The visible-mark path had grown three copies of one ladder sweep, four
near-identical `detect` arms, and four hand-rolled `footprint_mask` overrides;
mark knowledge sat in five hand-maintained tables across three modules; and the
flagship `all`/`batch` pipeline existed only in cli.py, written twice with
divergent behavior.
Detection is now one measurement. `_ladder_best` replaces the three sweeps,
`_scan`/`_verdict` replace the four arms, and the winning box travels to the
mask on `TextMarkDetection.match_box` instead of being swept a second time.
`detect_both` returns the strict and relaxed verdicts from one scan, which
halves the arbiter's perception cost (260 -> 130 matchTemplate calls on a 2048²
image, verdicts identical field for field). A per-mark demotion goes in the new
`_post_gate` hook, never in a `detect` override -- an override is invisible to
the single-pass path, which is how the RunningHub and Yuanbao anchor gates
briefly stopped applying.
Everything about a mark is now one registry row: product, label regime, the
platform sentence `identify` reports, the metadata signals that confirm it, and
its TC260 producer codes. `identify._VISIBLE_MARK_PLATFORM`, the signal mapping
in `api.visible_provenance`, `_PRODUCT_OF` and the pill veto are derived from
those rows.
`api.remove_all` / `api.remove_batch` are the library form of the `all` and
`batch` commands; the CLI is a wrapper that owns console text and exit codes.
Progress is a `(stage, detail)` pair of stable tokens, so the CLI keys its
wording off structure rather than parsing the library's prose back.
Two intentional behavior changes, both verified against a recorded 811-image
sample of detector verdicts, removal-mask hashes, arbiter decisions and
`identify` reports:
* A TC260 label now relaxes the vendor its `ContentProducer` names rather than
ByteDance's pair on every China-AIGC image. 333 of 811 samples move; on 185
of them the previously relaxed pair was simply the wrong vendor, and the
mark actually present never reached the relaxed gate its own
`provenance_ncc_factor` was calibrated for.
* A confident LibLibAI detection suppresses the Jimeng pill, like every other
TC260 product's mark. It was registered alongside RunningHub and Baidu, both
of which were added to the hand-written veto list, and it was not. 1 sample
moves, and it is exactly the co-firing case.
Nothing else in that record changes: detector verdicts, mask hashes and
`identify` verdicts are byte-identical, and all 200 calibration constants are
untouched.
Also: `aigc_label` and friends plus `extract_c2pa_info` are memoized on
(path, mtime_ns, size) -- size because this package rewrites in place; the
native TC260 container readers route on magic bytes instead of the file
extension, so a mislabeled AVI or FLV is no longer invisible; `identify` shares
one pixel decode between the DWT-DCT and visible stages (TrustMark keeps its own
Pillow decode, which is not substitutable); and the six `stabilize_*` video
wrappers collapse into one policy table.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The faint-mask fallback added for the tophat front-end thresholded the
max-normalized uint8 response at 0.5 -- which selects every non-zero pixel,
not "half the peak" as its comment claimed -- and filled ~120% of the corner
box on textured frames. Measured on 14 real faint-path frames (cv2 fill,
detector re-run after): the detector's own best-match box fills a 58.7%-median
corner box vs 120.9% for the threshold, both 100% detector-clean. Detection and
the mask now read one method, _tophat_best, whose score gates detection and
whose argmax box bounds the fill, so the two cannot drift by construction --
which is how the mismatch arose. The 0.5 constant is deleted.
Parity could not catch this (a mask that fills everything is trivially
detector-clean) and the regression test could not either: its flat fixture
gives every threshold the same box, so mutating the constant to 99.0 stayed
green. The fixture now carries texture and asserts the mask area is bounded,
not merely non-empty; it reproduces the corpus number (127% pre-fix).
Also lands the Tier B2 verification harnesses that found and bounded this:
- detector_response.py: response curves (detected AND maskable per cell); found
the size response is a comb, contrast is near-irrelevant, no unmaskable cells.
- ladder_headroom.py: measured that a denser scale ladder recovers 7.6% of
misses for a 2.52%->3.05% false-fire rise, and the one landscape rung that
helps is a geometry shift that helps and hurts equally (1.7:1) -- do not add.
- cjk_tail_probe.py: a generic shared-tail (AI生成) template does not separate
uncovered vendors from clean corners (0.407 vs clean p99 0.298).
Records the visible-parity re-run confirming the earlier front-end fix (doubao
91.8% -> 99.3%), and dedups the thrice-written stamp forward model into one
fill_quality.composite.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
