Files
gstack/docs
Garry Tan dc6c114b7e docs: four precision fixes on LOC controversy post
1. Citation fix. Kernighan didn't say anything about LOC-as-metric
   (that's the famous "aircraft building by weight" quote, commonly
   misattributed but actually Bill Gates). Replaced "Kernighan implied
   it before that" with the real Dijkstra quote ("lines produced" vs
   "lines spent" from EWD1036, with direct link) + the Gates quote.
   Verified via web search.

2. Slop-scan direction clarified. "(highest on his benchmark)" was
   ambiguous — could read as a brag. Now: "Higher score = more slop.
   He ran it on gstack and we scored 5.24, the worst he'd measured
   at the time." Then the 62% cut lands as an actual win.

3. Prose/chart skill-usage ordering now matches. Added /plan-eng-review
   (28,014) to the prose list so it doesn't conflict with the chart
   below it.

4. Cut the "David — I owe you one / GUnit" insider joke. Most readers
   won't connect Cramer → Sentry → GUnit naming. Ends the slop-scan
   paragraph on the stronger line: "Run `bun test` and watch 2,000+
   tests pass."

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-18 13:48:38 +08:00
..