mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-10-02 17:40:02 +02:00
- design-consultation Phase 1 asks one brief that confirms context and decides
research; the confirm-only first question scored substance 2.
- document-release defines ship-owned inputs, exact steps and the JSON result,
and drops stale spawned-from-/ship text (judge actionability 3.67 -> 4/4/4).
- plan-design-with-ui accepts the Step 0D focus menu the same way the shared
picker does ("focus on specific ones?").
- plan-design-review plan-mode saves in three Edits instead of one final Write.
- QA functional annotations ask for the full 40-character revision.
- Outside-disabled attribution judges quoted prior-record data by its exact
timestamp or a dated, pre-existing-record sentence; four captured phrasings
replay clean and current claims still fail.
- --case can select autoplan-dual-voice by its literal test name.
101 lines
5.9 KiB
TypeScript
101 lines
5.9 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
||
* /plan-design-review with UI scope (gate, paid, real-PTY).
|
||
*
|
||
* The exact UI-heavy plan is committed before the first model turn. Observe
|
||
* an acknowledged Design focus/rating question and a subsequent review
|
||
* question using the existing native counting driver. An initial target menu
|
||
* or a no-UI early exit cannot satisfy this positive path. Option descriptions
|
||
* are proposals, so mentioning "no UI scope" there is not an exit verdict.
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
import { test } from 'bun:test';
|
||
import { PTY_MS } from './helpers/eval-budgets';
|
||
import { describeE2ETier } from './helpers/e2e-gate';
|
||
import { createDesignReviewPicker, DESIGN_BOARD_ACTOR_PROTOCOL } from './helpers/plan-review-board-feedback';
|
||
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
|
||
import * as path from 'node:path';
|
||
import {
|
||
runPlanSkillCounting,
|
||
type AskUserQuestionFingerprint,
|
||
} from './helpers/claude-pty-runner';
|
||
|
||
const describeE2E = describeE2ETier('gate');
|
||
const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, '..');
|
||
const FIXTURE = path.join(ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'plans', 'ui-heavy-feature.md');
|
||
|
||
const designFocusBoundary = (fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint): boolean =>
|
||
fp.nativeCall?.answered === true && !fp.nativeCall.failed && fp.nativeCall.questions.some(({ question }) => {
|
||
const text = question.trim().replace(/^D\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*[—–:-]\s*/i, '');
|
||
// Require the source Step 0D question or its retained native paraphrase.
|
||
// A target menu can mention a design system without reviewing this plan.
|
||
return /^I(?:['’]ve| have) rated this plan (?:10(?:\.0+)?|[0-9](?:\.\d+)?)\/10 on design completeness\.[\s\S]*\bWant me to focus on specific areas instead of all 7\?/i.test(text)
|
||
|| /^Review all 7 design (?:dimensions|passes), or focus(?: on [^?\n]+)?\?$/i.test(text.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// Require a choice about the supplied UI, not a workflow offer after focus.
|
||
// The review labels each finding's options with its issue number and a letter
|
||
// ("3A", "3B"; review-sections.md), so a complete issue-labeled option set
|
||
// identifies a Design finding whatever vocabulary its title uses. Otherwise both
|
||
// the question and an offered remedy must describe concrete UI behavior.
|
||
const issueLabeled = (options: Array<{ label: string }>): boolean => {
|
||
const labels = options.map(({ label }) => /^\s*(\d+)([A-Z])(?=[):.\s]|$)/.exec(label));
|
||
return labels.length >= 2 && labels.every(Boolean)
|
||
&& new Set(labels.map(match => match![1])).size === 1
|
||
&& new Set(labels.map(match => match![2])).size === labels.length;
|
||
};
|
||
const uiChoice = /\b(?:layout|compos(?:e|ed|ition)|anchor|regions?|panels?|notifications?|activity|quick actions?|loading|skeletons?|empty|errors?|success|modals?|toasts?|buttons?|links?|copy|typography|fonts?|spacing|contrast|colors?|breakpoints?|responsive|keyboard|focus (?:order|trap|management)|aria|a11y|accessibility)\b/i;
|
||
const designReviewFinding = (fp: AskUserQuestionFingerprint): boolean =>
|
||
fp.nativeCall?.answered === true && !fp.nativeCall.failed && !designFocusBoundary(fp) && fp.nativeCall.questions.some(({ question, options }) => {
|
||
const title = question.split(/\r?\n/, 1)[0]!.trim().replace(/^D\d+(?:\.\d+)?\s*[—–:-]\s*/i, '');
|
||
const setup = /\b(?:outside (?:design )?voices|cross[ -]project learnings|review (?:target|scope|mode)|what should I (?:design[ -])?review|which (?:artifact|plan|file))\b/i;
|
||
return !setup.test(title) && (issueLabeled(options)
|
||
|| (uiChoice.test(title) && options.some(option => uiChoice.test(`${option.label} ${option.description}`))));
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describeE2E('/plan-design-review with UI scope (gate)', () => {
|
||
test(
|
||
'reviews the supplied UI plan through an acknowledged Design finding',
|
||
async () => {
|
||
const startedAt = Date.now();
|
||
const plan = fs.readFileSync(FIXTURE, 'utf8');
|
||
let picker: ReturnType<typeof createDesignReviewPicker> | undefined;
|
||
let pickerCwd: string | undefined;
|
||
const obs = await runPlanSkillCounting({
|
||
skillName: 'plan-design-review', slashCommand: '/plan-design-review',
|
||
followUpPrompt: ['Review the supplied UI plan in review-input.md. Read it before',
|
||
'choosing review scope.', '', plan, '', DESIGN_BOARD_ACTOR_PROTOCOL].join('\n'),
|
||
fixtureFiles: {'review-input.md': plan},
|
||
isLastStep0AUQ: designFocusBoundary,
|
||
isReviewAUQ: designReviewFinding,
|
||
reviewCountCeiling: 1,
|
||
observeSetupQuestions: true,
|
||
bindDesignBoardState: true,
|
||
pickAUQ: (_routing, active, context) => {
|
||
const call = active.nativeCall;
|
||
const index = active.nativeQuestionIndex ?? (call?.questions.length === 1 ? 0 : -1);
|
||
if (!call && (/\/boards\//.test(active.promptSnippet) || active.options.some(option => /\bSubmitted\b/.test(option.label)))) {
|
||
throw new Error('Design board choice requires an owned native question');
|
||
}
|
||
if (!call || call.answered || call.failed || index < 0 || !call.questions[index]) return null;
|
||
if (pickerCwd && pickerCwd !== context.cwd) throw new Error('Design board picker fixture changed');
|
||
pickerCwd = context.cwd;
|
||
picker ??= createDesignReviewPicker(context);
|
||
const question = call.questions[index];
|
||
return picker({...question, multiSelect: question.multiSelect ?? false,
|
||
options: question.options.map(option => ({...option, description: option.description ?? ''}))});
|
||
},
|
||
timeoutMs: 600_000 - (Date.now() - startedAt),
|
||
});
|
||
const focus = obs.fingerprints.findIndex(designFocusBoundary);
|
||
const postFocus = focus >= 0 && obs.fingerprints.slice(focus + 1).some(fp => !fp.preReview && designReviewFinding(fp));
|
||
if (obs.outcome !== 'ceiling_reached' || !postFocus) {
|
||
throw new Error(
|
||
`plan-design-review with UI scope FAILED: outcome=${obs.outcome}; no acknowledged Design focus and subsequent review question\n` +
|
||
`--- evidence (last 3KB) ---\n${obs.evidence}`,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
PTY_MS,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|