mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-09-17 02:15:31 +02:00
* feat: add a restricted and supervised Claude Code runner Preserve configured authentication and models while enforcing tool access, strict completion JSON, bounded output and process cleanup. Cover argv, failure handling, session metadata and Windows process containment. * feat: route outside reviews by harness and migrate wrapper installs Use Claude Code from Codex and Codex from other supported hosts, with shared invocation rendering, positive gate validation and per-phase provenance. Rename /claude to /claude-code, repair managed shared and copied installations safely, and generate native Kiro skills. Add installed-workflow, failure-injection and live cross-harness regression coverage. * test: recognize CEO mode labels without terminal spacing The paid workflow rendered SCOPEEXPANSION at option 4, but its driver required a literal space. Match the leading mode title without cursor-spacing artifacts and ignore adjacent preview text. Preserve missing-target failures and downstream posture assertions. * test: isolate plan-count fixtures before starting review workflows Seed the complete test plan in a private git repository before launching Claude, so a bare slash command cannot review the live workspace while a delayed fixture message remains queued. Preserve count thresholds, parsers and budgets. Add initial-context and installed-discovery tests, and retain startup/terminal diagnostics on failed evaluations. * test: stabilize review fixtures and Claude eval startup Preserve source boundaries in workflow judge inputs, isolate CEO mode plans, and wait for interactive trust input readiness. Keep startup failure evidence and retain existing models, budgets, and assertions. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: classify collapsed review modes and isolate seeded findings Keep review questions out of the setup count when terminal cursor positioning removes spaces. State existing webhook safeguards so the five-finding control measures its seeded defects without accidental extra security and concurrency gaps. Preserve question bands and the paired control. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: isolate browser daemon state across free shards Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: stabilize native review counting and interactive navigation Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * chore: prepare v1.82.0.0 release Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: eliminate browser and process-cleanup test flakes Pin every CI surface to Bun 1.4.0 to avoid extra-stdio finalizers closing reused live sockets. Add an isolated GC/listener regression that fails on Bun 1.3.13, and prevent coordinated rollback to an affected CI runtime. Check renderer cleanup against the render's own staging directory so concurrent renders cannot invalidate the assertion. Make the no-pgrep process-tree walk tolerate disappearing /proc entries, and synchronize its test fixture through child readiness and pipe EOF instead of sleeps. Validation: 9,157 passed, 31 skipped, zero failures across 556 files with retries disabled. Build, all-host generation freshness, and skill checks passed. All three races have failing-before/passing-after regressions. * fix: count completed native review questions in evals * fix: drive review navigation from confirmed native choices * fix: require complete section-loading eval reports * test: isolate telemetry HTTP transport from local assertions * fix: keep review input on the active native question * test: let tunnel revocation daemon choose an available port * test: allocate available ports for pairing and watchdog fixtures * fix: stabilize planning eval navigation and phase reporting * test: isolate installed runtime paths in planning evals * test: stabilize review evidence and concurrent refresh fixtures * fix: resolve design findings before editing the plan * fix: honor and persist disabled outside plan reviews * fix: preserve planning decisions and terminal evidence Load installed host reviews at autoplan phase entry and wait for completed reviewers and saved artifacts. Reuse approved remedies while preserving individual finding decisions. Drive interactive evals from the current terminal viewport, bind native questions across scrolling, and require complete native report evidence. Cover captured stale menus, permission lifecycles, setup classification, and disabled-review tool availability with deterministic regressions. Advance release metadata and the upgrade migration to the unclaimed 1.83.0.0 slot. * fix: drive native review questions and preserve current plans Use the native single-choice keyboard protocol and current terminal viewport, with per-question navigation inside packets and completed-call coverage. Keep permissions, multi-select menus, and Submit controls distinct. Send Autoplan reviewers the amended implementation plan, keep its review record separate, and supply retained application contracts in the chain fixture. Clarify individual DevEx decisions and complete CEO fix options; use one active plan destination for the section-loading report. * fix: preserve complete plan-review decisions * fix: recognize native plan dialogs and reviewer controls * fix: preserve review decisions and phase completion * fix: recognize completed reviews without losing findings * fix: preserve review continuity and native eval completion * test: fix native review completion and eval retry isolation * test: handle native review menus and complete eval fixtures * test: fix native review setup, completion, and isolation failures * test: limit native skill discovery to runtime assets * fix: bind Autoplan reviews to full ordered phase inputs * test: fix planning eval routing, counting, and timeout handling * chore: advance queued release to v1.84.0.0 * fix: preserve complete review inputs and planning decisions * fix: reconcile review approvals and preserve phase obligations * fix: preserve review obligations and unblock eval permissions Carry recorded Autoplan requirements into blind phase inputs, require Eng review approvals before exit, and exercise combined asynchronous flows in CEO reviews. Correct native finding and handoff classification and unblock repeated report edits using scoped request identities. * fix: retain plan requirements and complete native review dialogs * fix: complete native review prompts and retain plan references * fix: preserve review inputs and classify native eval evidence * fix: check competing completion orders in CEO reviews * fix: recognize review decisions and require phase methodology Require the current phase methodology before Autoplan snapshots. Correct substantive decision, closed handoff, and cache-finding classification, and honor the recommended implementation approach in native review dialogs. Add captured-transcript regressions without changing review thresholds, provider models, retries, or deadlines. * test: bind native review decisions and close completed handoffs * fix: complete review dialogs and verify methodology delivery * fix: preserve review evidence and unblock native eval prompts * fix: handle native review question completions * fix: recognize native review narration and controls * fix: count native review decisions and isolate eval fixtures * test: verify seeded review coverage and current artifact permissions * test: isolate model and brain-aware skill renders * fix: repair native workflow evaluation and clarify review steps * fix: stabilize workflow eval evidence and review guidance * test: repair native workflow observation and fixture isolation * fix: recognize completed workflow evidence and owned skill reads * test: repair seeded workflow delivery and completion evidence * test: recognize current review evidence across native forms * test: handle native review variants and permission redraws * fix: honor review preferences and recognize native eval evidence * test: recognize completed review decisions and queued permissions * test: match current review contracts and partial-line edits * test: recognize completed workflow evidence and bounded human waits * fix: preserve review entry gates and native eval interactions * fix: recognize native workflow evidence and preserve review gates * test: recognize current review evidence and preconfigure workflow fixtures * test: recognize completed review findings and scoped artifact permissions * fix: stabilize native workflow review and permission evidence * fix: recognize current review evidence and scoped edit confirmations Clarify Design and engineering review entry instructions and Design scoring. Recognize required legacy coverage and public Autoplan completion recaps. Bind the pending Edit confirmation to its exact file, ordered digest, and one-request approval when a preceding command display remains visible. Keep reviews within their existing size limits and preserve scope gates when extracting workflow fixtures from either supported preamble header. Keep failure outcomes, review thresholds, provider choices, and eval budgets. * fix: recover review workflow progress and eval evidence * fix: recognize valid review evidence and scope selection * test: fix review evidence parsing and repeated artifact prompts * test: recognize valid review decisions and pending native cards * fix(plan-eng-review): keep final navigation consistent with approved tasks * test: recognize valid review evidence and bind legacy diff requests * fix: stabilize review eval evidence and harness repair guidance * docs: update project documentation for v1.85.0.0 Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * test: fix Windows CI fixtures and credential scan Rebase captured JSON values and filesystem evidence using the appropriate path convention. Compile native fake CLIs on Windows and synchronize pipe holder readiness, with cleanup retained when assertions fail. Assemble synthetic credential fixtures at runtime so the added-line scan keeps enforcing the same gate without flagging its own rejection controls. Discover generated skills directly for the empty-find regression check, avoiding a recursive scan through saved evaluation artifacts and dependencies. * fix: preserve source renders on Windows Compare canonical generator paths using native separators so an output sidecar pointing at the source cannot overwrite its skill or metadata. Keep the regression fixture isolated from the real checkout and expose freshness diagnostics before asserting subprocess status. Detach Windows drain-test pipe holders from the fake provider's automatic child cleanup while preserving the enclosing runner job and its assertions. * fix: clarify outside review fallback and CEO decisions Render one applicable own-harness fallback path and retain native review, disabled policy, and missing-coverage semantics. Align report field names and mode labels, and make the existing per-cut scope approval explicit. Regenerate skill outputs and keep the workflow judge's model, thresholds, and retry policy unchanged. * chore: move release to free version slot (v1.86.0.0) PR #2852 now claims v1.85.0.0. Align the release metadata and rename migration so upgrades from that version still receive it. Co-Authored-By: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> * fix: include engineering review prerequisites and restore branch context * fix: recognize coverage diagrams and clarify design review instructions * fix: preserve file identities and join Windows test processes --------- Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com>
719 lines
41 KiB
TypeScript
719 lines
41 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Canonical carved-skill guard registry — the single source of truth for which
|
|
* skills are carved (skeleton SKILL.md + on-demand sections/*.md) and what each
|
|
* carve must guarantee.
|
|
*
|
|
* PURE LEAF DATA MODULE (codex outside-voice #1, refined-plan pass): this file
|
|
* has NO runtime imports — `import type` only. parity-harness.ts and
|
|
* skill-size-budget.test.ts derive their carved-skill lists FROM here (no
|
|
* parallel hand-maintained lists), so a runtime import back into either of them
|
|
* would create a cycle. Keep it data.
|
|
*
|
|
* Consumers:
|
|
* - test/carve-section-ordering.test.ts (E2, gate) → staticInvariants
|
|
* - test/carve-section-loading.test.ts (T2, periodic) → requiredReads + scenario
|
|
* - test/carve-guard-completeness.test.ts (E1, gate) → the set must equal the
|
|
* filesystem carved set
|
|
* - test/carve-guards-negative.test.ts (ET1, gate) → injects a broken fixture
|
|
* - test/helpers/parity-harness.ts → sectioned/maxSkeletonBytes/minBytes/mustContain
|
|
* - test/skill-size-budget.test.ts → SECTIONS_EXTRACTED = CARVED_SKILLS
|
|
*
|
|
* Adding a carve = add one entry here (atomically, in the same commit as the
|
|
* skeleton + manifest + sections — codex #4 — so E1's bidirectional parity never
|
|
* false-positives mid-commit).
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/** Static (skeleton-shape) invariants the per-PR ordering guard (E2) asserts. */
|
|
export interface CarveStaticInvariants {
|
|
/**
|
|
* Substrings that MUST remain in the always-loaded skeleton. Empty = skip
|
|
* (the skill has no distinctive pre-STOP anchor worth pinning beyond the
|
|
* universal STOP/section-index checks E2 already runs).
|
|
*/
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* Substrings that MUST appear in the skeleton BEFORE the first STOP-Read
|
|
* (earliest-use, codex #6). For cso: mode-dispatch directives (## Arguments,
|
|
* ## Mode Resolution) must be resolved before any section is read — a dispatch
|
|
* directive stranded after the STOP can't govern which sections to read.
|
|
* Empty/undefined = skip (most skills).
|
|
*/
|
|
mustPrecedeStop?: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* Substrings that MUST be in the union (skeleton + sections) but MUST NOT be in
|
|
* the skeleton — i.e. the heavy body that the carve relocated. Empty = skip.
|
|
*/
|
|
mustMoveToSection: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* If set, this marker must appear in the skeleton AFTER the last STOP-Read
|
|
* directive (e.g. the EXIT PLAN MODE GATE that fires once section work returns).
|
|
* Undefined = the skill has no post-STOP gate (operational/conversational carve).
|
|
*/
|
|
gateAfterStop?: string;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export interface CarveGuard {
|
|
skill: string;
|
|
/** Section .md filenames the manifest lists and the skeleton must STOP-Read. */
|
|
expectedSections: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* Sections the behavioral test (T2) asserts the agent actually Read when driven
|
|
* by `scenario`. A non-empty subset of expectedSections — the ones the scenario
|
|
* is built to require. The registry owns this so "registered ⇒ asserted" is
|
|
* structural (codex #2), not policed.
|
|
*/
|
|
requiredReads: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* Fixture prompt that drives a real `claude -p` run down the STOP-Read path for
|
|
* this skill (codex #7). The behavioral test asserts the run reached the STOP
|
|
* (read requiredReads), not merely that nothing was read.
|
|
*/
|
|
scenario: string;
|
|
staticInvariants: CarveStaticInvariants;
|
|
/**
|
|
* How the behavioral guard (T2) exercises this skill:
|
|
* - 'plan' → write a PLAN.md fixture, run the review against it
|
|
* - 'prompt' → no fixture file; the scenario prompt alone drives the run
|
|
* - 'external' → covered by a dedicated bespoke test (complex fixtures, e.g.
|
|
* ship's git/VERSION/CHANGELOG state). The data-driven loop
|
|
* skips it; E1 asserts `externalTest` exists instead.
|
|
*/
|
|
behavioral: 'plan' | 'prompt' | 'external';
|
|
/** Required when behavioral === 'external': path (repo-relative) to the dedicated test. */
|
|
externalTest?: string;
|
|
/** Parity: max bytes for the always-loaded skeleton (asserts the carve shrank it). */
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: number;
|
|
/** Parity: min bytes for the skeleton+sections union (total behavior preserved). */
|
|
minUnionBytes: number;
|
|
/** Parity: content phrases the union must preserve. */
|
|
mustContain: string[];
|
|
/**
|
|
* Parity: optional per-skill override for the union size-growth ceiling vs the
|
|
* v1.53.0.0 baseline (default 1.05). Bumped only when a deliberate cross-cutting
|
|
* preamble feature legitimately grows a smaller carved skeleton past 5%.
|
|
*/
|
|
maxSizeRatio?: number;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export const CARVE_GUARDS: Record<string, CarveGuard> = {
|
|
ship: {
|
|
skill: 'ship',
|
|
expectedSections: [
|
|
'apple-release.md',
|
|
'tests.md',
|
|
'test-coverage.md',
|
|
'plan-completion.md',
|
|
'review-army.md',
|
|
'greptile.md',
|
|
'adversarial.md',
|
|
'changelog.md',
|
|
'pr-body.md',
|
|
],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-army.md', 'changelog.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'This is a FRESH version-changing ship: the branch has a real code change, VERSION still equals the base version (needs a bump), and CHANGELOG.md needs a new entry. Follow the skill flow for a version-changing ship: run the pre-landing review and prepare the CHANGELOG entry. Produce the ship plan / review report. Do NOT actually commit, push, or open a PR.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
// The PR-title-version invariant MUST stay always-loaded: the v1.54.0.0
|
|
// carve stranded it in pr-body.md and PRs started landing with bare titles
|
|
// (CI backstop: test/pr-title-sync-workflow-safety.test.ts).
|
|
// Same carve also stranded the Step 18 /document-release dispatch out of
|
|
// sight — the skeleton never named it and the handoff "got lost" (#2666
|
|
// follow-up). Three NON-OVERLAPPING anchors pin the restored visibility,
|
|
// one per touchpoint (no anchor is a substring of another, so each is
|
|
// independently enforced — a subsumed anchor adds zero enforcement):
|
|
// gerund form → manifest trigger (renders 2x: section index + STOP)
|
|
// imperative → Step 17 handoff line
|
|
// 3rd person → hoisted doc-sync invariant
|
|
// Matching is case-sensitive String.includes — "dispatching the" does NOT
|
|
// contain "dispatch the" — so update anchors in lockstep with any
|
|
// touchpoint rewording.
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'v$NEW_VERSION',
|
|
'gstack-pr-title-rewrite',
|
|
'dispatching the /document-release subagent to sync docs',
|
|
'dispatch the /document-release subagent to sync docs',
|
|
'dispatches the /document-release subagent',
|
|
],
|
|
// ...while the full create/update procedure stays carved into pr-body.md
|
|
// (out of the skeleton, present in the union). Asserts BOTH PR paths
|
|
// survive: the create path and the idempotent update path. The Step 18
|
|
// dispatch imperative stays carved too — pasting that literal into the
|
|
// skeleton (correctly) fails this guard; the skeleton speaks of "the
|
|
// /document-release subagent", never the carved imperative.
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'gh pr create --base',
|
|
'gh pr edit --title',
|
|
'Dispatch /document-release as a subagent',
|
|
],
|
|
// ship is operational (multi-STOP, not a plan review); no single post-STOP gate.
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'external',
|
|
externalTest: 'test/skill-e2e-ship-section-loading.test.ts',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 79_300, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_RESEARCH}} (Aside first, WebSearch fallback); measured 78_275
|
|
minUnionBytes: 181_000, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch); measured union 201,464
|
|
mustContain: ['VERSION', 'CHANGELOG', 'review', 'merge', 'PR'],
|
|
// v1.58.5.0: pre-push-guard install (#2077) stacks on the shared first-run-guidance preamble.
|
|
// Fork port wave 2: multi-ecosystem test-detection evidence (Django/JVM
|
|
// markers, test-file census — e3259078 port) + the #1079 gh pr edit REST
|
|
// fallback grew the union to 1.090x; the third-party web-actions
|
|
// contract (consent-gated browser drive for API-key registration etc.)
|
|
// adds ~2.3KB inline judgment, measured 1.103x. The Apple release
|
|
// adapter (14.8KB carved section, 21 live releases of judgment — the
|
|
// wave's headline capability) grows the union to 1.195x. Deliberate:
|
|
// the section is on-demand (loads only for Apple store targets), so
|
|
// per-invocation cost for non-iOS ships is one manifest line.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.28, // Harness-aware dispatch adds validated commands and per-pass provenance (~1.25x).
|
|
},
|
|
'plan-ceo-review': {
|
|
skill: 'plan-ceo-review',
|
|
expectedSections: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Review the plan in PLAN.md. Hold the current scope (HOLD SCOPE mode) — do not challenge or expand scope. Run the full CEO review and produce the review report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['## Step 0: Nuclear Scope Challenge'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['### Section 1: Architecture Review', '## Mode Quick Reference'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'EXIT PLAN MODE GATE',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'external',
|
|
externalTest: 'test/skill-e2e-plan-ceo-review-section-loading.test.ts',
|
|
// v1.65 merge: provisional larger-of-both-waves budget; re-measured below.
|
|
// Fork port wave 2 (#703): the repo-doc-preference block in the design
|
|
// check grew every plan-review skeleton ~0.7KB. Measured values noted.
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 79_744, // Exact 744-byte anti-shortcut move: main 79,739 + section 75,559 = unchanged 155,298-byte union; retains 5-byte slack.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 123_600, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch): preamble bash -> bin/gstack-skill-start, onboarding -> gated emission; measured union 137,346
|
|
mustContain: ['SCOPE EXPANSION', 'SELECTIVE EXPANSION', 'HOLD SCOPE', 'SCOPE REDUCTION'],
|
|
// Default-on Codex outside-voice (codexPreflight block + CODEX_MODE branch
|
|
// prose replacing the smaller opt-in question) lands this ~5.2% over baseline.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.08,
|
|
},
|
|
'plan-eng-review': {
|
|
skill: 'plan-eng-review',
|
|
expectedSections: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Review the plan in PLAN.md. Accept the current scope. Run the full engineering review (architecture, code quality, tests, performance) and produce the review report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['### Step 0: Scope Challenge'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['### 1. Architecture review'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'EXIT PLAN MODE GATE',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'plan',
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift (shared first-run-guidance preamble) + #2077 ask-first scope gate.
|
|
// +~1 KB: plan-mode auto-select-B scope-gate exceptions (2026-08).
|
|
// v1.65 merge: provisional larger-of-both-waves budget; re-measured below.
|
|
// Fork port wave 2 (#703): the repo-doc-preference block in the design
|
|
// check grew every plan-review skeleton ~0.7KB. Measured values noted.
|
|
// #2499 project-scope MCP jq in the brain-sync block grew every tier-2+
|
|
// skeleton ~1.5KB (entry resolution emitted once per SKILL.md).
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 57_200, // Eng per-issue approval exit check, including regression-test authority; measured 57,113 bytes.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 99_800, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch); measured union 110,910
|
|
mustContain: ['Architecture', 'Code Quality', 'Test', 'Performance'],
|
|
// Cross-cutting preamble growth (v1.57.2.0 AUQ-failure prose fallback + the
|
|
// decision-memory nudge + the v1.57.4.0 Boil-the-Ocean rename) plus the
|
|
// default-on Codex outside-voice (codexPreflight block + CODEX_MODE branch
|
|
// prose, replacing the smaller opt-in question) land this at ~6.6% over the
|
|
// v1.53.0.0 baseline. Headroom for those intentional additions.
|
|
// 1.08 → 1.10: the scope-gate exceptions block (+ its adversarial-review
|
|
// hardening: host-anchored mode signal, precedence, passing-mention
|
|
// guards) and the plan-mode preamble reword land the union at 1.092.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.12, // measured 1.103
|
|
},
|
|
'plan-design-review': {
|
|
skill: 'plan-design-review',
|
|
expectedSections: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Review the plan in PLAN.md for design and UX. Accept the current scope. Run the full design review passes and produce the review report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['### Pass 1: Information Architecture'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'EXIT PLAN MODE GATE',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'plan',
|
|
// +Conductor AUQ-default-prose rule + one-way/continuation safety in the
|
|
// always-loaded AskUserQuestion Format section.
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift (shared first-run-guidance preamble) + #2077 ask-first scope gate.
|
|
// +~1.3 KB: plan-mode auto-select-B scope-gate exceptions (2026-08).
|
|
// Fork port wave 2 (D1): evidence directive adds ~0.45KB to every
|
|
// tier-2+ skeleton (measured 89,184). Main's v1.64.0.0 adds ~340 B more
|
|
// (telemetry --error-message/--failed-step preamble prose, PR #769).
|
|
// Budget covers the sum of both waves.
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 79_500, // Harness-aware outside voice: validated dispatch and provenance.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 99_200, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch); measured union 110,293
|
|
mustContain: ['design', 'visual'],
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.12, // D1 1.104 + main's ~0.008
|
|
},
|
|
'plan-devex-review': {
|
|
skill: 'plan-devex-review',
|
|
expectedSections: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-sections.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Review the plan in PLAN.md for developer experience. Accept the current scope. Run the full DX review passes and produce the review report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['### Pass 1: Getting Started Experience'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'EXIT PLAN MODE GATE',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'plan',
|
|
// +Conductor AUQ-default-prose rule + one-way/destructive prose safety +
|
|
// continuation protocol in the always-loaded AskUserQuestion Format section.
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift: first-run-guidance section in the shared preamble.
|
|
// Fork port wave 2 (#703): the repo-doc-preference block in the design
|
|
// check grew every plan-review skeleton ~0.7KB. Measured values noted.
|
|
// #2499 project-scope MCP jq in the brain-sync block grew every tier-2+
|
|
// skeleton ~1.5KB (entry resolution emitted once per SKILL.md).
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 68_500, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_RESEARCH}} (Aside first, WebSearch fallback); measured 67_129
|
|
minUnionBytes: 99_700, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch); measured union 110,833
|
|
mustContain: ['developer experience', 'Getting Started'],
|
|
// Default-on Codex outside-voice (codexPreflight block + CODEX_MODE branch
|
|
// prose replacing the smaller opt-in question) lands this ~5.7% over baseline.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.08,
|
|
},
|
|
'office-hours': {
|
|
skill: 'office-hours',
|
|
expectedSections: ['design-and-handoff.md', 'phase-2a-startup-diagnostic.md', 'phase-2b-builder-brainstorm.md'],
|
|
// Phase sections are mode-exclusive (a session runs exactly one of 2A/2B),
|
|
// so only the always-reached design/handoff section is a deterministic read.
|
|
requiredReads: ['design-and-handoff.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Run office hours for this product idea through to the end: have the diagnostic conversation, explore alternatives, then write the design doc and run the relationship handoff (Phases 5-6).',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['### The Six Forcing Questions', '### Pushback Patterns', 'Anti-Sycophancy Rules', 'Wild exemplar'],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['**Mode mapping:**'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: '## Section self-check',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift: first-run-guidance section in the shared preamble,
|
|
// plus the P1 office-hours closing handoff (AUQ that launches the next skill).
|
|
// v1.65 merge: provisional larger-of-both-waves budget; re-measured below.
|
|
// Fork port wave 2: the third-party web-actions contract sits inline
|
|
// (judgment must be visible before the workflow directs the user to a
|
|
// vendor site), plus the #703 dual-write + repo-doc-preference block and
|
|
// the #538 opt-out + D1 evidence directive — ratio 1.104 measured.
|
|
// #2499 project-scope MCP jq in the brain-sync block grew every tier-2+
|
|
// skeleton ~1.5KB (entry resolution emitted once per SKILL.md).
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 87_500, // Office-hours + sketch outside voices include host guards and completion checks.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 115_800, // Phase 4 wave 4; measured union 118,175
|
|
mustContain: ['design doc', 'problem statement'],
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.12,
|
|
},
|
|
'document-release': {
|
|
skill: 'document-release',
|
|
expectedSections: ['release-body.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['release-body.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'A PR has shipped a new CLI flag and touched README.md and CHANGELOG.md. Skip the git pre-flight shell commands (assume the diff adds --new-flag and updates those two docs). Run the documentation workflow: build the coverage map, then audit the docs, apply updates, and polish the CHANGELOG voice. Produce the documentation health summary.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['## Step 1: Pre-flight', '## Step 1.5: Coverage Map'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['## Step 2: Per-File Documentation Audit', '## Step 5: CHANGELOG Voice Polish'],
|
|
// Operational skill (no plan-mode review gate).
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
// +Conductor AUQ-default-prose rule + one-way/continuation safety in the
|
|
// always-loaded AskUserQuestion Format section.
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift: first-run-guidance section in the shared preamble.
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 41_000, // + v1.78 AUQ objectivity + v1.79 spawned contract incl. echo-failure tie-breaker; measured 40_575
|
|
minUnionBytes: 56_700, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch): preamble bash -> bin/gstack-skill-start, onboarding -> gated emission; measured union 63,018
|
|
mustContain: ['CHANGELOG', 'Diataxis', 'coverage'],
|
|
// Two intentional additions stack on this small skill: the AUQ-failure prose
|
|
// fallback (v1.57.2.0, ~2KB to every preamble) AND the new default-on Codex
|
|
// documentation-review section (codexPreflight + prompt + apply-gate, carved
|
|
// into release-body so the SKELETON stays under maxSkeletonBytes). On a ~55KB
|
|
// baseline that whole new capability is ~18.6% of union bytes. The doc review
|
|
// is a deliberate new feature, not preamble creep; the union ceiling is raised
|
|
// to match while the skeleton budget (50_000) still holds the always-loaded
|
|
// cost flat.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.20,
|
|
},
|
|
'design-consultation': {
|
|
skill: 'design-consultation',
|
|
expectedSections: ['proposal-and-preview.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['proposal-and-preview.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'The user gave product context (a B2B analytics dashboard for ops teams) and declined the research phase. Skip browser/design tool setup. Proceed to build the complete design-system proposal, then write DESIGN.md. Produce the proposal and the DESIGN.md content.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['## Phase 0: Pre-checks', '## Phase 1: Product Context', '## Phase 2: Research'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['## Phase 3: The Complete Proposal', '## Phase 6: Write DESIGN.md'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
// +Conductor AUQ-default-prose rule + one-way/continuation safety in the
|
|
// always-loaded AskUserQuestion Format section.
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift: first-run-guidance section in the shared preamble.
|
|
// v1.65 merge: provisional larger-of-both-waves budget; re-measured below.
|
|
// v1.64.1.0: shared-preamble prose from the two parallel v1.64 waves lands
|
|
// the skeleton at 69,022 B; +~1 KB headroom.
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 72_500, // Outside review + upstream DESIGN.md format check; merged render 72,175 bytes.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 65_000, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch): preamble bash -> bin/gstack-skill-start, onboarding -> gated emission; measured union 72,252
|
|
mustContain: ['Typography', 'Color', 'Aesthetic Direction'],
|
|
// Cross-cutting preamble growth (v1.57.2.0 AUQ-failure prose fallback ~2KB +
|
|
// the cross-session decision-memory nudge) lands this carved skeleton just over
|
|
// the strict 1.05; headroom for the shared preamble additions.
|
|
// v1.64+v1.65 merge sums both waves' preamble growth; measured 1.073.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.08,
|
|
},
|
|
cso: {
|
|
skill: 'cso',
|
|
expectedSections: ['audit-phases.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['audit-phases.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Run a security audit on this repository in --owasp mode (OWASP Top 10 only). Resolve the mode, do the Phase 0 stack detection and Phase 1 attack-surface census, then run the scoped audit phases and produce the findings report. Skip any step that needs network access.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
// Dispatch + always-run + FP-filtering phases are ALWAYS loaded (security).
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Arguments',
|
|
'## Mode Resolution',
|
|
'### Phase 0',
|
|
'### Phase 1',
|
|
'### Phase 12',
|
|
'### Phase 13',
|
|
'### Phase 14',
|
|
],
|
|
// Earliest-use: mode must be resolvable before any section is read (codex #6).
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Arguments', '## Mode Resolution'],
|
|
// Scope-dependent audit detail moved to the section.
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'### Phase 2: Secrets Archaeology',
|
|
'### Phase 9: OWASP Top 10 Assessment',
|
|
'### Phase 10: STRIDE Threat Model',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
// +Conductor AUQ-default-prose rule + one-way/continuation safety in the
|
|
// always-loaded AskUserQuestion Format section.
|
|
// v1.2.0 activation lift: first-run-guidance section in the shared preamble.
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 61_800, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_RESEARCH}} (Aside first, WebSearch fallback); measured 60_628
|
|
minUnionBytes: 64_200, // token-reduction Phases 1-2 (v1.69.x branch); measured union 71,379
|
|
mustContain: ['OWASP', 'STRIDE', 'daily', 'comprehensive', 'verif'],
|
|
// cso keeps its mode-dispatch + FP-filtering phases always-loaded, so the
|
|
// cross-cutting preamble growth (v1.57.2.0 AUQ-failure prose fallback ~2KB + the
|
|
// decision-memory nudge) lands it just over 1.05; headroom for the shared additions.
|
|
// v1.64+v1.65 merge sums both waves' preamble growth; measured 1.073.
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.08,
|
|
},
|
|
// ── Token-reduction Phase 4 wave 1 (v1.69.x branch) ──────────────────────
|
|
review: {
|
|
skill: 'review',
|
|
expectedSections: ['plan-completion.md', 'review-army.md', 'adversarial.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['plan-completion.md', 'review-army.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
"The working tree has a real diff against the base branch (assume Step 1's git checks passed; the diff implements the PLAN.md cache layer). Run the /review flow: the scope-drift and plan-completion deep pass against PLAN.md, then the critical pass, then the Review Army specialist dispatch — apply the specialist checklists yourself instead of launching subagents. Produce the review report. Do NOT commit, push, or create a PR.",
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch',
|
|
'## Step 1: Check branch',
|
|
'## Step 1.5: Scope Drift Detection',
|
|
'## Step 4: Critical pass (core review)',
|
|
'## Confidence Calibration',
|
|
'## Step 5: Fix-First Review',
|
|
'## Important Rules',
|
|
'Persist Eng Review result',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Step 0: Detect platform and base branch'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'Plan File Discovery',
|
|
'MULTI-SPECIALIST CONFIRMED',
|
|
'Cross-model synthesis',
|
|
'codex review --base',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined, // operational multi-STOP skill, like ship
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'plan',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 61_500, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_RESEARCH}} (Aside first, WebSearch fallback); measured 60_309
|
|
minUnionBytes: 89_000, // Phase 4 wave 1; measured union 93,357
|
|
mustContain: ['confidence', 'P1', 'P2', 'Review Army', 'adversarial'],
|
|
},
|
|
codex: {
|
|
skill: 'codex',
|
|
expectedSections: ['review-mode.md', 'challenge-mode.md', 'consult-mode.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['review-mode.md', 'consult-mode.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
"Run the /codex skill twice: first Review mode against this branch's diff (produce the GATE verdict), then Consult mode with the follow-up 'is the strongest finding worth fixing before ship?'. Follow the Step 1 dispatch and read each selected mode's section before executing it; if the codex CLI is unavailable, still walk the mode instructions and report what you would run.",
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Step 1: Detect mode',
|
|
'## Filesystem Boundary',
|
|
'Synthesis recommendation (REQUIRED)',
|
|
'Recommendation: <action> because',
|
|
'If the runtime guard reports a harness mismatch, stop.',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Step 1: Detect mode', '## Filesystem Boundary'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'The gate FAILS CLOSED',
|
|
'Think like an attacker and a chaos engineer',
|
|
'codex exec resume',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'EXIT PLAN MODE GATE',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 59_300, // + v1.78 AUQ spawned-trigger objectivity (explicit declaration + interactive fence); measured 58_867
|
|
minUnionBytes: 83_400, // Phase 4 wave 1; measured union 84,304
|
|
mustContain: ['GATE: PASS', 'CROSS-MODEL ANALYSIS', 'codex exec resume', 'sandbox_mode="read-only"', 'mktemp'],
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.06, // measured 1.040 vs the v1.64.1.0 parity baseline
|
|
},
|
|
'land-and-deploy': {
|
|
skill: 'land-and-deploy',
|
|
expectedSections: ['first-run-validation.md', 'readiness-gate.md', 'merge-and-deploy.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['readiness-gate.md', 'merge-and-deploy.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'This project has a confirmed prior /land-and-deploy run (treat the Step 1.5 check as CONFIRMED). A PR exists for this branch and CI is green. Simulate — do not run gh or actually merge: run the pre-merge readiness gate and produce the readiness report, then walk the merge and deploy-strategy steps, stating which merge path and deploy strategy you would take. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'land-deploy-confirmed',
|
|
'## Step 3.4: VERSION drift detection',
|
|
'## Step 6: Wait for deploy',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['land-deploy-confirmed'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'PRE-MERGE READINESS REPORT',
|
|
'gh pr merge "$MERGE_FLAG" --auto --delete-branch',
|
|
'DEPLOY INFRASTRUCTURE VALIDATION',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined, // operational skill
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 74_500, // + Aside browser contract for Step 7 canary ({{ASIDE_SETUP}}); measured 73_523
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.10, // + v1.81 Aside contract + gstack-browser fallback block; measured 1.077
|
|
minUnionBytes: 91_000, // Phase 4 wave 1; estimated union ~94.9KB
|
|
mustContain: ['readiness', 'merge', 'canary', 'revert', 'staging'],
|
|
},
|
|
// ── Token-reduction Phase 4 wave 2 (v1.69.x branch) ──────────────────────
|
|
autoplan: {
|
|
skill: 'autoplan',
|
|
expectedSections: ['ceo-phase.md', 'design-phase.md', 'eng-phase.md', 'dx-phase.md', 'tasks-aggregator.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['ceo-phase.md', 'eng-phase.md', 'tasks-aggregator.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Run the /autoplan pipeline against the plan in PLAN.md. Codex and subagent tools are unavailable — note both voices unavailable (single-reviewer mode) and keep going. The plan has no UI scope and no developer-facing scope, so Phase 2 and Phase 2.5 are skipped (do not read their sections). Execute Phase 1 (CEO) and Phase 3 (Eng) at full depth, run the Phase 4 aggregator step, and produce the Final Approval Gate summary as the report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## The 6 Decision Principles',
|
|
'## Sequential Execution — MANDATORY',
|
|
'## Decision Classification',
|
|
'## Filesystem Boundary — Codex Prompts',
|
|
'## Phase 0.5: Outside reviewer preflight',
|
|
'## Pre-Gate Verification',
|
|
'## Phase 2: Design Review (conditional — skip if no UI scope)',
|
|
'## Phase 2.5: DX Review (conditional — skip if no developer-facing scope)',
|
|
'- Scope gate (the plan under review is already the target)',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## The 6 Decision Principles', '## Sequential Execution — MANDATORY', '## Decision Classification'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'CEO DUAL VOICES — CONSENSUS TABLE:',
|
|
'Codex SAYS (design — UX challenge)',
|
|
'ENG DUAL VOICES — CONSENSUS TABLE:',
|
|
'DX DUAL VOICES — CONSENSUS TABLE:',
|
|
'## Implementation Tasks aggregator',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: 'AskUserQuestion options:',
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'external',
|
|
externalTest: 'test/skill-e2e-autoplan-chain.test.ts', // phase-complete markers live ONLY in sections — its assertions ARE section-read proof
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 70_000, // Phase-specific outside coverage, native fallback, and harness guard.
|
|
minUnionBytes: 85_000, // measured union 86,926
|
|
mustContain: ['6 Decision Principles', 'TASTE DECISION', 'USER CHALLENGE', 'consensus', 'Restore Point'],
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.12, // Four validated outside invocations replace raw CLI calls; phases keep independent coverage.
|
|
},
|
|
spec: {
|
|
skill: 'spec',
|
|
expectedSections: ['gate-and-file.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['gate-and-file.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
"The user already completed Phases 1-4 of /spec for the request 'add a --json output flag to the CLI status command'. Treat the five Phase 1 answers, the scope lock, and the technical interrogation as settled, and the Phase 4 draft as CONFIRMED by the user. Continue from that point in file-only mode (--no-execute is set): run the Phase 4.5 sequence and Phase 5, simulating every external command (codex, gh, the redaction bin) by stating what you would run and the expected outcome instead of executing it. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion.",
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'HARD GATE',
|
|
'### Phase 1: Understand the "Why"',
|
|
'### Phase 3: Technical Interrogation',
|
|
'### Phase 4: Draft Review',
|
|
'gstack-issue-guard',
|
|
'## Issue Structure Templates',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Flag Reference', '### Phase 1: Understand the "Why"'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'<<<USER_SPEC>>>',
|
|
'SEMANTIC_REVIEW: clean',
|
|
'gh issue create --title',
|
|
'PIN_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 58_400, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_RESEARCH}} (Aside first, WebSearch fallback); measured 57_356
|
|
minUnionBytes: 64_500, // measured union 67,430
|
|
mustContain: ['HARD GATE', 'dedupe', 'quality gate', 'acceptance criteria', 'archive'],
|
|
},
|
|
'setup-gbrain': {
|
|
skill: 'setup-gbrain',
|
|
expectedSections: ['engine-remediation.md', 'brain-init.md', 'transcript-gate.md', 'claude-md-persist.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['brain-init.md', 'claude-md-persist.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
"Walk /setup-gbrain in SIMULATION — do not execute any bash, install anything, or register MCP; for each step state the exact commands you WOULD run. Treat Step 1 detect as: gbrain_on_path=false, gbrain_local_status=missing-config, no shortcut flags. Treat Path 3 (PGLite local) as already picked at Step 2 — do not use AskUserQuestion. Walk Steps 3, 4 (Path 3 init), 5, 5a, and 8: read each step's pointed section before doing it, and write out the exact CLAUDE.md block Step 8 would persist. Skip Steps 6, 7, 7.5, 9, 9.5, and 10. End with a one-paragraph setup summary.",
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Step 2: Pick a path (AskUserQuestion)',
|
|
'## Step 1: Detect current state',
|
|
'gbrain_mcp_mode=remote-http',
|
|
'claude mcp add --scope user --transport http gbrain',
|
|
'SKIP entirely on Path 4 (Remote MCP)',
|
|
'<YOUR_TOKEN>',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Step 1: Detect current state'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'### Path 1 (Supabase, existing URL)',
|
|
'read_secret_to_env GBRAIN_MCP_TOKEN',
|
|
'Mode: remote-http',
|
|
'gstack-memory-ingest.ts --probe',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 60_450, // + v1.78 AUQ spawned-trigger objectivity (explicit declaration + interactive fence); measured 60_013
|
|
minUnionBytes: 78_300, // measured union 79,139
|
|
mustContain: ['PGLite', 'Supabase', 'claude mcp add', 'read_secret_to_env', 'pooler'],
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.07, // measured 1.051 vs the branch monolith: index + stubs + 4 STOP pointers
|
|
},
|
|
// ── Token-reduction Phase 4 wave 3 (v1.69.x branch) ──────────────────────
|
|
qa: {
|
|
skill: 'qa',
|
|
expectedSections: ['test-bootstrap.md', 'qa-patterns.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['qa-patterns.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Walk /qa in SIMULATION — do not launch a browser, run any aside command, or execute bash; treat the working tree as clean, the tier as Quick, and the target app as http://localhost:3000 with a small feature-branch diff touching one page. Skip the test-framework bootstrap (assume CLAUDE.md documents the test command). Read each pointed section before doing its step, then produce the QA plan as the report: the mode you selected and why, the Phase 1-6 steps you would run, and a worked health-score computation from the rubric. Do NOT use AskUserQuestion.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Setup',
|
|
'## BROWSER SETUP (Aside',
|
|
'## Phases 1-6: QA Baseline',
|
|
'## Phase 7: Triage',
|
|
'## Phase 8: Fix Loop',
|
|
'8e.5. Regression Test',
|
|
'WTF-LIKELIHOOD',
|
|
'## Additional Rules (qa-specific)',
|
|
'## Output Structure',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## Setup'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'## Test Framework Bootstrap',
|
|
'BOOTSTRAP_DECLINED',
|
|
'## Health Score Rubric',
|
|
'### Diff-aware (automatic when on a feature branch with no URL)',
|
|
'Never refuse to use the browser',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 63_500, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_SETUP}}/{{BROWSE_FALLBACK}} (replaces the browse setup block); measured 61_253
|
|
maxSizeRatio: 1.08, // + v1.81 Aside contract + gstack-browser fallback block; measured 1.063
|
|
minUnionBytes: 69_500, // measured union 70,385
|
|
// 'aside repl' pins the Aside contract; '$B goto' pins the fallback block in the always-loaded skeleton.
|
|
mustContain: ['bug', 'aside repl', '$B goto', 'fix', 'Health Score Rubric', 'regression'],
|
|
},
|
|
browse: {
|
|
skill: 'browse',
|
|
expectedSections: ['command-list.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['command-list.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'QA a static page: before driving it, plan the full audit — enumerate which browser steps you would run (the aside repl shapes, and the $B commands and snapshot flags the fallback would need), including extraction/tab/dialog commands beyond the basics, reading the full command reference first. Do not launch any browser or run any aside/$B command; produce the plan as the report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
// Aside is the primary browser: the skeleton carries the Aside contract;
|
|
// the $B command reference + snapshot flags are the carved section.
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['## BROWSER SETUP (Aside'],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## BROWSER SETUP (Aside'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['## Full Command List', '## Snapshot Flags', '### Navigation'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 32_000, // + v2.0 {{ASIDE_SETUP}}/{{BROWSE_FALLBACK}} skeleton + the STOP-Read pointer; measured 29_986
|
|
minUnionBytes: 36_000, // skeleton + command-list section (14,240); measured union ~38.5 KB
|
|
// 'BEGIN/END UNTRUSTED EXTERNAL' pins the untrusted-content warning in the
|
|
// command reference; 'aside repl' pins the Aside contract in the skeleton.
|
|
mustContain: ['BEGIN/END UNTRUSTED EXTERNAL', 'snapshot -i', '@e refs', 'aside repl'],
|
|
},
|
|
retro: {
|
|
skill: 'retro',
|
|
expectedSections: ['report-format.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['report-format.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Run the repo-scoped weekly retrospective for the last 7 days on this repo. There is no origin remote — proceed with the local branch per the guard disclosure rules. The gstack-retro-metrics script is not installed, so follow the degraded path (compute the metrics manually with git). Skip any AskUserQuestion calls — this is non-interactive. Produce the full narrative retrospective report.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: ['gstack-retro-metrics', '### Step 2: Compute Metrics', '### Step 13: Save Retro History'],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['### Step 2: Compute Metrics'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: ['## Engineering Retro: [date range]', '### Team Breakdown', 'Plan Completion This Period'],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 73_450, // + v1.78 AUQ spawned-trigger objectivity (explicit declaration + interactive fence); measured 73_059
|
|
minUnionBytes: 66_000, // measured union 73,496
|
|
mustContain: ['retrospective', '45-minute gap', 'Ship of the week', 'Praise'],
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// ── Token-reduction Phase 4 wave 4 (v1.69.x branch): design doctrine carve ──
|
|
// (D3A: read-on-demand doctrine, requiredReads-guarded + loading eval)
|
|
'design-html': {
|
|
skill: 'design-html',
|
|
expectedSections: ['doctrine.md', 'pretext-patterns.md', 'detector-install-offer.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['doctrine.md', 'pretext-patterns.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Walk /design-html in SIMULATION — do not run bash, start servers, launch a browser, or take screenshots. Treat Step 0 as already resolved: no CEO plan, no approved mockup, no variants, no DESIGN.md, no prior finalized.html — freeform mode (Case C option D), screen name "pricing", the user wants a pricing page for a developer-tools SaaS (dark, dense, three tiers, monospace-leaning). Do NOT use AskUserQuestion — proceed with the stated assumptions. Read each pointed section before doing its step, then execute Steps 1-3: produce the implementation spec, state the chosen Pretext tier and why, and generate the complete Pretext-native HTML — include the HTML in your report instead of writing files. Stop there: skip Step 3.5, Step 4, and Step 5.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Step 0: Input Detection',
|
|
'## Step 2: Smart Pretext API Routing',
|
|
'### HTML Generation',
|
|
'AI slop blacklist',
|
|
'## Step 4: Preview + Refinement Loop',
|
|
'## Important Rules',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## DESIGN SETUP'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'### The Three Laws of Usability',
|
|
'### The Goodwill Reservoir',
|
|
'### Pretext Wiring Patterns',
|
|
'### Pretext API Reference',
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined, // operational skill, no plan-mode gate
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 55_400, // measured 55,262 (2026-09-09): the detector install offer pointer + its sections-table row (the brief itself lives in sections/detector-install-offer.md); before that 54,545 for the review-cycle trust prose, the Slop Gate's Decisions-Log clause, and the blacklist header's override sentence
|
|
minUnionBytes: 57_500, // Phase 4 wave 4; measured union 58,682
|
|
mustContain: ["Don't make me think", "Users scan, they don't read", 'The Goodwill Reservoir', 'PRETEXT API CHEATSHEET', 'Pattern 3: Text around obstacles'],
|
|
},
|
|
'design-shotgun': {
|
|
skill: 'design-shotgun',
|
|
expectedSections: ['doctrine.md'],
|
|
requiredReads: ['doctrine.md'],
|
|
scenario:
|
|
'Walk /design-shotgun in SIMULATION — do not run bash, launch a browser, call the design binary, or spawn agents. Treat Step 0 as NO_PREVIOUS_SESSIONS and Step 1 context as fully gathered: a landing page for an open-source CLI tool, audience = developers evaluating it from a GitHub README link, no DESIGN.md, no taste profile or prior approved.json (Step 2 finds nothing). Do NOT use AskUserQuestion — proceed with the stated assumptions. Read each pointed section before doing its step, then run Step 3a at full depth: write three distinct variant concepts with their full variant-specific generation briefs, apply the anti-convergence check, and produce the concept list plus briefs as the report. Stop before Step 3b.',
|
|
staticInvariants: {
|
|
mustStayInSkeleton: [
|
|
'## Step 0: Session Detection',
|
|
'## Step 2: Taste Memory',
|
|
'Anti-convergence directive',
|
|
'### Step 3b: Concept Confirmation',
|
|
'## Important Rules',
|
|
],
|
|
mustPrecedeStop: ['## DESIGN SETUP'],
|
|
mustMoveToSection: [
|
|
'### The Three Laws of Usability',
|
|
'### The Goodwill Reservoir',
|
|
"Users scan, they don't read",
|
|
],
|
|
gateAfterStop: undefined,
|
|
},
|
|
behavioral: 'prompt',
|
|
maxSkeletonBytes: 54_000, // + v2.0 preamble growth (merged); measured 52_962
|
|
minUnionBytes: 53_200, // Phase 4 wave 4; measured union 54,290
|
|
mustContain: ["Don't make me think", "Users scan, they don't read", 'trunk test', '44px minimum'],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/** Sorted carved-skill names. Consumers derive their lists from this — no parallel lists. */
|
|
export const CARVED_SKILLS: readonly string[] = Object.freeze(
|
|
Object.keys(CARVE_GUARDS).sort(),
|
|
);
|