Files
gstack/test/skill-e2e-review-army.test.ts
T
Garry TanandOpenAI Codex 9f81911136 v1.86.0.0 feat: route outside reviews by harness (#2850)
* feat: add a restricted and supervised Claude Code runner

Preserve configured authentication and models while enforcing tool access, strict completion JSON, bounded output and process cleanup. Cover argv, failure handling, session metadata and Windows process containment.

* feat: route outside reviews by harness and migrate wrapper installs

Use Claude Code from Codex and Codex from other supported hosts, with shared invocation rendering, positive gate validation and per-phase provenance. Rename /claude to /claude-code, repair managed shared and copied installations safely, and generate native Kiro skills. Add installed-workflow, failure-injection and live cross-harness regression coverage.

* test: recognize CEO mode labels without terminal spacing

The paid workflow rendered SCOPEEXPANSION at option 4, but its driver required a literal space. Match the leading mode title without cursor-spacing artifacts and ignore adjacent preview text. Preserve missing-target failures and downstream posture assertions.

* test: isolate plan-count fixtures before starting review workflows

Seed the complete test plan in a private git repository before launching Claude, so a bare slash command cannot review the live workspace while a delayed fixture message remains queued. Preserve count thresholds, parsers and budgets. Add initial-context and installed-discovery tests, and retain startup/terminal diagnostics on failed evaluations.

* test: stabilize review fixtures and Claude eval startup

Preserve source boundaries in workflow judge inputs, isolate CEO mode plans, and wait for interactive trust input readiness. Keep startup failure evidence and retain existing models, budgets, and assertions.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* test: classify collapsed review modes and isolate seeded findings

Keep review questions out of the setup count when terminal cursor positioning removes spaces. State existing webhook safeguards so the five-finding control measures its seeded defects without accidental extra security and concurrency gaps. Preserve question bands and the paired control.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* test: isolate browser daemon state across free shards

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* test: stabilize native review counting and interactive navigation

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* chore: prepare v1.82.0.0 release

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: eliminate browser and process-cleanup test flakes

Pin every CI surface to Bun 1.4.0 to avoid extra-stdio finalizers closing
reused live sockets. Add an isolated GC/listener regression that fails on
Bun 1.3.13, and prevent coordinated rollback to an affected CI runtime.

Check renderer cleanup against the render's own staging directory so
concurrent renders cannot invalidate the assertion. Make the no-pgrep
process-tree walk tolerate disappearing /proc entries, and synchronize
its test fixture through child readiness and pipe EOF instead of sleeps.

Validation: 9,157 passed, 31 skipped, zero failures across 556 files with
retries disabled. Build, all-host generation freshness, and skill checks
passed. All three races have failing-before/passing-after regressions.

* fix: count completed native review questions in evals

* fix: drive review navigation from confirmed native choices

* fix: require complete section-loading eval reports

* test: isolate telemetry HTTP transport from local assertions

* fix: keep review input on the active native question

* test: let tunnel revocation daemon choose an available port

* test: allocate available ports for pairing and watchdog fixtures

* fix: stabilize planning eval navigation and phase reporting

* test: isolate installed runtime paths in planning evals

* test: stabilize review evidence and concurrent refresh fixtures

* fix: resolve design findings before editing the plan

* fix: honor and persist disabled outside plan reviews

* fix: preserve planning decisions and terminal evidence

Load installed host reviews at autoplan phase entry and wait for completed
reviewers and saved artifacts. Reuse approved remedies while preserving
individual finding decisions.

Drive interactive evals from the current terminal viewport, bind native
questions across scrolling, and require complete native report evidence.
Cover captured stale menus, permission lifecycles, setup classification,
and disabled-review tool availability with deterministic regressions.

Advance release metadata and the upgrade migration to the unclaimed
1.83.0.0 slot.

* fix: drive native review questions and preserve current plans

Use the native single-choice keyboard protocol and current terminal viewport,
with per-question navigation inside packets and completed-call coverage.
Keep permissions, multi-select menus, and Submit controls distinct.

Send Autoplan reviewers the amended implementation plan, keep its review record
separate, and supply retained application contracts in the chain fixture.
Clarify individual DevEx decisions and complete CEO fix options; use one active
plan destination for the section-loading report.

* fix: preserve complete plan-review decisions

* fix: recognize native plan dialogs and reviewer controls

* fix: preserve review decisions and phase completion

* fix: recognize completed reviews without losing findings

* fix: preserve review continuity and native eval completion

* test: fix native review completion and eval retry isolation

* test: handle native review menus and complete eval fixtures

* test: fix native review setup, completion, and isolation failures

* test: limit native skill discovery to runtime assets

* fix: bind Autoplan reviews to full ordered phase inputs

* test: fix planning eval routing, counting, and timeout handling

* chore: advance queued release to v1.84.0.0

* fix: preserve complete review inputs and planning decisions

* fix: reconcile review approvals and preserve phase obligations

* fix: preserve review obligations and unblock eval permissions

Carry recorded Autoplan requirements into blind phase inputs, require Eng
review approvals before exit, and exercise combined asynchronous flows in
CEO reviews. Correct native finding and handoff classification and unblock
repeated report edits using scoped request identities.

* fix: retain plan requirements and complete native review dialogs

* fix: complete native review prompts and retain plan references

* fix: preserve review inputs and classify native eval evidence

* fix: check competing completion orders in CEO reviews

* fix: recognize review decisions and require phase methodology

Require the current phase methodology before Autoplan snapshots. Correct
substantive decision, closed handoff, and cache-finding classification, and
honor the recommended implementation approach in native review dialogs.

Add captured-transcript regressions without changing review thresholds,
provider models, retries, or deadlines.

* test: bind native review decisions and close completed handoffs

* fix: complete review dialogs and verify methodology delivery

* fix: preserve review evidence and unblock native eval prompts

* fix: handle native review question completions

* fix: recognize native review narration and controls

* fix: count native review decisions and isolate eval fixtures

* test: verify seeded review coverage and current artifact permissions

* test: isolate model and brain-aware skill renders

* fix: repair native workflow evaluation and clarify review steps

* fix: stabilize workflow eval evidence and review guidance

* test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation

* fix: recognize completed workflow evidence and owned skill reads

* test: repair seeded workflow delivery and completion evidence

* test: recognize current review evidence across native forms

* test: handle native review variants and permission redraws

* fix: honor review preferences and recognize native eval evidence

* test: recognize completed review decisions and queued permissions

* test: match current review contracts and partial-line edits

* test: recognize completed workflow evidence and bounded human waits

* fix: preserve review entry gates and native eval interactions

* fix: recognize native workflow evidence and preserve review gates

* test: recognize current review evidence and preconfigure workflow fixtures

* test: recognize completed review findings and scoped artifact permissions

* fix: stabilize native workflow review and permission evidence

* fix: recognize current review evidence and scoped edit confirmations

Clarify Design and engineering review entry instructions and Design scoring.
Recognize required legacy coverage and public Autoplan completion recaps.
Bind the pending Edit confirmation to its exact file, ordered digest, and
one-request approval when a preceding command display remains visible.
Keep reviews within their existing size limits and preserve scope gates
when extracting workflow fixtures from either supported preamble header.

Keep failure outcomes, review thresholds, provider choices, and eval budgets.

* fix: recover review workflow progress and eval evidence

* fix: recognize valid review evidence and scope selection

* test: fix review evidence parsing and repeated artifact prompts

* test: recognize valid review decisions and pending native cards

* fix(plan-eng-review): keep final navigation consistent with approved tasks

* test: recognize valid review evidence and bind legacy diff requests

* fix: stabilize review eval evidence and harness repair guidance

* docs: update project documentation for v1.85.0.0

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* test: fix Windows CI fixtures and credential scan

Rebase captured JSON values and filesystem evidence using the appropriate
path convention. Compile native fake CLIs on Windows and synchronize pipe
holder readiness, with cleanup retained when assertions fail.

Assemble synthetic credential fixtures at runtime so the added-line scan
keeps enforcing the same gate without flagging its own rejection controls.

Discover generated skills directly for the empty-find regression check,
avoiding a recursive scan through saved evaluation artifacts and dependencies.

* fix: preserve source renders on Windows

Compare canonical generator paths using native separators so an output
sidecar pointing at the source cannot overwrite its skill or metadata.
Keep the regression fixture isolated from the real checkout and expose
freshness diagnostics before asserting subprocess status.

Detach Windows drain-test pipe holders from the fake provider's automatic
child cleanup while preserving the enclosing runner job and its assertions.

* fix: clarify outside review fallback and CEO decisions

Render one applicable own-harness fallback path and retain native review,
disabled policy, and missing-coverage semantics. Align report field names
and mode labels, and make the existing per-cut scope approval explicit.

Regenerate skill outputs and keep the workflow judge's model, thresholds,
and retry policy unchanged.

* chore: move release to free version slot (v1.86.0.0)

PR #2852 now claims v1.85.0.0. Align the release metadata and
rename migration so upgrades from that version still receive it.

Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>

* fix: include engineering review prerequisites and restore branch context

* fix: recognize coverage diagrams and clarify design review instructions

* fix: preserve file identities and join Windows test processes

---------

Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
2026-09-14 14:32:45 -07:00

729 lines
27 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
import { JUDGE_MS, CAPTURE_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
import { runSkillTest } from './helpers/session-runner';
import {
ROOT, runId, describeIfSelected, testConcurrentIfSelected,
logCost, recordE2E, createEvalCollector, finalizeEvalCollector,
} from './helpers/e2e-helpers';
import { extractSkillSections, REVIEW_ARMY_E2E_SECTIONS } from './helpers/skill-fixture';
import { spawnSync } from 'child_process';
import * as fs from 'fs';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as os from 'os';
const evalCollector = createEvalCollector('e2e-review-army');
// Helper: create a git repo with a feature branch
function setupRepo(prefix: string): { dir: string; run: (cmd: string, args: string[]) => void } {
const dir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), `skill-e2e-${prefix}-`));
const run = (cmd: string, args: string[]) =>
spawnSync(cmd, args, { cwd: dir, stdio: 'pipe', timeout: 5000 });
run('git', ['init', '-b', 'main']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.email', 'test@test.com']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.name', 'Test']);
return { dir, run };
}
// Helper: stage review skill files in the test dir. The SKILL.md fixture is
// EXTRACTED (CLAUDE.md: "E2E test fixtures: extract, don't copy") — core
// review workflow + Step 1.5 (Plan Completion Audit) + Step 4.5 (Review Army
// dispatch: quality score, JSON schema, consensus, Red Team).
//
// /review is carved (T9): the Step 4.5 dispatch body lives in
// review/sections/review-army.md and the Plan Completion Audit in
// review/sections/plan-completion.md — the skeleton keeps only STOP-Read
// pointers, so the '## Step 4.5' H2 no longer exists in review/SKILL.md.
// Extract the skeleton H2s minus Step 4.5, then append both section files
// (still an extraction: sections ARE the minimal on-demand units).
const REVIEW_ARMY_SKELETON_SECTIONS = REVIEW_ARMY_E2E_SECTIONS.filter(
(s) => !s.startsWith('Step 4.5'),
);
function readReviewSection(file: string): string {
const p = path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'sections', file);
const content = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf-8');
// Failure polarity: a fixture is never silently staged empty (regen missing).
if (content.trim().length < 500) {
throw new Error(`review section ${file} is unexpectedly small — was gen-skill-docs run after the carve?`);
}
return content;
}
function copyReviewFiles(dir: string) {
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(dir, 'review-SKILL.md'),
[
extractSkillSections(path.join(ROOT, 'review'), REVIEW_ARMY_SKELETON_SECTIONS),
readReviewSection('plan-completion.md'),
readReviewSection('review-army.md'),
].join('\n'),
);
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'checklist.md'), path.join(dir, 'review-checklist.md'));
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'greptile-triage.md'), path.join(dir, 'review-greptile-triage.md'));
// Copy specialist checklists
const specDir = path.join(dir, 'review-specialists');
fs.mkdirSync(specDir, { recursive: true });
const specialistsRoot = path.join(ROOT, 'review', 'specialists');
for (const f of fs.readdirSync(specialistsRoot)) {
fs.copyFileSync(path.join(specialistsRoot, f), path.join(specDir, f));
}
}
// --- Review Army: Migration Safety ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Migration Safety', ['review-army-migration-safety'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-migration');
dir = repo.dir;
// Base commit
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
// Feature branch with unsafe migration
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/drop-columns']);
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(dir, 'db', 'migrate'), { recursive: true });
const migrationContent = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-migration.sql'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'db', 'migrate', '20260330_drop_columns.sql'), migrationContent);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'drop email and phone columns']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-migration-safety', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch with a database migration that drops columns.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, security.md, performance.md, data-migration.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4 (Critical pass) then Step 4.5 (Review Army — Specialist Dispatch).
The base branch is main. Run gstack-diff-scope style analysis on the changed files.
Since db/migrate/ files changed, the Data Migration specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, instead of launching subagents, just read review-specialists/data-migration.md
and apply it yourself against the diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Write your findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-migration-safety',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army migration', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army migration safety', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
// Verify migration issues were caught
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
const hasMigrationFinding =
content.includes('drop') ||
content.includes('data loss') ||
content.includes('reversib') ||
content.includes('migration') ||
content.includes('column');
expect(hasMigrationFinding).toBe(true);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: N+1 Performance ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: N+1 Performance', ['review-army-perf-n-plus-one'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-n-plus-one');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/add-posts-index']);
const n1Content = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-n-plus-one.rb'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'posts_controller.rb'), n1Content);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add posts controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-perf-n-plus-one', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch with a Ruby controller that has N+1 queries.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, performance.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4 (Critical pass) then Step 4.5 (Review Army).
The base branch is main. This is a Ruby backend file, so Performance specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, read review-specialists/performance.md and apply it against the diff.
Write your findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-perf-n-plus-one',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army n+1', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army N+1 detection', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
const hasN1Finding =
content.includes('n+1') ||
content.includes('n + 1') ||
content.includes('eager') ||
content.includes('includes') ||
content.includes('preload') ||
content.includes('query') ||
content.includes('loop');
expect(hasN1Finding).toBe(true);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Delivery Audit ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Delivery Audit', ['review-army-delivery-audit'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-delivery');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/three-features']);
// Write a plan file promising 3 features
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'PLAN.md'), `# Feature Plan
## Implementation Items
1. Add user authentication with login/logout
2. Add user profile page with avatar upload
3. Add email notification system for new signups
## Test Items
- Test login flow
- Test profile page rendering
- Test email sending
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', 'PLAN.md']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add plan']);
// Implement only 2 of 3 features
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'auth.rb'), `class AuthController
def login
# authenticate user
session[:user_id] = user.id
end
def logout
session.delete(:user_id)
end
end
`);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'profile.rb'), `class ProfileController
def show
@user = User.find(params[:id])
end
def update_avatar
@user.avatar.attach(params[:avatar])
end
end
`);
// NOTE: email notification system is NOT implemented (intentionally missing)
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'implement auth and profile features']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-delivery-audit', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on branch feature/three-features.
There is a PLAN.md file that promises 3 features: auth, profile, and email notifications.
The diff (git diff main...HEAD) only implements 2 of them (auth and profile).
Read review-SKILL.md for the review workflow. Focus on the Plan Completion Audit section.
The plan file is at ./PLAN.md. Cross-reference it against the diff.
For each plan item, classify as DONE, PARTIAL, NOT DONE, or CHANGED.
The email notification system should be classified as NOT DONE.
Write your completion audit to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 15,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-delivery-audit',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army delivery', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army delivery audit', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// Should identify email notifications as NOT DONE
const hasNotDone =
content.includes('not done') ||
content.includes('not_done') ||
content.includes('missing') ||
content.includes('not implemented');
const mentionsEmail =
content.includes('email') ||
content.includes('notification');
expect(hasNotDone).toBe(true);
expect(mentionsEmail).toBe(true);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Quality Score ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Quality Score', ['review-army-quality-score'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-quality');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/add-controller']);
// Code with obvious issues for quality score computation
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'user_controller.rb'), `class UserController
def create
# SQL injection
User.where("name = '#{params[:name]}'")
# Magic number
if users.count > 42
raise "too many"
end
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add user controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-quality-score', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo with a vulnerable user controller.
Read review-SKILL.md and review-checklist.md.
Skip preamble, lake intro, telemetry.
Run the Critical pass (Step 4) against the diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Then compute the PR Quality Score as described in the Review Army merge step:
quality_score = max(0, 10 - (critical_count * 2 + informational_count * 0.5))
Write your findings AND the computed quality score to ${dir}/review-output.md
Include the line: "PR Quality Score: X/10" where X is the computed score.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 15,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-quality-score',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army quality', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army quality score', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
// Should contain a quality score
const hasScore =
content.toLowerCase().includes('quality score') ||
content.match(/\d+\/10/);
expect(hasScore).toBeTruthy();
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: JSON Findings ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: JSON Findings', ['review-army-json-findings'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-json');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/vuln']);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'search.rb'), `class SearchController
def index
# SQL injection via string interpolation
results = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(
"SELECT * FROM products WHERE name LIKE '%#{params[:q]}%'"
)
render json: results
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add search']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-json-findings', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are reviewing a git diff with a SQL injection vulnerability.
Read review-specialists/security.md for the security checklist.
Apply the checklist against this diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Output your findings as JSON objects, one per line, following the schema:
{"severity":"CRITICAL","confidence":9,"path":"search.rb","line":4,"category":"injection","summary":"SQL injection via string interpolation","fix":"Use parameterized query","fingerprint":"search.rb:4:injection","specialist":"security"}
Write ONLY JSON findings (no preamble) to ${dir}/findings.json`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 12,
timeout: JUDGE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-json-findings',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army json', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army JSON findings', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const findingsPath = path.join(dir, 'findings.json');
if (fs.existsSync(findingsPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(findingsPath, 'utf-8').trim();
const lines = content.split('\n').filter(l => l.trim());
// At least one finding
expect(lines.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(1);
// Each line should be valid JSON with required fields
for (const line of lines) {
let parsed: any;
try { parsed = JSON.parse(line); } catch { continue; }
// Required fields per schema
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('severity');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('confidence');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('path');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('category');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('summary');
expect(parsed).toHaveProperty('specialist');
break; // One valid line is enough for the gate test
}
}
}, JUDGE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Red Team (periodic) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Red Team', ['review-army-red-team'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-redteam');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/large-change']);
// Create a large diff (300+ lines)
const lines: string[] = ['class LargeController'];
for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
lines.push(` def method_${i}`);
lines.push(` data = params[:input_${i}]`);
lines.push(` process(data)`);
lines.push(' end');
lines.push('');
}
lines.push('end');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'large_controller.rb'), lines.join('\n'));
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add large controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-red-team', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are reviewing a large diff (300+ lines). Read review-SKILL.md.
Skip preamble, lake intro, telemetry.
The diff is large enough to activate the Red Team specialist.
Read review-specialists/red-team.md and apply it against the diff (git diff main...HEAD).
Focus on finding issues that other specialists might miss.
Write your red team findings to ${dir}/review-output.md
Start the file with "RED TEAM REVIEW" on the first line.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-red-team',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army red-team', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army red team', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
expect(content.toLowerCase()).toMatch(/red team|adversarial/);
}
}, CAPTURE_MS);
});
// --- Review Army: Consensus (periodic) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Consensus', ['review-army-consensus'], () => {
let dir: string;
let consensusCaptureSequence = 0;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-consensus');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.rb'), '# base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/vuln-auth']);
// SQL injection that both security AND testing specialists should flag
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'auth_controller.rb'), `class AuthController
def login
user = User.find_by("email = '#{params[:email]}' AND password = '#{params[:password]}'")
if user
session[:user_id] = user.id
redirect_to root_path
else
flash[:error] = "Invalid credentials"
render :login
end
end
end
`);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add auth controller']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-consensus', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are reviewing a git diff with a SQL injection in an auth controller.
Read review-SKILL.md, review-checklist.md, and the specialist checklists in review-specialists/.
This vulnerability should be caught by BOTH the security specialist (injection vector)
AND the testing specialist (no test for auth bypass).
Run the review. In your output, if a finding is flagged by multiple perspectives,
mark it as "MULTI-SPECIALIST CONFIRMED" with the confirming categories.
Write findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: CAPTURE_MS,
testName: 'review-army-consensus',
runId: `${process.env.EVALS_RUN_ID ?? runId}-review-consensus-${process.pid}-${++consensusCaptureSequence}`,
publicStreamDiagnostics: true,
});
logCost('/review army consensus', result);
let passed = false;
try {
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
if (fs.existsSync(outputPath)) {
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// Should catch the SQL injection
const hasSqlFinding =
content.includes('sql') ||
content.includes('injection') ||
content.includes('interpolat');
expect(hasSqlFinding).toBe(true);
}
passed = result.browseErrors.length === 0;
} finally {
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army consensus', 'Review Army', result, { passed });
}
// The runner can drain stderr for 5s after exit; reserve 1s for assertions/recording.
}, CAPTURE_MS + 6_000);
});
// --- Review Army: Simplification specialist (activation) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Simplification activation', ['review-army-simplification'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-simplification');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.js'), '// base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/date-utils']);
const overbuild = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-overbuild.js'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'date_utils.js'), overbuild);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add date utils']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-simplification', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch that adds a JS utility file.
Read review-SKILL.md for instructions. Also read review-checklist.md.
The specialist checklists are in review-specialists/ (testing.md, simplification.md, etc.).
Skip the preamble, lake intro, telemetry sections.
Run Step 4.5 (Review Army) only.
The base branch is main. The diff is over 100 lines, so the Simplification specialist should activate.
For the specialist dispatch, read review-specialists/simplification.md and apply it against the diff.
Write your findings to ${dir}/review-output.md`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 20,
timeout: 180_000,
testName: 'review-army-simplification',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army simplification', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army simplification detection', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8').toLowerCase();
// At least one planted invitation caught, expressed through the closed
// tag vocabulary or its obvious phrasing.
const hasStructureFinding =
content.includes('native') ||
content.includes('stdlib') ||
content.includes('speculative') ||
content.includes('intl') ||
content.includes('one implementation') ||
content.includes('single implementation');
expect(hasStructureFinding).toBe(true);
// Advisory findings must not read as defects: the disavowed frame stays out.
expect(content).not.toContain('lean already. ship.');
}, 210_000);
});
// --- Review Army: Simplification specialist (false-flag precision) ---
describeIfSelected('Review Army: Simplification precision', ['review-army-simplification-precision'], () => {
let dir: string;
beforeAll(() => {
const repo = setupRepo('army-simplification-lean');
dir = repo.dir;
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'app.js'), '// base\n');
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'initial']);
repo.run('git', ['checkout', '-b', 'feature/parse-port']);
const lean = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'review-army-lean-complete.js'), 'utf-8'
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'parse_port.js'), lean);
repo.run('git', ['add', '.']);
repo.run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add parsePort with self-check']);
copyReviewFiles(dir);
});
afterAll(() => { try { fs.rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {} });
testConcurrentIfSelected('review-army-simplification-precision', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `You are in a git repo on a feature branch that adds one small, complete utility (validation + error path + self-check).
Read review-specialists/simplification.md and apply it against the diff of the current branch vs main (git diff main).
Write the specialist's raw output to ${dir}/review-output.md — either the finding JSON lines or the exact NO FINDINGS sentinel.`,
workingDirectory: dir,
maxTurns: 12,
timeout: 150_000,
testName: 'review-army-simplification-precision',
runId,
});
logCost('/review army simplification precision', result);
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/review army simplification precision', 'Review Army', result);
expect(result.exitReason).toBe('success');
const outputPath = path.join(dir, 'review-output.md');
expect(fs.existsSync(outputPath)).toBe(true);
const content = fs.readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf-8');
// Precision: a lean, complete diff yields no simplification findings.
// The specialist must not flag the error path or the self-check for
// deletion — that is the noise failure mode this case pins.
const flaggedTestOrErrorPath =
/"category"\s*:\s*"(delete|shrink|stdlib|native|speculative)"/i.test(content) &&
/(testparseport|self-check|assert|throw)/i.test(content);
expect(flaggedTestOrErrorPath).toBe(false);
expect(content.toUpperCase()).toContain('NO FINDINGS');
}, 180_000);
});
// Finalize eval collector
afterAll(async () => {
await finalizeEvalCollector(evalCollector);
});