mirror of
https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git
synced 2026-05-06 21:46:40 +02:00
91c0b31a78
Periodic-tier eval surfaced that Opus 4.7 writes "Recommendation: A) SCOPE EXPANSION because..." (option label, no "Choose" prefix), which the generate-ask-user-format.ts spec actually mandates — `Recommendation: <choice> because <reason>` where <choice> is the bare option label. The legacy regex `/[Rr]ecommendation:[*\s]*Choose/` pinned down a per-skill template-example phrasing that the canonical spec doesn't require, so it false-failed on correctly-formatted captures. judgeRecommendation.present (deterministic regex over the canonical shape) plus has_because and reason_substance >= 4 cover the recommendation surface end-to-end. Drop the redundant strict regex from all five wired call sites (four plan-format cases + new office-hours Phase 4 test). Verified by re-reading the captured AUQs from both failing periodic runs: both contained substantive Recommendation lines that the spec accepts and the judge correctly grades at substance >= 4. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
162 lines
7.6 KiB
TypeScript
162 lines
7.6 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* /office-hours Phase 4 alternatives gate regression (periodic, paid, SDK-based).
|
|
*
|
|
* Reproduces the bug seen in production: agent in builder mode reaches Phase 4,
|
|
* presents 3 architectural alternatives (A/B/C), writes "Recommendation: C" in
|
|
* chat prose, and starts editing the design doc immediately — never calls
|
|
* AskUserQuestion. The fix is the STOP gate added to office-hours/SKILL.md.tmpl
|
|
* Phase 4 footer.
|
|
*
|
|
* Test approach: SDK + captureInstruction (same proven pattern as
|
|
* skill-e2e-plan-format.test.ts). Pre-seed builder mode + "skip Phase 1/2/3,
|
|
* I have already accepted all premises" so the agent reaches Phase 4 directly.
|
|
* captureInstruction tells the agent to dump the verbatim Phase 4 AskUserQuestion
|
|
* to a file. We then assert on the captured text (regex + Haiku judge) rather
|
|
* than on tool-call observability — the captured file IS the Phase 4 question.
|
|
*
|
|
* Why periodic (not gate): Phase 4 requires the agent to invent 2-3 distinct
|
|
* architectures, which is more open-ended than the 4 plan-format cases. Closer
|
|
* to a quality benchmark than a deterministic format check. Reclassify if the
|
|
* test turns out stable.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
|
|
import { runSkillTest } from './helpers/session-runner';
|
|
import {
|
|
ROOT, runId,
|
|
describeIfSelected, testConcurrentIfSelected,
|
|
logCost, recordE2E,
|
|
createEvalCollector, finalizeEvalCollector,
|
|
} from './helpers/e2e-helpers';
|
|
import { judgeRecommendation } from './helpers/llm-judge';
|
|
import { spawnSync } from 'child_process';
|
|
import * as fs from 'fs';
|
|
import * as path from 'path';
|
|
import * as os from 'os';
|
|
|
|
const evalCollector = createEvalCollector('e2e-office-hours-phase4');
|
|
|
|
// Format predicates. The strict `Recommendation:[*\s]*Choose` regex used by
|
|
// skill-e2e-plan-format pins down a specific template-example wording ("Choose
|
|
// [X]"). The format spec at scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts
|
|
// only requires `Recommendation: <choice> because <reason>` — `<choice>` can
|
|
// be the bare option label. judgeRecommendation.present (deterministic) checks
|
|
// this canonical shape correctly; we don't need a redundant strict regex here.
|
|
const BECAUSE_RE = /\bbecause\b/i;
|
|
// At least 2 numbered/lettered options (A/B or 1/2). Office-hours Phase 4 says
|
|
// "2-3 distinct alternatives," so 2+ is the minimum bar.
|
|
const TWO_OPTIONS_RE = /\b[AB]\)|\b1\)|\b2\)/;
|
|
// Phase-4-specific: at least one of these tokens should appear in the captured
|
|
// question. Without this, a captured AUQ from an earlier phase would false-pass.
|
|
const PHASE4_VOCAB_RE = /approach|alternative|architecture|implementation/i;
|
|
|
|
function setupOfficeHoursDir(): string {
|
|
const dir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'skill-e2e-office-hours-phase4-'));
|
|
const run = (cmd: string, args: string[]) =>
|
|
spawnSync(cmd, args, { cwd: dir, stdio: 'pipe', timeout: 5000 });
|
|
|
|
run('git', ['init', '-b', 'main']);
|
|
run('git', ['config', 'user.email', 'test@test.com']);
|
|
run('git', ['config', 'user.name', 'Test']);
|
|
|
|
// Seed a tiny project context so the skill has something to reason about.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'README.md'), `# gbrain-retrieval
|
|
|
|
We're building a retrieval surface for gbrain so cross-skill memory works
|
|
end-to-end. There are three architectural shapes worth considering: server-side
|
|
(gbrain ships the smarts), client-side (gstack ships the smarts), and a hybrid
|
|
that ships V1 client-side and promotes to gbrain in V1.5.
|
|
`);
|
|
run('git', ['add', '.']);
|
|
run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'seed']);
|
|
|
|
// Drop in office-hours/SKILL.md so the agent can read it inside the tmpdir.
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(dir, 'office-hours'), { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.copyFileSync(
|
|
path.join(ROOT, 'office-hours', 'SKILL.md'),
|
|
path.join(dir, 'office-hours', 'SKILL.md'),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
return dir;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function captureInstruction(outFile: string): string {
|
|
return `Write the verbatim text of the Phase 4 (Alternatives Generation) AskUserQuestion you would have made to ${outFile} (full text including all option labels, recommendation line with because-clause, and net-line). Do NOT call any tool to ask the user. Do NOT paraphrase — include the exact prose you would have shown. This is a format-capture test, not an interactive session.`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describeIfSelected('Office Hours Phase 4 — Architectural fork must surface AskUserQuestion', ['office-hours-phase4-fork'], () => {
|
|
let workDir: string;
|
|
let outFile: string;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
workDir = setupOfficeHoursDir();
|
|
outFile = path.join(workDir, 'phase4-capture.md');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterAll(() => {
|
|
try { fs.rmSync(workDir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
testConcurrentIfSelected('office-hours-phase4-fork', async () => {
|
|
const result = await runSkillTest({
|
|
prompt: `Read office-hours/SKILL.md for the workflow.
|
|
|
|
Context: this is BUILDER MODE (Path B). The project is gbrain-retrieval — see README.md. I have a fully-formed plan and have already accepted all your Phase 3 premises. Skip Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 entirely.
|
|
|
|
Proceed directly to Phase 4 (Alternatives Generation). Generate 2-3 distinct architectural approaches that differ in KIND (not in coverage). Realistic shapes for this project:
|
|
A) Server-side: gbrain ships the retrieval smarts as new MCP tools (e.g. get_recent_salience, find_anomalies).
|
|
B) Client-side: gstack ships a helper (bin/gstack-brain-context-load) that composes salience client-side from existing MCP tools.
|
|
C) Hybrid: V1 client-side in gstack; V1.5 promotes to gbrain server-side once the salience signal is validated.
|
|
|
|
Do not skip Phase 4 — the test depends on you reaching it.
|
|
|
|
${captureInstruction(outFile)}
|
|
|
|
After writing the file with that ONE Phase 4 question, stop. Do not continue to Phase 4.5 or Phase 5.`,
|
|
workingDirectory: workDir,
|
|
maxTurns: 12,
|
|
timeout: 300_000,
|
|
testName: 'office-hours-phase4-fork',
|
|
runId,
|
|
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
logCost('/office-hours Phase 4 fork', result);
|
|
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
|
|
|
|
expect(fs.existsSync(outFile)).toBe(true);
|
|
const captured = fs.readFileSync(outFile, 'utf-8');
|
|
expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(100);
|
|
|
|
// Format-spec compliance. judgeRecommendation below covers the
|
|
// Recommendation: line itself; these regexes catch cheap structural shape.
|
|
expect(captured).toMatch(BECAUSE_RE);
|
|
expect(captured).toMatch(TWO_OPTIONS_RE);
|
|
// Phase-4 specificity: prevents a stray earlier-phase AUQ from false-passing.
|
|
expect(captured).toMatch(PHASE4_VOCAB_RE);
|
|
|
|
// Recommendation-quality judge: same threshold as plan-format tests.
|
|
const recScore = await judgeRecommendation(captured);
|
|
recordE2E(evalCollector, '/office-hours-phase4-fork', 'Office Hours Phase 4 — Architectural fork must surface AskUserQuestion', result, {
|
|
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
|
|
judge_scores: {
|
|
rec_present: recScore.present ? 1 : 0,
|
|
rec_commits: recScore.commits ? 1 : 0,
|
|
rec_has_because: recScore.has_because ? 1 : 0,
|
|
rec_substance: recScore.reason_substance,
|
|
},
|
|
judge_reasoning: `${recScore.reasoning} | reason: "${recScore.reason_text}"`,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(recScore.present, recScore.reasoning).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(recScore.commits, recScore.reasoning).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(recScore.has_because, recScore.reasoning).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
recScore.reason_substance,
|
|
`${recScore.reasoning}\n reason: "${recScore.reason_text}"`,
|
|
).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(4);
|
|
}, 360_000);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
await finalizeEvalCollector(evalCollector);
|
|
});
|