Apply the same convention from the README pass across the rest of the repo content so the company and the product are never conflated: company -> "Keygraph", commercial product -> "the Keygraph platform". - docs/keygraph-platform.md: retitle "# Keygraph" -> "# Keygraph Platform" and refer to the product as "the Keygraph platform" throughout (the page is the platform overview, not a company page). - docs/coverage-roadmap.md, docs/safety.md: product references updated; the "Keygraph is not responsible for misuse" line stays as the company. - llms.txt / llms-full.txt: kept in sync with the README and docs they mirror, so the combined-context files don't reintroduce the conflation. No filenames changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.5 KiB
Safety and Limitations
Read this before running Shannon in a new environment.
Authorized Use Only
Shannon is designed for legitimate security auditing. You must have explicit written authorization from the owner of the target system before running Shannon.
Unauthorized scanning or exploitation of systems you do not own is illegal. Keygraph is not responsible for misuse of Shannon.
Do Not Run on Production
Shannon is not a passive scanner. Exploitation agents actively execute attacks to confirm vulnerabilities. This can mutate application state and data.
Do not run Shannon against production systems. Use sandboxed, staging, or local development environments where data integrity is not a concern.
Potential mutative effects include:
- Creating new users
- Modifying or deleting data
- Compromising test accounts
- Triggering unintended side effects from injection attacks
- Generating unexpected outbound traffic
- Writing exploit artifacts to reports or deliverables
For maximum isolation, run Shannon inside a disposable virtual machine.
LLM and Automation Caveats
- Verification is required: Shannon uses a proof-by-exploitation methodology, but final reports can still contain weakly supported or incorrect details. Human review is essential.
- Model support: Shannon is officially supported only with Claude models. Alternative models may be incomplete, inaccurate, or unstable.
- Prompt injection risk: Do not point Shannon at untrusted or adversarial codebases. AI-powered tools that read source code can be influenced by malicious repository content.
Scope of Analysis
Shannon currently targets exploitable vulnerabilities in these classes:
- Broken Authentication
- Broken Authorization
- Injection
- Cross-Site Scripting
- Server-Side Request Forgery
Shannon's proof-by-exploitation model means it does not report issues it cannot actively exploit, such as many vulnerable dependency, insecure configuration, or broad policy findings.
For broader coverage, the Keygraph platform adds black-box and white-box agentic pentesting, graph-based static analysis, SCA reachability, secrets detection, business logic testing, remediation workflows, SLA tracking, and reporting dashboards.
Cost and Performance
A full test run typically takes roughly 1 to 1.5 hours. LLM API costs vary by model pricing, target complexity, selected provider, and concurrency.
If you use subscription-based model access, consider the rate-limit guidance in Configuration.