feat: anti-skip rule for all review skills

Review skills sometimes skip sections when reviewing strategy or spec
plans. This adds an explicit anti-skip rule to CEO (1-11), eng (1-4),
design (1-7), and DX (1-8) review skills. Also fixes CEO header from
"10 sections" to "11 sections" to match actual count.

plan-design-review/SKILL.md

@@ -1023,6 +1023,8 @@ descriptions of what 10/10 looks like.
 
 ## Review Sections (7 passes, after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-7) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so design passes don't apply" is always wrong — design gaps are where implementation breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 ## Prior Learnings
 
 Search for relevant learnings from previous sessions:

plan-design-review/SKILL.md.tmpl

@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ descriptions of what 10/10 looks like.
 
 ## Review Sections (7 passes, after scope is agreed)
 
+**Anti-skip rule:** Never condense, abbreviate, or skip any review pass (1-7) regardless of plan type (strategy, spec, code, infra). Every pass in this skill exists for a reason. "This is a strategy doc so design passes don't apply" is always wrong — design gaps are where implementation breaks down. If a pass genuinely has zero findings, say "No issues found" and move on — but you must evaluate it.
+
 {{LEARNINGS_SEARCH}}
 
 ### Pass 1: Information Architecture