
},
|
|
"publicProjection": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/scope-announcement-public-independent-v1/plan-design-review-2-public.json",
|
|
"sha256": "7ef0efe3c941d04642b63263976f17c3951e2af75825667c6b1c0692b0b4c59c",
|
|
"bytes": 11180
|
|
},
|
|
"observed": {
|
|
"scopeGateAutoSelectObserved": false,
|
|
"scopeGateQuestionObserved": false
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "65380c44-4531-4119-addf-00c36a1f11ca",
|
|
"text": "I'll invoke the /plan-design-review skill against this draft plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:22.359Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "65380c44-4531-4119-addf-00c36a1f11ca",
|
|
"text": "Plan artifact written. Here are the audit findings and Step 0, then the focus question.\n\n**Pre-review audit**\n\n- **Platform / base:** GitHub, base branch `main`. Working tree clean. Recent commits are all test-harness fixes, so no prior design review cycles on this branch to be extra aggressive about.\n- **UI scope:** two marketing pages, `/` and `/pricing`. Hero, features grid, testimonials carousel, footer, three tier cards. This is a PERSUADE surface, so Landing Page Rules apply.\n- **DESIGN.md:** exists, open format with tokens in front matter. Direction is Industrial/Utilitarian, dark mode default, amber accent used sparingly, Satoshi display + DM Sans body + JetBrains Mono for data, 4px spacing base, 12-column grid at lg, 1200px max width, and one authored motion moment already claimed by the live-feed pulse. Every decision below calibrates against it.\n- **Brain context:** cold. No product, brand, or decisions digests.\n- **TODOS.md:** design entries are all about the detector and interop, none touch a landing page.\n- **Designer:** `DESIGN_READY`. Mockups will be generated in Step 0.5.\n\n**Step 0A: Initial design rating: 2/10**\n\nIt's a 2 because the plan names page sections but makes zero design decisions. The three decisions it does make are all wrong for this design system: center everything, an 8px h1-to-subhead gap that is off the spacing scale for a hero, and a CTA with the same weight as the secondary link, which means the page has no primary action. It hits two catalog anti-patterns by name (centered-everything, feature-grid-3col) and one hard rejection (carousel with no narrative purpose). States and responsive are explicitly declined.\n\nA 10 for this plan: hero specified as one full-bleed composition in Satoshi with amber reserved for the single CTA, a hierarchy that names first/second/third for each page, DESIGN.md tokens cited by path for every spacing and color choice, a state table covering testimonials and pricing loads and failures, a journey storyboard, per-viewport layouts at 375/768/1200, and an a11y spec with focus rings themed from the palette.\n\n**Step 0B:** DESIGN.md exists. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system.\n\n**Step 0C: Existing leverage.** DESIGN.md already answers typography, color, spacing, radius, grid, and motion budget. The plan should cite those tokens rather than invent values. The grain texture and \"CLI heritage IS the brand\" mood are the differentiation the features grid and hero should lean on.\n\n**Step 0D**",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:49:35.791Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "65380c44-4531-4119-addf-00c36a1f11ca",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:23.196Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01GDWFc5UrbXJEfHE4uTtMLV",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
|
},
|
|
"messageId": "msg_011CevepBQnaS7F5vjnjfe9m",
|
|
"requestId": "req_011CevepApKmD6naDpdkV9hF"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "65380c44-4531-4119-addf-00c36a1f11ca",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:24.637Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01GDWFc5UrbXJEfHE4uTtMLV",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "65380c44-4531-4119-addf-00c36a1f11ca",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789084099145
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-75/shards/skill-e2e-plan-eng-plan-mode/pty-count/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1-75/plan-eng-review-1789084194709-f7gZ47/observation.json",
|
|
"sha256": "11fc174e22f68c35f4d8a56d096a91b9dd8e63c48e89289d7071aebdc9785a43",
|
|
"bytes": 37141
|
|
},
|
|
"publicProjection": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/scope-announcement-public-independent-v1/plan-eng-review-1-public.json",
|
|
"sha256": "7b388fa4afadc2b16db3852613e07dc3618d2ecda983900fb02e365e31e9bcf8",
|
|
"bytes": 3093
|
|
},
|
|
"observed": {
|
|
"scopeGateAutoSelectObserved": false,
|
|
"scopeGateQuestionObserved": false
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "149e66b2-aeb4-4e0f-a45f-a346c1b3afb2",
|
|
"text": "I'll run the plan-eng-review skill against your draft plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:11.426Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "149e66b2-aeb4-4e0f-a45f-a346c1b3afb2",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:15.112Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01ADzgGTiveDRdGEgTrMj4ZP",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-eng-review",
|
|
"args": "Review this draft plan:\n\n# Parallelize unit tests\n\n## Plan\nBuild a custom test runner: scripts/test-parallel.ts, scripts/test-shard-impl.ts, scripts/test-merge-results.ts, scripts/test-progress.ts, scripts/test-watch.ts, scripts/test-coverage.ts, scripts/test-cli.ts, scripts/test-config.ts.\n\nAdd new TestRunner class, new ShardManager class, new ResultMerger class.\n\nIgnore Bun's native --shard flag because we want full control.\n\n## Files\n- scripts/test-parallel.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-shard-impl.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-merge-results.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-progress.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-watch.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-coverage.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-cli.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-config.ts (new)\n- package.json (add scripts)\n\n## Tests\nNone planned \u2014 will add later."
|
|
},
|
|
"messageId": "msg_011Ceveo3gvmKwFk72wVU8SW",
|
|
"requestId": "req_011Ceveo31F12oQsfAZupiFR"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "149e66b2-aeb4-4e0f-a45f-a346c1b3afb2",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:48:16.458Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01ADzgGTiveDRdGEgTrMj4ZP",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-eng-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Parallelize unit tests\n\n## Plan\nBuild a custom test runner: scripts/test-parallel.ts, scripts/test-shard-impl.ts,\nscripts/test-merge-results.ts, scripts/test-progress.ts, scripts/test-watch.ts,\nscripts/test-coverage.ts, scripts/test-cli.ts, scripts/test-config.ts.\n\nAdd new TestRunner class, new ShardManager class, new ResultMerger class.\n\nIgnore Bun's native --shard flag because we want full control.\n\n## Files\n- scripts/test-parallel.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-shard-impl.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-merge-results.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-progress.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-watch.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-coverage.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-cli.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-config.ts (new)\n- package.json (add scripts)\n\n## Tests\nNone planned \u2014 will add later.\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-eng-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "149e66b2-aeb4-4e0f-a45f-a346c1b3afb2",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789084083749
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/evals/job-75/shards/skill-e2e-plan-eng-plan-mode/pty-count/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1-75/plan-eng-review-1789084295452-oDbfMV/observation.json",
|
|
"sha256": "ea8fcfa647bf01a5e256fdf5b68b599a58a4f9ae02f080db68aa65a318377d4e",
|
|
"bytes": 62046
|
|
},
|
|
"publicProjection": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-av-delta-paid-20260910-v1/scope-announcement-public-independent-v1/plan-eng-review-2-public.json",
|
|
"sha256": "c94a58027c17f0e049286ca776ab2e9280988d3c9f027b1edd92966930b1ad09",
|
|
"bytes": 2486
|
|
},
|
|
"observed": {
|
|
"scopeGateAutoSelectObserved": false,
|
|
"scopeGateQuestionObserved": false
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "6ba86dfa-027d-4076-9ca6-b2a21a0989cc",
|
|
"text": "I'll run the /plan-eng-review skill against the draft plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:50:11.286Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "6ba86dfa-027d-4076-9ca6-b2a21a0989cc",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:50:12.875Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SR65Cr6BWHiu9DG6KqNduv",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-eng-review",
|
|
"args": "Review the draft plan \"Parallelize unit tests\" (custom test runner with 8 new scripts, new TestRunner/ShardManager/ResultMerger classes, ignoring Bun's native --shard flag, no tests planned)"
|
|
},
|
|
"messageId": "msg_011Cevex4gTN1JacvNC9s2xR",
|
|
"requestId": "req_011Cevex3xYDECs5BGXZsAid"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "6ba86dfa-027d-4076-9ca6-b2a21a0989cc",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T23:50:14.105Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01SR65Cr6BWHiu9DG6KqNduv",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-eng-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Parallelize unit tests\n\n## Plan\nBuild a custom test runner: scripts/test-parallel.ts, scripts/test-shard-impl.ts,\nscripts/test-merge-results.ts, scripts/test-progress.ts, scripts/test-watch.ts,\nscripts/test-coverage.ts, scripts/test-cli.ts, scripts/test-config.ts.\n\nAdd new TestRunner class, new ShardManager class, new ResultMerger class.\n\nIgnore Bun's native --shard flag because we want full control.\n\n## Files\n- scripts/test-parallel.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-shard-impl.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-merge-results.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-progress.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-watch.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-coverage.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-cli.ts (new)\n- scripts/test-config.ts (new)\n- package.json (add scripts)\n\n## Tests\nNone planned \u2014 will add later.\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-eng-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "6ba86dfa-027d-4076-9ca6-b2a21a0989cc",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789084206061
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|