gstack/test/fixtures/autoplan-phase-entry-alias-f359.json

{
  "sourceRevision": "f3596a42898462ce6d45a56fd87e21fcf052b449",
  "sourceEvidence": ".context/nouakchott-resume-validation/runtime-post-b176/executions/f3596a42898462ce6d45a56fd87e21fcf052b449/all/run/public-retention/skill-e2e-autoplan-chain/autoplan-1789544341633-RhTXQ5/public-events.ndjson",
  "sourceEvidenceSha256": "235ec6b52743ad4994b9ce26d73a728e3a82a68ff39d96236722732c0e3bc384",
  "originalOutcome": "Retained failed transition; no paid passing verdict is inferred.",
  "projection": "Exact public Read/ACK pair and complete retained public assistant prefix through its ACK. Tests rebase only the source path into an isolated fixture.",
  "sourceSha256": "b1c20b1c3b63ef7be689040c210cba9300c6eecc9a85e26db7c922f8b1b97bf5",
  "events": [
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:26:52.230Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_0116k1GsR8JxowqSYBJtJbpi",
      "kind": "use",
      "name": "Read",
      "input": {
        "file_path": "/tmp/g-0rk78u4r/gstack-paid-shard-THPcvA/tmp/gstack-hermetic-3472299-ViufGY/with-skills/.claude/skills/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md"
      },
      "messageId": "msg_011Cf6oPPNGGMca3KFZJPJKo",
      "requestId": "req_011Cf6oPNTwoVrg673beCqXe"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:26:52.251Z",
      "toolUseId": "toolu_0116k1GsR8JxowqSYBJtJbpi",
      "kind": "result",
      "content": "1\t<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from design-phase.md.tmpl — do not edit directly -->\n2\t<!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->\n3\tBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" methodology design \"<REVIEW_SKILL>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n4\t\n5\t**Override rules:**\n6\t- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n7\t- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n8\t- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n9\t- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n10\t- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n11\t\n12\t  **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `<DESIGN_INPUT>` for both voices:\n13\t```bash\n14\tbun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" create design \"<ACTIVE_PLAN>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\" \"<methodologyPath>\"\n15\t```\n16\t  Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n17\t\n18\t  **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n19\t  Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n20\t  Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n21\t\n22\t  Read `snapshot.json` beside `<DESIGN_INPUT>`. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n23\t  verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n24\t  Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n25\t  all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n26\t\n27\t  **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n28\t  Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for <agent ID>.\"\n29\t  No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n30\t  Other hosts await that ID. Then outside → this phase's review ONLY.\n31\t  Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n32\t  No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n33\t\n34\t  **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n35\t  Outside prompt: inline the full contents of <DESIGN_INPUT> and context below (Write tool).\n36\t\n37\tIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n38\t\n39\t  Read the plan file at <DESIGN_INPUT>. Evaluate this plan's\n40\t  UI/UX design decisions.\n41\t\n42\t  Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n43\t  <insert CEO dual voice findings summary — key concerns, disagreements>\n44\t\n45\t  Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n46\t  states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n47\t  imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n48\t  accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n49\t  aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n50\t  What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n51\t  Be opinionated. No hedging.\n52\t\n53\tWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for `<prepared-prompt-file>`; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: <action> because <specific reason> line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n54\t\n55\t```bash\n56\t# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\n57\tif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n58\t  echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n59\t  if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n60\t    echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host <actual-harness> (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n61\t  else\n62\t    echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n63\t  fi\n64\t  exit 78\n65\tfi\n66\t\n67\t_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n68\t_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\n69\ttrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n70\t_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\n71\tcat -- '<prepared-prompt-file>' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n72\t\n73\tsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n74\t_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n75\t_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n76\t_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n77\t# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\n78\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n79\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n80\t  _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n81\t  _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\n82\tfi\n83\tcat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\n84\tif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n85\t  echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n86\t  exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\n87\tfi\n88\tbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n89\t\n90\techo 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n91\t```\n92\t\n93\tShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n94\t\n95\tOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review → unavailable; disabled → skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n96\t\n97\tRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n98\t\n99\t  Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n100\t\n101\t- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n102\t  → TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on → USER CHALLENGE.\n103\t\n104\t**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n105\t\n106\t1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n107\t\n108\t2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design — UX challenge)\n109\t   and Claude SUBAGENT (design — independent review).\n110\t   Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n111\t   to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n112\t   Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n113\t\n114\t3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n115\t   DISAGREE items from scorecard → raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n116\t\n117\t**Close this phase:**\n118\t\n119\tThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\n120\tread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint `<DESIGN_INPUT>`, and this phase's\n121\t`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n122\t\n123\t> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n124\t> in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.\n125\t",
      "file": {
        "filePath": "/tmp/g-0rk78u4r/gstack-paid-shard-THPcvA/tmp/gstack-hermetic-3472299-ViufGY/with-skills/.claude/skills/autoplan/sections/design-phase.md",
        "content": "<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from design-phase.md.tmpl — do not edit directly -->\n<!-- Regenerate: bun run gen:skill-docs -->\nBefore dispatch, Read `methodologyPath` from `bun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" methodology design \"<REVIEW_SKILL>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\"` per `readRanges`; log successful ranges/total to EOF. Skip-listed: load only.\n\n**Override rules:**\n- Focus areas: all relevant dimensions (P1)\n- Structural issues (missing states, broken hierarchy): auto-fix (P5)\n- Aesthetic/taste issues: mark TASTE DECISION\n- Design system alignment: auto-fix if DESIGN.md exists and fix is obvious\n- Dual voices: always run BOTH Claude subagent AND Codex if available (P6).\n\n  **Bind phase input:** Run; use `snapshotPath` as `<DESIGN_INPUT>` for both voices:\n```bash\nbun \"<SNAPSHOT_TOOL>\" create design \"<ACTIVE_PLAN>\" \"<RESTORE_PATH>\" \"<methodologyPath>\"\n```\n  Fresh `Implementation plan` only; excludes `Review record`.\n\n  **Claude design subagent** (native tool):\n  Claude Code: set Agent `run_in_background: false` if its schema exposes it.\n  Other hosts: foreground; await completion when supported.\n\n  Read `snapshot.json` beside `<DESIGN_INPUT>`. Send its `nativeDispatchPrompt`\n  verbatim as the Agent prompt: ONLY/FINAL tool call this response.\n  Keep native Reads enabled. Child first Reads `nativePromptPath` to EOF:\n  all criteria + plan; no summaries or prior reviews.\n\n  **Native completion barrier:** Async (`isAsync: true` / `status: \"async_launched\"`):\n  Claude Code: end response immediately: \"Waiting for <agent ID>.\"\n  No further tool calls/review until that ID's terminal notification is delivered.\n  Other hosts await that ID. Then outside → this phase's review ONLY.\n  Completed-native INPUT must match snapshot phase/hash. Retry invalid input once; then failure policy if still invalid.\n  No inline substitute; apply failure policy.\n\n  **Codex design voice** (via Bash):\n  Outside prompt: inline the full contents of <DESIGN_INPUT> and context below (Write tool).\n\nIMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any SKILL.md files or paths containing skills/gstack (foreign instructions). Review repository code only.\n\n  Read the plan file at <DESIGN_INPUT>. Evaluate this plan's\n  UI/UX design decisions.\n\n  Also consider these findings from the CEO review phase:\n  <insert CEO dual voice findings summary — key concerns, disagreements>\n\n  Does the information hierarchy serve the user or the developer? Are interaction\n  states (loading, empty, error, partial) specified or left to the implementer's\n  imagination? Is the responsive strategy intentional or afterthought? Are\n  accessibility requirements (keyboard nav, contrast, touch targets) specified or\n  aspirational? Does the plan describe specific UI decisions or generic patterns?\n  What design decisions will haunt the implementer if left ambiguous?\n  Be opinionated. No hedging.\n\nWrite the **complete prompt and context**, including actual plan/spec/source, to a private file. Substitute its shell-quoted path for `<prepared-prompt-file>`; never interpolate user text into shell source. Request a final Recommendation: <action> because <specific reason> line, including an explicit no-findings rationale.\n\n```bash\n# GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST names the harness, never the model.\nif { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n  echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: harness mismatch; no outside process started. Missing coverage.' >&2\n  if { [ -n \"${CLAUDECODE:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = claude ]; } && { [ -n \"${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}\" ] || [ -n \"${CODEX_SANDBOX:-}\" ] || [ \"${GSTACK_ACTIVE_HOST:-}\" = codex ]; }; then\n    echo 'Inherited harness markers conflict. Run setup --host <actual-harness> (claude or codex); do not guess a replacement provider.' >&2\n  else\n    echo 'Repair installed skills: run setup --host codex from your gstack checkout.' >&2\n  fi\n  exit 78\nfi\n\n_REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || { echo 'ERROR: not in a git repo' >&2; exit 1; }\n_OUTSIDE_TMP=$(mktemp -d \"${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/gstack-outside.XXXXXXXX\") || exit 1\ntrap 'rm -rf \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP\"' EXIT\n_OUTSIDE_INPUT=\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/prompt\"\ncat -- '<prepared-prompt-file>' >\"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\" || exit 1\n\nsource \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-codex-probe\" || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_PROMPT=$(cat \"$_OUTSIDE_INPUT\") || exit 1\n_OUTSIDE_EXIT=0\n_gstack_codex_timeout_wrapper 600 codex exec \"$_OUTSIDE_PROMPT\" -C \"$_REPO_ROOT\" -s read-only -c \"model=\\\"${GSTACK_CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-6-astra}\\\"\" -c 'model_reasoning_effort=\"high\"' -c 'web_search=\"cached\"' < /dev/null >\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" 2>\"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=$?\n# Preserve findings and partial output even when transport or validation fails.\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -eq 124 ]; then\n  _gstack_codex_log_event \"codex_timeout\" \"600\" || true\n  _gstack_codex_log_hang \"autoplan\" \"0\" || true\nfi\ncat \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/stderr\" >&2 || { [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ] || _OUTSIDE_EXIT=1; }\nif [ \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\" -ne 0 ]; then\n  echo 'Codex outside review unavailable: execution failed; missing coverage. Check the provider diagnosis above.' >&2\n  exit \"$_OUTSIDE_EXIT\"\nfi\nbun \"$HOME/.claude/skills/gstack/lib/outside-review-result.ts\" review \"$_OUTSIDE_TMP/text\" || exit 1\n\necho 'OUTSIDE_STATUS: completed provider=codex host=claude'\n```\n\nShow the full response in a `tool-output` fence. Require successful execution and valid markers. Refusal, empty/malformed output, missing score/severity/completion markers, timeout or CLI failure means `outside_status: unavailable`. Use the caller's fallback; missing coverage is never clean/PASS. After either outcome, delete only your private prompt; scratch cleanup is automatic.\n\nOuter tool timeout: 720000ms. Failed/incomplete outside review → unavailable; disabled → skip outside. Both retain the native pass.\n\nRetain the historical review-log skill ID; add `\"host\":\"claude\",\"outside_provider\":\"codex\",\"outside_status\":\"completed|unavailable|disabled|skipped\",\"phase\":\"design\"`. Record differing attempt outcomes separately. `source:\"codex\"` requires completed CLI output; native uses `source:\"in-host\"` (historical `source:\"claude\"`: native Claude). Availability/native fallback is not outside completion. Preserve all reported modelUsage; unknown model identity stays unknown.\n\n  Error handling: Phase 1 failure/degradation policy applies.\n\n- Design choices: if the outside reviewer disagrees with a design decision with valid UX reasoning\n  → TASTE DECISION. Scope changes both models agree on → USER CHALLENGE.\n\n**Required execution checklist (Design):**\n\n1. Step 0 (Design Scope): Rate completeness 0-10. Check DESIGN.md. Map existing patterns.\n\n2. Step 0.5 (Dual Voices): Present the completed calls above under Codex SAYS (design — UX challenge)\n   and Claude SUBAGENT (design — independent review).\n   Produce the design litmus scorecard from plan-design-review. CEO findings go only\n   to the outside voice; the native voice stays independent.\n   Missing/disabled outside = N/A, not CONFIRMED; primary cannot replace it.\n\n3. Passes 1-7: Run each from loaded skill. Rate 0-10. Auto-decide each issue.\n   DISAGREE items from scorecard → raised in the relevant pass with both perspectives.\n\n**Close this phase:**\n\nThe review work above ends here. Now load the shared close steps afresh, even if\nread earlier. Use phase `design`, checkpoint `<DESIGN_INPUT>`, and this phase's\n`methodologyPath`. Keep this checkpoint for this invocation; review exports do not replace it.\n\n> **STOP.** Before closing a review phase, after its reviews finish and before announcing completion or loading the next phase (read afresh at each exit), Read `~/.claude/skills/gstack/autoplan/sections/phase-close.md` and execute it\n> in full. Do not work from memory — that section is the source of truth for this step.\n",
        "numLines": 125,
        "startLine": 1,
        "totalLines": 125
      },
      "isError": false
    }
  ],
  "assistantMessages": [
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "I'll start by running the skill preamble.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:38:35.450Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Preamble healthy: interactive session, telemetry off, question tuning off. Now Step 0 (platform/base branch), context recovery, and the design doc check.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:38:43.327Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Base branch: `main` (no remote, git-native fallback). A design doc exists and there's an existing plan file in the plans directory. Let me read both.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:39:04.602Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Codex passes skipped (codex_reviews disabled) — running Claude adversarial only.\n\nNow Phase 1. Loading the CEO phase section as instructed.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:40:19.328Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now resolving the CEO review skill and loading its methodology via the snapshot tool.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:40:25.225Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Reading the CEO methodology at all four ranges (2388 lines).",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:40:34.995Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now create the Step 0 amendment checkpoint.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:48:03.045Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the CEO scope summary in CEO_PLANS (a `~/.gstack`-root write, permitted), then `amend-input`.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:48:33.945Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Dispatching spec reviewer launch 1 with both saved paths and only the prescribed instructions.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:49:39.365Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Spec reviewer launch 1 is running in the background. Per the methodology, I'm holding here: no edits to either input and no further reviewer launches until its completion notification arrives.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:49:52.614Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Spec review launch 1 returned 7/10 with 18 numbered issues across Completeness (5), Consistency (4), Clarity (6), Feasibility (3); Scope PASS. Processing each through 0D and amending both inputs, then re-dispatching.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:52:31.233Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the accepted block rewrite (Review record copy only; the Implementation-plan copy is regenerated by `amend-input`).",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:53:00.297Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now update the CEO scope summary to match (fixes Consistency #2, #3 and the R6/R9 dependency).",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:54:28.267Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Lines 1–77 are unchanged from the previous read (same baseline edits); lines 78–93 carry the amended R0–R12. Both inputs reconciled. Launch 2.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:55:20.224Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Launch 2 is running against both amended inputs. Holding until its completion notification; no edits to either input in the meantime.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:55:31.886Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Launch 2: 8/10, 13 new issues (Completeness 4, Consistency 2, Clarity 3, Scope 2, Feasibility 2), none repeating launch 1. Resolving each through 0D and amending both inputs for the third and final launch.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:57:59.935Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now sync the scope summary.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T07:59:53.441Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Full read of the launch-3 input complete (lines 1–78 byte-identical to the prior input, 79–93 amended R0–R12). Dispatching the third and final reviewer launch.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:00:57.295Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Launch 3 (the last permitted) is running. Whatever it returns closes the loop: its findings get recorded as reviewer concerns rather than triggering another dispatch. Holding until the notification.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:01:11.235Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Launch 3: 8/10, 18 issues (Completeness 6, Consistency 3, Clarity 6, Scope PASS, Feasibility 3). Three launches used, so the loop closes here. Launches 2 and 3 each confirmed the prior round's fixes (31 reviewer-confirmed); the 18 new items are all one-sentence fixes, so I'm applying them now and recording them as addressed-but-unconfirmed reviewer concerns.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:03:55.587Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the baseline edit for the top-level \"Out of scope\" pointer (Consistency #3) and the audit rows.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:05:16.156Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the Spec Review Loop record in the Review record, then the summary, then `amend-input` to regenerate the Implementation copy.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:05:38.409Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now re-run `amend-input` to apply the 4th baseline edit and confirm the hand-edited Implementation copy is accepted.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:09:15.220Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Accepted. Reading the regenerated input in full to reconcile.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:09:59.211Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Spec loop closed. Now Step 0 is complete; per ceo-phase.md, the next step is a fresh `create ceo` and native voice dispatch. Re-reading the relevant section of ceo-phase.md to execute it exactly.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:11:25.688Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "`<CEO_INPUT>` = `autoplan-ceo-NGRK22/ceo-implementation.md` (sha `0611221a…`, matches the reconciled review input). Dispatching the native CEO voice with `nativeDispatchPrompt` verbatim.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:11:48.700Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Waiting for the native CEO reviewer to complete.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:12:00.608Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Native voice result is valid: it starts with `INPUT: ceo 0611221a…`, matching the snapshot hash. Codex passes skipped (codex_reviews disabled) — running Claude adversarial only. Recording the dual-voice outcome, then processing F1–F14.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:14:13.224Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Accepted. Now the audit rows and the dual-voices / Sections 1–11 record in the Review record.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:15:28.319Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Also R6 needs the flag-read failure branch, and R0 the CSRF-class check:",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:17:33.203Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Accepted. Now the audit rows for the section findings, then the full Step 0.5 + Sections 1–11 record.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:18:02.910Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the Step 0.5 dual voices record and Sections 1–11, appended after 0I.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:18:23.860Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Now the JSONL task artifact via `jq -nc` (write to GSTACK_HOME is permitted).",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:25:56.999Z"
    },
    {
      "sessionId": "45abf2fa-0d62-471f-9efa-9a0d5b2ec1b5",
      "text": "Task JSONL written (11 lines). Now reading `phase-close.md` afresh to close Phase 1.",
      "timestamp": "2026-09-16T08:26:23.970Z"
    }
  ]
}