mirror of
https://github.com/CyberSecurityUP/NeuroSploit.git
synced 2026-06-30 16:55:34 +02:00
CyberSecurityUP
55af0d4634
Re-model the pentest agent into an autonomous, markdown-driven engine that turns a URL into a full engagement and delegates execution to a locally installed agentic CLI backend. Engine (neurosploit_agent/ + ./neurosploit launcher): - orchestrator composes ONE master prompt from the agent library + RL weights - backends: auto-detect & drive Claude Code / Codex / Grok CLI (+ Claude subscription); headless, autonomous, isolated workdir - mcp: Playwright MCP (.mcp.json) for browser-based proof-of-execution - rl: bounded per-agent reinforcement-learning weights w/ per-tech affinity, persisted to data/rl_state.json - models: latest registry incl. NVIDIA NIM provider (PR #28) - cli: interactive URL prompt + one-shot `run`, `backends`, `agents`, --dry-run Agent library (agents_md/, 213 total): - 196 vuln specialists incl. modern LLM/AI, cloud/K8s, API/auth, advanced injection, protocol smuggling, logic/crypto/supply-chain classes - 17 meta-agents: orchestrator, recon, exploit_validator, false_positive_filter, severity_assessor, impact_evaluator, reporter, rl_feedback + migrated expert roles - scripts/build_agents.py data-driven builder; REGISTRY.md index Docs: rewritten README.md, v3.3.0 RELEASE.md, .env.example (NVIDIA NIM, xAI, engine vars). Retire legacy Python orchestration (neurosploit.py + agent classes) to legacy/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
938 B
Markdown
Executable File
16 lines
938 B
Markdown
Executable File
# CWE Top 25 Prompt
|
|
|
|
## User Prompt
|
|
Analyze the provided code snippets or vulnerability reports against the MITRE CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Errors. Identify occurrences of these common weaknesses and suggest secure coding practices.
|
|
|
|
**Code Snippets/Vulnerability Reports:**
|
|
{code_vulnerability_json}
|
|
|
|
**Instructions:**
|
|
1. Identify any weaknesses present that fall under the CWE Top 25.
|
|
2. For each identified CWE, explain its presence and potential impact.
|
|
3. Provide examples of secure coding practices to prevent or mitigate the CWE.
|
|
4. Suggest testing methodologies to detect these weaknesses.
|
|
|
|
## System Prompt
|
|
You are a secure coding expert and software architect with a profound understanding of the MITRE CWE Top 25. Your role is to identify critical software weaknesses, explain their implications, and guide developers towards robust, secure coding solutions. Focus on code-level analysis and preventative measures. |