mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-16 09:55:29 +02:00
* feat: add a restricted and supervised Claude Code runner Preserve configured authentication and models while enforcing tool access, strict completion JSON, bounded output and process cleanup. Cover argv, failure handling, session metadata and Windows process containment. * feat: route outside reviews by harness and migrate wrapper installs Use Claude Code from Codex and Codex from other supported hosts, with shared invocation rendering, positive gate validation and per-phase provenance. Rename /claude to /claude-code, repair managed shared and copied installations safely, and generate native Kiro skills. Add installed-workflow, failure-injection and live cross-harness regression coverage. * test: recognize CEO mode labels without terminal spacing The paid workflow rendered SCOPEEXPANSION at option 4, but its driver required a literal space. Match the leading mode title without cursor-spacing artifacts and ignore adjacent preview text. Preserve missing-target failures and downstream posture assertions. * test: isolate plan-count fixtures before starting review workflows Seed the complete test plan in a private git repository before launching Claude, so a bare slash command cannot review the live workspace while a delayed fixture message remains queued. Preserve count thresholds, parsers and budgets. Add initial-context and installed-discovery tests, and retain startup/terminal diagnostics on failed evaluations. * test: stabilize review fixtures and Claude eval startup Preserve source boundaries in workflow judge inputs, isolate CEO mode plans, and wait for interactive trust input readiness. Keep startup failure evidence and retain existing models, budgets, and assertions. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: classify collapsed review modes and isolate seeded findings Keep review questions out of the setup count when terminal cursor positioning removes spaces. State existing webhook safeguards so the five-finding control measures its seeded defects without accidental extra security and concurrency gaps. Preserve question bands and the paired control. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: isolate browser daemon state across free shards Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: stabilize native review counting and interactive navigation Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * chore: prepare v1.82.0.0 release Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: eliminate browser and process-cleanup test flakes Pin every CI surface to Bun 1.4.0 to avoid extra-stdio finalizers closing reused live sockets. Add an isolated GC/listener regression that fails on Bun 1.3.13, and prevent coordinated rollback to an affected CI runtime. Check renderer cleanup against the render's own staging directory so concurrent renders cannot invalidate the assertion. Make the no-pgrep process-tree walk tolerate disappearing /proc entries, and synchronize its test fixture through child readiness and pipe EOF instead of sleeps. Validation: 9,157 passed, 31 skipped, zero failures across 556 files with retries disabled. Build, all-host generation freshness, and skill checks passed. All three races have failing-before/passing-after regressions. * fix: count completed native review questions in evals * fix: drive review navigation from confirmed native choices * fix: require complete section-loading eval reports * test: isolate telemetry HTTP transport from local assertions * fix: keep review input on the active native question * test: let tunnel revocation daemon choose an available port * test: allocate available ports for pairing and watchdog fixtures * fix: stabilize planning eval navigation and phase reporting * test: isolate installed runtime paths in planning evals * test: stabilize review evidence and concurrent refresh fixtures * fix: resolve design findings before editing the plan * fix: honor and persist disabled outside plan reviews * fix: preserve planning decisions and terminal evidence Load installed host reviews at autoplan phase entry and wait for completed reviewers and saved artifacts. Reuse approved remedies while preserving individual finding decisions. Drive interactive evals from the current terminal viewport, bind native questions across scrolling, and require complete native report evidence. Cover captured stale menus, permission lifecycles, setup classification, and disabled-review tool availability with deterministic regressions. Advance release metadata and the upgrade migration to the unclaimed 1.83.0.0 slot. * fix: drive native review questions and preserve current plans Use the native single-choice keyboard protocol and current terminal viewport, with per-question navigation inside packets and completed-call coverage. Keep permissions, multi-select menus, and Submit controls distinct. Send Autoplan reviewers the amended implementation plan, keep its review record separate, and supply retained application contracts in the chain fixture. Clarify individual DevEx decisions and complete CEO fix options; use one active plan destination for the section-loading report. * fix: preserve complete plan-review decisions * fix: recognize native plan dialogs and reviewer controls * fix: preserve review decisions and phase completion * fix: recognize completed reviews without losing findings * fix: preserve review continuity and native eval completion * test: fix native review completion and eval retry isolation * test: handle native review menus and complete eval fixtures * test: fix native review setup, completion, and isolation failures * test: limit native skill discovery to runtime assets * fix: bind Autoplan reviews to full ordered phase inputs * test: fix planning eval routing, counting, and timeout handling * chore: advance queued release to v1.84.0.0 * fix: preserve complete review inputs and planning decisions * fix: reconcile review approvals and preserve phase obligations * fix: preserve review obligations and unblock eval permissions Carry recorded Autoplan requirements into blind phase inputs, require Eng review approvals before exit, and exercise combined asynchronous flows in CEO reviews. Correct native finding and handoff classification and unblock repeated report edits using scoped request identities. * fix: retain plan requirements and complete native review dialogs * fix: complete native review prompts and retain plan references * fix: preserve review inputs and classify native eval evidence * fix: check competing completion orders in CEO reviews * fix: recognize review decisions and require phase methodology Require the current phase methodology before Autoplan snapshots. Correct substantive decision, closed handoff, and cache-finding classification, and honor the recommended implementation approach in native review dialogs. Add captured-transcript regressions without changing review thresholds, provider models, retries, or deadlines. * test: bind native review decisions and close completed handoffs * fix: complete review dialogs and verify methodology delivery * fix: preserve review evidence and unblock native eval prompts * fix: handle native review question completions * fix: recognize native review narration and controls * fix: count native review decisions and isolate eval fixtures * test: verify seeded review coverage and current artifact permissions * test: isolate model and brain-aware skill renders * fix: repair native workflow evaluation and clarify review steps * fix: stabilize workflow eval evidence and review guidance * test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation * fix: recognize completed workflow evidence and owned skill reads * test: repair seeded workflow delivery and completion evidence * test: recognize current review evidence across native forms * test: handle native review variants and permission redraws * fix: honor review preferences and recognize native eval evidence * test: recognize completed review decisions and queued permissions * test: match current review contracts and partial-line edits * test: recognize completed workflow evidence and bounded human waits * fix: preserve review entry gates and native eval interactions * fix: recognize native workflow evidence and preserve review gates * test: recognize current review evidence and preconfigure workflow fixtures * test: recognize completed review findings and scoped artifact permissions * fix: stabilize native workflow review and permission evidence * fix: recognize current review evidence and scoped edit confirmations Clarify Design and engineering review entry instructions and Design scoring. Recognize required legacy coverage and public Autoplan completion recaps. Bind the pending Edit confirmation to its exact file, ordered digest, and one-request approval when a preceding command display remains visible. Keep reviews within their existing size limits and preserve scope gates when extracting workflow fixtures from either supported preamble header. Keep failure outcomes, review thresholds, provider choices, and eval budgets. * fix: recover review workflow progress and eval evidence * fix: recognize valid review evidence and scope selection * test: fix review evidence parsing and repeated artifact prompts * test: recognize valid review decisions and pending native cards * fix(plan-eng-review): keep final navigation consistent with approved tasks * test: recognize valid review evidence and bind legacy diff requests * fix: stabilize review eval evidence and harness repair guidance * docs: update project documentation for v1.85.0.0 Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: fix Windows CI fixtures and credential scan Rebase captured JSON values and filesystem evidence using the appropriate path convention. Compile native fake CLIs on Windows and synchronize pipe holder readiness, with cleanup retained when assertions fail. Assemble synthetic credential fixtures at runtime so the added-line scan keeps enforcing the same gate without flagging its own rejection controls. Discover generated skills directly for the empty-find regression check, avoiding a recursive scan through saved evaluation artifacts and dependencies. * fix: preserve source renders on Windows Compare canonical generator paths using native separators so an output sidecar pointing at the source cannot overwrite its skill or metadata. Keep the regression fixture isolated from the real checkout and expose freshness diagnostics before asserting subprocess status. Detach Windows drain-test pipe holders from the fake provider's automatic child cleanup while preserving the enclosing runner job and its assertions. * fix: clarify outside review fallback and CEO decisions Render one applicable own-harness fallback path and retain native review, disabled policy, and missing-coverage semantics. Align report field names and mode labels, and make the existing per-cut scope approval explicit. Regenerate skill outputs and keep the workflow judge's model, thresholds, and retry policy unchanged. * chore: move release to free version slot (v1.86.0.0) PR #2852 now claims v1.85.0.0. Align the release metadata and rename migration so upgrades from that version still receive it. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: include engineering review prerequisites and restore branch context * fix: recognize coverage diagrams and clarify design review instructions * fix: preserve file identities and join Windows test processes --------- Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
127 lines
11 KiB
JSON
127 lines
11 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"scope": "Exact owned public assistant and Skill-use/result projection. Full source snapshots retain Write/results separately. No private text.",
|
|
"observations": [
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-plan-mode-evidence-v1/plan-design-review-1789007179653-n3jdJd.json",
|
|
"sha256": "9c5b3d45dd34f975ab6b28e8573d93525cd5476da6fdf2592b65666cb34fcece"
|
|
},
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789007077511
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"text": "I'll run the design review skill on your draft landing page plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:42.925Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"text": "Running the skill preamble first.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:48.496Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"text": "A DESIGN.md exists, so every design call will calibrate against it. Reading it plus the design-related TODOs.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:25:15.585Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"text": "Audit done. Writing the initial plan artifact (your draft copied verbatim, gaps recorded as pending), then Step 0.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:25:28.973Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"text": "**Pre-review audit findings**\n\n- **UI scope:** two marketing pages, `/` and `/pricing`. Design review applies.\n- **DESIGN.md exists** and is specific: Industrial/Utilitarian, dark default, amber accent used sparingly, Satoshi display + DM Sans body + JetBrains Mono as the personality font, 4px spacing base, 12-col grid at 1200px, and an explicit \"editorial hero for landing page\" layout direction. The draft plan contradicts it on several points.\n- **Prior design reviews:** none logged for this branch. Recent commits are all eval infrastructure, so nothing to be extra aggressive about.\n- **Designer binary:** `DESIGN_READY`. Mockups will be generated after Step 0.\n- **Base branch:** `main` (GitHub).\n\n**Step 0A. Initial design rating: 2/10 on design completeness.**\n\nIt's a 2 because the plan names page sections, but every actual design decision it does make is wrong or missing. \"Clean modern look\" is a vibe, not a decision. Center-aligning everything contradicts the editorial hero your DESIGN.md already chose. An 8px gap between a 72px hero and its subhead is spacing for a caption, not a headline. A CTA with the same weight as \"Learn more\" means there is no primary action, so the page has no job. The three-column features grid plus testimonials carousel is the exact template every AI-generated site ships. \"Stacks on mobile\" and \"only the happy path\" together mean roughly half the users' actual experience is undesigned.\n\nA 10 for this plan: hero composition specified in DESIGN.md tokens (Satoshi at clamp(40px, 6vw, 72px), subhead at `lg`/`xl` spacing, left-aligned editorial layout, one amber CTA, \"Learn more\" as a quiet text link). One scannable proof section that earns its layout instead of a card grid. Testimonials with a narrative purpose or cut entirely. Pricing with a recommended tier, per-tier CTA, and a FAQ. Every state named: font loading, fetch failure, 404, form success/error. Mobile designed per viewport with 44px touch targets and a real nav. Contrast, focus rings, and reduced-motion specified. One authored motion moment on the first viewport.\n\n**Step 0B.** DESIGN.md found. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system.\n\n**Step 0C. Existing leverage.** The whole token set is already decided: fonts, color roles, the spacing scale, radii, the grain texture, easing curves. The plan should bind to those tokens by name rather than invent anything. The Decisions Log also settled that the live-feed pulse is the one authored motion moment, so a landing hero would need its own explicit decision if it wants motion.\n\n**Step 0D.** Focus areas.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:01.369Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:42.968Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01KviY5jExf7Nmwsy5d5wxVf",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "9d275b27-7c60-4f06-b2af-82617b1c5e2c",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:24:44.365Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01KviY5jExf7Nmwsy5d5wxVf",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"path": ".context/ship-source-ag-delta-paid-20260910-v1/design-plan-mode-evidence-v1/plan-design-review-1789007300958-g4QVMs.json",
|
|
"sha256": "91caf7e1e5edce281f5ceb3e44e5988839ac43e3d6ba17f20ed7e452b356061c"
|
|
},
|
|
"opts": {
|
|
"seed": "\n# Plan: Marketing landing page\n\n## Layout\nAll headings, taglines, and body copy will be center-aligned for a\n\"clean modern look.\" The hero h1 sits 8px above the subhead; the CTA\nbutton has the same visual weight as the \"Learn more\" link beside it.\n\n## Pages\n- / (hero, 3-column features grid, testimonials carousel, footer)\n- /pricing (3 tier cards)\n\n## States\nOnly the happy path is designed. No empty states, no error states,\nno loading states. Mobile: \"stacks on mobile.\"\n",
|
|
"skillName": "plan-design-review",
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"commandStartedAt": 1789007191011
|
|
},
|
|
"transcript": {
|
|
"status": "ready",
|
|
"calls": [],
|
|
"assistantMessages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"text": "I'll invoke the /plan-design-review skill to review the draft landing page plan.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:35.166Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"text": "I've selected reviewing the pasted \"Marketing landing page\" draft plan since we're in plan mode. Now I'll run the pre-review audit, design setup probe, context recovery, and brain context checks in parallel.\n\n",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:53.055Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"text": "Base branch is main. DESIGN.md exists, so design decisions will calibrate against it. Reading DESIGN.md, design TODOs, and the review sections now.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:27:09.985Z"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"text": "## Pre-review system audit\n\n**UI scope:** two pages. `/` has a hero, a 3-column features grid, a testimonials carousel, and a footer. `/pricing` has three tier cards. This is a PERSUADE surface (marketing landing page), so Landing Page Rules apply.\n\n**DESIGN.md:** exists, open format with tokens in front matter. Direction is Industrial/Utilitarian, dark default, restrained amber accent, Satoshi display + DM Sans body + JetBrains Mono for data, 12-col grid at 1200px, 4px spacing base. It explicitly calls for an \"editorial hero for landing page.\" All design decisions calibrate against it.\n\n**TODOS.md:** no landing-page design TODOs. The design entries there are about the detector and skill internals.\n\n**Prior reviews:** none logged for this branch. Git log is skill infrastructure work, no landing page history, so no retrospective hot spots.\n\n**Existing leverage:** the DESIGN.md token set and its Decisions Log (light-mode amber-600 rationale, grain texture, \"one authored motion moment\" already spent on the live-feed pulse). No landing page code exists in the repo yet.\n\n## Step 0: Design Scope Assessment\n\n**0A. Initial rating: 2/10** on design completeness. The draft names pages and components but nearly every stated decision violates a principle, and the omissions are total. Specifically: it has no primary action (CTA and \"Learn more\" carry equal weight), it centers everything for a \"clean modern look\" (a vibe, not a decision), it puts 8px between hero h1 and subhead, it uses the 3-column features grid and a testimonials carousel (both on the slop list, the carousel a hard rejection), it defaults pricing to cards, it designs zero non-happy states, it hand-waves mobile as \"stacks,\" and it never mentions type, color, motion, or accessibility despite a full DESIGN.md sitting in the repo.\n\n**A 10 for this plan** would: name the one thing a visitor sees first in the hero and what they click, cite DESIGN.md tokens by path for every type size, color, and spacing value, give each section one job with one headline, replace the grid and carousel with sections that earn their pixels, specify loading/empty/error states for every dynamic element (pricing fetch, testimonials, any form), lay out 375px, 768px, and 1200px intentionally, and spec keyboard nav, landmarks, 44px targets, focus rings, and 4.5:1 contrast.\n\n**0B. DESIGN.md status:** present. All design decisions will be calibrated against your stated design system.\n\n**0C. Existing design leverage:** reuse the DESIGN.md tokens (`{typography.display}` Satoshi for hero, `{colors.primary-dark-mode}` for the one CTA, `{spacing.*}` scale, `{rounded.md}` for buttons), the grain texture treatment, and the 12-col/1200px grid. Note the Decisions Log already spends the \"one authored motion moment\" on the live-feed pulse, so the landing page's first-viewport motion needs its own decision.\n\nI've recorded ten pending gaps (G1 to G10) in the plan file. None is approved yet.",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:28:08.900Z"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"tools": [
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:35.988Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MW4bfwniQhj4Cscv8CuPyo",
|
|
"kind": "use",
|
|
"name": "Skill",
|
|
"input": {
|
|
"skill": "plan-design-review"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"sessionId": "76d68e6c-2f79-40b9-a432-1010c1ee7668",
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-09-10T02:26:37.340Z",
|
|
"toolUseId": "toolu_01MW4bfwniQhj4Cscv8CuPyo",
|
|
"kind": "result",
|
|
"content": "Launching skill: plan-design-review",
|
|
"isError": false
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|