feat: anti-skip rule for all review skills

Review skills sometimes skip sections when reviewing strategy or spec
plans. This adds an explicit anti-skip rule to CEO (1-11), eng (1-4),
design (1-7), and DX (1-8) review skills. Also fixes CEO header from
"10 sections" to "11 sections" to match actual count.

plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md

@@ -1042,7 +1042,9 @@ After mode is selected, confirm which implementation approach (from 0C-bis) appl
 Once selected, commit fully. Do not silently drift.
 **STOP.** AskUserQuestion once per issue. Do NOT batch. Recommend + WHY. If no issues or fix is obvious, state what you'll do and move on — don't waste a question. Do NOT proceed until user responds.
 
-## Review Sections (10 sections, after scope and mode are agreed)
+## Review Sections (11 sections, after scope and mode are agreed)
+
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review section (1-11) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every section in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so implementation sections don't apply" is always wrong — implementation details are where strategy breaks down. If a section genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
 
 ### Section 1: Architecture Review
 Evaluate and diagram:

plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -353,7 +353,9 @@ After mode is selected, confirm which implementation approach (from 0C-bis) appl
 Once selected, commit fully. Do not silently drift.
 **STOP.** AskUserQuestion once per issue. Do NOT batch. Recommend + WHY. If no issues or fix is obvious, state what you'll do and move on — don't waste a question. Do NOT proceed until user responds.
 
-## Review Sections (10 sections, after scope and mode are agreed)
+## Review Sections (11 sections, after scope and mode are agreed)
+
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review section (1-11) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every section in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so implementation sections don't apply" is always wrong — implementation details are where strategy breaks down. If a section genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
 
 ### Section 1: Architecture Review
 Evaluate and diagram:

plan-design-review/SKILL.md

@@ -1023,6 +1023,8 @@ descriptions of what 10/10 looks like.
 
 ## Review Sections (7 passes, after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-7) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so design passes don't apply" is always wrong — design gaps are where implementation breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 ## Prior Learnings
 
 Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions:

plan-design-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ descriptions of what 10/10 looks like.
 
 ## Review Sections (7 passes, after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-7) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so design passes don't apply" is always wrong — design gaps are where implementation breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 {{LEARNINGS_SEARCH}}
 
 ### Pass 1: Information Architecture

plan-devex-review/SKILL.md

@@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ Pattern:
 
 ## Review Sections (8 passes, after Step 0 is complete)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-8) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so DX passes don't apply" is always wrong — DX gaps are where adoption breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 ## Prior Learnings
 
 Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions:

plan-devex-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ Pattern:
 
 ## Review Sections (8 passes, after Step 0 is complete)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-8) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so DX passes don't apply" is always wrong — DX gaps are where adoption breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 {{LEARNINGS_SEARCH}}
 
 ### DX Trend Check

plan-eng-review/SKILL.md

@@ -649,6 +649,8 @@ Always work through the full interactive review: one section at a time (Architec
 
 ## Review Sections (after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review section (1-4) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every section in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so implementation sections don't apply" is always wrong — implementation details are where strategy breaks down. If a section genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 ## Prior Learnings
 
 Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions:

plan-eng-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ Always work through the full interactive review: one section at a time (Architec
 
 ## Review Sections (after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review section (1-4) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every section in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so implementation sections don't apply" is always wrong — implementation details are where strategy breaks down. If a section genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 {{LEARNINGS_SEARCH}}
 
 ### 1. Architecture review