mirror of
https://github.com/wiltodelta/remove-ai-watermarks.git
synced 2026-08-09 15:36:01 +02:00
Victor KuznetsovandClaude Opus 5
84583dd479
The document asserted it in two places and recommended capping Gemini at 1536 with 0.30, or native-calibrating to ~0.35+. Nothing measured that, and the one relevant measurement points the other way: the 2026-06-14 deployed-worker re-test cleared Gemini at 0.15 on two NATIVE 2816x1536 images, the same rung as capped 1536. The document already recorded that as contradicting the "native >= 0.30" guess, then kept the guess anyway in the historical-certification paragraph and restated it as fact in the strength floors. Replaced with what was measured, plus an explicit statement that the direction is unproven and the low-resolution end has never been through the Gemini oracle on any pipeline. Also removes the same appeal from the qwen-zimage denoise-boundary note added earlier in this branch, which had used the unproven trend as reassurance that the bottom of the adaptive curve is safe. It is not reassurance; it is an open question, and it is now written as one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>