The Content Seal manifest named the production GPU worker in its provenance
column and in two row keys, several docstrings described their sources as user
uploads from the private corpus, and that corpus was called by the storage
product holding it. Each is now what a public reader can check: a pipeline and
strength, material that is not publication-cleared, and a private corpus. The
corpus test follows the renamed rows. Deployment and tier detail goes the same
way, since which backend each hosting tier can afford is a product decision,
not a library fact.
Twelve harnesses that need a cloud GPU account leave scripts/. The research
pages that cite their findings name them as harnesses kept outside this
repository and stop implying a reader can rerun them; the tracked inputs and
recorded verdicts remain the durable record, and the offline analysis step
stays here with its test. A development invariant states the rule so the next
harness is not added back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A throwaway test CA with leaf subject CN=Ideogram, Inc signs a flat PNG
carrying a trainedAlgorithmicMedia claim. The fixture exercises the
issuer-to-platform attribution end to end through the real reader and pins
the second dimension the project separates: attribution names Ideogram
while signer trust stays untrusted. Recipe documented in the fixtures
README; no keys, vendor bytes, or user uploads are committed.
detect_doubao_frame reuses the image engine's synthetic doubao alpha as its
video template, so the glyph cannot drift between registries. The policy is
seedance-style single-floor, calibrated by sequential decode over 39
TC260-confirmed Doubao corpus videos and 25 negatives: a 12-frame stable run
at 0.35 accepts 33/39 positives and 0/25 negatives (0.30 already accepted a
negative), and through the shipped arbiter identify_video selects 32/39 with
no false selection. Also documents the measured impossibility of a bare-pill
removal arm with the current detector (68 OCR-confirmed pills max 0.317 vs
clean negatives max 0.353 -- no separating threshold exists).
One committed example per registered mark: 12 PNG (image registry) and 6 MP4
clips (video registry), generated by scripts/render_visible_examples.py from
the committed silhouettes and detector templates -- never from user uploads.
The generator self-verifies (exit 1 when a mark misses its own example) and
tests/test_visible_examples.py holds both sides to it: registry completeness
both ways, per-engine detection on the canonical example, and the shipped
temporal selection accepting each clip.
Second tranche of measured-but-unregistered candidates parked under
scripts/assets/visible-mark-candidates/ with a README recording why none
ships yet (positives do not separate from clean negatives): samsung_en,
gemini_text, notebooklm, dola, mindvideo, higgsfield, jianying, capcut, zsky,
chromastudio, digenai, gendo.
Victor Kuznetsov