Files
gstack/scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts
T
Garry Tan 0926e4b994 refactor: split preamble.ts into submodules (byte-identical output)
Splits scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts (841 lines, 18 generator functions +
composition root) into one file per generator under
scripts/resolvers/preamble/. Root preamble.ts becomes a thin composition
layer (~80 lines of imports + generatePreamble).

Before:
  scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts  841 lines

After:
  scripts/resolvers/preamble.ts                                   83 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts            97 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-upgrade-check.ts            48 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-lake-intro.ts               16 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-telemetry-prompt.ts         37 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-proactive-prompt.ts         25 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-routing-injection.ts        49 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-vendoring-deprecation.ts    36 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-spawned-session-check.ts    11 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts          16 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completeness-section.ts     19 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-repo-mode-section.ts        12 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-test-failure-triage.ts     108 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-search-before-building.ts   14 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-completion-status.ts       161 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-voice-directive.ts          60 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-context-recovery.ts         51 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-continuous-checkpoint.ts    48 lines
  scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-context-health.ts           31 lines

Byte-identity verification (the real gate per Codex correction):
- Before refactor: snapshotted 135 generated SKILL.md files via
  `find -name SKILL.md -type f | grep -v /gstack/` across all hosts.
- After refactor: regenerated with `bun run gen:skill-docs --host all`
  and re-snapshotted.
- `diff -r baseline after` returned zero differences and exit 0.

The `--host all --dry-run` gate passes too. No template or host behavior
changes — purely a code-organization refactor.

Test fix: audit-compliance.test.ts's telemetry check previously grepped
preamble.ts directly for `_TEL != "off"`. After the refactor that logic
lives in preamble/generate-preamble-bash.ts. Test now concatenates all
preamble submodule sources before asserting — tracks the semantic contract,
not the file layout. Doing the minimum rewrite preserves the test's intent
(conditional telemetry) without coupling it to file boundaries.

Why now: we were in-session with full context. Codex had downgraded this
from mandatory to optional, but the preamble had grown to 841 lines and
was getting harder to navigate. User asked "why not?" given the context
was hot. Shipping it as a clean bisectable commit while all the prior
preamble.ts changes are fresh reduces rebase pain later.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-17 06:43:19 +08:00

17 lines
1.5 KiB
TypeScript

import type { TemplateContext } from '../types';
export function generateAskUserFormat(_ctx: TemplateContext): string {
return `## AskUserQuestion Format
**ALWAYS follow this structure for every AskUserQuestion call:**
1. **Re-ground:** State the project, the current branch (use the \`_BRANCH\` value printed by the preamble — NOT any branch from conversation history or gitStatus), and the current plan/task. (1-2 sentences)
2. **Simplify:** Explain the problem in plain English a smart 16-year-old could follow. No raw function names, no internal jargon, no implementation details. Use concrete examples and analogies. Say what it DOES, not what it's called.
3. **Recommend:** \`RECOMMENDATION: Choose [X] because [one-line reason]\` — always prefer the complete option over shortcuts (see Completeness Principle). Include \`Completeness: X/10\` for each option. Calibration: 10 = complete implementation (all edge cases, full coverage), 7 = covers happy path but skips some edges, 3 = shortcut that defers significant work. If both options are 8+, pick the higher; if one is ≤5, flag it.
4. **Options:** Lettered options: \`A) ... B) ... C) ...\` — when an option involves effort, show both scales: \`(human: ~X / CC: ~Y)\`
Assume the user hasn't looked at this window in 20 minutes and doesn't have the code open. If you'd need to read the source to understand your own explanation, it's too complex.
Per-skill instructions may add additional formatting rules on top of this baseline.`;
}