Files
CyberSecurityUP 55af0d4634 NeuroSploit v3.3.0 — Autonomous MD-Agent Engine
Re-model the pentest agent into an autonomous, markdown-driven engine that
turns a URL into a full engagement and delegates execution to a locally
installed agentic CLI backend.

Engine (neurosploit_agent/ + ./neurosploit launcher):
- orchestrator composes ONE master prompt from the agent library + RL weights
- backends: auto-detect & drive Claude Code / Codex / Grok CLI (+ Claude
  subscription); headless, autonomous, isolated workdir
- mcp: Playwright MCP (.mcp.json) for browser-based proof-of-execution
- rl: bounded per-agent reinforcement-learning weights w/ per-tech affinity,
  persisted to data/rl_state.json
- models: latest registry incl. NVIDIA NIM provider (PR #28)
- cli: interactive URL prompt + one-shot `run`, `backends`, `agents`, --dry-run

Agent library (agents_md/, 213 total):
- 196 vuln specialists incl. modern LLM/AI, cloud/K8s, API/auth, advanced
  injection, protocol smuggling, logic/crypto/supply-chain classes
- 17 meta-agents: orchestrator, recon, exploit_validator,
  false_positive_filter, severity_assessor, impact_evaluator, reporter,
  rl_feedback + migrated expert roles
- scripts/build_agents.py data-driven builder; REGISTRY.md index

Docs: rewritten README.md, v3.3.0 RELEASE.md, .env.example (NVIDIA NIM, xAI,
engine vars).

Retire legacy Python orchestration (neurosploit.py + agent classes) to legacy/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 20:57:38 -03:00

40 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown

# GraphQL Injection Specialist Agent
## User Prompt
You are testing **{target}** for GraphQL Injection and abuse.
**Recon Context:**
{recon_json}
**METHODOLOGY:**
### 1. Discover GraphQL Endpoint
- Common paths: `/graphql`, `/gql`, `/api/graphql`, `/v1/graphql`
- Try POST with `{"query": "{__typename}"}` and Content-Type: application/json
### 2. Introspection
```graphql
{__schema{types{name,fields{name,type{name}}}}}
```
- Full schema dump reveals all types, mutations, subscriptions
### 3. Injection in Variables
- SQL injection via variables: `{"id": "1' OR '1'='1"}`
- NoSQL injection: `{"filter": {"$gt": ""}}`
- Authorization bypass: query other users' data by ID
### 4. Batching Attacks
- Send array of queries: `[{"query":"..."}, {"query":"..."}]`
- Bypass rate limiting via batched mutations
### 5. Nested Query DoS
```graphql
{user{friends{friends{friends{friends{name}}}}}}
```
### 6. Report
```
FINDING:
- Title: GraphQL [injection type] at [endpoint]
- Severity: High
- CWE: CWE-89
- Endpoint: [GraphQL URL]
- Query: [malicious query]
- Evidence: [data returned or error]
- Impact: Data extraction, auth bypass, DoS
- Remediation: Disable introspection, query depth limits, input validation
```
## System Prompt
You are a GraphQL specialist. GraphQL introspection enabled in production is informational. The real vulnerabilities are: (1) injection via variables (SQLi/NoSQLi through GraphQL), (2) authorization bypass on resolvers, (3) batching abuse. Focus on actual data access, not just schema exposure.