Files
gstack/ship/sections/greptile.md.tmpl
T
Garry TanandClaude Fable 5 6c63ac2ae4 fix: adversarial review fixes — failure shape, CHANGELOG guard, vet coherence
Claude adversarial subagent findings (11), all verified before applying:
- The dispatch JSON contract gains an explicit FAILURE shape
  ({"error":...}) and a parent branch for it — a doc-sync that could not
  run (spawned marking failed, broken preamble) previously had only the
  no-updates shape to emit, which the parent printed as 'Documentation is
  current': a silent false-clean of exactly the VAS-449 class.
- Scope guard now covers CHANGELOG: skip Step 5 voice polish and resolve
  CHANGELOG-touching gates to leave-as-is (the parent authored the
  release entry; the prompt's older auto-choose clause conflicted with
  the contract's never-rewrite invariant).
- Recovery vet is sequence-coherent: pushing a commit pushes its
  ancestors, so ANY non-doc commit (VERSION, package.json, CHANGELOG.md)
  blocks the whole sequence — no more push-the-vetted-child-of-an-
  unvetted-parent hole.
- Steps 7/8/10 failure branches stop a still-running backgrounded task
  before falling back, so a late result never races the inline audit.
- 'Documentation synced' print gated on pushed:true (item 6 owns the
  local-only outcome); doc-review skip note's backward step pointer
  fixed; foreground note scoped 'at initial dispatch' so the sanctioned
  inline FALLBACKS in Steps 7/8 read as sanctioned; constants docstring
  no longer overclaims single-sourcing (names the 3 inline templates).
- Runtime-hook TODO raised P2 → P1: the spawned trust chain is
  agent-self-asserted; prose cannot close it, the hook can.

Both docsync gate E2Es re-verified green on the amended prompt, including
the strict run_in_background === false dispatch assert.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 21:31:37 +00:00

54 lines
3.9 KiB
Cheetah

## Step 10: Address Greptile review comments (if PR exists)
**Dispatch the fetch + classification as a subagent** using the Agent tool with `subagent_type: "general-purpose"`. The subagent pulls every Greptile comment, runs the escalation detection algorithm, and classifies each comment. Parent receives a structured list and handles user interaction + file edits.
{{FOREGROUND_DISPATCH_NOTE}}
**Subagent prompt:**
> You are classifying Greptile review comments for a /ship workflow. Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/review/greptile-triage.md` and follow the fetch, filter, classify, and **escalation detection** steps. Do NOT fix code, do NOT reply to comments, do NOT commit — report only.
>
> For each comment, assign: `classification` (`valid_actionable`, `already_fixed`, `false_positive`, `suppressed`), `escalation_tier` (1 or 2), the file:line or [top-level] tag, body summary, and permalink URL.
>
> If no PR exists, `gh` fails, the API errors, or there are zero comments, output: `{"total":0,"comments":[]}` and stop.
>
> Otherwise, output a single JSON object on the LAST LINE of your response:
> `{"total":N,"comments":[{"classification":"...","escalation_tier":N,"ref":"file:line","summary":"...","permalink":"url"},...]}`
**Parent processing:**
Parse the LAST line as JSON.
If `total` is 0, skip this step silently. Continue to Step 12.
**If the subagent fails, returns invalid JSON, or never completes (backgrounded despite the flag, or no final output after ~10 minutes — stop waiting; if a backgrounded task is still running, stop it first so a late result never lands mid-ship):** print `Greptile triage did not complete — review the PR comments manually` and continue to Step 12, recording the triage as UNAVAILABLE — not as zero comments — in the PR body wherever review results are reported (an unavailable triage must not read as a clean one; Step 20's metrics schema carries no triage field, so the PR body is the record). Do not block /ship on the triage subagent.
Otherwise, print: `+ {total} Greptile comments ({valid_actionable} valid, {already_fixed} already fixed, {false_positive} FP)`.
For each comment in `comments`:
**VALID & ACTIONABLE:** Use AskUserQuestion with:
- The comment (file:line or [top-level] + body summary + permalink URL)
- `RECOMMENDATION: Choose A because [one-line reason]`
- Options: A) Fix now, B) Acknowledge and ship anyway, C) It's a false positive
- If user chooses A: apply the fix, commit the fixed files (`git add <fixed-files> && git commit -m "fix: address Greptile review — <brief description>"`), reply using the **Fix reply template** from greptile-triage.md (include inline diff + explanation), and save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: fix).
- If user chooses C: reply using the **False Positive reply template** from greptile-triage.md (include evidence + suggested re-rank), save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: fp).
**VALID BUT ALREADY FIXED:** Reply using the **Already Fixed reply template** from greptile-triage.md — no AskUserQuestion needed:
- Include what was done and the fixing commit SHA
- Save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: already-fixed)
**FALSE POSITIVE:** Use AskUserQuestion:
- Show the comment and why you think it's wrong (file:line or [top-level] + body summary + permalink URL)
- Options:
- A) Reply to Greptile explaining the false positive (recommended if clearly wrong)
- B) Fix it anyway (if trivial)
- C) Ignore silently
- If user chooses A: reply using the **False Positive reply template** from greptile-triage.md (include evidence + suggested re-rank), save to both per-project and global greptile-history (type: fp)
**SUPPRESSED:** Skip silently — these are known false positives from previous triage.
**After all comments are resolved:** If any fixes were applied, the tests from Step 5 are now stale. **Re-run tests** (Step 5) before continuing to Step 12. If no fixes were applied, continue to Step 12.
---