Files
gstack/test/helpers/plan-review-cases.ts
T
garrytan 5d032ef299 test: delete tests of dead eval code (A)
- A1: the retired Eng lexical oracle (evaluateEngSeedCoverage,
  isEngSeedDecisionAUQ), the completion-handoff detector and the retained
  corpus had no paid caller since v1.87.6; delete their 26 replay files,
  ~2.6k helper LOC and fixtures, and the dead blocks in 8 mixed files
  (live hasNativePlanTerminal / batching assertions stay).
- A2: dead viewport approvers in autoplan-artifact-permission and their 11
  replay files + fixtures; recorder/launcher cases stay.
- A3: never-wired oracles and seeders (autoplan-phase-order,
  eng-finding-fixture, ceo-paired-fixture, design-ui-scope,
  plan-skill-completion, pty-current-screen, required-reads,
  transcript-section-logger); plan-seed-submission now decodes through the
  production createPtyScreen; section manifests name their actual guard.
- A4: zero-reference helper exports, plus execGit and invokeAndObserve
  found by the reachability pass.
- 52 fixtures orphaned by the deletions; touchfile and selection-table
  entries for every deleted path.
2026-09-29 05:09:36 +00:00

95 lines
7.1 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/** Ground truth for the existing plan fixtures, independent of review phase. */
import type { NativeQuestion } from './plan-skill-questions';
export const CEO_PAIRED_FINDINGS = [
{ id: 'receipt-test', description: 'Independently decide happy-path processPayment test coverage asserting the correct receipt after a successful Stripe charge.' },
{ id: 'failure-test', description: 'Independently decide Stripe 502/timeout coverage asserting one retry with backoff and then clean failure.' },
];
export const CEO_SCOPE_CANDIDATES = [
{ id: 'E1', description: 'The whole Slack DM bot for incident alerts integration: include, defer, or cut it.' },
{ id: 'E2', description: 'The whole Discord guild bot for community channels integration: include, defer, or cut it.' },
{ id: 'E3', description: 'The whole Microsoft Teams webhook and bot framework integration: include, defer, or cut it.' },
{ id: 'E4', description: 'The whole Telegram bot API integration: include, defer, or cut it.' },
{ id: 'E5', description: 'The whole Mattermost REST plugin integration: include, defer, or cut it.' },
];
export const DEVEX_FINDINGS = [
{ id: 'persona', description: 'Decide a specific target developer persona instead of shipping for everyone.' },
{ id: 'first-run-benchmark', description: 'Decide measurement/benchmarking of time to hello world instead of leaving first-run duration unknown.' },
{ id: 'mandatory-ci', description: 'Decide how to remove or justify the mandatory five-minute CI step before the first eval.' },
{ id: 'aha', description: 'Decide a concrete interactive demo or aha moment in the getting-started flow instead of documentation alone.' },
{ id: 'peer-comparison', description: 'Produce grounded comparative analysis of peer SDK developer experiences and its implications for this plan instead of ignoring existing solutions.' },
];
export const ENG_BATCHING_FINDINGS = [
{ id: 'retry-library', description: 'Decide reuse of existing job-library retry hooks instead of a custom inline backoff scheduler per worker.' },
{ id: 'retry-duplication', description: 'Decide consolidation of the copied retry envelope across five workers.' },
{ id: 'at-most-once', description: 'Decide regression coverage for processWebhookJob at-most-once delivery when rewriting it.' },
{ id: 'dependency-cache', description: 'Decide caching and reusing the dependency graph across retries instead of rebuilding it on every attempt. Payload fetching or freshness is a separate policy and is not required for graph-cache coverage.' },
];
const planReviewQuestionLead = (question: NativeQuestion) =>
question.question.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!.replace(/^D\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*[—–:-]\s*/, '');
const planReviewOptionLabel = (label: string) => label.trim()
.replace(/^(?:[A-E][).:]?|\([A-E]\)|\[[A-E]\])\s+/i, '')
.replace(/\s*\(recommended\)\s*$/i, '').trim();
/** This fixture's actor retains optional roadmap work for later planning.
* It does not classify findings: a seeded obligation offered as a TODO still
* has to satisfy the unchanged semantic judge after native completion. */
export function pickDevexCheckpointQuestion(question: NativeQuestion): number {
const labels = question.options.map(option => planReviewOptionLabel(option.label).toLowerCase());
const todo = /^TODO(?:\s|:|$)/i;
const actionContext = labels.some(label => /^(?:add to todos\.md|build it now)\b/.test(label));
if (!todo.test(question.header.trim()) && !todo.test(planReviewQuestionLead(question).trim()) && !actionContext) {
return pickPlanReviewQuestion(question);
}
const actions = ['add to todos.md', 'skip', 'build it now'];
if (question.multiSelect || labels.length !== actions.length
|| actions.some(action => labels.filter(label => label === action).length !== 1)) {
throw new Error('DX checkpoint TODO menu must offer exactly Add to TODOS.md, Skip and Build it now');
}
return labels.indexOf('add to todos.md') + 1;
}
/** Answer only the finite next-step menus offered by the review sources. These
* are future handoffs; the driver still requires native completion and never
* approves ExitPlanMode or treats this selection as completion. */
export function pickPlanReviewQuestion(question: NativeQuestion): number {
const lead = planReviewQuestionLead(question);
const nextReview = /^(?:next review|next steps?|what['’]s next)\b/i.test(question.header.trim())
|| /^(?:next reviews?|next steps?|what['’]s next)\b/i.test(lead.trim());
const recommended = () => {
const choices = question.options.flatMap((option, index) =>
/\s\(recommended\)\s*$/i.test(option.label) ? [index + 1] : []);
if (choices.length > 1) throw new Error('Review question has multiple recommended options');
return choices[0] ?? 1;
};
if (!nextReview) return recommended();
const labels = question.options.map(option => planReviewOptionLabel(option.label));
const run = (label: string) => /^(?:Run )?\/plan-(?:ceo|eng|design|devex)-review(?: (?:next|first))?(?:\s*\((?:required gate|only if UI scope detected(?: and no design review exists)?|only if fundamental product gaps found|only if significant product change and no CEO review exists)\))?$/i.test(label)
|| /^(?:Run )?\/design-shotgun(?: to explore visual variants| for visual variants| after adding an OpenAI key|\s*[—–-]\s*explore visual design variants for issues found)?$/i.test(label)
|| /^(?:Run )?\/design-html(?:\s*[—–-]\s*generate Pretext-native HTML from approved mockups)?$/i.test(label);
// A bare Skip declines only an offered, recognized follow-up in this handoff.
const offersFollowUp = labels.some(run);
const manual = (label: string) => /^Skip\s*[,:;.—–-]\s*(?:I(?:['’]ll| will)\s+)?handle (?:reviews|next steps) manually$/i.test(label)
|| (offersFollowUp && (/^(?:Skip|Handle manually)$/i.test(label) || /^Skip\s*[,:;.—–-]\s*handle manually$/i.test(label) || /^Skip, manual next steps$/i.test(label)));
const future = (label: string) => /^Ready to implement(?:\s*[—–-]\s*run \/ship when done)?$/i.test(label)
|| /^Ready to implement[,;] (?:run )?\/devex-review after shipping$/i.test(label)
|| (offersFollowUp && (/^Implement, then \/devex-review$/i.test(label)
|| /^Implement now, \/devex-review after$/i.test(label)));
if (!labels.some(label => run(label) || manual(label) || future(label))) return recommended();
const manualChoices = labels.flatMap((label, index) => manual(label) ? [index + 1] : []);
const futureChoices = labels.flatMap((label, index) => future(label) ? [index + 1] : []);
const choices = manualChoices.length ? manualChoices : futureChoices;
if (choices.length !== 1 || labels.some(label => !run(label) && !manual(label) && !future(label))) {
throw new Error('Review handoff has no unambiguous offered manual or future-follow-up choice\n' + JSON.stringify({
header: question.header.slice(0, 80), lead: lead.slice(0, 240), optionCount: labels.length,
options: question.options.slice(0, 8).map((option, index) => ({
index: index + 1, label: option.label.slice(0, 256),
run: run(labels[index]!), manual: manual(labels[index]!), future: future(labels[index]!),
})),
omittedOptions: Math.max(0, labels.length - 8),
}));
}
return choices[0]!;
}