mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-30 23:09:32 +02:00
a6fb31726c
* feat(preamble): add "Handling 5+ options — split, never drop" rule Agents repeatedly hit Conductor's 4-option AskUserQuestion cap and silently drop one option to fit, shrinking the user's decision space. This rule names the bug and gives two compliant shapes: batch into ≤4-groups (for coherent alternatives) or split into N sequential per-option calls (for independent scope items, default). Inline preamble subsection is ~15 lines (rule + buckets + pointer). Full reference with worked examples, Hold/dependency semantics, and final-summary validation lives in docs/askuserquestion-split.md. The agent loads the docs file on demand when N>4. Per-option call shape: D<N>.k header, ELI10, Recommendation, kind-note (no completeness score — decision actions, not coverage), Include / Defer / Cut / Hold buckets. Hold stops the chain immediately; the final D<N>.final call validates dependencies and confirms the assembled scope. question_ids: <skill>-split-<option-slug> (kebab-case ASCII, ≤64 chars). Also fixes orphan "12. " prefix on the existing CJK rule. Tier-2+ skills inherit via the existing resolver. SKILL.md regenerated for all 41 affected skills + 3 golden fixtures. Net diff per SKILL.md: ~34 lines (vs ~110 for the full inline version). 6 tests pin the inline contract (4-option cap, buckets, D-numbering, docs pointer, runtime AUTO_DECIDE gate reference, orphan 12 regression). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(question-pref): runtime AUTO_DECIDE carve-out for *-split-* ids Split chains (per-option AskUserQuestion calls emitted by the new "Handling 5+ options" rule) must never be silently auto-approved via /plan-tune preferences. The user's option set is sacred. Layer 1 (mechanism): unique <skill>-split-<option-slug> ids prevent cross-option preference leakage. Layer 2 (this commit): the runtime checker `gstack-question-preference --check` detects any id matching *-split-* and forces ASK_NORMALLY even when never-ask or ask-only-for-one-way preferences exist for that exact id. An explanatory note tells the user their preference was bypassed and why. 7 tests pin the carve-out: no-pref baseline, never-ask override, explanatory note text, ask-only-for-one-way override, always-ask (no note), non-split id containing "split" word (negative case for regex specificity), multi-skill split id formats. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(e2e): split-overflow regression for /plan-ceo-review Periodic-tier E2E test that catches the original failure mode the user complained about: 5+ options for ONE decision must split into N sequential AskUserQuestion calls, not drop one to fit Conductor's 4-option cap. Fixture: 5 independent chat-platform integration candidates (Slack/Discord/Teams/Telegram/Mattermost), each carrying its own include/defer/cut decision. Floor = 4 review-phase AUQs (standard [N-1] tolerance band). Pre-fix "drop to 4 + 1 dropped" fails this floor. Wired into test/helpers/touchfiles.ts: tier periodic, depends on plan-ceo-review/**, the new preamble subsection, the question-pref binary (for the carve-out), and the runner helper. touchfiles.test.ts expected count bumped 21 → 22 to account for the new entry. Cost: ~$0.30/run when EVALS_TIER=periodic. Skips silently otherwise. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: post-merge regen + rebase size-budget baseline to v1.47.0.0 After merging origin/main (v1.45 → v1.47), three things needed cleanup: 1. spec/SKILL.md (main's new skill) regenerated to include our split-vs-drop preamble subsection — same mechanical regen as the other 41 tier-2+ skills. 2. Three golden ship fixtures refreshed to capture main's GSTACK_PLAN_MODE block + /spec routing entry + jargon-list.json refactor. 3. docs/skills.md — added /spec table row that main's PR (#1698/#1733) shipped without. Pre-existing failure on main; this PR catches and fixes. Also rebased test/skill-size-budget.test.ts from v1.44.1 → v1.47.0.0 baseline. Main's v1.46 (catalog tokens trim) + v1.47 (/spec skill) pushed the v1.44.1 anchor past the 5% ratchet to ×1.059 — pre-existing failure on main. This PR captures a fresh parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json and re-anchors the test there. Historical v1.44.1.json and v1.46.0.0.json retained in test/fixtures/ for reference. Our subsection contributes ~0.1% of the post-rebase corpus. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: bump version and changelog (v1.48.0.0) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
226 lines
9.7 KiB
TypeScript
226 lines
9.7 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
||
* Per-skill SKILL.md size budget regression (v1.46.0.0 T5).
|
||
*
|
||
* Asserts that no skill's generated SKILL.md grew beyond the v1.47.0.0
|
||
* baseline. Catches preamble/resolver changes that bloat skills back to
|
||
* the pre-compression size. Free — pure file IO + JSON diff.
|
||
*
|
||
* Baseline rebased v1.44.1 → v1.47.0.0 in the AskUserQuestion split-rule
|
||
* PR after main merged GSTACK_PLAN_MODE + /spec, pushing the v1.44.1
|
||
* anchor past the 5% ratchet. Historical v1.44.1.json and v1.46.0.0.json
|
||
* are retained in test/fixtures/ for reference.
|
||
*
|
||
* Why a separate test from skill-budget-regression.test.ts: that one
|
||
* compares LIVE eval runs (tool calls, turns, cost); this one compares
|
||
* static SKILL.md sizes. Both gate-tier.
|
||
*
|
||
* The baseline lives at test/fixtures/parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json,
|
||
* captured by scripts/capture-baseline.ts before any Phase A work landed.
|
||
*
|
||
* Override:
|
||
* - GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_RATIO=<n> changes the per-skill regression ratio.
|
||
* Default 1.0 (no growth allowed). Set to 1.10 to permit 10% growth
|
||
* (e.g., during deliberate feature additions that the catalog trim
|
||
* doesn't offset).
|
||
* - GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON="text" allows a regression to
|
||
* pass and logs the reason to ~/.gstack/analytics/spend-overrides.jsonl
|
||
* for audit. Use sparingly; the next baseline should bake in the new
|
||
* size.
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
import { describe, test, expect } from 'bun:test';
|
||
import * as fs from 'fs';
|
||
import * as path from 'path';
|
||
import { captureBaseline, type ParityBaseline } from './helpers/capture-parity-baseline';
|
||
import { logBudgetOverride } from './helpers/budget-override';
|
||
|
||
const REPO_ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, '..');
|
||
const BASELINE_PATH = path.join(REPO_ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures', 'parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json');
|
||
|
||
// Default per-skill ratio is 1.05 (5% growth tolerance). T4 catalog trim
|
||
// MOVES text from frontmatter (always-loaded catalog) to a body section
|
||
// ("## When to invoke"), so small skills with already-short descriptions
|
||
// see a tiny body growth from the section header itself (~20 bytes). The
|
||
// 5% per-skill tolerance accommodates that while still catching real bloat;
|
||
// the always-loaded catalog cost is enforced separately with a hard ceiling.
|
||
const DEFAULT_RATIO = 1.05;
|
||
const RATIO = Number(process.env.GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_RATIO) || DEFAULT_RATIO;
|
||
|
||
interface Regression {
|
||
skill: string;
|
||
beforeBytes: number;
|
||
afterBytes: number;
|
||
growth: number;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
describe('SKILL.md size budget regression (gate, free)', () => {
|
||
test('parity-baseline-v1.47.0.0.json exists', () => {
|
||
expect(fs.existsSync(BASELINE_PATH)).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('no skill exceeds v1.47.0.0 baseline size × ratio', () => {
|
||
const baseline: ParityBaseline = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(BASELINE_PATH, 'utf-8'));
|
||
const current = captureBaseline({ repoRoot: REPO_ROOT });
|
||
|
||
const regressions: Regression[] = [];
|
||
for (const [skill, before] of Object.entries(baseline.skills)) {
|
||
const after = current.skills[skill];
|
||
if (!after) continue; // skill removed since v1.44 — not a regression
|
||
if (after.skillMdBytes <= before.skillMdBytes * RATIO) continue;
|
||
regressions.push({
|
||
skill,
|
||
beforeBytes: before.skillMdBytes,
|
||
afterBytes: after.skillMdBytes,
|
||
growth: after.skillMdBytes / before.skillMdBytes,
|
||
});
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (regressions.length === 0) return;
|
||
|
||
const overrideReason = process.env.GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON?.trim();
|
||
if (overrideReason) {
|
||
logBudgetOverride({
|
||
scope: 'skill-size-budget',
|
||
reason: overrideReason,
|
||
details: { ratio: RATIO, regressions },
|
||
});
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||
console.warn(
|
||
`[skill-size-budget] OVERRIDE APPLIED (${overrideReason}) — ${regressions.length} regression(s) allowed:`,
|
||
);
|
||
for (const r of regressions) {
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||
console.warn(` ${r.skill}: ${r.beforeBytes} → ${r.afterBytes} bytes (×${r.growth.toFixed(2)})`);
|
||
}
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const msg = regressions.map(r =>
|
||
` ${r.skill}: ${r.beforeBytes} → ${r.afterBytes} bytes (×${r.growth.toFixed(2)})`,
|
||
).join('\n');
|
||
throw new Error(
|
||
`${regressions.length} skill(s) regressed past v1.47.0.0 baseline × ${RATIO}:\n${msg}\n` +
|
||
`Override: set GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON="why this is OK" to allow and audit-log.`,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('total corpus byte count does not regress past baseline × ratio', () => {
|
||
const baseline: ParityBaseline = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(BASELINE_PATH, 'utf-8'));
|
||
const current = captureBaseline({ repoRoot: REPO_ROOT });
|
||
const ratio = current.totalCorpusBytes / baseline.totalCorpusBytes;
|
||
if (current.totalCorpusBytes <= baseline.totalCorpusBytes * RATIO) {
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||
console.log(
|
||
`[skill-size-budget] corpus OK: ${baseline.totalCorpusBytes} → ${current.totalCorpusBytes} bytes (×${ratio.toFixed(3)})`,
|
||
);
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
const overrideReason = process.env.GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON?.trim();
|
||
if (overrideReason) {
|
||
logBudgetOverride({
|
||
scope: 'skill-size-budget-corpus',
|
||
reason: overrideReason,
|
||
details: { ratio: RATIO, observed: ratio, before: baseline.totalCorpusBytes, after: current.totalCorpusBytes },
|
||
});
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
throw new Error(
|
||
`Total corpus regressed past v1.47.0.0 baseline × ${RATIO}: ` +
|
||
`${baseline.totalCorpusBytes} → ${current.totalCorpusBytes} bytes (×${ratio.toFixed(3)}). ` +
|
||
`Override: set GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON to allow.`,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Gap E (v1.46.0.0): per-skill min-size floor.
|
||
*
|
||
* The existing skill-coverage-floor enforces body ≥ 200 bytes, which is
|
||
* a tiny noise floor. A skill that was 100 KB at v1.47.0.0 and shrinks to
|
||
* 250 bytes passes that check despite losing 99.75% of content. The
|
||
* parity-suite content invariants cover this for 10 hand-picked skills
|
||
* (cso, ship, plan-ceo, etc.); the remaining 41 skills had no per-skill
|
||
* shrinkage floor.
|
||
*
|
||
* Floor: 80% of the v1.47.0.0 baseline. v1.46 actual shrinkage is <1% per
|
||
* skill, so this is a comfortable ceiling that still catches accidental
|
||
* mass deletion (e.g., a refactor that strips the body of a skill).
|
||
*
|
||
* v2.0.0.0 will introduce the sections/ pattern for 5 heavyweights
|
||
* (ship, plan-ceo-review, office-hours, plan-eng-review,
|
||
* plan-design-review). Those skills will legitimately shrink to ~15 KB
|
||
* skeletons. When that lands, add them to SECTIONS_EXTRACTED so the floor
|
||
* relaxes for them.
|
||
*/
|
||
test('no skill shrinks past 80% of v1.47.0.0 baseline (catches accidental body strip)', () => {
|
||
const baseline: ParityBaseline = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(BASELINE_PATH, 'utf-8'));
|
||
const current = captureBaseline({ repoRoot: REPO_ROOT });
|
||
const MIN_RATIO = 0.80; // a skill at <80% of its v1.44 size signals mass-deletion
|
||
const SECTIONS_EXTRACTED = new Set<string>(); // populate in v2.0.0.0 when sections/ lands
|
||
|
||
const undershoots: Array<{
|
||
skill: string; beforeBytes: number; afterBytes: number; ratio: number;
|
||
}> = [];
|
||
for (const [skill, before] of Object.entries(baseline.skills)) {
|
||
if (SECTIONS_EXTRACTED.has(skill)) continue;
|
||
const after = current.skills[skill];
|
||
if (!after) continue; // skill removed since baseline — separate concern
|
||
const ratio = after.skillMdBytes / before.skillMdBytes;
|
||
if (ratio < MIN_RATIO) {
|
||
undershoots.push({
|
||
skill, beforeBytes: before.skillMdBytes, afterBytes: after.skillMdBytes, ratio,
|
||
});
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (undershoots.length === 0) return;
|
||
|
||
const overrideReason = process.env.GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON?.trim();
|
||
if (overrideReason) {
|
||
logBudgetOverride({
|
||
scope: 'skill-size-budget-floor',
|
||
reason: overrideReason,
|
||
details: { min_ratio: MIN_RATIO, undershoots },
|
||
});
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||
console.warn(
|
||
`[skill-size-budget-floor] OVERRIDE APPLIED (${overrideReason}) — ${undershoots.length} undershoot(s) allowed`,
|
||
);
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const msg = undershoots.map(u =>
|
||
` ${u.skill}: ${u.beforeBytes} → ${u.afterBytes} bytes (×${u.ratio.toFixed(2)} — below ${MIN_RATIO} floor)`,
|
||
).join('\n');
|
||
throw new Error(
|
||
`${undershoots.length} skill(s) shrunk past v1.47.0.0 × ${MIN_RATIO} floor:\n${msg}\n` +
|
||
`This usually signals accidental body strip (e.g., a resolver returning empty, a ` +
|
||
`template losing a section). If the shrinkage is intentional (e.g., the skill moved ` +
|
||
`to the sections/ pattern), add it to SECTIONS_EXTRACTED in this test. Override: ` +
|
||
`GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON="why" allows + audit-logs.`,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('catalog token estimate stays compressed (v1.45 target ≤ 7000)', () => {
|
||
const current = captureBaseline({ repoRoot: REPO_ROOT });
|
||
const v145Target = 7000;
|
||
if (current.estTotalCatalogTokens <= v145Target) {
|
||
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
|
||
console.log(`[skill-size-budget] catalog OK: ~${current.estTotalCatalogTokens} tokens (target ≤${v145Target})`);
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
const overrideReason = process.env.GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON?.trim();
|
||
if (overrideReason) {
|
||
logBudgetOverride({
|
||
scope: 'skill-size-budget-catalog',
|
||
reason: overrideReason,
|
||
details: { target: v145Target, observed: current.estTotalCatalogTokens },
|
||
});
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
throw new Error(
|
||
`Catalog token estimate regressed past v1.45 target: ${current.estTotalCatalogTokens} tokens > ${v145Target}. ` +
|
||
`T4 catalog trim should keep this under control. Override: set GSTACK_SIZE_BUDGET_OVERRIDE_REASON to allow.`,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|