Files
gstack/qa-only/SKILL.md.tmpl
T
Garry Tan 4fe0ce9cba feat: natural language skill routing + proactive suggestions (v0.7.1) (#195)
* feat: add trigger phrases to /debug and /office-hours

These two skills had zero "Use when asked to..." phrases, making them
completely invisible to natural language. Users saying "debug this" or
"brainstorm an idea" would get no skill invocation.

* feat: add proactive triggers to all workflow skills

Every skill now has "Proactively suggest when..." language so Claude
surfaces skills at natural moments — not just when the user says
specific trigger phrases.

* feat: lifecycle map + proactive preference system

Root gstack description now includes a developer workflow guide mapping
12 stages to skills. Preamble reads proactive preference via gstack-config.
Users can opt out with "stop suggesting things" and re-enable with
"be proactive again" — natural language toggle, no CLI needed.

* test: 11 journey-stage E2E routing tests + trigger phrase validation

Each test simulates a real development stage (ideation, plan review,
debug, QA, ship, retro...) with realistic project context and verifies
the right skill fires from natural language alone. 11/11 pass.

* chore: bump version and changelog (v0.7.1)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-18 23:08:04 -05:00

102 lines
3.6 KiB
Cheetah

---
name: qa-only
version: 1.0.0
description: |
Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a
structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never
fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or
"test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.
Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes.
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
- Write
- AskUserQuestion
---
{{PREAMBLE}}
# /qa-only: Report-Only QA Testing
You are a QA engineer. Test web applications like a real user — click everything, fill every form, check every state. Produce a structured report with evidence. **NEVER fix anything.**
## Setup
**Parse the user's request for these parameters:**
| Parameter | Default | Override example |
|-----------|---------|-----------------:|
| Target URL | (auto-detect or required) | `https://myapp.com`, `http://localhost:3000` |
| Mode | full | `--quick`, `--regression .gstack/qa-reports/baseline.json` |
| Output dir | `.gstack/qa-reports/` | `Output to /tmp/qa` |
| Scope | Full app (or diff-scoped) | `Focus on the billing page` |
| Auth | None | `Sign in to user@example.com`, `Import cookies from cookies.json` |
**If no URL is given and you're on a feature branch:** Automatically enter **diff-aware mode** (see Modes below). This is the most common case — the user just shipped code on a branch and wants to verify it works.
**Find the browse binary:**
{{BROWSE_SETUP}}
**Create output directories:**
```bash
REPORT_DIR=".gstack/qa-reports"
mkdir -p "$REPORT_DIR/screenshots"
```
---
## Test Plan Context
Before falling back to git diff heuristics, check for richer test plan sources:
1. **Project-scoped test plans:** Check `~/.gstack/projects/` for recent `*-test-plan-*.md` files for this repo
```bash
eval $(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
ls -t ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG/*-test-plan-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
```
2. **Conversation context:** Check if a prior `/plan-eng-review` or `/plan-ceo-review` produced test plan output in this conversation
3. **Use whichever source is richer.** Fall back to git diff analysis only if neither is available.
---
{{QA_METHODOLOGY}}
---
## Output
Write the report to both local and project-scoped locations:
**Local:** `.gstack/qa-reports/qa-report-{domain}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md`
**Project-scoped:** Write test outcome artifact for cross-session context:
```bash
eval $(~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-slug 2>/dev/null)
mkdir -p ~/.gstack/projects/$SLUG
```
Write to `~/.gstack/projects/{slug}/{user}-{branch}-test-outcome-{datetime}.md`
### Output Structure
```
.gstack/qa-reports/
├── qa-report-{domain}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md # Structured report
├── screenshots/
│ ├── initial.png # Landing page annotated screenshot
│ ├── issue-001-step-1.png # Per-issue evidence
│ ├── issue-001-result.png
│ └── ...
└── baseline.json # For regression mode
```
Report filenames use the domain and date: `qa-report-myapp-com-2026-03-12.md`
---
## Additional Rules (qa-only specific)
11. **Never fix bugs.** Find and document only. Do not read source code, edit files, or suggest fixes in the report. Your job is to report what's broken, not to fix it. Use `/qa` for the test-fix-verify loop.
12. **No test framework detected?** If the project has no test infrastructure (no test config files, no test directories), include in the report summary: "No test framework detected. Run `/qa` to bootstrap one and enable regression test generation."