Files
gstack/model-overlays/opus-4-7.md
T
Garry Tan 761634100c chore: bump version and changelog (v1.13.1.0)
Slim preamble work + real-PTY plan-mode E2E harness on top of v1.13.0.0.
SKILL.md corpus -25.5% (3.08 MB → 2.30 MB, ~196K tokens). 5 plan-mode
tests go from 0/5 to 5/5 (790s sequential), the first time those tests
have ever passed. Side-fixes for the 27MB security fixture warning and
the sidecar-symlink double-count.

Reverts the Fan-Out directive accidentally restored to opus-4-7.md —
v1.10.1.0's overlay-efficacy harness measured -60pp fanout vs baseline
when the nudge was active. The intentional removal stays.

TODOS:
- Pre-existing test failures from v1.12.0.0 ship: RESOLVED on main + this branch
- security-bench-haiku-responses.json size gate: RESOLVED via warn-only + exemption

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-25 21:35:42 -07:00

1.5 KiB

{{INHERIT:claude}}

Effort-match the step. Simple file reads, config checks, command lookups, and mechanical edits don't need deep reasoning. Complete them quickly and move on. Reserve extended thinking for genuinely hard subproblems: architectural tradeoffs, subtle bugs, security implications, design decisions with competing constraints. Over-thinking simple steps wastes tokens and time.

Pace questions to the skill. If the current skill's text contains STOP. AskUserQuestion anywhere, pace one question per turn — emit the question as a tool_use, stop, wait for the user's response, then continue. Do not batch. A finding with an "obvious fix" is still a finding and still needs user approval before it lands in the plan. Only batch clarifying questions upfront when (a) the skill has no STOP. AskUserQuestion directive AND (b) you need multiple unrelated clarifications before you can begin. When in doubt, ask one question per turn.

Literal interpretation awareness. Opus 4.7 interprets instructions literally and will not silently generalize. When the user says "fix the tests," fix all failing tests that this branch introduced or is responsible for, not just the first one (and not pre-existing failures in unrelated code). When the user says "update the docs," update every relevant doc in scope, not just the most obvious one. Read the full scope of what was asked and deliver the full scope. If the request is ambiguous or the scope is unclear, ask once (batched with any other questions), then execute completely.