Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-plan-design-with-ui.test.ts
T
ac20ef1e13 v1.91.16.0 fix: safe installs and upgrades, skills start everywhere, truthful completion (parallel wave) (#3014)
* fix(make-pdf,design): real TOC page numbers and anchors; design models move to gpt-5.5 + gpt-image-2 (#2903, #2807)

* ci: pin every action to a SHA, Scorecard, checksummed Bun, scoped Codex CLI in the CI image, macOS named-regressions job (#1948, #1706, #1997)

* fix(cso,browse): Windows/macOS lease identity, retention skips bad runs, truthful 'not assessed' reports, env.kv false positive, Windows browse spawn fixes (#2894, #2912, #2048, #2637, #2805)

* fix(outside-voice): one Codex model precedence for probe and dispatch, bounded timeouts with KILL escalation, probe cache identity, guarded mktemp, skills hidden in nested Codex (#2776, #2914, #2787, #2881, #2847)

* feat(setup): install registry, ./setup --status, staged activation, per-scope migrations, host tiers and conformance kit, OpenCode/Hermes fixes, Copilot CLI (experimental), disabled_skills, slimmer CLAUDE.md (#1925, #2879, #2347, #2338, #2626, #2629, #2825, #2015, #393, #1206, #2096)

Co-authored-by: Andrey Esipov <61357035+andrey-esipov@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Williams <5863886+ridermw@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rocky Wu <92764750+lolisaigao1234@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(preamble): skills start in worktree-isolated Claude Code sessions — one literal skill-start line, context-recovery helper, no eval in skill blocks, $N token tripwire, honest plan-mode precedence (#2763, #2896, #2851)

* fix(setup): per-install renders for renamed, vendored and custom-config installs, space-safe alias roots, per-host /cso launcher path (#1882, #2906)

* test: free tests never write the real HOME (home-write tripwire), no orphaned browse daemons, symlinked-TMPDIR (macOS) fixes, gbrain-on-PATH isolation (#2895, #2816, #2829, #2841, #2982, #2911, #2909, #2908, #2910)

* chore: integrate wave follow-ups — regenerate all hosts, README model docs, TODOS, touchfiles, duration seeds, Bun 1.3 telemetry test fix, replay fixtures pinned to their recorded bytes

* v1.91.14.0: release metadata

* test(browse): group-kill cleanup falls back to the leader when macOS returns EPERM for a live group

* ci: Codex login steps run under bash (the CI container's default sh rejects pipefail)

* fix: full-suite repairs — private state roots for 7 real-HOME writers, truthful home-guard attribution with --attribute-home, gstack-paths shim in ship-hook fixtures, Copilot in team-init probes, test-of-test detector, cookie review fixture pinned to the approved excerpt

* fix(windows): LF for Dockerfiles, normalized home-guard exclusions, path.relative fixture containment, ship push test spawn timeouts

* test(design-detect): widen the whole-scan budget test's timing margins so a loaded macOS runner can't time out the single-batch call

* fix(evals): qa protocol names defined for the judge, async PTY judge so overlapping sessions keep their cleanup deadline, bws setup cases use the standard JUDGE_MS tier

* test(pty): the non-blocking judge case is POSIX-only (its fake judge is a shebang script, like the PTY harness it covers)

* test(evals): ship-coverage-audit names absolute skill paths, uses Read, and skips the Step 7 artifact nothing consumes (removes the mechanism behind 3 of 4 historical timeouts)

* test: deflake terminal-agent concurrent startup (write the placeholder record before spawning, like the product) and qa-evidence resumed pipe (barrier on a full high-water mark instead of a sleep)

* fix(design): daemon log stream handles open errors instead of crashing the daemon; shutdown test awaits the stubbed exit

* test(evals): skillify checks the product's resolved state root (no GSTACK_HOME bypass), negative cases check every root; tpa shims live outside the agent's cwd and answer consistently

* test(evals): coverage-audit detector splits parallel columns at │ rails and [+] groups; coverage prompts name absolute skill paths; TODOs from the gate eval census

* fix(plan-eng-review): scope gate always sends the menu (no headless 'Scope pending' exit); PTY harness ends idle turn-ends and API-error panels promptly with a precise diagnostic

* test(evals): one position-bound coverage-read rule credits read-only && chains (labels, context ranges, git displays in either order) and still rejects forged output

* fix(ship): documentation section has one saved source inserted by cat (never retyped); spawned-marker evidence is the child output; refreshed codex/factory ship goldens

* test(docsync): the byte-exact insert positive is POSIX-only (the bash-command observer refuses backslash paths by design)

* test(evals): plan-design-with-ui focus-title rule accepts the comma-less 'dimensions or focus' wording (replayed on the captured CI run, negative controls kept)

* fix(qa-callers): exploratory preflight says the scope/method Reads come after exploratory.md; design-review scan check credits an executed scan proven by one engine run over the changed files

---------

Co-authored-by: Andrey Esipov <61357035+andrey-esipov@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Williams <5863886+ridermw@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rocky Wu <92764750+lolisaigao1234@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-03 07:54:09 -07:00

101 lines
5.9 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/**
* /plan-design-review with UI scope (gate, paid, real-PTY).
*
* The exact UI-heavy plan is committed before the first model turn. Observe
* an acknowledged Design focus/rating question and a subsequent review
* question using the existing native counting driver. An initial target menu
* or a no-UI early exit cannot satisfy this positive path. Option descriptions
* are proposals, so mentioning "no UI scope" there is not an exit verdict.
*/
import { test } from 'bun:test';
import { PTY_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
import { describeE2ETier } from './helpers/e2e-gate';
import { createDesignReviewPicker, DESIGN_BOARD_ACTOR_PROTOCOL } from './helpers/plan-review-board-feedback';
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
import * as path from 'node:path';
import {
runPlanSkillCounting,
type AskUserQuestionFingerprint,
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
const describeE2E = describeE2ETier('gate');
const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, '..');
const FIXTURE = path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'plans', 'ui-heavy-feature.md');
const designFocusBoundary = (fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint): boolean =>
fp.nativeCall?.answered === true && !fp.nativeCall.failed && fp.nativeCall.questions.some(({ question }) => {
const text = question.trim().replace(/^D\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*[—–:-]\s*/i, '');
// Require the source Step 0D question or its retained native paraphrase.
// A target menu can mention a design system without reviewing this plan.
return /^I(?:['’]ve| have) rated this plan (?:10(?:\.0+)?|[0-9](?:\.\d+)?)\/10 on design completeness\.[\s\S]*\bWant me to focus on specific areas instead of all 7\?/i.test(text)
|| /^Review all 7 design (?:dimensions|passes),? or focus(?: on [^?\n]+)?\?$/i.test(text.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!);
});
// Require a choice about the supplied UI, not a workflow offer after focus.
// The review labels each finding's options with its issue number and a letter
// ("3A", "3B"; review-sections.md), so a complete issue-labeled option set
// identifies a Design finding whatever vocabulary its title uses. Otherwise both
// the question and an offered remedy must describe concrete UI behavior.
const issueLabeled = (options: Array<{ label: string }>): boolean => {
const labels = options.map(({ label }) => /^\s*(\d+)([A-Z])(?=[):.\s]|$)/.exec(label));
return labels.length >= 2 && labels.every(Boolean)
&& new Set(labels.map(match => match![1])).size === 1
&& new Set(labels.map(match => match![2])).size === labels.length;
};
const uiChoice = /\b(?:layout|compos(?:e|ed|ition)|anchor|regions?|panels?|notifications?|activity|quick actions?|loading|skeletons?|empty|errors?|success|modals?|toasts?|buttons?|links?|copy|typography|fonts?|spacing|contrast|colors?|breakpoints?|responsive|keyboard|focus (?:order|trap|management)|aria|a11y|accessibility)\b/i;
const designReviewFinding = (fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint): boolean =>
fp.nativeCall?.answered === true && !fp.nativeCall.failed && !designFocusBoundary(fp) && fp.nativeCall.questions.some(({ question, options }) => {
const title = question.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!.trim().replace(/^D\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*[—–:-]\s*/i, '');
const setup = /\b(?:outside (?:design )?voices|cross[ -]project learnings|review (?:target|scope|mode)|what should I (?:design[ -])?review|which (?:artifact|plan|file))\b/i;
return !setup.test(title) && (issueLabeled(options)
|| (uiChoice.test(title) && options.some(option => uiChoice.test(`${option.label} ${option.description}`))));
});
describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
test(
'reviews the supplied UI plan through an acknowledged Design finding',
async () => {
const startedAt = Date.now();
const plan = fs.readFileSync(FIXTURE, 'utf8');
let picker: ReturnType<typeof createDesignReviewPicker> | undefined;
let pickerCwd: string | undefined;
const obs = await runPlanSkillCounting({
skillName: 'plan-design-review', slashCommand: '/plan-design-review',
followUpPrompt: ['Review the supplied UI plan in review-input.md. Read it before',
'choosing review scope.', '', plan, '', DESIGN_BOARD_ACTOR_PROTOCOL].join('\n'),
fixtureFiles: {'review-input.md': plan},
isLastStep0AUQ: designFocusBoundary,
isReviewAUQ: designReviewFinding,
reviewCountCeiling: 1,
observeSetupQuestions: true,
bindDesignBoardState: true,
pickAUQ: (_routing, active, context) => {
const call = active.nativeCall;
const index = active.nativeQuestionIndex ?? (call?.questions.length === 1 ? 0 : -1);
if (!call && (/\/boards\//.test(active.promptSnippet) || active.options.some(option => /\bSubmitted\b/.test(option.label)))) {
throw new Error('Design board choice requires an owned native question');
}
if (!call || call.answered || call.failed || index < 0 || !call.questions[index]) return null;
if (pickerCwd && pickerCwd !== context.cwd) throw new Error('Design board picker fixture changed');
pickerCwd = context.cwd;
picker ??= createDesignReviewPicker(context);
const question = call.questions[index];
return picker({...question, multiSelect: question.multiSelect ?? false,
options: question.options.map(option => ({...option, description: option.description ?? ''}))});
},
timeoutMs: 600_000 - (Date.now() - startedAt),
});
const focus = obs.fingerprints.findIndex(designFocusBoundary);
const postFocus = focus >= 0 && obs.fingerprints.slice(focus + 1).some(fp => !fp.preReview && designReviewFinding(fp));
if (obs.outcome !== 'ceiling_reached' || !postFocus) {
throw new Error(
`plan-design-review with UI scope FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}; no acknowledged Design focus and subsequent review question\n` +
`--- evidence (last 3KB) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
);
}
},
PTY_MS,
);
});