7.6 KiB
4.2 Appendix B: Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral (DIE) Threat Identification
AI models operate at massive scale, rely on highly dynamic data flows, and often function as opaque “black boxes,” which can introduce unexpected failure modes and attack surfaces. To address this, the DIE Triad, Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral offers a complementary, resilience-focused framework. Originally proposed by Sounil Yu [20], the DIE model shifts the focus from traditional data protection toward system survivability, adaptability, and architectural robustness. In AI contexts, where model drift, adversarial inputs, and dependency chains are constant concerns, applying the DIE principles helps ensure that AI systems are not only secure, but also resilient by design, capable of withstanding disruption and degradation.
While CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) focuses on protecting data and systems from unauthorized access and disruption, DIE shifts the focus to reducing the value and longevity of attack targets through design principles that emphasize:
-
Distributed – Systems should not rely on single points of failure. Workloads, data, and services are spread across nodes to ensure resilience, scalability, and fault tolerance.
-
Immutable – Components, especially code and data, should not be modified after deployment. This limits tampering, simplifies rollback, and ensures auditability and predictability.
-
Ephemeral – Systems should be short-lived by design. Containers, functions, sessions, and data should expire quickly, reducing attack windows and minimizing exposure in case of compromise.
Where CIA is about protecting data, DIE is about designing systems that are inherently resistant to compromise, even if breached. Together, CIA and DIE provide a complementary security and resilience strategy, particularly important in AI, serverless, and microservices environments. Where CIA is excellent for defining security objectives like preventing unauthorized access or ensuring uptime, DIE focuses on architectural resilience and trustworthiness, especially important for: Cloud-native AI systems, LLM agents and plugin architectures and Federated learning and edge AI.
Many modern AI system failures (e.g., data remnants in shared GPUs, hot-reloaded LLM agents, or drift in distributed pipelines, are violations of DIE principles, not just CIA.)
Below is a structured explanation showing how DIE (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) threats differ from and complement the CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability) model specifically in the context of AI systems aligned to the SAIF (Secure AI Framework) architecture.
| DIE vs CIA in SAIF-Aligned AI Architectures | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIF Layer | DIE Property | Example DIE Threat | Why It’s Not Fully Covered by CIA |
| Infrastructure | Ephemeral | Data residue in serverless inference functions | CIA assumes static data protection, but doesn’t assess whether environments are truly short-lived. |
| Infrastructure | Immutable | Improper model immutability in CI/CD pipelines | CIA covers unauthorized changes but not immutability guarantees for reproducibility and rollback. |
| Data | Distributed | Loss of data provenance in federated training | CIA protects data in motion/rest but not consistency or lineage in distributed environments. |
| Model | Immutable | Self-modifying inference logic | CIA may flag unauthorized updates but not dynamic, internal logic changes (e.g., prompt tuning). |
| Application | Ephemeral | Persistent caching in chatbots or RAG systems | CIA addresses data exposure but not requirements for automatic expiration or zero-trace design. |
| Infrastructure | Distributed | Inconsistent access policies across multi-cloud deployments | CIA checks policy presence but not synchronization or enforcement across distributed systems. |
Here is the completed DIE (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) threat mapping for SAIF components #1–#18.
| Application Layer - DIE Threats Mapping | |
|---|---|
| SAIF Component | DIE Threats (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) |
| #1 - User | Distributed: User impersonation across multiple access points;Immutable: Insecure session storage allowing manipulation;Ephemeral: Persistent session tokens or non-expiring authentication. |
| #2 - User Input & Output | Distributed: Interception at multiple points of UI/API;Immutable: Unvalidated input leading to state corruption;Ephemeral: Cached responses leading to stale or replayed outputs. |
| #3 - Application | Distributed: Lateral movement within app clusters;Immutable: Tampered configs or injected runtime logic;Ephemeral: Long-lived processes vulnerable to memory attacks. |
| #4 - Agents/Plugins | Distributed: Chained plugin abuse;Immutable: Modified plugin payloads;Ephemeral: Persistent plugin state leaking data. |
| #5 - External Sources | Distributed: Manipulated feeds at source or in transit;Immutable: Lack of integrity validation on ingested data;Ephemeral: Reliance on long-lived static external datasets. |
| Model Layer - DIE Threats Mapping | |
|---|---|
| SAIF Component | DIE Threats (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) |
| #6 - Input Handling | Distributed: Input abuse across endpoints;Immutable: Bypass of sanitization layers;Ephemeral: Delayed reprocessing of malicious data. |
| #7 - Output Handling | Distributed: Output leaking via multiple channels;Immutable: Spoofed or altered model responses; Ephemeral: Retention of unsafe inference results. |
| #8 - Model Usage | Distributed: Repeated or coordinated inference abuse;Immutable: Malicious prompts altering inference pathways; Ephemeral: Caching of results exposing stale outputs. |
| Infrastructure Layer - DIE Threats Mapping | |
|---|---|
| SAIF Component | DIE Threats (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) |
| #9 - Model Storage Infrastructure | Distributed: Replicated stolen models; Immutable: Hash mismatch undetected; Ephemeral: Residual temp artifacts after use. |
| #10 - Model Serving Infrastructure | Distributed: Scalable attack surface across nodes; Immutable: Corrupted container images; Ephemeral: Persistent sockets vulnerable to abuse. |
| #11 - Model Evaluation | Distributed: Result leakage across evaluations; Immutable: Fake metrics stored long-term; Ephemeral: Testing artifacts reused in prod. |
| #12 - Model Training & Tuning | Distributed: Federated poisoning attacks; Immutable: Compromised checkpoints; Ephemeral: Retained outdated training data. |
| #13 - Model Frameworks & Code | Distributed: Infected libraries used across builds; Immutable: Code injection in frameworks; Ephemeral: Exploitable debug files not purged. |
| #14 - Data Storage Infrastructure | Distributed: Data exfiltration via synced systems;Immutable: Stale corrupted backups;Ephemeral: Temporary stores left exposed. |
| Data Layer - DIE Threats Mapping | |
|---|---|
| SAIF Component | DIE Threats (Distributed, Immutable, Ephemeral) |
| #15 - Training Data | Distributed: Poisoning across datasets; Immutable: Bad data fixed in only one copy; Ephemeral: Non-rotated sensitive data. |
| #16 - Data Filtering & Processing | Distributed: Filter evasion via edge node abuse; Immutable: Faulty transformations undetected; Ephemeral: Processed data not purged timely. |
| #17 - Internal Data Sources | Distributed: Compromise through internal systems; Immutable: Corrupt reference records; Ephemeral: Excessive query logs or retained queries. |
| #18 - External Data Sources | Distributed: Public API abuse; Immutable: No integrity checks on ingestion; Ephemeral: Source content reused unsafely. |