style: drop dead Candidate fields, simplify resolve_backend, US spelling

- Candidate carries only the fields the arbiter reads (key, label,
  detected_strict, detected_relaxed, features); location/region/confidence were
  vestigial from the removed best_auto_mark max-by-confidence path.
- resolve_backend returns preferred_inpaint_backend() directly (typed Literal)
  instead of an identity ternary.
- colour/normalise/behaviour -> US spelling across code comments and docs.

No behavior change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/known-limitations.md

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ pipelines, strength defaults, or metadata coverage.
 `--tile` (OFF by default; `--tile-size` default 1024, `--tile-overlap` default 128) processes the diffusion pass in overlapping sliding-window tiles instead of one forward pass, so a large image is regenerated at **native resolution** without the OOM and without the lossy `--max-resolution` downscale round-trip. It engages only when the long side exceeds `--tile-size`; a sub-tile image runs a single pass unchanged. `WatermarkRemover.remove_watermark` refactors the single-image `_generate` into a per-tile `_generate_one` (the ControlNet canny edge map is rebuilt per tile, so structure preservation works tile-local) and routes it through `noai.tiling.run_tiled` when tiling is active. The geometry and blend math are pure helpers, unit-tested without the model (`tests/test_tiling.py`):
 
 - `plan_tiles(w, h, tile_size, overlap)` lays out a row-major grid where every tile is exactly `tile_size` (the last tile on each axis is pulled back flush to the far edge, simply overlapping its predecessor more). Uniform tile size keeps each diffusion pass at SDXL's preferred dimension.
-- `feather_weights(w, h, overlap)` is a separable linear taper, ~1 in the interior and ramping toward each edge, kept **strictly positive** so the normalised accumulate-and-divide blend (`accum / weight_sum`) is a partition of unity: a region covered by one feathered edge (an image corner) still divides cleanly. Identical (unchanged) tiles therefore reconstruct the input exactly -- the seam-free guarantee, asserted in `test_identity_generate_reconstructs_image`.
+- `feather_weights(w, h, overlap)` is a separable linear taper, ~1 in the interior and ramping toward each edge, kept **strictly positive** so the normalized accumulate-and-divide blend (`accum / weight_sum`) is a partition of unity: a region covered by one feathered edge (an image corner) still divides cleanly. Identical (unchanged) tiles therefore reconstruct the input exactly -- the seam-free guarantee, asserted in `test_identity_generate_reconstructs_image`.
 
 CAVEAT: each tile is an **independent** low-strength regeneration. At the certified removal strengths (0.20-0.30) the per-tile drift is small and the feather blend hides the seams, but tiling is a memory workaround, not a quality upgrade over a single native pass -- a 32 GB MPS box that clears the native UNet peak should prefer no tiling. The MPS->CPU fallback still applies per tile; if the first tile falls back to CPU, the device stays CPU for the rest of the image.
 

docs/module-internals.md

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ module.
 
 `watermark_registry.py` — **single catalog of known visible watermarks**, the unified "find known marks in their usual places, recognize, remove" entry.
 
-**Localize -> fill by policy (replaced reverse-alpha):** each mark is localized to a binary full-frame footprint mask (a `Localization`), and one shared, swappable fill inpaints that mask via `fill(image, mask, backend=...)` (delegates to `region_eraser.erase`). This replaced the old reverse-alpha removal (invert a captured alpha map, `original = (wm - a*logo)/(1-a)`, plus a thin residual inpaint) for ALL marks — gemini, doubao, jimeng, samsung, and jimeng_pill. **Why it changed:** reverse-alpha depended on a fixed captured alpha map at a fixed position, so it broke whenever a vendor moved or re-rendered its mark; and it was not colour-lossless even with the right map (it amplifies 8-bit quantization and JPEG-chroma error by `1/(1-a)`), which showed up as "the colour just changed, not removed" reports. Localize -> fill has a benign failure mode: a slightly-off localization just inpaints a small region near-losslessly instead of leaving a colour-shifted smear. The captured alpha maps are still used to DETECT the marks and to shape the mask (gemini's footprint), but NOT for pixel recovery. Fill backends: `cv2` (classical inpaint, no deps, the floor), `migan` (MI-GAN ONNX, light, the preferred default when the `migan` extra is installed), `lama` (big-LaMa ONNX, best quality, heavier, explicit opt-in); `auto` = MI-GAN if installed, else cv2. Each `KnownMark` ties a key to {usual `location`, `in_auto` flag, a `_detect` callable → uniform `MarkDetection`, a `_mask` callable → full-frame footprint mask}; `KnownMark.remove(image, *, backend="auto", provenance=False, force=False)`. Entries today: `gemini` (bottom-right sparkle), `doubao` (bottom-right "豆包AI生成"), `jimeng` (bottom-right "★ 即梦AI"), `samsung` (bottom-**LEFT** "✦ Contenuti generati dall'AI", Samsung Galaxy AI, Italian locale), and the capture-less `jimeng_pill` (top-left "AI生成"). `detect_marks(image, *, provenance=frozenset())` scans all (strict, for the identify verdict); `remove_auto_marks(image, *, sensitivity="auto", provenance=frozenset(), backend="auto")` removes every detected mark in one pass. **Sensitivity (`auto`/`strict`/`assume_ai`)** decides how hard a borderline mark is trusted: the visual detectors are pixel-based (no metadata needed) and the recall gain comes from relaxing the false-positive gate, not from metadata. `resolve_relax` turns the policy + evidence into the per-mark relaxation boolean — `strict` never relaxes, `assume_ai` always relaxes (the caller asserts AI, e.g. a metadata-stripped screenshot; ~46% -> ~92% Gemini recall, at the cost of a small near-lossless fill on some clean corners), `auto` relaxes only on same-product evidence (metadata provenance for that vendor, or a confidently strict-detected sibling of the same `_PRODUCT_OF` — Doubao and Jimeng are both bottom-right ByteDance but distinct products, so they do NOT cross-relax). **Perception / decision / action are separated three ways** (the removal path only; `identify` keeps calling `KnownMark.detect` directly, so its verdict is untouched): `_build_candidates(image)` is PERCEPTION — it runs each detector at both trust levels and packages raw verdicts + the pill's flatness feature into `Candidate`s, no policy; `decide(candidates, Context(sensitivity, provenance)) -> [Decision]` is the pure DECISION arbiter — all keep/drop policy (`resolve_relax` cross-mark corroboration + the pill gate) in one image-free, unit-testable function (`tests/test_watermark_registry.py::TestArbiter`); then `remove_auto_marks` does the ACTION, localizing -> filling each winner. The Gemini FP gate deliberately stays inside `gemini_engine` (not the arbiter) because `identify` reads that same gated confidence — pulling it out would drift the provenance verdict. Behavior is byte-identical to the pre-arbiter two-pass (corpus-verified: strict/auto 46%, assume_ai 92% Gemini recall unchanged).
+**Localize -> fill by policy (replaced reverse-alpha):** each mark is localized to a binary full-frame footprint mask (a `Localization`), and one shared, swappable fill inpaints that mask via `fill(image, mask, backend=...)` (delegates to `region_eraser.erase`). This replaced the old reverse-alpha removal (invert a captured alpha map, `original = (wm - a*logo)/(1-a)`, plus a thin residual inpaint) for ALL marks — gemini, doubao, jimeng, samsung, and jimeng_pill. **Why it changed:** reverse-alpha depended on a fixed captured alpha map at a fixed position, so it broke whenever a vendor moved or re-rendered its mark; and it was not color-lossless even with the right map (it amplifies 8-bit quantization and JPEG-chroma error by `1/(1-a)`), which showed up as "the color just changed, not removed" reports. Localize -> fill has a benign failure mode: a slightly-off localization just inpaints a small region near-losslessly instead of leaving a color-shifted smear. The captured alpha maps are still used to DETECT the marks and to shape the mask (gemini's footprint), but NOT for pixel recovery. Fill backends: `cv2` (classical inpaint, no deps, the floor), `migan` (MI-GAN ONNX, light, the preferred default when the `migan` extra is installed), `lama` (big-LaMa ONNX, best quality, heavier, explicit opt-in); `auto` = MI-GAN if installed, else cv2. Each `KnownMark` ties a key to {usual `location`, `in_auto` flag, a `_detect` callable → uniform `MarkDetection`, a `_mask` callable → full-frame footprint mask}; `KnownMark.remove(image, *, backend="auto", provenance=False, force=False)`. Entries today: `gemini` (bottom-right sparkle), `doubao` (bottom-right "豆包AI生成"), `jimeng` (bottom-right "★ 即梦AI"), `samsung` (bottom-**LEFT** "✦ Contenuti generati dall'AI", Samsung Galaxy AI, Italian locale), and the capture-less `jimeng_pill` (top-left "AI生成"). `detect_marks(image, *, provenance=frozenset())` scans all (strict, for the identify verdict); `remove_auto_marks(image, *, sensitivity="auto", provenance=frozenset(), backend="auto")` removes every detected mark in one pass. **Sensitivity (`auto`/`strict`/`assume_ai`)** decides how hard a borderline mark is trusted: the visual detectors are pixel-based (no metadata needed) and the recall gain comes from relaxing the false-positive gate, not from metadata. `resolve_relax` turns the policy + evidence into the per-mark relaxation boolean — `strict` never relaxes, `assume_ai` always relaxes (the caller asserts AI, e.g. a metadata-stripped screenshot; ~46% -> ~92% Gemini recall, at the cost of a small near-lossless fill on some clean corners), `auto` relaxes only on same-product evidence (metadata provenance for that vendor, or a confidently strict-detected sibling of the same `_PRODUCT_OF` — Doubao and Jimeng are both bottom-right ByteDance but distinct products, so they do NOT cross-relax). **Perception / decision / action are separated three ways** (the removal path only; `identify` keeps calling `KnownMark.detect` directly, so its verdict is untouched): `_build_candidates(image)` is PERCEPTION — it runs each detector at both trust levels and packages raw verdicts + the pill's flatness feature into `Candidate`s, no policy; `decide(candidates, Context(sensitivity, provenance)) -> [Decision]` is the pure DECISION arbiter — all keep/drop policy (`resolve_relax` cross-mark corroboration + the pill gate) in one image-free, unit-testable function (`tests/test_watermark_registry.py::TestArbiter`); then `remove_auto_marks` does the ACTION, localizing -> filling each winner. The Gemini FP gate deliberately stays inside `gemini_engine` (not the arbiter) because `identify` reads that same gated confidence — pulling it out would drift the provenance verdict. Behavior is byte-identical to the pre-arbiter two-pass (corpus-verified: strict/auto 46%, assume_ai 92% Gemini recall unchanged).
 
 **Provenance prior:** when local metadata already confirms the vendor, the mark's detection trust gate is relaxed (a confirmed vendor means the mark is present with high prior, so a mark the conservative detector would demote as a content false positive is trusted). `detect_marks` / `remove_auto_marks` take a `provenance` frozenset and `KnownMark.remove` a `provenance` flag. Mapping: a Google/Gemini C2PA issuer relaxes gemini (skips its false-positive gate and lowers the trust threshold from 0.5 to 0.35); a China-AIGC (TC260) label relaxes doubao/jimeng; `samsung_genai` relaxes samsung. Corpus finding: on Google-C2PA images, Gemini sparkle recall rose from ~46% (plain detector) to ~90% with the provenance prior (recovering marks the vendor moved or re-rendered). The localizer is cheap CPU (cv2/numpy), so a memory-tight caller runs it anywhere; the heavy MI-GAN/LaMa fill is opt-in and chosen by the caller.
 
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ module.
 
 The cost (mislabel ~8-33% of non-Gemini content as Gemini) outweighs the benefit -- the visible sparkle is a medium-confidence stripped-metadata fallback, and intact Gemini is caught by C2PA in `identify` regardless. Remaining square misses are an accepted known limitation; a real fix would need a sparkle-specific discriminator (template match on a background-subtracted image, or a hard fixed-margin position prior), which is open research, not a threshold tweak.
 
-**Removal is localize -> fill** (`footprint_mask` → `watermark_registry.fill`): `footprint_mask` returns the sparkle footprint = the captured alpha (computed `alpha = max(R,G,B)/255` from the bundled sparkle-on-black captures `assets/gemini_bg_{96,48}.png`, capture max ~130 for the ~51%-opaque overlay) thresholded LOW so the faint halo is included, then dilated by a sparkle-relative margin. That binary mask is inpainted by the shared fill (cv2 / MI-GAN / big-LaMa). The captured alpha maps are used only to detect and to shape the mask, not for pixel recovery. This replaced the old reverse-alpha removal path; because the fill only reconstructs the masked footprint from its surroundings (rather than dividing by `1-a`), the whole reverse-alpha removal tail — the over-subtraction guard (`_reverse_alpha_oversubtracts`, the dark-background black-pit fix), the under-subtraction alpha-gain estimate (`_estimate_alpha_gain`), and the self-verify repair — is GONE, along with the near-white `1/(1-a)` ill-conditioning and the "colour changed, not removed" failure mode those guards patched around. A slightly-off localization now just fills a small region near-losslessly instead of leaving a colour-shifted smear.
+**Removal is localize -> fill** (`footprint_mask` → `watermark_registry.fill`): `footprint_mask` returns the sparkle footprint = the captured alpha (computed `alpha = max(R,G,B)/255` from the bundled sparkle-on-black captures `assets/gemini_bg_{96,48}.png`, capture max ~130 for the ~51%-opaque overlay) thresholded LOW so the faint halo is included, then dilated by a sparkle-relative margin. That binary mask is inpainted by the shared fill (cv2 / MI-GAN / big-LaMa). The captured alpha maps are used only to detect and to shape the mask, not for pixel recovery. This replaced the old reverse-alpha removal path; because the fill only reconstructs the masked footprint from its surroundings (rather than dividing by `1-a`), the whole reverse-alpha removal tail — the over-subtraction guard (`_reverse_alpha_oversubtracts`, the dark-background black-pit fix), the under-subtraction alpha-gain estimate (`_estimate_alpha_gain`), and the self-verify repair — is GONE, along with the near-white `1/(1-a)` ill-conditioning and the "color changed, not removed" failure mode those guards patched around. A slightly-off localization now just fills a small region near-losslessly instead of leaving a color-shifted smear.
 
 **False-positive gate (added 2026-06-03):** `detect_watermark`'s shape-only NCC (`spatial*0.5 + gradient*0.3 + var*0.2`) fires on ornate/flat content (text strips, banners, hatching) that coincidentally matches the diamond shape — a real Gemini sparkle is a bright WHITE overlay, so its core sits above the local background, but the NCC is contrast-invariant and cannot see that. The fusion now **demotes** (caps confidence to 0.30) any low-confidence (`< _SPARKLE_FP_CONF` 0.65) match that shows NEITHER real-sparkle signature: a bright core (`_core_ring_margin >= _SPARKLE_FP_MARGIN` 5) OR a crisp star silhouette (`gradient_score >= _SPARKLE_FP_GRAD` 0.55). I.e. demote when `low_margin OR low_grad`. Real sparkles escape via high confidence (white-bg sparkles score ≥0.79 despite a low margin — the NCC shape match is strong), high margin (dark/mid backgrounds, incl. the #36 faint-corner case, lift well clear), OR high gradient (a real sparkle is grad ~0.97–1.0). **The gradient condition (added 2026-06-26) closes the bright-background FP class** the margin check alone missed: a snow+sky photo and a white-background product render both scored ~0.51 at `identify`, because a bright background gives the match a HIGH core-ring margin (it genuinely IS brighter than its surroundings), so the brightness gate read it as a real overlay — but a smooth luminance blob that shape-NCC-matches the rough diamond has low gradient fidelity (the two FPs measured grad 0.105 and 0.463 vs ≥0.8 for real sparkles), so the gradient floor demotes them. The OR is **strictly a superset** of the old margin-only demotion (it only ADDS demotions on bright backgrounds, where a real sparkle keeps grad ~0.97), so it cannot regress a dark/mid sparkle (kept by margin) or a white-bg one (kept by confidence ≥ 0.65). The gate is **monotonic** (only ever removes detections, never adds), so it cannot regress the verified-negative corpus (already 0 FPs); the 2026-06-26 corpus re-sweep flipped only OpenAI/ChatGPT content (no Gemini sparkle exists there) and already-`cleaned/` outputs, all sub-0.5 (below the `identify` threshold), so no provenance verdict changed. The original gate demoted 16/495 flagged sparkles on the validation corpus (13 carried no AI metadata = content FPs; the 3 AI-meta were visually FPs / a near-invisible white-on-white sparkle whose AI verdict is held by metadata anyway). `_core_ring_margin` uses the `_core_and_bg` helper (core 75th-pct brightness vs background-ring median). This gate is detection-side and unchanged by the localize -> fill refactor; the provenance prior skips it when a Google/Gemini C2PA issuer confirms the vendor. Regression-guarded by `test_gemini_engine.py::TestSparkleFalsePositiveGate` (incl. `test_bright_background_low_gradient_match_demoted`).
 
@@ -97,15 +97,15 @@ The cost (mislabel ~8-33% of non-Gemini content as Gemini) outweighs the benefit
 
 `_text_mark_engine.py` — **shared base for the three text-mark engines (Doubao/Jimeng/Samsung), extracted 2026-06-09** (they were ~90% byte-identical clones). `TextMarkEngine(config: TextMarkConfig)` owns the `locate → extract_mask → detect` detection pipeline plus the removal that localizes the glyph blob to a footprint mask and hands it to the shared `watermark_registry.fill` (+ the asset-keyed `load_alpha_template`/`glyph_silhouette`/`template_match_score` caches). Detection still matches the glyph silhouette (NCC against the captured template); the removal MASK is TEMPLATE-FREE — it is the bounding box of the top-hat glyph blob from `extract_mask`, filled solid + dilated, so a re-rendered or differently-placed mark is still masked. This dropped the fixed alpha-template placement; the captured alpha maps are now used only for the detection silhouette, not for removal. Each engine module is a thin subclass supplying only its `TextMarkConfig` (the tuned constants, the bundled asset, and the bounded structural deltas — `corner` br/bl, `margin_floor` 4/2, `morph_open_size` 5/3, `min_gw` 8/16) plus the test-facing module shims (`_alpha_template`/`_glyph_silhouette`/`_template_match_score` + the constants). Gemini stays a SEPARATE engine (its multi-size fixed-slot sparkle model is genuinely different). Add a new text mark = a new `TextMarkConfig` + a thin subclass + one registry `_text_mark(...)` row. The engine bullets below describe each mark's calibration history; the LOGIC lives here. **Small-image detection guard (`_MIN_DETECT_SHORT_SIDE` 200, added 2026-06-26):** `detect` returns not-detected when the image short side is below 200px. Below that the glyph template degrades to the `min_gw` floor (~8px) and `TM_CCOEFF_NORMED` on a few pixels is noise, so an unrelated small geometric shape can spuriously correlate with the CJK silhouette — a 48×48 app-icon chevron scored Doubao 0.41 / Jimeng 0.47 (both above their thresholds), a pure small-size artifact (the same icon upscaled collapses to ~0.06–0.10 NCC at ≥256px). A real AI-generation label is stamped on a full-resolution render (the captured samples are 1086–2048px wide, the smallest positive test image is 1086px), so the floor sits far below any genuine mark while killing the icon/thumbnail band (≤96px); `identify` falls back to "unknown" (the safe default) and removal, gated on detection, is suppressed too. Regression-guarded by `test_{doubao,jimeng,samsung}_engine.py::TestDetect::test_small_image_guarded_from_false_positive`.
 
-**Removal is localize -> fill.** The engine localizes the glyph blob (`extract_mask` over the located box) into a solid, dilated footprint mask and hands it to the shared `watermark_registry.fill` (cv2 / MI-GAN / big-LaMa). The template-free mask (bounding box of the glyph blob, not the fixed alpha template) means a re-rendered or moved mark is still covered, and the fill reconstructs the box from its surroundings. On corpus images doubao and jimeng localize + remove at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no colour shift, no dark pit); clean images with no vendor signature had 0% false removal.
+**Removal is localize -> fill.** The engine localizes the glyph blob (`extract_mask` over the located box) into a solid, dilated footprint mask and hands it to the shared `watermark_registry.fill` (cv2 / MI-GAN / big-LaMa). The template-free mask (bounding box of the glyph blob, not the fixed alpha template) means a re-rendered or moved mark is still covered, and the fill reconstructs the box from its surroundings. On corpus images doubao and jimeng localize + remove at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no color shift, no dark pit); clean images with no vendor signature had 0% false removal.
 
-**The reverse-alpha removal machinery is retired.** The old per-glyph reverse-alpha blend (`_apply_reverse_alpha`), the fixed/aligned alpha-map helpers, the over-subtraction guard (`_reverse_alpha_oversubtracts` → `_inpaint_footprint`, the dark-pit fix on dark/mid-tone backgrounds), and the always-align placement search are all gone — the fill reconstructs the footprint from its surroundings rather than inverting the captured alpha, so the dark-pit and colour-shift failure modes those guards patched around no longer arise. `extract_mask` still returns a box-sized (`(loc.h, loc.w)`) mask rather than a full frame, which keeps the memory-tight `identify` detect path cheap.
+**The reverse-alpha removal machinery is retired.** The old per-glyph reverse-alpha blend (`_apply_reverse_alpha`), the fixed/aligned alpha-map helpers, the over-subtraction guard (`_reverse_alpha_oversubtracts` → `_inpaint_footprint`, the dark-pit fix on dark/mid-tone backgrounds), and the always-align placement search are all gone — the fill reconstructs the footprint from its surroundings rather than inverting the captured alpha, so the dark-pit and color-shift failure modes those guards patched around no longer arise. `extract_mask` still returns a box-sized (`(loc.h, loc.w)`) mask rather than a full frame, which keeps the memory-tight `identify` detect path cheap.
 
 ## `doubao_engine.py`
 
 `doubao_engine.py` — **a thin `_text_mark_engine.TextMarkEngine` subclass (config only) since 2026-06-09.** visible Doubao "豆包AI生成" detector + localizer (cv2/numpy, no GPU). `DoubaoEngine.locate` anchors a bottom-right box by **geometry** (mark scales with image WIDTH), `extract_mask` pulls the light, low-chroma glyphs (the detection candidate) using a per-pixel channel-spread proxy `sat = roi.max(axis=2) - roi.min(axis=2)` (no HSV conversion). `detect` is **shape-consistent**: it matches the bundled glyph silhouette (`assets/doubao_alpha.png`) against the candidate via zero-mean normalized correlation (`_template_match_score`, cv2 `TM_CCOEFF_NORMED`), gated at `DETECT_NCC_THRESHOLD` 0.4 over a small `DETECT_MIN_COVERAGE` floor. Keying on glyph SHAPE (not coverage heuristics) fixed #23 (corpus FP 7/1243).
 
-**Removal is localize -> fill:** the glyph blob is localized to a solid, dilated footprint mask (`extract_mask` over the located box) and the shared `watermark_registry.fill` inpaints it. On corpus images this removes at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no colour shift, no dark pit).
+**Removal is localize -> fill:** the glyph blob is localized to a solid, dilated footprint mask (`extract_mask` over the located box) and the shared `watermark_registry.fill` inpaints it. On corpus images this removes at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no color shift, no dark pit).
 
 **The detection template (`assets/doubao_alpha.png`) is rebuilt by `scripts/visible_alpha_solve.py`** (the careful gray-self solve: cubic background fit, mean over channels, full halo, unblurred), same recipe as Jimeng — the captures are committed in `data/doubao_capture/captures/`. It is used only as the detection silhouette, not for pixel recovery.
 
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ The cost (mislabel ~8-33% of non-Gemini content as Gemini) outweighs the benefit
 
 **The detection template (`assets/jimeng_alpha.png`) is rebuilt by `scripts/visible_alpha_solve.py` from the GRAY capture** (`data/jimeng_capture/captures/`, the solid captures committed): `a = (I - B)/(255 - B)`, B a per-capture **cubic** background fit over the non-glyph pixels, **averaged over channels, full halo extent (down to a~0.02), unblurred**. Gray (bg ~132) is the deliberate choice over black: it is the best proxy for real content (the mark sits on bright photo areas, not on black). The captured template is used only as the detection silhouette, not for pixel recovery. Solver geometry at `_ALPHA_NATIVE_WIDTH` 2048: `_ALPHA_WIDTH_FRAC` 0.202, `_ALPHA_HEIGHT_FRAC` 0.058, margins ~0.029.
 
-**Removal is localize -> fill:** the glyph blob is localized to a solid, dilated footprint mask and the shared `watermark_registry.fill` inpaints it; the `WM_*` locate box is generous so a re-rasterized, corner-ward-shifted mark stays inside the localized box (the same widen that fixed Doubao). On corpus images this removes at ~100% with clean footprints (blends within a few LAB levels, no colour shift). The registry gates removal on `detect`.
+**Removal is localize -> fill:** the glyph blob is localized to a solid, dilated footprint mask and the shared `watermark_registry.fill` inpaints it; the `WM_*` locate box is generous so a re-rasterized, corner-ward-shifted mark stays inside the localized box (the same widen that fixed Doubao). On corpus images this removes at ~100% with clean footprints (blends within a few LAB levels, no color shift). The registry gates removal on `detect`.
 
 **No committed real sample** (only the solid calibration captures are committed) — `tests/test_jimeng_engine.py` synthesizes a mark from the bundled template, and `test_recovers_shifted_mark_on_texture` guards the localize-on-shift path that the Doubao defect exposed. Jimeng images are independently caught by the China TC260 AIGC label in `metadata`/`identify`, so this engine is the visible-mark *removal* path, not a new `identify` signal.
 
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ At the shared low removal strength the canny edge-conditioning keeps the regener
 
 ## `noai/tiling.py`
 
-Pure sliding-window tiling for the diffusion path (no torch import; numpy/PIL only). `plan_tiles(w, h, tile_size, overlap)` returns a row-major grid of uniform-size `Tile` boxes — every tile is exactly `tile_size` (the SDXL training size), with the last tile on each axis pulled back flush to the far edge (`_axis_positions` clamps a pathological `overlap >= tile` to `tile - 1` so the step stays >= 1). `feather_weights(w, h, overlap)` is a separable linear taper (1 in the interior, ramping toward each edge) floored at `_WEIGHT_EPS` so it is **strictly positive everywhere** — that makes the normalised `accum / weight_sum` blend a partition of unity, so identical/unchanged tiles reconstruct the input exactly (the seam-free guarantee). `run_tiled(generate_tile, image, tile_size, overlap, set_progress)` is the orchestration loop: crop each planned tile, call `generate_tile` (one diffusion pass on a single PIL tile — injected, so this stays decoupled from the pipeline), resize a latent-grid-rounded result back to the exact tile size, and feather-accumulate. All three are unit-tested without the model (`tests/test_tiling.py`: axis math, grid coverage, taper shape/symmetry/positivity, identity reconstruction, per-tile call count, and the resize-back path). New blend tuning belongs in these pure helpers, not inlined into the runner.
+Pure sliding-window tiling for the diffusion path (no torch import; numpy/PIL only). `plan_tiles(w, h, tile_size, overlap)` returns a row-major grid of uniform-size `Tile` boxes — every tile is exactly `tile_size` (the SDXL training size), with the last tile on each axis pulled back flush to the far edge (`_axis_positions` clamps a pathological `overlap >= tile` to `tile - 1` so the step stays >= 1). `feather_weights(w, h, overlap)` is a separable linear taper (1 in the interior, ramping toward each edge) floored at `_WEIGHT_EPS` so it is **strictly positive everywhere** — that makes the normalized `accum / weight_sum` blend a partition of unity, so identical/unchanged tiles reconstruct the input exactly (the seam-free guarantee). `run_tiled(generate_tile, image, tile_size, overlap, set_progress)` is the orchestration loop: crop each planned tile, call `generate_tile` (one diffusion pass on a single PIL tile — injected, so this stays decoupled from the pipeline), resize a latent-grid-rounded result back to the exact tile size, and feather-accumulate. All three are unit-tested without the model (`tests/test_tiling.py`: axis math, grid coverage, taper shape/symmetry/positivity, identity reconstruction, per-tile call count, and the resize-back path). New blend tuning belongs in these pure helpers, not inlined into the runner.
 
 `feather_region_composite(base, regenerated, box, *, feather)` is the pure region-targeted compositor for **AI-enhanced composites** (roadmap P1#8; `identify` `ai_source_kind == "enhanced"`, digitalSourceType `compositeWithTrainedAlgorithmicMedia`). It blends `regenerated` over `base` inside `box = (x, y, w, h)` with a separable linear taper of `feather` px at the box edges (the taper anchors to ~0 at the boundary, so unlike `feather_weights` it is NOT floored — the result equals `base` EXACTLY outside the box), preserving dtype and supporting HxW or HxWxC. It backs `WatermarkRemover.remove_watermark(region=..., region_feather=...)`: the remover regenerates the frame (or tiles), then composites only the AI box back over the original input, so the real photo outside the box stays pixel-exact and only the AI region is scrubbed. The box is caller-supplied (a C2PA composite manifest carries no reliable machine-readable region); the no-model lossless region path remains `region_eraser.erase`. Unit-tested in `tests/test_tiling.py::TestFeatherRegionComposite` (outside-box exactness, interior == regenerated, hard-paste at feather 0, monotonic seam ramp, dtype/grayscale/clamp/empty-box/shape-mismatch).
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Diffusion SynthID removal. The `--tile/--no-tile` knob is the *lossless* alterna
 
 ### `visible`
 
-Known-visible-mark removal by **localize -> fill**: each detected mark is localized to a binary full-frame footprint mask, then one shared, swappable fill inpaints that mask. `--backend auto|cv2|migan|lama` (default `auto`) picks the fill: `cv2` (classical inpaint, no deps, the floor), `migan` (MI-GAN ONNX, the preferred default when the `migan` extra is installed), `lama` (big-LaMa ONNX, best quality, heavier, explicit opt-in); `auto` = MI-GAN if installed, else cv2 (big-LaMa is NOT auto-selected). `--sensitivity auto|strict|assume-ai` (default `auto`) controls how hard a borderline mark is trusted (see the registry section: the visual detectors are metadata-independent; `auto` relaxes a mark only on same-product evidence, `assume-ai` relaxes every mark on the caller's AI assertion — the only path to high recall on a metadata-stripped screenshot). `--backend` and `--sensitivity` are shared across `visible`/`all`/`batch`. Detection keys on each mark's own shape, and under `auto` the trust gate is relaxed when local metadata confirms the vendor (a Google/Gemini C2PA issuer relaxes gemini, a China-AIGC label relaxes doubao/jimeng, `samsung_genai` relaxes samsung), so a moved or re-rendered mark is still caught. `--mark auto` (default) removes EVERY detected mark in one pass (`registry.remove_auto_marks`, not the single strongest -- a Jimeng-basic image carries both the top-left pill and the bottom-right wordmark) from: the Gemini sparkle, the Doubao "豆包AI生成" text strip, the Jimeng "★ 即梦AI" wordmark, the Samsung Galaxy AI "✦ Contenuti generati dall'AI" strip (bottom-LEFT, Italian-locale detection), and the capture-less Jimeng "AI生成" pill (top-left, `pill_engine`). The pill's weak edge-NCC detector is gated in `remove_auto_marks` via `_keep_pill` (32k real-upload corpus validation 2026-07): never on Doubao, and two confirmation arms since metadata confirms the platform, not pill presence. (1) The bottom-right wordmark fired — ~94% precise and survives metadata-STRIPPED uploads (screenshots / re-saves) — removes the pill unrestricted. (2) TC260 metadata confirms Jimeng (`"jimeng" in provenance`, from `cli._visible_provenance`) OR the caller asserts AI (`sensitivity == "assume_ai"`), no wordmark — ~27% precise, its false fires are textured ceilings/walls that the fill visibly SMEARS — removes the pill ONLY when the top-left footprint is flat enough for an invisible fill (`pill_engine.footprint_is_flat`, median-Sobel ≤ `_FLAT_TEXTURE_MAX`; the flatness guard holds even under `assume_ai`). No confirmation → never removed. `--mark gemini|doubao|jimeng|samsung|jimeng_pill` forces one (choices come from the registry). Corpus validation: doubao and jimeng localize + remove at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no colour shift, no dark pit); clean images with no vendor signature had 0% false removal. For arbitrary logos/objects use `erase`. **When `--mark auto` finds no known mark (the common case — ~74% of real uploads carry no registered visible mark), the command does NOT silently re-serve the input as a finished result.** It runs a cheap metadata-only `identify`, prints actionable guidance (if the image carries an invisible/metadata mark, e.g. an OpenAI/Gemini C2PA image, it points to `all`; otherwise it does NOT imply the image is clean -- it warns that an invisible pixel watermark like SynthID cannot be detected once the metadata proxy is gone and routes to both `all` and `erase --region`), writes NO output file, and exits **`EXIT_NO_VISIBLE_MARK` (2)** — distinct from success (0) and a hard error (1) so a wrapping service (raiw.cc) can surface the message instead of treating the unchanged image as done (the production "it didn't work" / score-0 trap). Same handling for an explicit `--mark <name>` that is not detected. Helper `cli._no_visible_mark_exit`; regression-guarded by `tests/test_cli.py::TestVisibleCommand::test_visible_auto_no_mark_exits_two_with_eraser_hint` and `test_visible_auto_no_mark_routes_to_all_when_metadata`. `--no-detect` still forces the gemini fallback and proceeds (exit 0).
+Known-visible-mark removal by **localize -> fill**: each detected mark is localized to a binary full-frame footprint mask, then one shared, swappable fill inpaints that mask. `--backend auto|cv2|migan|lama` (default `auto`) picks the fill: `cv2` (classical inpaint, no deps, the floor), `migan` (MI-GAN ONNX, the preferred default when the `migan` extra is installed), `lama` (big-LaMa ONNX, best quality, heavier, explicit opt-in); `auto` = MI-GAN if installed, else cv2 (big-LaMa is NOT auto-selected). `--sensitivity auto|strict|assume-ai` (default `auto`) controls how hard a borderline mark is trusted (see the registry section: the visual detectors are metadata-independent; `auto` relaxes a mark only on same-product evidence, `assume-ai` relaxes every mark on the caller's AI assertion — the only path to high recall on a metadata-stripped screenshot). `--backend` and `--sensitivity` are shared across `visible`/`all`/`batch`. Detection keys on each mark's own shape, and under `auto` the trust gate is relaxed when local metadata confirms the vendor (a Google/Gemini C2PA issuer relaxes gemini, a China-AIGC label relaxes doubao/jimeng, `samsung_genai` relaxes samsung), so a moved or re-rendered mark is still caught. `--mark auto` (default) removes EVERY detected mark in one pass (`registry.remove_auto_marks`, not the single strongest -- a Jimeng-basic image carries both the top-left pill and the bottom-right wordmark) from: the Gemini sparkle, the Doubao "豆包AI生成" text strip, the Jimeng "★ 即梦AI" wordmark, the Samsung Galaxy AI "✦ Contenuti generati dall'AI" strip (bottom-LEFT, Italian-locale detection), and the capture-less Jimeng "AI生成" pill (top-left, `pill_engine`). The pill's weak edge-NCC detector is gated in `remove_auto_marks` via `_keep_pill` (32k real-upload corpus validation 2026-07): never on Doubao, and two confirmation arms since metadata confirms the platform, not pill presence. (1) The bottom-right wordmark fired — ~94% precise and survives metadata-STRIPPED uploads (screenshots / re-saves) — removes the pill unrestricted. (2) TC260 metadata confirms Jimeng (`"jimeng" in provenance`, from `cli._visible_provenance`) OR the caller asserts AI (`sensitivity == "assume_ai"`), no wordmark — ~27% precise, its false fires are textured ceilings/walls that the fill visibly SMEARS — removes the pill ONLY when the top-left footprint is flat enough for an invisible fill (`pill_engine.footprint_is_flat`, median-Sobel ≤ `_FLAT_TEXTURE_MAX`; the flatness guard holds even under `assume_ai`). No confirmation → never removed. `--mark gemini|doubao|jimeng|samsung|jimeng_pill` forces one (choices come from the registry). Corpus validation: doubao and jimeng localize + remove at ~100% with clean footprints (the filled region blends into its surroundings within a few LAB levels, no color shift, no dark pit); clean images with no vendor signature had 0% false removal. For arbitrary logos/objects use `erase`. **When `--mark auto` finds no known mark (the common case — ~74% of real uploads carry no registered visible mark), the command does NOT silently re-serve the input as a finished result.** It runs a cheap metadata-only `identify`, prints actionable guidance (if the image carries an invisible/metadata mark, e.g. an OpenAI/Gemini C2PA image, it points to `all`; otherwise it does NOT imply the image is clean -- it warns that an invisible pixel watermark like SynthID cannot be detected once the metadata proxy is gone and routes to both `all` and `erase --region`), writes NO output file, and exits **`EXIT_NO_VISIBLE_MARK` (2)** — distinct from success (0) and a hard error (1) so a wrapping service (raiw.cc) can surface the message instead of treating the unchanged image as done (the production "it didn't work" / score-0 trap). Same handling for an explicit `--mark <name>` that is not detected. Helper `cli._no_visible_mark_exit`; regression-guarded by `tests/test_cli.py::TestVisibleCommand::test_visible_auto_no_mark_exits_two_with_eraser_hint` and `test_visible_auto_no_mark_routes_to_all_when_metadata`. `--no-detect` still forces the gemini fallback and proceeds (exit 0).
 
 ### `batch`
 

docs/research-doubao-distillation.md

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@
 
 **Conclusion (historical): pure reverse-alpha distilled from content images does NOT work, and the blocker is the WRONG kind of data, not too little of it.**
 
-The earlier framing ("need ~5-8 PRISTINE same-resolution originals") is obsolete -- a local corpus of pristine originals holds plenty. Curate them with `DoubaoEngine.detect` + an NCC filter against a clean glyph template, keeping only marks at offset ≈ (0,0): that yields e.g. **15 pixel-aligned 2048² marks** (sub-pixel drift, not the ±50 px the old lossy/mixed-res scrapes had), plus 1086x1448 / 1792x2400 clusters. With those, LaMa-clean `O` + weighted-LS (and per-pixel I-on-O regression) for `α` (+ logo colour) was tried end-to-end and **still leaves a persistent ghost outline.**
+The earlier framing ("need ~5-8 PRISTINE same-resolution originals") is obsolete -- a local corpus of pristine originals holds plenty. Curate them with `DoubaoEngine.detect` + an NCC filter against a clean glyph template, keeping only marks at offset ≈ (0,0): that yields e.g. **15 pixel-aligned 2048² marks** (sub-pixel drift, not the ±50 px the old lossy/mixed-res scrapes had), plus 1086x1448 / 1792x2400 clusters. With those, LaMa-clean `O` + weighted-LS (and per-pixel I-on-O regression) for `α` (+ logo color) was tried end-to-end and **still leaves a persistent ghost outline.**
 
-Diagnosed why, empirically (cached stacks, `/tmp/doubao_distill`): (1) the mark is a clean white overlay with **no dark halo** -- over glyph pixels ~54% are brighter than the clean bg, only ~4% darker -- so the white-logo model `I=(1-α)O+α·255` is correct; (2) but content backgrounds are almost never dark *under* the mark (median darkest available bg over glyph pixels = **58/255**; only ~13% of mark pixels are ever observed on a bg < 40), so on bright backgrounds the equation is ill-conditioned and `α` is unidentifiable; (3) LaMa's `O` is a plausible **hallucination**, not the true pre-mark background, which compounds the error, and per-pixel regression on ~15 obs overfits into colour noise.
+Diagnosed why, empirically (cached stacks, `/tmp/doubao_distill`): (1) the mark is a clean white overlay with **no dark halo** -- over glyph pixels ~54% are brighter than the clean bg, only ~4% darker -- so the white-logo model `I=(1-α)O+α·255` is correct; (2) but content backgrounds are almost never dark *under* the mark (median darkest available bg over glyph pixels = **58/255**; only ~13% of mark pixels are ever observed on a bg < 40), so on bright backgrounds the equation is ill-conditioned and `α` is unidentifiable; (3) LaMa's `O` is a plausible **hallucination**, not the true pre-mark background, which compounds the error, and per-pixel regression on ~15 obs overfits into color noise.
 
 **Why Gemini's engine is clean (verified in GeminiWatermarkTool `src/core/watermark_engine.cpp`): its alpha map is the watermark stamped on a PURE-BLACK background**, where `watermarked = α·255 + (1-α)·0 = α·255`, so `alpha = capture/255` exactly -- no estimation. (`gemini_bg_*.png` is literally the sparkle in grey on black.) So the real Doubao unlock is the same controlled capture, **not more content images**. Black/white/gray seeds exist (`data/doubao_capture/seeds/seed_*_1x1_2048x2048.png`); a capture run (feed a black seed through doubao.com edit mode, download the *original*) was requested from the #13 reporter 2026-05-29. With ~2-3 black captures we get `α = capture/255` for free, Gemini-quality.