gstack/docs/memorable-workflow-memory.md

Workflow memory with Memorable (optional, third party)

The third time you ask Claude Code to do the same shape of work, it starts from nothing again. It re-reads the same files, re-runs the same searches, and arrives at the fix it already wrote last month. Memorable is a third-party CLI that records how a task was done and hands that back the next time you ask for something close to it.

gstack does not install it, bundle it, or depend on it. What gstack adds is a bridge: Memorable's UserPromptSubmit hook registered through gstack's own hook manager, wrapped in the guarantees gstack gives every other off-machine sink. It is off until you turn it on, Claude Code is the only host it works with, and it is not available on Windows yet.

What you get

• Before each prompt, the hook asks Memorable whether a past session already solved something close to this and, if so, injects that procedure as clearly labelled reference data.
• An explicit gstack-side consent key, memorable_recall, off by default and listed by gstack-egress grants with its revoke command.
• A receipt for every prompt handed to the vendor binary, before the hand-off (gstack-egress list --sink memorable-recall). No receipt, no hand-off.
• A HIGH-tier secret pre-scan: a prompt carrying a live-shaped credential is never handed over.
• A trust envelope and an 8 KiB cap on whatever comes back, and the vendor can never block a prompt or speak as gstack.
• The vendor runs in an allowlisted environment (no API keys from your session) inside its own process group, and is killed with that group if it overruns the budget.
• Registration at the stable install, healing on every ./setup, survival of ./setup --no-team, removal by gstack-uninstall, and an off switch that works even after Claude Code has rewritten settings.json.

What this is not

• Not deterministic replay. It is recalled guidance the model may ignore.
• Not related to Aside or to browser automation.
• Not a gstack feature with gstack's guarantees past the process boundary. Everything the memorable binary does after gstack hands it a prompt belongs to a closed-source npm package from another vendor.

Two consents, neither implies the other

Consent	Who sets it	What it controls
memorable_recall (gstack)	gstack-memorable enable / disable	whether gstack's hook hands prompts to the vendor binary at all
Memorable's own consent	memorable enable / disable / forget, run by you	whether Memorable stores procedures and, per its docs, sends session traces to its extraction API

gstack never runs the vendor's consent commands and never reads their state. gstack-memorable enable prints them so you can run or inspect them yourself. Turning the bridge off turns off gstack's hand-off; it does not change what Memorable is allowed to do with what it already has.

What gstack hands over, and what it can attest

Command	What gstack hands to the vendor binary
gstack-memorable status, enable, disable	Nothing. They check that the binary exists; they never execute it.
the hook, on every prompt (gate on)	Claude Code's UserPromptSubmit JSON: session_id, cwd, transcript_path, prompt. The binary runs with your privileges, so it can read anything you can, including the transcript that path names.

The receipt attests exactly those bytes (count and sha256) and names the recipient gstack actually ran: local:<path to the memorable executable>. It does not and cannot attest the vendor's network activity. Memorable's documentation states that recall embeds a scrubbed task line through its API only when the local lexical match misses, and that capture uploads tool names, allowlisted argument fields and a 200-character task line. Those are the vendor's claims. The bridge is tested against memorable-cli 0.5.18's hook contract; other versions are the vendor's compatibility claim.

The hook skips the hand-off entirely, with one rate-limited line in ~/.gstack/hook-errors.log, when:

• the gate is off, MEMORABLE=0 is set, or the vendor binary is missing;
• the prompt carries a HIGH-tier credential shape (checked on the raw bytes and on the decoded string values, so a JSON-escaped key does not slip by), or is larger than 1 MiB;
• the repo's per-remote trust policy is deny or read-only (judged by the session's working directory, so a session that touches other repositories is not covered);
• the receipt cannot be written, or fewer than 500 ms remain of the hook's 4.5 s budget.

A receipt whose outcome is missing means the host killed the hook or the clock ran out. Read it as unknown, never as success. An outcome of output-written means gstack wrote enveloped context to Claude Code's stdin; whether Claude used it is not something a hook can know.

What gstack tests, and what is Memorable's claim

gstack tests the bridge in test/gstack-memorable.test.ts, test/memorable-user-prompt-hook.test.ts and test/gstack-settings-hook-schema-aware.test.ts, against a fake vendor: every refusal above, the receipt-before-hand-off order, the envelope and cap, the environment allowlist, the process-group kill, the identity-based removal after Claude Code strips the tag, the sweep exclusion, the uninstall arm, and the exit codes. Everything past the process boundary, what Memorable stores, where, what it sends, and what memorable disable and memorable forget erase, is Memorable's claim and not ours.

Turning it on (three steps, the middle one is yours)

npm i -g memorable-cli          # the CLI, from npm, not from gstack
memorable login && memorable enable   # the vendor's account and the vendor's consent; only you can do these
gstack-memorable enable         # gstack's gate + the hook, at the stable install

enable refuses, and changes nothing, when the vendor binary is missing, when Memorable already registered its own hook (see below), when the stable install does not carry this bridge (run ./setup first), or when settings.json cannot be read. Claude Code picks up the new hook within a few seconds on current versions; if it does not fire, restart the session. Verify with:

gstack-memorable status

If Memorable already registered the hook

memorable install-hooks and memorable start register the same UserPromptSubmit hook under Memorable's own name, outside gstack's table (memorable enable does not; only those two do). enable refuses in that case rather than adding a second entry: two entries run the hook twice on every prompt, injecting twice and capturing twice against your allowance.

To hand it to gstack instead, delete that entry from ~/.claude/settings.json and run enable again. Memorable has no command that removes its own hook.

Turning it off

gstack-memorable disable

The gate goes off first, so the very next prompt is off even before the entry is gone; a prompt already past the gate completes. Then gstack's entry is removed by identity (tag or no tag), both results are verified, and any partial failure is reported with a non-zero exit. Memorable's own consent and whatever it stored are untouched: memorable disable stops capture, memorable forget denies everything, and its own docs say what each erases.

The entry also comes out with gstack-uninstall (named in its summary) and survives ./setup --no-team, which only tears down team-mode hooks.

Troubleshooting

• The hook never fires. gstack-memorable status should show the gate on and "registered by gstack". If it shows a mismatch line, follow it. If everything looks right, restart Claude Code once.
• Nothing is ever recalled. The hand-offs are happening if gstack-egress list --sink memorable-recall shows receipts with output-written or injected=no outcomes. injected=no means the vendor returned nothing: check memorable status and memorable doctor for login, consent and stored procedures.
• Outcomes say timeout. The vendor took longer than the budget allowed (roughly 4 seconds after gstack's own work). That is usually network.
• hook-errors.log names a refusal. refused:redaction-high means a credential shape was in the prompt; trust policy ... deny or read-only means the repo is protected; receipt-unwritable means ~/.gstack/security is not writable.
• enable says the stable install predates this bridge. Run ./setup (or /gstack-upgrade) so the hook registered at ~/.claude/skills/gstack is the code that will run.

Under the hood, accurately

bin/gstack-memorable is the front door. It resolves the vendor CLI from GSTACK_MEMORABLE_BIN, then MEMORABLE_BIN, then ~/.memorable/bin/memorable, then PATH, and refuses with a message naming those when it finds none. It never executes the binary. It takes a lock for the duration of enable and disable, captures the prior state first, and on a failure restores that state rather than an assumed one.

hosts/claude/hooks/memorable-user-prompt-hook is the registered command: a fail-open bash shim over memorable-user-prompt-hook.ts, which runs the pipeline described above and always exits 0.

Registration goes through gstack-settings-hook ensure-event with a 5 s timeout, and the hook has a row in that file's KNOWN_HOOKS table, so it is identified by its command, never by a tag. Consequences:

• gstack-settings-hook list-items --event UserPromptSubmit --owned-by gstack-memorable shows it whether or not the tag survived; list-sources shows only tagged entries, so it may not.
• prune-stale --repoint (run by every ./setup) heals a stale path.
• ./setup --no-team excludes it from its sweep; gstack-uninstall removes it.
• gstack-settings-hook rollback is a whole-file restore of the last mutation, not a per-hook undo.

Windows: not yet. There is no process group to contain the vendor there, so enable refuses and the hook exits 0. Tracked in TODOS.md.

Credits

The integration and its hook contract are by Advaiyt Sane (@AdvaiytSane) and Nikhil Krishnaswamy (@NIkhil-cmd-cmd) at Memorable (#2831). The consent, receipt, envelope and containment layers were added in review.